The wonderful FBI back door app that got used against January 6th protestors, nice. They also ban talking about Js, and if Kanye changes that I bet it would get pulled from Google and Apples app stores
These social media sites are the ghettos of the internet.
I rather get on MIRC or other old school chatroom servers.
I like old school traditional tree format forums.
FakeBook, Twitter, all these other sites are too busy, full of smartasses and attention whores.
I come here to meet other outcasts to society. This world is not my home and I'm not buying all this propaganda and government and corporate media lies. I don't like corporations. I was probably once fooled into believing corporations were owned by many shareholders and represented them well. Nope. Those shares were bought off by Jews who were handed free money by other Jews who print fiat fake currency at the jew banks.
PARLE (oral treaty; negotiation) + MENT (mind; memory)
Friendly reminder that choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law doesn't represent negotiation within perceivable, but submission to suggested.
The few suggest collectivism; the many consent to collect whatever the few are suggesting...I break down the collected partials to express the ignored whole.
Nature doesn't collect those within from somewhere else; it self differentiates from whole (process of dying) into partial (living), which represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Ask yourself as a leader of followers, why can others break down your following over and over again? What if the few simply utilize a nature which doesn't lead to follow; but directs (inception towards death) to resist (life)? If the followers within ignore to resist; then nature will destroy them. The few simply have to distract the many from that.
People don't
Suggested don't (doing nothing) ignores the perceiving (living) being done by perceivable everything (process of dying).
What if one can perceive what the many do while they suggest they don't? Wouldn't that make whatever they're suggesting irrelevant to what one perceives? Imagine the burden lifted from ones mind if the suggestions by others simply represents temptations unless consented to?
Now reconsider why the parasitic few can move freely among the ignorant many, while the many get exponentially restricted by how the few suggest them to behave...
The wonderful FBI back door app that got used against January 6th protestors, nice. They also ban talking about Js, and if Kanye changes that I bet it would get pulled from Google and Apples app stores
Candace Owen's husband is the current CEO
That explains their recent pairing. She was grooming a sucker to take over that piece of shit honeypot known as Parler.
We're half a nanometer away from speaking in proverbs a code like people in China have to not to get invited for tea by the local police.
These social media sites are the ghettos of the internet.
I rather get on MIRC or other old school chatroom servers.
I like old school traditional tree format forums.
FakeBook, Twitter, all these other sites are too busy, full of smartasses and attention whores.
I come here to meet other outcasts to society. This world is not my home and I'm not buying all this propaganda and government and corporate media lies. I don't like corporations. I was probably once fooled into believing corporations were owned by many shareholders and represented them well. Nope. Those shares were bought off by Jews who were handed free money by other Jews who print fiat fake currency at the jew banks.
Friendly reminder that choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law doesn't represent negotiation within perceivable, but submission to suggested.
The few suggest collectivism; the many consent to collect whatever the few are suggesting...I break down the collected partials to express the ignored whole.
Nature doesn't collect those within from somewhere else; it self differentiates from whole (process of dying) into partial (living), which represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Ask yourself as a leader of followers, why can others break down your following over and over again? What if the few simply utilize a nature which doesn't lead to follow; but directs (inception towards death) to resist (life)? If the followers within ignore to resist; then nature will destroy them. The few simply have to distract the many from that.
Suggested don't (doing nothing) ignores the perceiving (living) being done by perceivable everything (process of dying).
What if one can perceive what the many do while they suggest they don't? Wouldn't that make whatever they're suggesting irrelevant to what one perceives? Imagine the burden lifted from ones mind if the suggestions by others simply represents temptations unless consented to?
Now reconsider why the parasitic few can move freely among the ignorant many, while the many get exponentially restricted by how the few suggest them to behave...
They see me flexin'; they hatin'...