A likely explanation to the flatties
(media.scored.co)
Comments (36)
sorted by:
It had that effect to me. Made me back off of the community when I was still just starting to take the blinders off.
I am open to the possibility but it is such a minor issue compared to everything else out there right now. Can we not just post it in every discussion? I am trying to figure out how to survive what is coming (if it is even possible) and understand my threats. No need for internal drama or well poisoning, the deep states of the world do enough of that for us.
Its the Mott-and-baily trick
This isn’t exactly wrong, but it isn’t quite right either.
The heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop’s primary purpose is making sure that you never seriously discuss or research the valuable subject.
It was, regrettably, so successful that now it can (and is) used the way you show it above.
Fundamentally, why such an ostensibly stupid idea (“the world is flat”) would warrant an expensive ad campaign “assuring” you that it was “too stupid” for you to ever bother with should tell you a lot... Methinks the woman doth protest too much, eh?
If you want to learn more about the subject and/or flat earth psyop, or merely exchange views on it - please join us on flatearthresearch!
Flat. Earth. Is. Retarded.
The sun rises in the East and sets in the West, everywhere on the planet, year round.
Get a frisbee and a tennis ball and try to figure out that could possibly happen on a flat Earth.
It's just well poison. A few hundred people are paid to "question" the "consensus" and then act like everyone is persecuting them or i denial. This then smears anyone who questions the concensus as a retard.
It's not that complicated...
Right? So why is there such a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) campaign to make sure that we know that? When by default it is so ostensibly retarded on its face, why bother?
True (ish).
It doesn’t seem like you’ve done this :(. Why do you think it’s impossible?
Consider the tautology. IF the earth is flat, then everything we observe/experience occurs over a flat earth.
The fact that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west doesn’t change the shape of the world, nor measure or define that shape in any significant way. Why do you think it would?
They're just wasting your time; not interested in actually considering the evidence
They said the same frisbee and tennis ball thing the other day, was replied to with explanation, and here again saying the same thing as if it never happened
They're just another of the regular globe shills, out to protect their lie
It's the same thing with Reptiles, nanomachines and solar flares.
Sure did.
Hey u/HonestTruth/ . Can you help me out? I just need for you to give me a link to a spherical star map as viewed from Earth.
In advance thanks!
I can't speak for 925 or Jack but, for better or worse, I am neither Fed nor bot, and do not operate or control any other accounts aside from this one. I would expect mods or at least the site admins would be able to confirm this.
If you understand (((They™))) lie about anything and everything, then I guess it's not important that you also wake up to the globe deception
I was a spiritual person before I woke up to flat earth, and not because of some holy book I've never read or church I've never gone to, but for a variety of other reasons
Learning without a doubt that the earth isn't the spinning globe hurtling through some fictional endless void of space might be enough to truly red pill someone on the scope of the lies and control, but also might be enough to prove to someone that Earth is in fact unique and special, and that Earth isn't some insignificant speck of dust that just happened to accidentally evolve random lifeforms and humans evolved from fish and apes or whatever other nonsense they sell
What it is for me, and I think for many other "flat earthers", is simply calling out deception wherever we see it
There's already plenty of people calling out the political/elite deception, and plenty of us naming the Jew, and so I take up the flat earth banner
I don't know what evidence against the spinning globe will be the smoking gun for you, but if you live near a large body of water you can go observe for yourself that we can see distant landmarks/buildings that should be obscured by the curve of the earth itself. No special tools required, but you can bring binoculars with you to go even further and really leave zero room for doubt
There's plenty of videos online showing this, but it's best that you go see for yourself with your own eyes, as we know videos can be faked.
Keep calling me a fed all you like, it’s simply incorrect
A browse of my post/comment history both here and on Gab (@afks) over the past couple of years would offer clarity
“Reddit” lol k
You just come off like a shill, scared of what truth has to offer
Disappointing
The feds want you to do as you’re told and not ask questions. They want you to believe. I want you to stop believing, and either know (and know how you know, and how you validated such knowledge) or recognize that you do not.
You may assume, as you are encouraged to through the FE psyop, that flat earth research is only a distraction - but you will never know until you earnestly research it. You should stop giving in to your fear and try to understand what it is, and why. I assure you it will be valuable/rewarding if you can only do so earnestly.
I am open to debate, but I will not debate false claims and propaganda. I am curious why evidence does not prove one way or the other.
There are many points made by people who choose to belief flat earth I do not agree with, that is fine. Being someone into flat earth implies there are many such beliefs associated and I am looking for the actual evidential points.
Not statements like, see? humans can't build big structures. yadda yadda.
So, when it comes to many of the flat earth propositions and the track record with the feds it is clear that it is used as a psyop to control and take time from people.
In this equation, we have more unknowns than knowns the result is, an estimate.
Does this not in itself prove to you that this is subjective analysis based on imaginary inputs and ideas? There is no way to produce this answer definitively, this is the exact reason why the current state of astrophysics is such a mess, we have all these people asserting they can calculate a thing and then with conviction make these claims to people to convey their own personal 'belief' regarding the information they have collected. This is not science, this is more like alchemy.
So, do people choose to 'believe' in science? absolutely, especially in astrophysics. But more importantly, it is this belief that drives one to form understandings and if you are not able to deduce your understanding from facts or evidence, then it remains a belief.
If you cannot find evidential proof then the odds are you are just dealing with guesswork, which is why any answer you find regarding this question is associated as such, just estimations based on what we think we know.
Ok, so given the forces at play, you are assuming that only velocity is modified, but you are ignoring all the other various forces involved in a gravity orbit. I have a pretty firm grip on a variety of mathematics. So I will not proclaim to understand nor be able to measure them all. Many have produced much guesswork on the topic and it is better than assuming it is not in orbit imo. There are still mysteries here to be truly unraveled, we simply insert a constant or otherwise generated value to continue and present you with what we think we know.
When you see the moon, orbiting the earth or moving across the firmament rest assured there are forces at play you are not in full understanding of. There is no need to force it to fill some claim made in the past.
I do not feel there is a human on earth who has what it takes to provide full explanation on the cosmos, it is very much a work in progress. We are on the verge of dispelling the notion that the sun is a ball of gas, do you have any idea what this will do to astrophysics as we know it?
I am fine if you want to accept a flat earth, I want to know why. So far we have these points to argue on, but I feel we are done on these points as none of them are anything other than subjective analysis and nothing like measuring the tensile strength of steel.
Scientific method is rooted in belief, it starts with a desire to understand a given entity. This is belief in both the entity and the ability to unravel an understanding. As we move through the process of scientific analysis we produce measurable quantities. This becomes the understanding and collection of facts as we know it. While also realizing what we think we know may be wrong at any given moment we are ready to adapt and conform to the new information.
So, do not try to discount beliefs as usable constructs that help us innovate ideas and get to new plateaus of thinking.
We can start with the hypothesis that we are just matter in a petri dish in some science experiment performed by a being so advanced we cannot comprehend.
Why not? can you disprove that? of course not. Can you prove it? hah, good luck.
Yes, because the three points I have basically shown little interest in as I find them subjective claims of understanding, I did submit this right away. This is a function of missing data points, no fault of mine nor yours. I am just stating that we need more to dig in, because any subjective analysis is prone to being incorrect and there is no need to be incorrect. We just let it go and wait for it to evolve.
I am interested in observations but they are theoretical understandings as they are perceived by the eye of the beholder. Until we can convert that to a broader understanding it is pie in the sky.
I have heard a few theories on rapid canyon formation and I do not really reject them nor accept them, they are interesting ideas and as more evidence continues to be collected maybe one day we can definitively prove one way or the other.
Same as old structures and how many of them were built, lot's of ideas many not concrete but some apparently so. Fun stuff. By themselves they do not prove aliens were ever here :)
What difference does it even make? If the Earth is flat, and someone has manipulated us into thinking it is round (why?), despite all observable reality, that can only mean that there is a level of control in place that is insurmountable. At that point everything you do is pointless; it's just a black pill for people who have already given up.
Perfect meme. Except there really are people who think macro evolution isn't real and the Earth is flat.