Motion represents loss; resistance within motion represents growth. Motion inspires resistance by differentiating the whole into the partial within the only whole. The suggestion of winning tempts one to ignore resisting; while suggested losing tempts one to hold onto "prices already won", hence also ignoring to resist being moved.
per "around"
a) PER - "a Latin preposition, denoting through, passing, over the whole extent; by"
b) "around" implies around others; hence among partial; which implies within; by and in response to whole.
armed force
"furnished with weapons of offense or defense" (armed) implies the weapon of choice; while force implies velocity; momentum and resistance aka resistance as the defense within the momentum of offending velocity aka living (defense) within the process of dying (offense).
So we're looking for a man about town and a fella with two arms.
One is being tempted to look forwards; while ignoring the response-ability (choice) to origin (balance). The two armed man about town represents choice falling for the temptation of form (want) over flow (need).
As for "we" and "two arms"...one perceives one arm and another one arm in different positions within the oneness of all, and why would the partial within the whole need to suggest in the name of others (we)? Before both of these issues came the choice to count and brand "units" so that one can suggest both to other ones.
How about from this perspective...to be (one) comes before suggesting what (we)
Was it I that was measuring...
"we" and "two arms" suggests as such.
or did I blurt out strings like a malfunctioning database engine and it was left as an exercise for the reader to go about assigning some sense of what might be called positionality to them?
Whatever you choose has consequences for others; and whatever others choose represents the need to adapt to what's being sensed and the temptation to assign sense to suggestible meaning.
cromulent
A Simpsons reference aka SONs of SIMPle (single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded)...for all represents one in energy.
STICKS!? What is this utter extravagance! We ain't got no sticks
Oh dear; another one burdened by faggots...
I'm gonna make bumper-stickers of this (If one consents to the judge; one ignores being the court)
Displaying messages of empowerment while driving around neutered in electric cars...
The commotion of the motion brings the notion that we're all absolutely stuck, as if by some manner of glue, on a road to, well, somewhere.
What if the process of dying is impressing (loss) to inspire those living within to express (growth); which requires choice of adaptation (need); hence also offering the temptation of ignorance (want) aka self repression?
In other words...those who ignore to grow are tempted to feel stuck; while being moved on a road they ignore (process of dying) towards somewhere (death) their ignorance denies them to comprehend. Furthermore; the choice to ignore need for want; tempts them to want to hold onto; hence gluing themselves onto temporary within ongoing.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to willingly attach themselves to the fleeting material; while ignoring to be the material resistance (living) within the immaterial velocity (process of dying).
commotion of the motion brings the notion
The ignorance of temperance towards permanence tempts impotence of sustenance through lack of resistance.
Which is all fine and good, right up until those differentiated bits start cottoning on and before one can so much as a swing a cat they're all over the show, each one pointing to another one and declaring "That's me, over there!" at which point it rapidly becomes very confusing for everyone.
Which is why the ongoing whole differentiates into "temporary" partials; which have to struggle to sustain self (apartheid); while resisting the temptation of "cottoning" together. Entrance the parasitic few suggesting the ignorant many to pick cotton together.
As for losing and winning - these are different words for what is far too often the same thing
If one (living) comprehends the only origin (process of dying); then it isn't about wanting (winning) vs not wanting (losing); but about the need to grow within loss; by resisting the temptation of suggested wins or loses.
to sell
Choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law allows the few to sell everything perceivable back to the many who ignore this for suggested.
Everyone (perceiving) exists at the center of everything (perceivable) as the free will of choice to utilize it (growth)...or ignore it (loss). The few sell perceivable loss under suggested growth back to the many who pay growth (living) into loss (dying). A self destruction racket; more or less carefully hidden behind suggested narratives; which are collapsing upon each other over and over again.
In short...suggesting to sell what is perceptibly free.
if choice itself were a weapon...
WEAPON, noun - "any instrument of offense"...there has to be a weapon of offense (choice) within a self sustaining system of defense (balance). The "will" within free will of choice represents the want (temptation) within the need (resistance).
Self discernment has to be grown for one to comprehend that "instrument" implies in response to perceivable sound. Without that one views any weapon as offense vs defense among others; instead of as response-ability (choice) to origin (balance).
I have no basis for suggesting
Choice represents the base for suggestion (want); perceivable balance (need) represents the base for choice. Those who are reasoning against each other about suggestion; lack comprehension about base (choice) because they already consented by choice to the suggested choices of others; hence willingly ignoring free will of choice; while submitting the choices of others.
never yet led me astray
Inception towards death represents the way; momentum (balance) represents what one perceives it at, and ones choice operates at the center thereof. One cannot wander off the path (astray) while being confined to the momentum of the only path. Wandering around in willing ignorance is a choice tho...
face forward, no doubt to better track prey
Why hunting prey? To sustain self. Where to sustain self? Within momentum (balance); hence origin of every choice to hunt. Now change perspective to the prey...sustaining self; while resisting the suggested temptations by others (getting hunted down) all while adapting as choice to the ever changing moment (balance).
Even while both hunter and hunted are "facing" death; they each operate for the sustenance of life; hence adapting to origin...not to the predefined outcome. Once again; such a perspective requires the growth of self discernment about living within the process of dying; hence in need to react to an enacting system; while being tempted to want everything else.
gazes are harmonized somewhere forward
From center (perceiving) into surrounding (perceivable) based on free will of choice.
looking in other directions
a) inception towards death represents the only direction...looking freely (choice) around within the momentum (balance) thereof; doesn't change the direction.
b) constant change (aka forward velocity) represents direction (progress of dying) for those (living) within.
c) if all represents one in energy; then others represent moving partials of the whole. All others represent perceivable inspiration (need) and suggesting information (want) for ones free will of choice. If all represents one in energy; then there can be only one; hence all for one and one for all.
What's lacking is each ones self discernment about representing a partial within a self differentiating whole. The more one comprehends apartheid; the more one comprehends wholeness. The parasitic few distract the ignorant many from that by suggesting diversity (difference) for equality (sameness) as the inversion of difference (partial) out of sameness (whole).
regarded by the aforementioned others as some manner of potentate
Every one represents potential (growth) within potentiality (loss); yet it requires adaptation of potential to potentiality to grow; while resisting the temptation to drain potential among others.
In other words...one is tempted to want what others grow; while ignoring the need to grow oneself.
Also...one doesn't need to regard the suggestions of others; one represents the RE (responding) GUARD (preservation; self sustenance) within perceivable.
to have a posse assembled
Strength in numbers (sleight of hand for strength within the designated unit "one") misdirected by suggested collectivism (out of many; one) against others. Notice also...POSSE (possession) aka want over need.
Wherefrom hangs this platform? Why, from skyhooks, naturally?
PLAT (to spread) FORM (that manner of being peculiar to each body, which exhibits it to the eye as distinct from every other body) aka growth through self differentiation within loss.
Also; PLATEAU (elevated tract of relatively level land) aka choice based growth (elevation) within the momentum (level aka balance) of motion, hence the implied relation of growth to loss; of form to flow; of elevation to degradation etc.
The hook on the other hand represents the snare; the temptation to want to hold onto the material (life); while ignoring to grow in response to immaterial (inception towards death).
Does the rain choose upon whom it falls?
Each drop of liquid seeks level (balance); hence representing choice. Liquid also adapts to ever changing circumstances. You don't perceive rain (plural) but partial liquid within whole motion. Branding the momentum of liquid "rain" was suggested to you. Furthermore; suggested "whom" implies the choice to count; while each part of liquid adapts to the whole momentum until disrupted by "whomever" chose to resist liquid finding level.
automotion
The few suggest "automobile" to tempt the many to ignore being mobility (living) within automation (process of dying). They furthermore tempt choice into a conflict between manual and automatic; as the inversion of being the manual choice within the automatic balance.
Ever see those assembly-line robots? Timeful as metronomes they are; never missing a beat. Regular like the tides as they set about their tasks.
Who assembled and maintains them? What if the origin of ROBOT (Latin robur; strength) represents resisting (living) temptation (dying); and what if others suggest strength as loss in disguise to tempt one to ignore growing it?
The few suggest the automated assembly of sameness to tempt the many to ignore being the manual difference within the self differentiating (automated) sameness. They call it strength (robot) to manufacture sameness within differences (out of many; one) as the inversion of being different within same (one within oneness).
Suggesting these automatic assemblies represents mesmerism aka hypnotism to domesticate free will of choice from adaptation into stagnation.
Show them to the sages and they'd declare them almost definitionally unnatural, in no small part owing to their precision, yet those same wiseguys sit on a stump and marvel at the bird-nests high above.
Showing ones understanding (consent to standing under the suggestions of others) reconfirms the positions of others as above oneself. Resisting suggestion corrodes the position of the ones suggesting; because the ones suggesting utilize the lack of resistance by the ones consenting to sustain their position.
Because growing out of it implies resisting (living) being transmuted back into it (process of dying). The wanderer (life) is stuck to the road (inception towards death); while representing the constant crossroad (choice within balance) in-between keep wandering and becoming roadkill.
if ever they should stop
They (the partial) cannot stop the whole...only ignore being moved by it.
if they start going backwards
Backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right represent choices bound to balance (aka while within the momentum of motion). The "if" (if/then implication) for life is predefined by being moved from inception towards death. The reaction to perceivable implication can only exist within the momentum of the enacting motion.
One exists in-between; at the center of; in response to...if/then. The "/" (forward slash) aka SLASH; from French ESCLACHIER (to break); also ESCLATER (to break; splinter) represents the forwards motion self differentiating into the forwarded slash (broken partial within whole).
Sleight of hand for "starting"...
"We didn't start the fire...It was always burning...Since the world's been turning"
"We didn't start the fire...No, we didn't light it...But we tried to fight it"
I'm in a lifeboat and pulling for shore
You're representing the boat of life floating from inception towards death. You are tempted to misuse the other lifeboats as a shore for temporary habitation.
Sleight of hand: "Islands in the stream...that is what we are...no one in-between...how could we be wrong?"
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many one such island as "America" aka the land of the free (will of choice) and the home of the brave (fearless of danger) aka a collective of lifeboats forming the island "united states" of America. What's gonna happen to islands in the stream? Just listen to the suggested "mainstream"...
Ask yourself if pulling to shore represents selling yourself short?
Seems awful busy (ongoing whole)...
SEEM; verb - "to become; to befit"; which implies the temporary partial to come to being by the "awful busy" ongoing whole. Not that flattering to self to discredit origin as awful...and yet the living (reactors) keeping discrediting the process of dying (generator).
Always going and going on...
..."and on; on and on; the beat don't stop until the break (self differentiation) of dawn (inception of life) aka Rapper's Delight aka RAP (Latin rapio, rapidus, rapid) DE-LIGHT (off; away from light).
let's call me "a monument to an anecdote on the massive inanity of existence."
Aka a single mind (mono-ment) given out (anecdote) to express the collected (massive) empty space (inane) of being within (existence).
Ask yourself if collecting suggested nothingness (ex-nihilo) really expresses everything one exists within? What if one (perceiving) represents the monument within the anecdote of oneness (perceivable)?
There's this other saying: "There are two..."
Who but "one" can say it and who but another "one" can consent to it being said?
those who don't
Suggesting "those" implies one to perceive others; while suggesting them to represent "those"...this implies them being done by; otherwise one couldn't perceive other ones without being done by motion. So how could those who are done do nothing (don't)?
"I know just what you're saying" (I perceive sound; you suggest words)
"So please stop explaining" (resist the temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know what you're thinkin" (your memory is filled with suggested words)
"I don't need your reasons" (I don't need your conflict of want vs not want)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
a complete akashic record, containing within their pages all of knowledge
Each (perceiving) one exists contained within all (perceivable) knowledge. Others suggest a twist (chord) aka suggestion as the inversion of perceivable as to tempt one to respond to the twist (re-cord) by consenting to memorize suggested information; which then tempts one to remember aka respond to twisted memory.
The parasitic few suggest AKASHIC; from AKASHA (ether) to tempt the many to ignore E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Greek to burn, to shine.] aka the origin of heat and light aka when flow (velocity) and form (resistance) meet within momentum (balance).
Sleight of hand..."we don't need no water" (cause form exists within flow) "let the motherfucker burn" (let the living resist dying)..."burn; motherfucker; burn" aka out of heat (burn), within momentum (mother; womb); as self sustenance within temptation (fucking) and back to heat (burn).
In life - debatable. In cards - essential.
The essence of cards implies the suggested game (winning vs losing). Others suggest games to tempt one to ignore the essence of being growth (living) within loss (inception towards death) aka evaluation at the center of value. Loss represents the generator for the reaction of growth.
Consenting to suggested games tempts one to debate (winning vs losing) against others, while ignoring to sustain oneself within perceivable. Those who think they can win what others suggest; ignore being the highest value (evaluation) within existence.
As for the center of everything, if one were to go there
The center of balance isn't a place for choice to go; but the origin demanding resistance (need), while tempting with ignorance (want). All the other "places" around represent the perceivable inspiration (need) and suggested information (want) temporary formed (living) within the momentum of ongoing flow (process of dying) for the choice at the center of balance.
I imagine it'd be a prime location in which to set up a tentpole.
a) LOCO; LOCATUS (to set: to place, to position) -ATION (through action)...hence the enacting represents the prime for all reactions within it, and reaction by choice implies within enacting balance (momentum of motion).
b) one is being set up as the tentpole and the higher the pole grows; the more shelter it expresses for the sustenance of self.
c) TENT (to stretch) POLE (instrument of measurement) aka a prepared (instruo); measuring mind within predefined sound; able to grow (resistance) within loss (velocity).
weapons, much like people, have somewhat-distinct personalities about 'em
Everything by (per) sound (sonos) represents a different expression thereof; hence choice being used to adapt to the expressed inspiration thereof as to be able to grow comprehension thereof. Every so called weapon one utilizes becomes inspiration for ones partial growth, hence the more one trains with a distinct weapon; the more one feels the need to train with other distinct weapons.
Perceivable differences represent communicated inspiration for adaptation.
Probably better to reason with others
What does "better" imply? A conflict of reason against "worse". One cannot reason "with" others; because reasoning represents wanting versus not wanting suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, one exists "with" and "within".
Reason (want vs not want) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable balance (need/want)...imbalance; hence conflict. Choice exits at the center of balance, and only the choice to ignore perceivable balance, shapes suggested imbalance. Others use suggestion to be able to shape imbalances among those who ignore balance.
if pushed to againstness
a) life is being pushed from inception towards death
b) being alive doesn't represent being against death; but balancing as choice within the momentum of motion.
c) one feels pushed by the suggestions of others; because ones consent to any suggestion causes the conflict (reason) within ones mind. If one chooses to be within a conflict; then the other side will be perceived as pushing the limits of ones side. Nature doesn't push the limit...it sets one (choice) into the limit (balance).
Sleight of hand: "Push it to the limit" (be the resistance within the limit)..."Walk along the razor's edge" (be choice within balance)..."But don't look down, just keep your head" (resist the temptation of dying; keep sustaining life)
to serve the sandwiches silently
The origin of sound which allows one to shape through resonance within, is so loud, that one perceives the vibrations thereof as for example the ingredients of a so called "sandwich". Everything perceivable represents the materialized expressions of immaterial sound, and everyone perceiving it represents the free will of choice to shape it through resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
Each person is being served by (per) sound (sonos). The few suggest serving to represent "working for" as to tempt the ignorance of all representing one in energy (work).
scarper whilst they masticate
Growing while others feed upon loss; through their willing ignorance to grow, for the appetite tempting towards the fleeting.
It's the mindset between "I want the taste of that" and "I need to grow what sustains; which would surround me with ever changing tastes".
As for inception-toward-death being representative of it - sure, as are rivers, reeds, the compass winds, falling rains, traffic jams, winged animals, and non-winged animals.
Others suggested you brands for different aspects of the same motion as temptation. Your consent to suggested (information) represents your willing ignorance of perceivable (inspiration), and suggesting to others perpetuates the temptation of ignorance (choice of want over need).
RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence); hence as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...not responding to what others are suggesting (words over sound).
comprehensive is this particular work of civil engineering
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law represents the foundation of civil engineering aka the temptation to stand under (understanding) the suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
The parasitic few suggest EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "agent for another" to tempt the many to ignore being the reaction within the enacting; while surrounded by reacting others, hence tempted to react to them.
they were the last of the grasses
A temporary convenience (living) within an ongoing inconvenience (process of dying).
Hunger was everywhere
Within the temptation of appetite; the inspiration to sustain self (hunger) was everywhere.
as were the predators
a) a temporary convenience (want for prey) within an ongoing inconvenience (need to predate upon to still hunger)
b) "if it bleeds; we can kill it"
leaving them to fall on that habitual dullard; Billy.
Frequency of adaptation (as choice within balance) to perceivable differences (need) or suggested sameness (want) shapes form sharp or dull; yet since this is about balancing..."all work (need) and no play (want) makes Billy a dull boy".
the "C" eyeball
EYE C ALL...ALL SEEING I...balls to the wall annoying wordplay. Meanwhile among the phonetic kabbalists: "such foolish insolence".
it didn't really dissuade the others much
Because within the inspiring whole perceivable; each partial represents suggesting temptation. Each dissuading advice represents suggested temptation to others; until each one chooses to resist suggested (want) for perceivable (need).
Dissuasion represents the temptation to not want what others suggest, while suggesting them to want what's needed (perceivable). One cannot suggest perceivable without tempting others to consent to the suggesting substitute of the perceivable origin.
My suggestion (this is reality) tempts you to consent to me as the representative of the perceivable reality I suggest. Each one is then being tempted to ignore RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence).
steered out of the worst of trouble
Hence the living temporary resisting the temptation to ignore the ongoing process of dying. It's less steering, than it is you spending resistance to pick others up; while attempting to get them to grow by themselves within the loss they're willingly ignoring to be in.
Unless it's karst terrain. A pox on the house of karst terrain.
House of Karst (karra- "rock")...you don't seem to like caves that much. Claustrophobia or did you had to spend a night hiding in a den; while waiting for the occupants to leave?
I know the difference between rain and "other sources of falling water"
"source of falling" implies motion...look at yourself (living) within motion (process of dying) and notice how different it feels to be alive; from the consequences of dying, which are perceivable among the remains of the living?
Living is not just dying; but a different expression of the same origin. Branding living as "humans; nations; races; families etc." tempts the perceivable singular to ignore self for the suggested plural.
The story of rain goes, that it was water given freely the warmth of the sun, but was then mugged for said energy by the workings of the sky, and thus robbed of all of its wealth, it goes back home - and directly, too
Reacting liquidity within a directing current. You are being tempted with the suggested shape of the perceivable liquid from the current directing it.
at no point does their presence enter into the water's own calculus
CALCULA (computing by numbers) -TION (through action) implies being the reacting number (one) within the enacting (oneness). Counting is what's being suggested to you. One doesn't need to count oneness; one (perceiving) needs to adapt to oneness (perceivable); because one (partial) is being moved by oneness (whole).
The water neither counts; not pretends to own its reactions; it simply reacts to enacting; while adapting to whatever circumstances are balancing the choice to balance...like Gene Kelly choosing to go singin' in the rain for the glorious feeling of being happy again.
Water doesn't give a fuck; it adapts to everything given; while struggling to sustain itself within momentum.
Now, weird though the words may be, they still have their utility.
Distracting from perceivable now (balance); with suggested new (imbalance); hence tempting choice to ignore resisting. Meanwhile...comprehending the whole process is very inspiring for growing more comprehension out of it; while also tempting with a little bit of schadenfreude.
Motion represents loss; resistance within motion represents growth. Motion inspires resistance by differentiating the whole into the partial within the only whole. The suggestion of winning tempts one to ignore resisting; while suggested losing tempts one to hold onto "prices already won", hence also ignoring to resist being moved.
a) PER - "a Latin preposition, denoting through, passing, over the whole extent; by"
b) "around" implies around others; hence among partial; which implies within; by and in response to whole.
"furnished with weapons of offense or defense" (armed) implies the weapon of choice; while force implies velocity; momentum and resistance aka resistance as the defense within the momentum of offending velocity aka living (defense) within the process of dying (offense).
One is being tempted to look forwards; while ignoring the response-ability (choice) to origin (balance). The two armed man about town represents choice falling for the temptation of form (want) over flow (need).
As for "we" and "two arms"...one perceives one arm and another one arm in different positions within the oneness of all, and why would the partial within the whole need to suggest in the name of others (we)? Before both of these issues came the choice to count and brand "units" so that one can suggest both to other ones.
How about from this perspective...to be (one) comes before suggesting what (we)
"we" and "two arms" suggests as such.
Whatever you choose has consequences for others; and whatever others choose represents the need to adapt to what's being sensed and the temptation to assign sense to suggestible meaning.
A Simpsons reference aka SONs of SIMPle (single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded)...for all represents one in energy.
Oh dear; another one burdened by faggots...
Displaying messages of empowerment while driving around neutered in electric cars...
What if the process of dying is impressing (loss) to inspire those living within to express (growth); which requires choice of adaptation (need); hence also offering the temptation of ignorance (want) aka self repression?
In other words...those who ignore to grow are tempted to feel stuck; while being moved on a road they ignore (process of dying) towards somewhere (death) their ignorance denies them to comprehend. Furthermore; the choice to ignore need for want; tempts them to want to hold onto; hence gluing themselves onto temporary within ongoing.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to willingly attach themselves to the fleeting material; while ignoring to be the material resistance (living) within the immaterial velocity (process of dying).
The ignorance of temperance towards permanence tempts impotence of sustenance through lack of resistance.
Which is why the ongoing whole differentiates into "temporary" partials; which have to struggle to sustain self (apartheid); while resisting the temptation of "cottoning" together. Entrance the parasitic few suggesting the ignorant many to pick cotton together.
If one (living) comprehends the only origin (process of dying); then it isn't about wanting (winning) vs not wanting (losing); but about the need to grow within loss; by resisting the temptation of suggested wins or loses.
Choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law allows the few to sell everything perceivable back to the many who ignore this for suggested.
Everyone (perceiving) exists at the center of everything (perceivable) as the free will of choice to utilize it (growth)...or ignore it (loss). The few sell perceivable loss under suggested growth back to the many who pay growth (living) into loss (dying). A self destruction racket; more or less carefully hidden behind suggested narratives; which are collapsing upon each other over and over again.
In short...suggesting to sell what is perceptibly free.
WEAPON, noun - "any instrument of offense"...there has to be a weapon of offense (choice) within a self sustaining system of defense (balance). The "will" within free will of choice represents the want (temptation) within the need (resistance).
Self discernment has to be grown for one to comprehend that "instrument" implies in response to perceivable sound. Without that one views any weapon as offense vs defense among others; instead of as response-ability (choice) to origin (balance).
Choice represents the base for suggestion (want); perceivable balance (need) represents the base for choice. Those who are reasoning against each other about suggestion; lack comprehension about base (choice) because they already consented by choice to the suggested choices of others; hence willingly ignoring free will of choice; while submitting the choices of others.
Inception towards death represents the way; momentum (balance) represents what one perceives it at, and ones choice operates at the center thereof. One cannot wander off the path (astray) while being confined to the momentum of the only path. Wandering around in willing ignorance is a choice tho...
Why hunting prey? To sustain self. Where to sustain self? Within momentum (balance); hence origin of every choice to hunt. Now change perspective to the prey...sustaining self; while resisting the suggested temptations by others (getting hunted down) all while adapting as choice to the ever changing moment (balance).
Even while both hunter and hunted are "facing" death; they each operate for the sustenance of life; hence adapting to origin...not to the predefined outcome. Once again; such a perspective requires the growth of self discernment about living within the process of dying; hence in need to react to an enacting system; while being tempted to want everything else.
From center (perceiving) into surrounding (perceivable) based on free will of choice.
a) inception towards death represents the only direction...looking freely (choice) around within the momentum (balance) thereof; doesn't change the direction.
b) constant change (aka forward velocity) represents direction (progress of dying) for those (living) within.
c) if all represents one in energy; then others represent moving partials of the whole. All others represent perceivable inspiration (need) and suggesting information (want) for ones free will of choice. If all represents one in energy; then there can be only one; hence all for one and one for all.
What's lacking is each ones self discernment about representing a partial within a self differentiating whole. The more one comprehends apartheid; the more one comprehends wholeness. The parasitic few distract the ignorant many from that by suggesting diversity (difference) for equality (sameness) as the inversion of difference (partial) out of sameness (whole).
Every one represents potential (growth) within potentiality (loss); yet it requires adaptation of potential to potentiality to grow; while resisting the temptation to drain potential among others.
In other words...one is tempted to want what others grow; while ignoring the need to grow oneself.
Also...one doesn't need to regard the suggestions of others; one represents the RE (responding) GUARD (preservation; self sustenance) within perceivable.
Strength in numbers (sleight of hand for strength within the designated unit "one") misdirected by suggested collectivism (out of many; one) against others. Notice also...POSSE (possession) aka want over need.
PLAT (to spread) FORM (that manner of being peculiar to each body, which exhibits it to the eye as distinct from every other body) aka growth through self differentiation within loss.
Also; PLATEAU (elevated tract of relatively level land) aka choice based growth (elevation) within the momentum (level aka balance) of motion, hence the implied relation of growth to loss; of form to flow; of elevation to degradation etc.
The hook on the other hand represents the snare; the temptation to want to hold onto the material (life); while ignoring to grow in response to immaterial (inception towards death).
Each drop of liquid seeks level (balance); hence representing choice. Liquid also adapts to ever changing circumstances. You don't perceive rain (plural) but partial liquid within whole motion. Branding the momentum of liquid "rain" was suggested to you. Furthermore; suggested "whom" implies the choice to count; while each part of liquid adapts to the whole momentum until disrupted by "whomever" chose to resist liquid finding level.
The few suggest "automobile" to tempt the many to ignore being mobility (living) within automation (process of dying). They furthermore tempt choice into a conflict between manual and automatic; as the inversion of being the manual choice within the automatic balance.
Who assembled and maintains them? What if the origin of ROBOT (Latin robur; strength) represents resisting (living) temptation (dying); and what if others suggest strength as loss in disguise to tempt one to ignore growing it?
The few suggest the automated assembly of sameness to tempt the many to ignore being the manual difference within the self differentiating (automated) sameness. They call it strength (robot) to manufacture sameness within differences (out of many; one) as the inversion of being different within same (one within oneness).
Suggesting these automatic assemblies represents mesmerism aka hypnotism to domesticate free will of choice from adaptation into stagnation.
Showing ones understanding (consent to standing under the suggestions of others) reconfirms the positions of others as above oneself. Resisting suggestion corrodes the position of the ones suggesting; because the ones suggesting utilize the lack of resistance by the ones consenting to sustain their position.
Because growing out of it implies resisting (living) being transmuted back into it (process of dying). The wanderer (life) is stuck to the road (inception towards death); while representing the constant crossroad (choice within balance) in-between keep wandering and becoming roadkill.
They (the partial) cannot stop the whole...only ignore being moved by it.
Backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right represent choices bound to balance (aka while within the momentum of motion). The "if" (if/then implication) for life is predefined by being moved from inception towards death. The reaction to perceivable implication can only exist within the momentum of the enacting motion.
One exists in-between; at the center of; in response to...if/then. The "/" (forward slash) aka SLASH; from French ESCLACHIER (to break); also ESCLATER (to break; splinter) represents the forwards motion self differentiating into the forwarded slash (broken partial within whole).
Sleight of hand for "starting"...
"We didn't start the fire...It was always burning...Since the world's been turning"
"We didn't start the fire...No, we didn't light it...But we tried to fight it"
You're representing the boat of life floating from inception towards death. You are tempted to misuse the other lifeboats as a shore for temporary habitation.
Sleight of hand: "Islands in the stream...that is what we are...no one in-between...how could we be wrong?"
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many one such island as "America" aka the land of the free (will of choice) and the home of the brave (fearless of danger) aka a collective of lifeboats forming the island "united states" of America. What's gonna happen to islands in the stream? Just listen to the suggested "mainstream"...
Ask yourself if pulling to shore represents selling yourself short?
SEEM; verb - "to become; to befit"; which implies the temporary partial to come to being by the "awful busy" ongoing whole. Not that flattering to self to discredit origin as awful...and yet the living (reactors) keeping discrediting the process of dying (generator).
..."and on; on and on; the beat don't stop until the break (self differentiation) of dawn (inception of life) aka Rapper's Delight aka RAP (Latin rapio, rapidus, rapid) DE-LIGHT (off; away from light).
Aka a single mind (mono-ment) given out (anecdote) to express the collected (massive) empty space (inane) of being within (existence).
Ask yourself if collecting suggested nothingness (ex-nihilo) really expresses everything one exists within? What if one (perceiving) represents the monument within the anecdote of oneness (perceivable)?
Who but "one" can say it and who but another "one" can consent to it being said?
Suggesting "those" implies one to perceive others; while suggesting them to represent "those"...this implies them being done by; otherwise one couldn't perceive other ones without being done by motion. So how could those who are done do nothing (don't)?
Perceivable as or suggested by?
Sleight of hand: No Doubt - "Don't Speak"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR3Vdo5etCQ
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know just what you're saying" (I perceive sound; you suggest words)
"So please stop explaining" (resist the temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know what you're thinkin" (your memory is filled with suggested words)
"I don't need your reasons" (I don't need your conflict of want vs not want)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
Each (perceiving) one exists contained within all (perceivable) knowledge. Others suggest a twist (chord) aka suggestion as the inversion of perceivable as to tempt one to respond to the twist (re-cord) by consenting to memorize suggested information; which then tempts one to remember aka respond to twisted memory.
The parasitic few suggest AKASHIC; from AKASHA (ether) to tempt the many to ignore E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Greek to burn, to shine.] aka the origin of heat and light aka when flow (velocity) and form (resistance) meet within momentum (balance).
Sleight of hand..."we don't need no water" (cause form exists within flow) "let the motherfucker burn" (let the living resist dying)..."burn; motherfucker; burn" aka out of heat (burn), within momentum (mother; womb); as self sustenance within temptation (fucking) and back to heat (burn).
The essence of cards implies the suggested game (winning vs losing). Others suggest games to tempt one to ignore the essence of being growth (living) within loss (inception towards death) aka evaluation at the center of value. Loss represents the generator for the reaction of growth.
Consenting to suggested games tempts one to debate (winning vs losing) against others, while ignoring to sustain oneself within perceivable. Those who think they can win what others suggest; ignore being the highest value (evaluation) within existence.
The center of balance isn't a place for choice to go; but the origin demanding resistance (need), while tempting with ignorance (want). All the other "places" around represent the perceivable inspiration (need) and suggested information (want) temporary formed (living) within the momentum of ongoing flow (process of dying) for the choice at the center of balance.
a) LOCO; LOCATUS (to set: to place, to position) -ATION (through action)...hence the enacting represents the prime for all reactions within it, and reaction by choice implies within enacting balance (momentum of motion).
b) one is being set up as the tentpole and the higher the pole grows; the more shelter it expresses for the sustenance of self.
c) TENT (to stretch) POLE (instrument of measurement) aka a prepared (instruo); measuring mind within predefined sound; able to grow (resistance) within loss (velocity).
Everything by (per) sound (sonos) represents a different expression thereof; hence choice being used to adapt to the expressed inspiration thereof as to be able to grow comprehension thereof. Every so called weapon one utilizes becomes inspiration for ones partial growth, hence the more one trains with a distinct weapon; the more one feels the need to train with other distinct weapons.
Perceivable differences represent communicated inspiration for adaptation.
What does "better" imply? A conflict of reason against "worse". One cannot reason "with" others; because reasoning represents wanting versus not wanting suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, one exists "with" and "within".
Reason (want vs not want) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable balance (need/want)...imbalance; hence conflict. Choice exits at the center of balance, and only the choice to ignore perceivable balance, shapes suggested imbalance. Others use suggestion to be able to shape imbalances among those who ignore balance.
a) life is being pushed from inception towards death
b) being alive doesn't represent being against death; but balancing as choice within the momentum of motion.
c) one feels pushed by the suggestions of others; because ones consent to any suggestion causes the conflict (reason) within ones mind. If one chooses to be within a conflict; then the other side will be perceived as pushing the limits of ones side. Nature doesn't push the limit...it sets one (choice) into the limit (balance).
Sleight of hand: "Push it to the limit" (be the resistance within the limit)..."Walk along the razor's edge" (be choice within balance)..."But don't look down, just keep your head" (resist the temptation of dying; keep sustaining life)
The origin of sound which allows one to shape through resonance within, is so loud, that one perceives the vibrations thereof as for example the ingredients of a so called "sandwich". Everything perceivable represents the materialized expressions of immaterial sound, and everyone perceiving it represents the free will of choice to shape it through resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
Each person is being served by (per) sound (sonos). The few suggest serving to represent "working for" as to tempt the ignorance of all representing one in energy (work).
Growing while others feed upon loss; through their willing ignorance to grow, for the appetite tempting towards the fleeting.
It's the mindset between "I want the taste of that" and "I need to grow what sustains; which would surround me with ever changing tastes".
Others suggested you brands for different aspects of the same motion as temptation. Your consent to suggested (information) represents your willing ignorance of perceivable (inspiration), and suggesting to others perpetuates the temptation of ignorance (choice of want over need).
RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence); hence as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...not responding to what others are suggesting (words over sound).
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law represents the foundation of civil engineering aka the temptation to stand under (understanding) the suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
The parasitic few suggest EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "agent for another" to tempt the many to ignore being the reaction within the enacting; while surrounded by reacting others, hence tempted to react to them.
A temporary convenience (living) within an ongoing inconvenience (process of dying).
Within the temptation of appetite; the inspiration to sustain self (hunger) was everywhere.
a) a temporary convenience (want for prey) within an ongoing inconvenience (need to predate upon to still hunger)
b) "if it bleeds; we can kill it"
Frequency of adaptation (as choice within balance) to perceivable differences (need) or suggested sameness (want) shapes form sharp or dull; yet since this is about balancing..."all work (need) and no play (want) makes Billy a dull boy".
EYE C ALL...ALL SEEING I...balls to the wall annoying wordplay. Meanwhile among the phonetic kabbalists: "such foolish insolence".
Because within the inspiring whole perceivable; each partial represents suggesting temptation. Each dissuading advice represents suggested temptation to others; until each one chooses to resist suggested (want) for perceivable (need).
Dissuasion represents the temptation to not want what others suggest, while suggesting them to want what's needed (perceivable). One cannot suggest perceivable without tempting others to consent to the suggesting substitute of the perceivable origin.
My suggestion (this is reality) tempts you to consent to me as the representative of the perceivable reality I suggest. Each one is then being tempted to ignore RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence).
Hence the living temporary resisting the temptation to ignore the ongoing process of dying. It's less steering, than it is you spending resistance to pick others up; while attempting to get them to grow by themselves within the loss they're willingly ignoring to be in.
House of Karst (karra- "rock")...you don't seem to like caves that much. Claustrophobia or did you had to spend a night hiding in a den; while waiting for the occupants to leave?
"source of falling" implies motion...look at yourself (living) within motion (process of dying) and notice how different it feels to be alive; from the consequences of dying, which are perceivable among the remains of the living?
Living is not just dying; but a different expression of the same origin. Branding living as "humans; nations; races; families etc." tempts the perceivable singular to ignore self for the suggested plural.
Reacting liquidity within a directing current. You are being tempted with the suggested shape of the perceivable liquid from the current directing it.
CALCULA (computing by numbers) -TION (through action) implies being the reacting number (one) within the enacting (oneness). Counting is what's being suggested to you. One doesn't need to count oneness; one (perceiving) needs to adapt to oneness (perceivable); because one (partial) is being moved by oneness (whole).
The water neither counts; not pretends to own its reactions; it simply reacts to enacting; while adapting to whatever circumstances are balancing the choice to balance...like Gene Kelly choosing to go singin' in the rain for the glorious feeling of being happy again.
Water doesn't give a fuck; it adapts to everything given; while struggling to sustain itself within momentum.
Distracting from perceivable now (balance); with suggested new (imbalance); hence tempting choice to ignore resisting. Meanwhile...comprehending the whole process is very inspiring for growing more comprehension out of it; while also tempting with a little bit of schadenfreude.