Growing up...I never understood why people hated them so much. I was mystified. It didn't make any sense at the time and you couldn't discuss it. I understand why now and I'm willing to speak up.
At least put the fucking god damn date on it of when it was written.
Old school you'd be reading it in an actual journal with a publish date, but if you find a paper in the wild the only thing you know is it was sometime post-LaTeX.
What do you think is the reason they are hated? And do you think it is something integral to their religion that causes it? What's the deal? I have done so much work for good jewish families- they are what I wish Christians would be in so many ways. They raise their kids in wonderful communities, they stay away from the disgusting influences of the outside world. They live together in a real community. But yet so much of the degenerate things happening in our outside world, which they avoid.. seems to originate from them. Is it just a small few at the top?
I, too, have personally witnessed strong, pure, Jewish communities (Solon, OH for example). My interest in this is such that I need to experience firsthand and I saw what you saw. My thinking is, it is these individuals and their families who are sacrificed first, front-line. They are the "shield" behind which the S-F's execute their occult ideals. The innocents are always the ones who pay; you, me, these folks, we're just trying to live here...It's a complex and uncomfortable arrangement. If people would wisen up and acquire knowledge/wisdom, this would become self-evident. I know their representatives will see this.
Because as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); one represents the resistance "influence" aka within fluidity. Institute implies being within (in) setting (statuo); hence in response to it; hence in need to adapt to it moving life towards death; hence in resistance (form) to velocity (flow).
It's not that the few subvert everything the many build; it's that they suggest the many to build; while ignoring the fluid foundation they build it onto. The resulting trauma from all the shaped form being transmuted back to base; represents the opportunity for the few to feed upon the ignorance of the many.
In other words...life isn't outcome oriented; its temporary growth requires adaption (choice) to origin (balance). One doesn't need to build something; one needs to build in response to everything.
There is no "without" as form "within" flow. The foundation for temporary chaotic form represents ongoing flowing order. From the energy perspective...temporary resistance (form) within ongoing velocity (flow) aka the internal balance of energy (loss/growth).
Unending flow is a wash of ungrounded idealism
a) life couldn't be temporary if the motion from inception towards death wasn't ongoing. Look at a sinus curve...the temporary growth of the curve represents inception to life to death; yet the base-line energy has to be ongoing for the temporary sinus curve.
b) for the perceived to become the foundation for those within requires the growth of comprehension by adapting to perceived. Life cannot perceive its own inception and death; yet it can comprehend both; which implies life representing form within the momentum of flow. The growth of comprehension opens up more and more about the perceived foundation.
Within constant change; one can only ever make assumptions; hence requiring comprehension of perceived as the foundation to make assumptions about behavior within motion.
c) IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see] represents perceived inspiration; while idealism represents suggested information aka others suggesting you what to look at; which meaning to agree to; which label to put on it.
d) the "wash" represents ones lack of comprehending being the response to fluidity aka being washed away; hence in need to resist it.
Meh. So he basically wants to change the publication process to web-based, rather than continue relying on academic journals. I don't really understand why they are mutually exclusive. You could (and we do) use both.
"difficult to correct"
They even don't shy anymore.
"difficult to correct"
Growing up...I never understood why people hated them so much. I was mystified. It didn't make any sense at the time and you couldn't discuss it. I understand why now and I'm willing to speak up.
At least put the fucking god damn date on it of when it was written.
Old school you'd be reading it in an actual journal with a publish date, but if you find a paper in the wild the only thing you know is it was sometime post-LaTeX.
What do you think is the reason they are hated? And do you think it is something integral to their religion that causes it? What's the deal? I have done so much work for good jewish families- they are what I wish Christians would be in so many ways. They raise their kids in wonderful communities, they stay away from the disgusting influences of the outside world. They live together in a real community. But yet so much of the degenerate things happening in our outside world, which they avoid.. seems to originate from them. Is it just a small few at the top?
Quick answer: https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/10/the-influence-of-sabbatian-frankism-on-the-world/
I, too, have personally witnessed strong, pure, Jewish communities (Solon, OH for example). My interest in this is such that I need to experience firsthand and I saw what you saw. My thinking is, it is these individuals and their families who are sacrificed first, front-line. They are the "shield" behind which the S-F's execute their occult ideals. The innocents are always the ones who pay; you, me, these folks, we're just trying to live here...It's a complex and uncomfortable arrangement. If people would wisen up and acquire knowledge/wisdom, this would become self-evident. I know their representatives will see this.
Any institution that obtains sufficient influence will be subverted
Because as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); one represents the resistance "influence" aka within fluidity. Institute implies being within (in) setting (statuo); hence in response to it; hence in need to adapt to it moving life towards death; hence in resistance (form) to velocity (flow).
It's not that the few subvert everything the many build; it's that they suggest the many to build; while ignoring the fluid foundation they build it onto. The resulting trauma from all the shaped form being transmuted back to base; represents the opportunity for the few to feed upon the ignorance of the many.
In other words...life isn't outcome oriented; its temporary growth requires adaption (choice) to origin (balance). One doesn't need to build something; one needs to build in response to everything.
Life without foundation is chaos. Unending flow is a wash of ungrounded idealism
There is no "without" as form "within" flow. The foundation for temporary chaotic form represents ongoing flowing order. From the energy perspective...temporary resistance (form) within ongoing velocity (flow) aka the internal balance of energy (loss/growth).
a) life couldn't be temporary if the motion from inception towards death wasn't ongoing. Look at a sinus curve...the temporary growth of the curve represents inception to life to death; yet the base-line energy has to be ongoing for the temporary sinus curve.
b) for the perceived to become the foundation for those within requires the growth of comprehension by adapting to perceived. Life cannot perceive its own inception and death; yet it can comprehend both; which implies life representing form within the momentum of flow. The growth of comprehension opens up more and more about the perceived foundation.
Within constant change; one can only ever make assumptions; hence requiring comprehension of perceived as the foundation to make assumptions about behavior within motion.
c) IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see] represents perceived inspiration; while idealism represents suggested information aka others suggesting you what to look at; which meaning to agree to; which label to put on it.
d) the "wash" represents ones lack of comprehending being the response to fluidity aka being washed away; hence in need to resist it.
And then ... a bigger socialist won . Because socialism always brings MORE socialism ... UNTIL IT IMPLODES .
FUCK THE SOCIALISTS !
They should do away with critical thinking while they're at it.
Don't Go Down the Rabbit Hole https://archive.ph/EsEsn
Meh. So he basically wants to change the publication process to web-based, rather than continue relying on academic journals. I don't really understand why they are mutually exclusive. You could (and we do) use both.
Because being "web-based" makes it far easier to censor. Not even a conspiracy, that's literally the talking point they're making.