The people who want war is reason enough for me not to want it.
(media.scored.co)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Many years ago when I watched his show, that douchebag globalist Fareed Zakaria posed the question: "How would you change the Constitution?"
I think he was fishing for the answer, "Let's just get rid of it!" But the question stuck with me. If I could only have one amendment to do the most good, what would it be? Took me years to think of it, but it's simplicity itself:
Any punishment up to and including the death penalty for warmongers.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); one represents the reacting form within the constant change of the enacting flow. CON (constant) STIT (set) -UTION (action).
Being moved represents the perceivable constitution (need); rules of behavior represent the suggested constitution (want or not want)...it's free will of choice to ignore perceived need (sustenance of life) for suggested want (temptation luring towards death).
Creeps willing to fight to the last drop of somebody else's blood.
Hillary's ass is the worst thing in that picture
Scenario...guy standing next to a pile of shit, while pointing at it.
Guy: "look guys; that's disgusting"
Guys; "then why are you standing next to it; while suggesting us to look at it?"
You may now exchange "pile of shit" with any suggested political party.
huh??? why is mark levin on there? pleease dont tell me he fell for this shit :/
Reason represents the want versus not want conflict; caused by ones consent to another ones suggestion; while ignoring to respond to perceived need.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); one needs to adapt to being moved by flow; not to what other form suggests one to do. The ignorance of need (perceived) for want (suggested) is being parasitically exploited with endless more suggestions, and WAR, noun - "contest between states (form), carried on by force" (flow) is being suggested to distract those causing the conflict of reason (want vs not want) with their choices (want over need) by suggesting them a narrative to shirk response-ability of choice onto.
From a different perspective...to ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information) represents the ignorance of everything (reality) for nothing (fiction); hence the sleight of hand..."War, huh, yeah...What is it good for...Absolutely nothing" by Edwin Starr aka ED (fortunate) WIN (gain (consent) by solicitation (suggestion)) STARR (radiating luminescence aka growth of comprehension).