Because it's stupid, open source code is just as easy to verify as if CIA gave you a recepie for pancakes which literally only contain the four ingredients eggs, milk, flour and salt. While if you make those pancakes it'll be CIA pancakes, that doesn't mean those pancakes will be toxic or fuck you over in anyway.
This is because you made them out of a recepie you could verify. If the CIA however gave you proprietary pancakes, then you could obviously expect some fuckery. Not because it says ICA (acronym of CIA) on the recepie.
I am not saying you can’t make money on it, I made 30k, of course the feds taxed the fuck out of it, I took home 15k.
I’m saying they (cia) started it to usher in digital currency, no more hard copy cash, means your bank account and assets can be “more easily” frozen (because all your assets are now “online”) cash will be no longer be “good for trade”.
Look at china, they are BURNING cash because muh “covid” (sure okay) and have a social credit system in place TODAY. So for example when you are no longer “allowed” to be “anon” online (not that we REALLY are), and you spread “misinformation”, the US “ministry of truth” can seize your funds, you can’t travel, buy or sell, etc. That’s straight out of “1984” and Revelations lol.
When Elon talked about solving the “bot” problem on twitler, he’s talking about YOU, you (we) are the BOT. Everyone will likely have to be verified (eventually). It’s a slow process but it will happen.
If this doesn’t at least cause some “suspicion”, then carry on sir.
I am not saying you can’t make money on it, I made 30k, of course the feds taxed the fuck out of it, I took home 15k.
It's about privacy and control over your own assets, even in the digital space, not a get rich quick scheme. And the government will always fuck you over if you have capital gains from any "investment".
I’m saying they (cia) started it to usher in digital currency, no more hard copy cash, means your bank account and assets can be “more easily” frozen (because all your assets are now “online”) cash will be no longer be “good for trade”.
Cash is vulnerable to inflation, they can drain the value out of it, leaving you with nothing but the worthless slips of paper. If you're really into physical assets then it's gold and silver you want.
As for "digital" currency, banks have keep digital logs since the 70's. Doesn't matter if you use a card, your phone, a chip in your hand or even mail or checks, the transaction still happens digitally in the back end. So quit that bullshit, the only thing that's "physical" about fiat currency is the user legacy interface to the end user, such as cash or checks, otherwise it's already digital and outside of your control.
Look at china, they are BURNING cash because muh “covid” (sure okay) and have a social credit system in place TODAY. So for example when you are no longer “allowed” to be “anon” online (not that we REALLY are), and you spread “misinformation”, the US “ministry of truth” can seize your funds, you can’t travel, buy or sell, etc. That’s straight out of “1984” and Revelations lol.
China's "social credit system" is just more honest than what we have here in the west, ever wanted to buy a house? notice how you probably need a loan for that, but you can't get a loan with a bad credit score, and what gives you a bad credit score, that's right, criticizing the government or being a "bad citizen".
When Elon talked about solving the “bot” problem on twitler, he’s talking about YOU, you (we) are the BOT. Everyone will likely have to be verified (eventually). It’s a slow process but it will happen.
It's their goal to end anonymity online, but it can't be done as long as there are alternative software, which there always will be. Problem is, a large portion of normies are gonna stick to the mainstream platforms and let themselves get fucked over into compliance.
If this doesn’t at least cause some “suspicion”, then carry on sir.
Not only is it suspicious, it's a fact that the globalist elite hates us. Now don't pretend that they won't keep fucking up the mainstream platforms, because they will. And we're building alternatives in order to take back control. Internet is a too powerful tool to let it slip straight into the hands of the globalist elite.
You wouldn't think it would be that hard to validate this, but years ago I tried and found that one of the words did indeed mean "middle", and thus reasonably "central", but couldn't translate the other. I've been waiting to run across a native Japanese speaker ever since.
This was years ago and I swear I could not find it after an hour of looking. Anyway, I would say "confirmed". The plot twist is that still, almost no one will get it. Or should we start to say "can't" get it?
There's actually a ton of evidence that cryptocurrency is a big global-scale Intelligence project, but I always thought this particular piece of the puzzle was vitally important. I mean, if someone doesn't get this, they are NOT going to get any of the other stuff.
In my experience, people who only speak English are among the crappiest at translation from foreign languages to English, no offense, it's just how it is.
This is because you can't just take words out of context from any language and translate them into English and expect a correct translation. Other languages use a completely different set of grammatical rules, words are usually put in a different order and similar.
I've seen Goolag translate many times twist the meaning of a sentence into the complete opposite of what it really means.
yeah I get what you’re saying but that’s still what it means, source: japanese dude. lol.
side note english is a horribly watered down language, like the word “believe” doesn’t mean “to think”, it means “to be doing, taking action, action mirroring what you think”.
Seems like a far fetched theory tho letting people call them out that easily, why? what's their gain from it?
If they have anything to do with it, and I'm not saying that may not be the case. It's morel likely to be similar to the TOR project. TOR was created by the NSA in order to let CIA agents fuck around anonymously on the internet.
Problem is, if only CIA uses TOR anyone who see's a TOR visitor would know it's a CIA agent which ruins the whole point of anonymity. That's why they made TOR open source, and allowed everyone perfect anonymity, because it was the only way for CIA themselves to hide in plain sight.
Pay attention to the open source part, if that wasn't the case then literally nobody would use TOR to get anonymity from the government.
After all, the government needs privacy and digital gold just as much as you do. The government doesn't control the banks and especially not the federal reserve. There's a conflict of interest there.
I made 30k at the peak, had to give 15k to the irs if you are wondering, knew it was a ponzi when I bought it. Unfortunately that’s how most “investments” work.
are worse and more adversarial entities than the NSA
what a glowie thing to say... the NSA is the worst of them all moron. Its like the big brother now. NSA spies and records everything happening on the internet. those large datacenters they have in Utah and elsewhere are under the NSA
It's not so simple, but the CIA would not leave a calling card like this.
Citation needed
Meanwhile these central banks are on board with DC. Devils children. Digital currency.
Di - divide Git - mind Al - all
https://cbdctracker.org/
Because it's stupid, open source code is just as easy to verify as if CIA gave you a recepie for pancakes which literally only contain the four ingredients eggs, milk, flour and salt. While if you make those pancakes it'll be CIA pancakes, that doesn't mean those pancakes will be toxic or fuck you over in anyway.
This is because you made them out of a recepie you could verify. If the CIA however gave you proprietary pancakes, then you could obviously expect some fuckery. Not because it says ICA (acronym of CIA) on the recepie.
I am not saying you can’t make money on it, I made 30k, of course the feds taxed the fuck out of it, I took home 15k.
I’m saying they (cia) started it to usher in digital currency, no more hard copy cash, means your bank account and assets can be “more easily” frozen (because all your assets are now “online”) cash will be no longer be “good for trade”.
Look at china, they are BURNING cash because muh “covid” (sure okay) and have a social credit system in place TODAY. So for example when you are no longer “allowed” to be “anon” online (not that we REALLY are), and you spread “misinformation”, the US “ministry of truth” can seize your funds, you can’t travel, buy or sell, etc. That’s straight out of “1984” and Revelations lol.
When Elon talked about solving the “bot” problem on twitler, he’s talking about YOU, you (we) are the BOT. Everyone will likely have to be verified (eventually). It’s a slow process but it will happen.
If this doesn’t at least cause some “suspicion”, then carry on sir.
It's about privacy and control over your own assets, even in the digital space, not a get rich quick scheme. And the government will always fuck you over if you have capital gains from any "investment".
Cash is vulnerable to inflation, they can drain the value out of it, leaving you with nothing but the worthless slips of paper. If you're really into physical assets then it's gold and silver you want.
As for "digital" currency, banks have keep digital logs since the 70's. Doesn't matter if you use a card, your phone, a chip in your hand or even mail or checks, the transaction still happens digitally in the back end. So quit that bullshit, the only thing that's "physical" about fiat currency is the user legacy interface to the end user, such as cash or checks, otherwise it's already digital and outside of your control.
China's "social credit system" is just more honest than what we have here in the west, ever wanted to buy a house? notice how you probably need a loan for that, but you can't get a loan with a bad credit score, and what gives you a bad credit score, that's right, criticizing the government or being a "bad citizen".
It's their goal to end anonymity online, but it can't be done as long as there are alternative software, which there always will be. Problem is, a large portion of normies are gonna stick to the mainstream platforms and let themselves get fucked over into compliance.
Not only is it suspicious, it's a fact that the globalist elite hates us. Now don't pretend that they won't keep fucking up the mainstream platforms, because they will. And we're building alternatives in order to take back control. Internet is a too powerful tool to let it slip straight into the hands of the globalist elite.
eggscellent points, I learn a helluvalot more here than twitler. Thanks!
You wouldn't think it would be that hard to validate this, but years ago I tried and found that one of the words did indeed mean "middle", and thus reasonably "central", but couldn't translate the other. I've been waiting to run across a native Japanese speaker ever since.
Satoshi: knowledge, wisdom 聡, intelligent, clever, bright 慧, Not that hard to look up, I know a few japanese ppl if you need a phone number. lol.
This was years ago and I swear I could not find it after an hour of looking. Anyway, I would say "confirmed". The plot twist is that still, almost no one will get it. Or should we start to say "can't" get it?
There's actually a ton of evidence that cryptocurrency is a big global-scale Intelligence project, but I always thought this particular piece of the puzzle was vitally important. I mean, if someone doesn't get this, they are NOT going to get any of the other stuff.
Thanks!
In my experience, people who only speak English are among the crappiest at translation from foreign languages to English, no offense, it's just how it is.
This is because you can't just take words out of context from any language and translate them into English and expect a correct translation. Other languages use a completely different set of grammatical rules, words are usually put in a different order and similar.
I've seen Goolag translate many times twist the meaning of a sentence into the complete opposite of what it really means.
yeah I get what you’re saying but that’s still what it means, source: japanese dude. lol.
side note english is a horribly watered down language, like the word “believe” doesn’t mean “to think”, it means “to be doing, taking action, action mirroring what you think”.
Seems like a far fetched theory tho letting people call them out that easily, why? what's their gain from it?
If they have anything to do with it, and I'm not saying that may not be the case. It's morel likely to be similar to the TOR project. TOR was created by the NSA in order to let CIA agents fuck around anonymously on the internet.
Problem is, if only CIA uses TOR anyone who see's a TOR visitor would know it's a CIA agent which ruins the whole point of anonymity. That's why they made TOR open source, and allowed everyone perfect anonymity, because it was the only way for CIA themselves to hide in plain sight.
Pay attention to the open source part, if that wasn't the case then literally nobody would use TOR to get anonymity from the government.
After all, the government needs privacy and digital gold just as much as you do. The government doesn't control the banks and especially not the federal reserve. There's a conflict of interest there.
I made 30k at the peak, had to give 15k to the irs if you are wondering, knew it was a ponzi when I bought it. Unfortunately that’s how most “investments” work.
good points, I probably should have just called them “abc”. To me they’re all the same…corrupt entities, just different buildings.
what a glowie thing to say... the NSA is the worst of them all moron. Its like the big brother now. NSA spies and records everything happening on the internet. those large datacenters they have in Utah and elsewhere are under the NSA