The most obvious reason is that women are collectively nowhere near as violent as men, there won't be violent riots composed primarily of women for the same reason that the title "first female mass shooter" is still up for grabs
ANTI (against) FACSIM'ILE (from facio "to make" and similis "like"). Nature self differentiates ALL (perceivable) into each ONE (perceiving)..."antifa" is suggested as the resistance to being made alike aka the response to the mass ignorance of being different.
The many were domesticated by the suggestion of the few to consent to being herded together aka to unite under suggested umbrellas (religion; nations; civilizations; society, and all the -isms). What the many ignore represents UNITY; noun (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness".
This is why the few can effortlessly implement "united" nations; "united" states, a european "union"; while the many, in their ignorance of perceivable, are lacking to comprehend why every collective around them is falling apart; is being transmuted back to base oneness aka E Pluribus Unum (out of many, one).
What's the implication of pleading with the temporary living within the ongoing process of dying to stop? Notice also that you're utilizing the ongoing as the source for frequency (a thing often repeated at short intervals)...yet you suggest "stop" aka the cessation of motion.
Resist the temptation to judge what the few are suggesting you and instead question the perceivable results of the suggested; how the ones suggesting are directing those who consent to it, and how the many react to what the few are suggesting them.
A little bit of suggested spray-paint can deceive the many into judging facades; while ignoring the ancient structure these facades are covering. The more of the many judge the spray-paint as ugly; the less resistance the ancient structures have from being torn down. This goes the other way too...suggested advertisements; attractions; or anonymous walls all tempt the many to ignore the perceivable reality by step by step isolating themselves from their surroundings.
Until they are bombing the Pentagon and doing bank robberies like the Weather Underground, I'm gonna go on the limited evidence we have, that they are protestors who are engaging in property damage, which is common on the left.
WEATHER, verb - "to sail to the windward of something else; to pass with difficulty" aka being temporary living within the ongoing process of dying.
UN'DERGROUND, adjective - "being below the surface" aka form (life) below the surface of flow (inception towards death) or choice (reaction) below the surface of balance (enacting).
the limited evidence we have
EV'IDENT, adjective - "plain; open to be seen" aka ALL perceivable inspiration for each ONE perceiving it within aka being ONE perceiving under the surface of ALL perceivable.
One represents the limited access of perceiving the unlimited evidence perceivable. The parasitic few utilize suggested information to tempt the ignorant many to self restrict by consenting to limitations.
common on the left
a) COMMON, adjective - "belonging equally to more than one"...ask yourself if different choices (ONEs) within the same balance (ALL) can hold onto sameness (equal) while being different (diverse)?
b) left/right represents a perceivable balance for your responding free will of choice at the center. From wherever you choose to step left; you came from a right and vice versa.
Left/right...forward/back...up/down...notice that your perspective exists within a cube. Afterwards notice that while you can freely (by free will of choice) move within the cube; you are also being moved from inception towards death. Could it be that your temporary free will of movement is defined by the momentum (balance) of ongoing motion?
What if the parasitic few suggest you a left versus right conflict (imbalance) to tempt you to ignore the perceivable balance (need/want)?
this supposed "janes revenge" group is probably fake and created by the CIA
a) all groups represent suggestions by the few; because the many ignore the unity (Latin unitas) represents "the state of being one; oneness"...not togetherness.
b) groups imply leaders and followers; which tempts one to ignore that life can only follow and be led towards death, hence representing the resistance to the temptation of being led to follow.
c) CIA (central intelligence agency) aka "center; understanding; action" represents the suggested inversion of CCR aka "center; comprehension; reaction"...
Choice represents the center of a balance based system; the ones perceiving within all perceivable need to grow their comprehension thereof, and living within the process of dying represents being the enacted upon reaction.
The parasitic few suggest understanding to tempt the many to consent to "stand under" suggested information; while ignoring to grow comprehension out of perceivable inspiration. They also suggest actors so that the many mimic acting; while ignoring that actors responding to directors imply "reacting". Being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being reaction within enacting direction.
From the energy perspective...being reactors (living) within a generator (dying). One (perceiving) needs to react to the generator (perceivable) to be able to regenerate (growth of comprehension); which is what allows temporary self sustenance of the living within the process of dying.
The few suggest Jane-ism; the many consent to want or not want (fuck jane) the suggested; which in return fuels the suggestion to be usable within the narrative.
RE (response to) VENGE (vengeance)...that's what the many are doing when consenting to suggested Jane-ism (or any other suggested information).
The most obvious reason is that women are collectively nowhere near as violent as men, there won't be violent riots composed primarily of women for the same reason that the title "first female mass shooter" is still up for grabs
How about the ones now juiced up on testosterone?
Wow, look at the shit show the comments of a post mentioning the CIA became.
Definitely
It seems like the same people that started antifa. The organizers are wearing all black, have a private com, and are funded by some rich leftists.
ANTI (against) FACSIM'ILE (from facio "to make" and similis "like"). Nature self differentiates ALL (perceivable) into each ONE (perceiving)..."antifa" is suggested as the resistance to being made alike aka the response to the mass ignorance of being different.
The many were domesticated by the suggestion of the few to consent to being herded together aka to unite under suggested umbrellas (religion; nations; civilizations; society, and all the -isms). What the many ignore represents UNITY; noun (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness".
This is why the few can effortlessly implement "united" nations; "united" states, a european "union"; while the many, in their ignorance of perceivable, are lacking to comprehend why every collective around them is falling apart; is being transmuted back to base oneness aka E Pluribus Unum (out of many, one).
Please stop. Please stop.
What's the implication of pleading with the temporary living within the ongoing process of dying to stop? Notice also that you're utilizing the ongoing as the source for frequency (a thing often repeated at short intervals)...yet you suggest "stop" aka the cessation of motion.
So far, all they've done is knock over some statues and spraypaint stuff. Hardly the kind of thing the CIA get wet over.
Resist the temptation to judge what the few are suggesting you and instead question the perceivable results of the suggested; how the ones suggesting are directing those who consent to it, and how the many react to what the few are suggesting them.
A little bit of suggested spray-paint can deceive the many into judging facades; while ignoring the ancient structure these facades are covering. The more of the many judge the spray-paint as ugly; the less resistance the ancient structures have from being torn down. This goes the other way too...suggested advertisements; attractions; or anonymous walls all tempt the many to ignore the perceivable reality by step by step isolating themselves from their surroundings.
Until they are bombing the Pentagon and doing bank robberies like the Weather Underground, I'm gonna go on the limited evidence we have, that they are protestors who are engaging in property damage, which is common on the left.
PROTEST', verb intransitive [Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it.]...whose narration are they affirming and for which audience?
https://pic8.co/sh/LVsCFD.jpg
WEATHER, verb - "to sail to the windward of something else; to pass with difficulty" aka being temporary living within the ongoing process of dying.
UN'DERGROUND, adjective - "being below the surface" aka form (life) below the surface of flow (inception towards death) or choice (reaction) below the surface of balance (enacting).
EV'IDENT, adjective - "plain; open to be seen" aka ALL perceivable inspiration for each ONE perceiving it within aka being ONE perceiving under the surface of ALL perceivable.
One represents the limited access of perceiving the unlimited evidence perceivable. The parasitic few utilize suggested information to tempt the ignorant many to self restrict by consenting to limitations.
a) COMMON, adjective - "belonging equally to more than one"...ask yourself if different choices (ONEs) within the same balance (ALL) can hold onto sameness (equal) while being different (diverse)?
b) left/right represents a perceivable balance for your responding free will of choice at the center. From wherever you choose to step left; you came from a right and vice versa.
Left/right...forward/back...up/down...notice that your perspective exists within a cube. Afterwards notice that while you can freely (by free will of choice) move within the cube; you are also being moved from inception towards death. Could it be that your temporary free will of movement is defined by the momentum (balance) of ongoing motion?
What if the parasitic few suggest you a left versus right conflict (imbalance) to tempt you to ignore the perceivable balance (need/want)?
a) all groups represent suggestions by the few; because the many ignore the unity (Latin unitas) represents "the state of being one; oneness"...not togetherness.
b) groups imply leaders and followers; which tempts one to ignore that life can only follow and be led towards death, hence representing the resistance to the temptation of being led to follow.
c) CIA (central intelligence agency) aka "center; understanding; action" represents the suggested inversion of CCR aka "center; comprehension; reaction"...
Choice represents the center of a balance based system; the ones perceiving within all perceivable need to grow their comprehension thereof, and living within the process of dying represents being the enacted upon reaction.
The parasitic few suggest understanding to tempt the many to consent to "stand under" suggested information; while ignoring to grow comprehension out of perceivable inspiration. They also suggest actors so that the many mimic acting; while ignoring that actors responding to directors imply "reacting". Being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being reaction within enacting direction.
From the energy perspective...being reactors (living) within a generator (dying). One (perceiving) needs to react to the generator (perceivable) to be able to regenerate (growth of comprehension); which is what allows temporary self sustenance of the living within the process of dying.
Never heard of Jane until this year. Fuck Jane and her revenge.
Office windows don't fight back.
The few suggest Jane-ism; the many consent to want or not want (fuck jane) the suggested; which in return fuels the suggestion to be usable within the narrative.
RE (response to) VENGE (vengeance)...that's what the many are doing when consenting to suggested Jane-ism (or any other suggested information).
There should be some undecipherable tablet somewhere; roughly translating to "dude; don't stick your dick into crazy".