This makes me think of the great enigma of our time, a question seldom discussed: how in the name of Christ did the likes of Al Gore and DARPA ever let the Internet get loose in the world?

I have my personal theory as to how, but no way to produce evidence for it. For any that wish to here advance the thesis that, "iT's A tRaP!", then how silly you were to have fallen into it with the rest of us.

None of this trouble for the Parasites--of which the article describes only a miniscule aspect--would be happening if the Net didn't exist. I've wondered how many of their servants were ritually sacrificed to atone for the error. I think we shall live to see whether that error proves fatal for the Parasites themselves.

asange has been fucked with for over a decade, not because he lied, but because he told the truth.

They want to own every verb and word, thought and concept. The data must be assimilated and recalibrated into whatever they say it is.

Until all they produce is compliance and slavery.

All they produce is disinformation. What is information, it is every idea, word, and concept. There is no such thing as disinformation. Information, informs, to assume something else is incorrect, it is disinformation. Facts are simply a popular opinion, turned into fact, or rule, etc. Of course they can become laws. Which is where there can become criminality. But more often being unfactual is simply an unpopular opinion. It's not an apple because no matter how crazy, you're calling it something else, incorrectly to a majority calling it an apple. Wrongfully, it has become disinformation. But you're still informing of another language, concept, idea. Can't have that can we. We might have the children thinking men can birth.

Until nobody has the God given rights left to challenge the absurdity of a popular opinion, or indeed innovate, they're simply being assimilated and programmed. They want to restrict your own choices and speech. Slavery. You should be able to choose what you consider informative within the reasons of both free speech and the laws upheld.

a) if the many consent to want or not want suggested information by the few; then the resulting conflict of reason (want versus not want) can be maintained by suggesting contradictions to suggested information; hence disinformation.

b) nature does not communicate suggested information; it doesn't idolize meaning by branding anything. What it does is moving everything inside; which senses perceive as communicated inspiration for responding choice to adapt to.

c) IN (within) FORMATION (formed through action); hence being formed reaction (life) to flowing action (inception towards death). IN (within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breathe) -ATION (through action) represents forms adaptation to enacted flow.

d) the "spread" represents flow (inception towards death) for all the form (life) within; hence both the inspiration to resist for the sustenance of life and the temptation to go with the flow towards death aka the want for suggested information or the need for perceivable inspiration.