There are a lot of scams in crypto, but this is just overgeneralising. Crypto allows for a fully decentralised rules-based currency. Whether or not you think bitcoin perfects that ideal doesn't change the fact that that ideal does not appear to be possible outside of crypto. That means the potential value in the space, both for an investor and for humanity generally, is colossal.
Fiat is outcompeted by bitcoin since fiat simply fails to hold value over time due to corrupt monetary debasement. Gold is outcompeted since gold tends to inflate at 2% per year. All things that were previously considered financial assets are outcompeted by virtue of the fact that they are not "pure" financial assets. That is to say, part of gold's value is derived from the fact it's used for jewelry, microprocessors etc. i.e. if you want to use it for its monetary qualities, you have to pay the premium ascribed to the non-financial aspect of the good.
Fiat is just a (((scam))) from top to bottom.
Property and land needs maintenance, can be confiscated, can be heavily taxed. It is used as a financial asset only because investors perceive a lack of a suitable pure financial asset...it is likely that as people realise what bitcoin is, a lot of the monetary premiums currently sitting in land, gold and so on will be completely absorbed into a true financial asset. Then again I may be too bullish; this is a long way off. But to think there's no value here is simply to be missing something.
TAN'GIBLE, adjective [from Latin tango, to touch.] - "perceptible by the touch; tactile" + ASSETS', noun [Latin sat, satis, enough.]
Can one ever touch enough without touching again?
real, physical assets
Can life exist without the motion moving it from inception towards death? Does the physical represent more value than what produces it? What if that which was set (living) represents the evaluation within the value of what is setting it (process of dying)?
ponzi scheme
Aka an investment scheme aka IN (within) VESTIO (to clothe) MENT (mind; memory). What if memory is clothed within the flow of perceivable inspiration? What if others tempt one to ignore the ongoing flow of inspiration for suggested information; which in return blocks ones access to the flow of inspiration; hence reducing the incoming inspiration into a trickle. This causes less and less for more and more wanting it aka a pyramid scheme.
what real valued assets are...
Can there be a higher value than evaluation? Was evaluation (perceiving) set into value (perceivable) as to be able to grow (comprehension) within it?
Some kind of ETH marketing. BTC bad, ETH good. PoW bad, PoS good.
If you throw out all that stupid references to $ from article, then there will be only question of energy left. But choosing between total PoS fraud and relatively working PoW crypto with some energy needed to support network, I'll definitely choose PoW, until new iteration of crypto experiment will evetually roll out. Fuck energy economy. Who the fuck will care about energy like beggars among crypto users?
What if others suggest energy to represent a quest towards; as to tempt one to ignore that EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" represents the solution for all within.
What if one represents problem (living) within solution (process of dying); hence the struggle to sustain self by resisting temptation? What if the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) causes temporary chaos (life) within itself?
choosing between
Can choice be situated outside the center of balance? Can choice be tempted to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested choices (want vs not want)? Is choice already in-between need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information) when considering to want or not want suggestions by the choices of others?
energy needed
If energy represents the source of need; they why use choice to reason between want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; true vs false; believing vs not-believing; eth vs btc; analogue vs digital; gibs me dis vs gibs me dat and so on?
I'll definitely choose
a) can one not choose within what nature offers or does each choice within perceivable counts as a reaction to the enacting system...even in ignorance thereof?
b) DEFINITE, adjective - "having certain limits"...if perceivable balance represents the limit for choice at its center; then can the suggested choices of others tempt one to limit self further?
until new
Where does that "new" come from if not out of the motion causing the "until". How can something out of an ongoing origin (motion) be "new"? What if you represent the temporary (living) lacking to comprehend the ongoing (process of dying), hence representing the opportunity to grow comprehension of perceivable by adapting to it?
Who the fuck will care about energy
What if everything perceivable exists inside energy? Can you tell me anything that doesn't represent energy (work)? Does a "workless" person stop laboring within perceivable reality or does he keep breathing; does his heart keep pumping; does he still need to resist the temptation of dying as to sustain his life?
Why do you consent to allow others to suggest you definitions for energy, to the point where you suggest to the world at large the question: "who the fuck will care about energy"?
Of course they are ignoring the value of bitcoin cryptography keys that uphold the ledger and were produced through work effort. Every ten minutes, a new lock is added to the chain. Those locks are as valuable as the locking mechanism of a vault door, at the cost and work effort of 142.59 terawatt-hours, and 233.75 ExaHash per second. That is what Proof of Work is.
Proof of Stake on the other hand is a token system that pays the wealthy for having money. It is literally what the central banks are already doing. And it is disgusting.
Any token system can be thought of as a pot of money. Every cryptocurrency is its own pot of money. When people sell, they are taking money out of the pot. When people buy, they are putting money into the pot.
It's all a speculative investment, some more speculative than others. Nothing is a perfect store a value, not gold, not silver, not land, not fiat in the bank, not stocks, not bonds. Not even a marketable skill. A family, maybe, treasure stored up in heaven, really.
a) STORE, noun - "a large number" + NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit (unus; one)" represents "ones" growth (living) within all (process of dying).
b) one represents the perceiving evaluation (living) within perceivable value (process of dying). The few tempt the many to ignore this for trying to store suggested values in the banks of the few; who use them to devalue the many.
is not
This rhetoric shows the domestication of will by suggesting it to consent to perpetuate contradictions aka "something is nothing".
How is "bitcoin" nothing, if you suggest it to be "bitcoin"? Underneath that...why do you define what "bitcoin" isn't; when you represent the reaction to what others suggest "bitcoin" is? And underneath that...if you can react to perceivable reality by making suggestions about what something is or isn't; then that implies that reality "was" perceivable before you can suggest what it "is or isn't".
educated
Educated by the suggestions of others to represent what within perceivable inspiration?
EDUCATE (to lead) -ATION (through action) implies being the reaction (living) that is led by the enacting (process of dying).
The next step would be self discernment about being the living resistance within the perceivable temptation of dying; which brings one to others who suggest one to follow (student) the lead (teachers) of education, being tempted to follow leaders towards death, following suggested orders; NPC'S adhering to programming; marching lockstep to the chain of command; being flushed away by the mainstream; cattle marching to slaughter; consenting to suggested progressivism; wanting suggested outcomes over perceivable origin etc.
counterpoint
a) what's the counterpoint to perceivable reality?
b) does nature demand from those within to count numbers, or does the oneness of perceivable nature self differentiates into each perceiving one unit?
d) are the many being terrorized by suggested numbers (inflation vs deflation; exponential debt; rich vs poor; social credit; price-tags; population numbers; historical dates; doomsday predictions; time is ticking away; so many problems; so little choices; more; more; more...)?
Yet when it comes to consenting to suggested numbers; "there can be only one" wielding the choice to consent...oneself.
e) what if pointing out suggested directions; tempts one to ignore the origin of perceivable direction (inception towards death) for oneself (life)?
f) what comes first...the point (living) or the line (process of dying)? What if others simply point further down the line to trick you to ignore the point of living?
No, binary code is not a store of value...at all.
Only tangible assets are a store of value...real, physical assets.
Land...real estate...fuck the house...is a real store of value.
Crypto anything is a pull rug ponzi scheme.
Solid liquidity goes for LAND, art, precious metals, precious gems...like diamonds.
Crypto is for people who have no clue what real valued assets are.
Set because of real assets...for life.
100%
Bingo.
There are a lot of scams in crypto, but this is just overgeneralising. Crypto allows for a fully decentralised rules-based currency. Whether or not you think bitcoin perfects that ideal doesn't change the fact that that ideal does not appear to be possible outside of crypto. That means the potential value in the space, both for an investor and for humanity generally, is colossal.
Fiat is outcompeted by bitcoin since fiat simply fails to hold value over time due to corrupt monetary debasement. Gold is outcompeted since gold tends to inflate at 2% per year. All things that were previously considered financial assets are outcompeted by virtue of the fact that they are not "pure" financial assets. That is to say, part of gold's value is derived from the fact it's used for jewelry, microprocessors etc. i.e. if you want to use it for its monetary qualities, you have to pay the premium ascribed to the non-financial aspect of the good.
Fiat is just a (((scam))) from top to bottom.
Property and land needs maintenance, can be confiscated, can be heavily taxed. It is used as a financial asset only because investors perceive a lack of a suitable pure financial asset...it is likely that as people realise what bitcoin is, a lot of the monetary premiums currently sitting in land, gold and so on will be completely absorbed into a true financial asset. Then again I may be too bullish; this is a long way off. But to think there's no value here is simply to be missing something.
wow.
crypto.
much yes.
immutable ledger.
remove the banks.
BUT YOU AINT GONNA REMOVE THE COMPUTERS.
that is prob the only "store of value" of crypto.
and the fintechs/banks are SALIVATING over that fact.
Can one ever touch enough without touching again?
Can life exist without the motion moving it from inception towards death? Does the physical represent more value than what produces it? What if that which was set (living) represents the evaluation within the value of what is setting it (process of dying)?
Aka an investment scheme aka IN (within) VESTIO (to clothe) MENT (mind; memory). What if memory is clothed within the flow of perceivable inspiration? What if others tempt one to ignore the ongoing flow of inspiration for suggested information; which in return blocks ones access to the flow of inspiration; hence reducing the incoming inspiration into a trickle. This causes less and less for more and more wanting it aka a pyramid scheme.
Can there be a higher value than evaluation? Was evaluation (perceiving) set into value (perceivable) as to be able to grow (comprehension) within it?
Some kind of ETH marketing. BTC bad, ETH good. PoW bad, PoS good.
If you throw out all that stupid references to $ from article, then there will be only question of energy left. But choosing between total PoS fraud and relatively working PoW crypto with some energy needed to support network, I'll definitely choose PoW, until new iteration of crypto experiment will evetually roll out. Fuck energy economy. Who the fuck will care about energy like beggars among crypto users?
What if others suggest energy to represent a quest towards; as to tempt one to ignore that EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" represents the solution for all within.
What if one represents problem (living) within solution (process of dying); hence the struggle to sustain self by resisting temptation? What if the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) causes temporary chaos (life) within itself?
Can choice be situated outside the center of balance? Can choice be tempted to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested choices (want vs not want)? Is choice already in-between need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information) when considering to want or not want suggestions by the choices of others?
If energy represents the source of need; they why use choice to reason between want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; true vs false; believing vs not-believing; eth vs btc; analogue vs digital; gibs me dis vs gibs me dat and so on?
a) can one not choose within what nature offers or does each choice within perceivable counts as a reaction to the enacting system...even in ignorance thereof?
b) DEFINITE, adjective - "having certain limits"...if perceivable balance represents the limit for choice at its center; then can the suggested choices of others tempt one to limit self further?
Where does that "new" come from if not out of the motion causing the "until". How can something out of an ongoing origin (motion) be "new"? What if you represent the temporary (living) lacking to comprehend the ongoing (process of dying), hence representing the opportunity to grow comprehension of perceivable by adapting to it?
What if everything perceivable exists inside energy? Can you tell me anything that doesn't represent energy (work)? Does a "workless" person stop laboring within perceivable reality or does he keep breathing; does his heart keep pumping; does he still need to resist the temptation of dying as to sustain his life?
Why do you consent to allow others to suggest you definitions for energy, to the point where you suggest to the world at large the question: "who the fuck will care about energy"?
Of course they are ignoring the value of bitcoin cryptography keys that uphold the ledger and were produced through work effort. Every ten minutes, a new lock is added to the chain. Those locks are as valuable as the locking mechanism of a vault door, at the cost and work effort of 142.59 terawatt-hours, and 233.75 ExaHash per second. That is what Proof of Work is.
Proof of Stake on the other hand is a token system that pays the wealthy for having money. It is literally what the central banks are already doing. And it is disgusting.
Wow. Did a retard write this?
BLOCKCHAIN HAS MORE VALUE THAN CRYPTO-COINS.
True, but we gauge that value in coins.
It's all a speculative investment, some more speculative than others. Nothing is a perfect store a value, not gold, not silver, not land, not fiat in the bank, not stocks, not bonds. Not even a marketable skill. A family, maybe, treasure stored up in heaven, really.
i dont have to speculate the surface area of planet earth.
that is static.
it truly is capped at a particular number.
that is true scarcity.
Scarcity =/= demand. There is no demand for most of the surface are of the Earth, but high demand for surface area in Paris, Manhattan, and London.
wuh wuh WUH?! land in antartica aint flyn off the shelf?
At this point, I'm not even sure you know what you're going on about. Have a nice day.
All crypto is nothing but a digital fiat. Buy real, physical gold.
Buy land. The benefits outweigh the liability of property taxes. I have real estate holdings, (not houses).
I have natgas, oil, and timber leases that pay monthly dividends.
Land is the number one investment source since time immemorial.
There's an interesting phrase that comes to mind ...
"They ain't making more land."
The problem is ... when you buy the land, you must make sure to get the mineral rights.
Hence my leases. ;-)
numbers.
i can even write numbers on a piece of paper.
and that shits suppose to be a "store of value?"
NAH, TURD-HAT.
its a store of ego in your empty brain.
while youre at it, start hoarding tulips.
gold/silver has the track record and HISTORY of being a store of value.
gold/silver is hard to acquire.
you can literally hold gold/silver.
besides monetary value, you can use gold/silver for "goods."
gold/silver is literally finite.
BTC says they only have 21 milly.... UNTIL THEY DECIDE THEY GONNA UP IT TO 42 MILLY-TRON.
GOLD
SILVER
YOUR MOM
a) STORE, noun - "a large number" + NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit (unus; one)" represents "ones" growth (living) within all (process of dying).
b) one represents the perceiving evaluation (living) within perceivable value (process of dying). The few tempt the many to ignore this for trying to store suggested values in the banks of the few; who use them to devalue the many.
This rhetoric shows the domestication of will by suggesting it to consent to perpetuate contradictions aka "something is nothing".
How is "bitcoin" nothing, if you suggest it to be "bitcoin"? Underneath that...why do you define what "bitcoin" isn't; when you represent the reaction to what others suggest "bitcoin" is? And underneath that...if you can react to perceivable reality by making suggestions about what something is or isn't; then that implies that reality "was" perceivable before you can suggest what it "is or isn't".
Educated by the suggestions of others to represent what within perceivable inspiration?
EDUCATE (to lead) -ATION (through action) implies being the reaction (living) that is led by the enacting (process of dying).
The next step would be self discernment about being the living resistance within the perceivable temptation of dying; which brings one to others who suggest one to follow (student) the lead (teachers) of education, being tempted to follow leaders towards death, following suggested orders; NPC'S adhering to programming; marching lockstep to the chain of command; being flushed away by the mainstream; cattle marching to slaughter; consenting to suggested progressivism; wanting suggested outcomes over perceivable origin etc.
a) what's the counterpoint to perceivable reality?
b) does nature demand from those within to count numbers, or does the oneness of perceivable nature self differentiates into each perceiving one unit?
c) are the parasitic few suggesting the ignorant many to count? https://pic8.co/sh/gqSc1L.jpg
d) are the many being terrorized by suggested numbers (inflation vs deflation; exponential debt; rich vs poor; social credit; price-tags; population numbers; historical dates; doomsday predictions; time is ticking away; so many problems; so little choices; more; more; more...)?
Yet when it comes to consenting to suggested numbers; "there can be only one" wielding the choice to consent...oneself.
e) what if pointing out suggested directions; tempts one to ignore the origin of perceivable direction (inception towards death) for oneself (life)?
f) what comes first...the point (living) or the line (process of dying)? What if others simply point further down the line to trick you to ignore the point of living?