a) STORE, noun - "a large number" + NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit (unus; one)" represents "ones" growth (living) within all (process of dying).
b) one represents the perceiving evaluation (living) within perceivable value (process of dying). The few tempt the many to ignore this for trying to store suggested values in the banks of the few; who use them to devalue the many.
is not
This rhetoric shows the domestication of will by suggesting it to consent to perpetuate contradictions aka "something is nothing".
How is "bitcoin" nothing, if you suggest it to be "bitcoin"? Underneath that...why do you define what "bitcoin" isn't; when you represent the reaction to what others suggest "bitcoin" is? And underneath that...if you can react to perceivable reality by making suggestions about what something is or isn't; then that implies that reality "was" perceivable before you can suggest what it "is or isn't".
educated
Educated by the suggestions of others to represent what within perceivable inspiration?
EDUCATE (to lead) -ATION (through action) implies being the reaction (living) that is led by the enacting (process of dying).
The next step would be self discernment about being the living resistance within the perceivable temptation of dying; which brings one to others who suggest one to follow (student) the lead (teachers) of education, being tempted to follow leaders towards death, following suggested orders; NPC'S adhering to programming; marching lockstep to the chain of command; being flushed away by the mainstream; cattle marching to slaughter; consenting to suggested progressivism; wanting suggested outcomes over perceivable origin etc.
counterpoint
a) what's the counterpoint to perceivable reality?
b) does nature demand from those within to count numbers, or does the oneness of perceivable nature self differentiates into each perceiving one unit?
d) are the many being terrorized by suggested numbers (inflation vs deflation; exponential debt; rich vs poor; social credit; price-tags; population numbers; historical dates; doomsday predictions; time is ticking away; so many problems; so little choices; more; more; more...)?
Yet when it comes to consenting to suggested numbers; "there can be only one" wielding the choice to consent...oneself.
e) what if pointing out suggested directions; tempts one to ignore the origin of perceivable direction (inception towards death) for oneself (life)?
f) what comes first...the point (living) or the line (process of dying)? What if others simply point further down the line to trick you to ignore the point of living?
a) STORE, noun - "a large number" + NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit (unus; one)" represents "ones" growth (living) within all (process of dying).
b) one represents the perceiving evaluation (living) within perceivable value (process of dying). The few tempt the many to ignore this for trying to store suggested values in the banks of the few; who use them to devalue the many.
This rhetoric shows the domestication of will by suggesting it to consent to perpetuate contradictions aka "something is nothing".
How is "bitcoin" nothing, if you suggest it to be "bitcoin"? Underneath that...why do you define what "bitcoin" isn't; when you represent the reaction to what others suggest "bitcoin" is? And underneath that...if you can react to perceivable reality by making suggestions about what something is or isn't; then that implies that reality "was" perceivable before you can suggest what it "is or isn't".
Educated by the suggestions of others to represent what within perceivable inspiration?
EDUCATE (to lead) -ATION (through action) implies being the reaction (living) that is led by the enacting (process of dying).
The next step would be self discernment about being the living resistance within the perceivable temptation of dying; which brings one to others who suggest one to follow (student) the lead (teachers) of education, being tempted to follow leaders towards death, following suggested orders; NPC'S adhering to programming; marching lockstep to the chain of command; being flushed away by the mainstream; cattle marching to slaughter; consenting to suggested progressivism; wanting suggested outcomes over perceivable origin etc.
a) what's the counterpoint to perceivable reality?
b) does nature demand from those within to count numbers, or does the oneness of perceivable nature self differentiates into each perceiving one unit?
c) are the parasitic few suggesting the ignorant many to count? https://pic8.co/sh/gqSc1L.jpg
d) are the many being terrorized by suggested numbers (inflation vs deflation; exponential debt; rich vs poor; social credit; price-tags; population numbers; historical dates; doomsday predictions; time is ticking away; so many problems; so little choices; more; more; more...)?
Yet when it comes to consenting to suggested numbers; "there can be only one" wielding the choice to consent...oneself.
e) what if pointing out suggested directions; tempts one to ignore the origin of perceivable direction (inception towards death) for oneself (life)?
f) what comes first...the point (living) or the line (process of dying)? What if others simply point further down the line to trick you to ignore the point of living?