Amazing....you push the same author's who a bunch of random YouTubers push.....I wonder why....maybe it's because they all claim Steinmetz and dollard are geniuses yet I have yet to see a single YouTuber actually apply anything....build anything....do anything except promote for them....sad really...
These geniuses are so genius they cannot teach a single person one useful practical skill.....seriously.. gtfo
Can you draft up a small circuit diagram which runs a small fan? And please share it. It should be simple enough if you have a familiarity with the physics. This would help me who better learns from examples.
I have the education requirements, the equipment I also have for simple circuits....so all I need is a diagram to build.....I have the materials, experience, skills and education....I can do it you tell me what to build....I see one link with diagrams that you posted...and the diagrams only discharge...... So....how about a better example please....I will make a video and report my findings if you provide a proper diagram ....
"perpetual motion" and being impossible due to the laws of physics
As temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) one exists within the momentum of perpetual motion; hence surrounded by temporary form. When trying to mimic perpetual motion; we ignore that all form used to mimic perpetual motion represents a momentary state aka within the ever changing moment(um) of motion.
As for the laws of physics...PHYS'IC, [Greek, from, nature; to produce.] That implies form produced by flow; hence the source of being moved representing the laws of nature for all responses within.
Temporary choice represents the center of ongoing perceivable momentum (balance), and the suggested choices by others can imbalance choice.
free energy
Free implies within dominance aka Momentum represents balance in motion; "free" will of choice represents the response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka choice (evaluation) within balance (value) aka temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing velocity (loss) represents being ONE within ALL; while implying that ALL is ONE in EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power".
The internal balance (self sustenance) of energy represents flow/form aka loss/growth aka potentiality/potential aka velocity/resistance aka electric/magnetic aka ongoing/temporary aka source/resource. The parasite sleight of hand (notice of liability) for this goes "all for one and one for all" or "there can only be one". Alone represents allegory for ALL(in)ONE.
over-unity
U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". That both represents you aka the ONE (form) within ALL (flow) and the ONEness of ALL (energy). Meanwhile; over/under represents balance (value) for evaluating choice.
The parasitic few suggest the word "unity" as the inversion of oneness...togetherness; which ignores that the flowing ALL self segregates into the formed ONEs. Why? Because perceivable differences in motion represents communicated inspiration required for individual self sustenance (growth) within collective destruction (loss).
The parasites suggest the ignorant many to seek order out of chaos as the inversion of temporary form within ongoing flow representing "chaos out of order"; hence the struggle to sustain self.
there's no need to say "it's fake" or "it's a scam"
As choice within balance (need/want); need represents perceived inspiration; while want represents suggested information. Those who fall for the temptation of suggested information are causing the want versus not want conflict (imbalance) among themselves. The parasitic few...
a) utilize suggestion of want to deceive the many to ignore need
b) suggest the resulting conflict of want vs not want to mean "reason; logic"
c) utilize choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which is in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law, to gain mass consent and thereby the power to define (suggestion); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) any suggested meaning for mass population control aka division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
d) both sides reasoning about any suggested meaning are ignoring that only those making the suggestion have the free will of choice to define; redefine and contradict the meaning; not those who ignore their free will of choice when consenting to want or not want suggested information by the choices of others.
e) true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; pepsi vs coke etc. represent rebranding of the same want vs not want imbalance; caused by ignoring to respond as choice to perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
based on real science
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka knowledge aka perceived inspiration; not suggested information (scientism). In other words...perceived (reality); suggested (fiction). There is only one perceivable source (flow) for all those perceiving it within (form).
That being said...before the suggested word (fiction) comes the perceived sound (reality). "Insane Person" represents suggested fiction; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) represents perceived reality, yet only free will of choice can discern itself within balance (perceived) or imbalance (suggested).
I am not like the other ones. I actually understand the laws of physics, where they come from, and how/why. Things are never impossible because the "laws" say so. That is a profoundly stupid belief and lays bare a depressingly feeble grasp on physics and science.
because anyone else who falls in this category already believes that
Belief has no place in knowledge, least of all scientific, and is directly across purposes to objective study of any kind (it's called bias)
I assure you that this technology is very real
No, it isn't. At least not what bearden the fraud was peddling. Change my mind!
If anyone is genuinely interested in learning more about the suppressed science or suppressed technologies that exploit it, ask me anything!
Have you built a perpetual motion machine following bearden's instructions? If so, how long has it been running without intervention or charging/fuel (that you add) of any sort?
Also, would you consider discussing this topic further on the community I created specifically for such discussions? This is a wonderful example, and its thorough evaluation and research approach(es) to validating bearden's claims could be very useful to others!
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here. I like excepticism but they should not doubt the method, they should doubt the experiment or the man who carried it out. This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here.
Badge of honor, if you ask me!
This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
I think the widespread scientific illiteracy also plays a large part in creating an environment where they can thrive. The people who attend these "conventions" are impressed by the bullshit, and don't know enough about science to evaluate it or criticize it properly.
I know Tom's site https://cheniere.org for a long time. It is a good collection of interesting devices and ideas, but none of that devices was reproduced successfully, i.e. for generating energy in self-sustaining mode. We have Russian site https://x-faq.ru/ with forum where ordinary people trying to replicate any non-conventional device from free energy and antigravity generators to medical devices and vortex things and people really discussing the problems and results of their real experiments. There are tons of information, circuits, photos, descriptions on any possible "forbidden device", unfortunately in Russian only. But if you really interested in non-conventional devices, especially if you going to replicate one - this is definitely place to visit, discomfort with online translators worth it.
His MEG device is not unique, many others have built devices which use the same principle.
That had been resolved very fast. Like with DIY YBCO liquid nitrogen superconductor. Initally results of DIY attempts was unstable, but since components was not expensive or hard-to-find, many people tried to reproduce it and quickly find all nuances, and now you could find numerous HOWTOs and even YouTube videos with every detail you need to know to get stable and reproduceable result in making your own superconductor.
So, since we still have no such HOWTOs, at least it is suspicious.
I tried to build his MEG using data from http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htmhttp://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm and got some kind of COP>1, but completely failed to utilize this COP>1 when tried to run it in self-sustaining mode. So, it is just a measurement mishap, not something real. Working free energy device absolutely should run in self-sustaining mode without any problems.
I tried with batteries too. Unforunately it does not charge one battery more than it drains another. So eventually I got two empty batteries. I also tried big electrolythic capacitors, to eliminate losses in batteries, but that does not work for me too.
IDK, there is more than decade passed, may be there was some breakthrough, but really, even if a trick with battery will work now, it is not a good idea - any battery have limited number of charge-discharge cycles, so you will have to periodically replace batteries with new ones. That does not look like free energy at all. It will be easier just to spend aluminium garbage to get electricity in the aluminium-air batteries. At least they always works, easy to build and give perfectly useable amount of electricity.
Please, do, I'm very interested in anything that have even a tiny part of some technology that allow us to get rid of energy yoke
As for free energy devices, I think the most promising are ones based one way or another on Cazimir effect. Effect is perfectly proven and reproduceable, and any math you use to explain it show a possibility of using that effect for energy harvesting. Also, seems that Cazimir effect is a key for warp-drives and force fields - latest from Harold White et. al https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09484-z
Didn't saw that thing, but it is a kind of MEG device. And prone to wrong measurements due to high frequency harmonics of pulses.
Simpliest device I saw was cheap china 12V1A LED power adapter. Measured input power was less than measured output. However, the secret was in extremely bad input filters and all my powermeters and multimeters just don't see sharp HF ringing on the edges of transformer pulses. That HF ringing carry significant part of power. Only after using oscilloscope on the input I found that "free" energy.
Interesting, that that kind of trick could be really used to cheat electric company, since electricity counters miss that HF part of input power too.
Mechanical counters are inertial, disc will not react to extremely narrow pulses, f.e. Electronic counters have ADC's that measure instantaneous voltage and current periodically and aproximate power by that points. If you will steal power between the sampling, that power will be unaccounted.
So, somehow that works, but, unfortunately not in the way we really need.
I think self-sustainability is a perfect marker for any free energy device. Say, by that parameter, joule thief circuit works perfectly. You don't need additional power source to collect free RF energy and transorm it to some useable form. As for MEG (and many other devices, from Bedini motors to some weird "torsion field generators") - I never heard anything about it running on its own.
Searl generator looks like something promising, but I don't know about any successfull replication, and AFAIK Searl himself don't want to disclose his secrets. There was attempts to replicate Searl generator even in Russian universities, I know about at least two attempts. But researchers published papers describing antigravity effects (mass of device become lower or higher, depending on rotation direction) and some power generation, but completely abandon that research and disassembled their devices, as revealed when other scientists tried to contact them about their research. Published papers was never replicated. IDK, scientists are not angels, may be that was just a hoax to get a publication, and that's all. It was not a rare thing in Russia at the time, and is not a rare thing in the whole world now. Tons written about "replication crisis" in science, mostly social and medical, but physics have it too, just at smaller scale. Really, I can't imagine a scientist who observed some completely unknown effect and very promising and practically useful effect in his experimetns and just droped the research.
Are there any devices that would be useful for longevity, rejuvenation, health and beauty? For example, there are some interesting new technologies using RF and IR for health and beauty treatments. Or Tesla's violet ray....
Try to check "Mishin coils" It is planar coils with specific winding feeded mostly with coil self resonance frequency, however some people use other frequencies, waveforms and even music to power that coils.
I don't know how it could be named in English and if there is some analog on the West, but try to use online translator on this Russian forum section https://x-faq.ru/index.php?board=174.0 You will find detailed instructions, diagrams, circuits and step-by-step howtos on building that devices.
Results are controversial. Mishin coils definitely somehow interact with humans, but whether it be positive or negative result, and on what things it depends is unclear. There are a lot of replication stories on the above forum, so judge yourself.
Here's another more in depth video on the history of electricity and its potential by Eric Dollard. I am intrigued by this idea that true electrical theory has been suppressed but I am too low IQ to properly get my head around any of it (I only have an IQ of 130). I don't understand it enough to be able to verify it to any degree at all - it may as well be magic to me - but I like the idea that there is much more advanced electrical theory. I can't rule it out, with the knowledge that pretty much everything I was ever taught in public school is either 100% bullshit or extremely watered down.
Negative resistor is real thing, easy to build from OPAMP and 3 resistors or even from two transistors and few resistors. There are also tunnel diodes that have negative resistance segment on their Volt-Amp characteristic (nearly all 10GHz and higher generators build using tunnel diode working in negative resistance mode). Just search it - you will get a lot of circuits and explanations of how it works. Problem is that negative resistor always consume more power to work than you will be able to get from that negative resistance.
Incorrect. He was a largely talentless moron and fraud. He never contributed a single thing of value to science whatsoever. He also stole a lot of money and time from a lot of people, and so was a common thief to boot.
Change my mind (by supplying something of value to science that he did contribute)!
Nope. We've contributed exactly the same, which is to say - nothing!
based on nothing more than your unwavering belief
As I said, I'm not like the others. I identify and destroy belief where it does not belong, like in knowledge, especially scientific. Like your belief in your guru bearden, for instance. I can't destroy it for you, but perhaps I can help you to identify it!
You are in fact the moron and fraud
Try to avoid ad hominem if you can. It is the last resort of the intellectually feeble. Attack the thought! Never the thinker!
as the models are provable incomplete
Models aren't science. As I said, I am not like the others.
I won't waste energy on trying to change your mind, as it's clear that your mind is made up
My mind is made up because of my research into bearden and his egregious fraud. Maybe I'm wrong? Maybe I've been misinformed? Maybe you have scientific proof that he's not a fraud? I have been wrong many times before, it will not be a new experience for me. Let me have it! Change my mind!
I am an earnest student, and not the strawman caricature that you initially lumped me into by mistake.
Sure thing buddy. You're feel that you're special and not like everyone else.
You misunderstand, I'm not like the other people you are mistaking me for. There are lots of others like me!
Your actions speak louder than your words.
This is a conversation. There are only words here. This is a perplexing statement in this context. Speaking of actions, why aren't you just supplying the science that bearden has contributed?
If you gain a complete understanding of something, you no longer have to resort to bind belief, as the knowledge speaks for itself.
If only it were so simple! So then you completely understand bearden's "science" and can replicate and explain it thoroughly? Lay it on me, brother or sister!
It's literally your ad hom that I threw back at you.
You misunderstand. We are having a conversation. There has been no attack against you, just your guru. And that "attack" was merely a fair representation of the facts and a conclusion of my research into their repeated and egregious fraud. As I said, I may be wrong! Help me see the error of my ways! I am sincere and earnest, and will not spit meaningless insult at you as you have done.
You've given me more than enough reason not to.
Just for insulting your guru? Why not clear his name! It shouldn't be too hard. Just provide this "science" you've been going on about!
If you want to know the truth, you can take the time to learn for yourself.
I have! I have listened to and evaluated the fraud beardon's "work"/"science". But as I said, perhaps I made a mistake! Perhaps I was in a bad mood! Maybe I didn't know enough about science at the time I made the determination! Help me out!
I don't really want you to change my mind (that's not something anyone can do), I want you - assuming you are interested - to share this "science" so we can evaluate it earnestly!
I only discovered him years after learning the science his devices are based on.
I'm intrigued! What science are you talking about?
stupid people already have all the answers.” – Socrates
It actually is that simple. - You
If you gain a complete understanding of something ... the knowledge speaks for itself. - Also you
Now, I am not calling you stupid - socrates is! I am an earnest student. Please share with me your depth of knowledge on this topic.
I have likewise spent countless hours researching this fraud, and his utter lack of scientific ability or product. If I am in error, I should like to know! Socrates is my favorite, and (evidently unlike you) I am never done learning (or correcting what I have mislearned in the past) nor have a "complete understanding" of anything!
Come on! Share the science! Don't hoard it all to yourself like a greedy dragon!
If I had the solution to the energy crisis, I would give it to you freely brother or sister! Don't leave me hangin'!
Bro I wouldn't bother arguing with jack. I've debated this guy before and all he does is pretend like hes some genius with more knowledge than you and never actually talks about his facts or even sources anything. Its just pilpul all the way down, and he's great at it too. He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it, he doesn't care about the facts or imparting knowledge to others, just claims he does. All he does is character defame.
I'm sure he'll comment and try to trick me into a debate too but the only way to win is to not play.
I pictured him with purple hair right from the start.
Honestly his tongue is more silver than some retard leftists would be. Literally mossad? Who knows. But I don't exactly just want to sit around and talk about shills all day, you know? They don't deserve that much thought.
That's true. Argument is for idiots. I only engage in rational discourse. If you think you are debating or in an argument when speaking with me, you are confused and pissing in the wind.
He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it
It saddens me that you may actually believe that. I have only the intention to share and to discuss, the "inflaming" happens organically. Take this thread for instance. The "insults" (actually valid criticisms and conclusions bore of research) were directed at beardon, but "TheScience" mistook that for personal attack against them :( Misunderstandings are easy, and communication is hard.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot and the point of it. I seek to discuss, not "win"! As I've said to you before, there is no judge and no audience - it is just us, struggling to communicate!
Any books we can download on this?
Thanks a bunch for the detailed response.
Amazing....you push the same author's who a bunch of random YouTubers push.....I wonder why....maybe it's because they all claim Steinmetz and dollard are geniuses yet I have yet to see a single YouTuber actually apply anything....build anything....do anything except promote for them....sad really...
These geniuses are so genius they cannot teach a single person one useful practical skill.....seriously.. gtfo
Lol...sure.you 'watched'.....not one had a proper guide to replicate....not one
Can you draft up a small circuit diagram which runs a small fan? And please share it. It should be simple enough if you have a familiarity with the physics. This would help me who better learns from examples.
Dillard's book is useless......grab a fucking undergrad year 1 EE book....read chapter 1....maybe 2....
Not that are worth reading, or have anything of value to learn within them - sadly, no :(
As temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) one exists within the momentum of perpetual motion; hence surrounded by temporary form. When trying to mimic perpetual motion; we ignore that all form used to mimic perpetual motion represents a momentary state aka within the ever changing moment(um) of motion.
As for the laws of physics...PHYS'IC, [Greek, from, nature; to produce.] That implies form produced by flow; hence the source of being moved representing the laws of nature for all responses within.
Temporary choice represents the center of ongoing perceivable momentum (balance), and the suggested choices by others can imbalance choice.
Free implies within dominance aka Momentum represents balance in motion; "free" will of choice represents the response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka choice (evaluation) within balance (value) aka temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing velocity (loss) represents being ONE within ALL; while implying that ALL is ONE in EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power".
The internal balance (self sustenance) of energy represents flow/form aka loss/growth aka potentiality/potential aka velocity/resistance aka electric/magnetic aka ongoing/temporary aka source/resource. The parasite sleight of hand (notice of liability) for this goes "all for one and one for all" or "there can only be one". Alone represents allegory for ALL(in)ONE.
U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". That both represents you aka the ONE (form) within ALL (flow) and the ONEness of ALL (energy). Meanwhile; over/under represents balance (value) for evaluating choice.
The parasitic few suggest the word "unity" as the inversion of oneness...togetherness; which ignores that the flowing ALL self segregates into the formed ONEs. Why? Because perceivable differences in motion represents communicated inspiration required for individual self sustenance (growth) within collective destruction (loss).
The parasites suggest the ignorant many to seek order out of chaos as the inversion of temporary form within ongoing flow representing "chaos out of order"; hence the struggle to sustain self.
As choice within balance (need/want); need represents perceived inspiration; while want represents suggested information. Those who fall for the temptation of suggested information are causing the want versus not want conflict (imbalance) among themselves. The parasitic few...
a) utilize suggestion of want to deceive the many to ignore need
b) suggest the resulting conflict of want vs not want to mean "reason; logic"
c) utilize choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which is in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law, to gain mass consent and thereby the power to define (suggestion); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) any suggested meaning for mass population control aka division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
d) both sides reasoning about any suggested meaning are ignoring that only those making the suggestion have the free will of choice to define; redefine and contradict the meaning; not those who ignore their free will of choice when consenting to want or not want suggested information by the choices of others.
e) true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; pepsi vs coke etc. represent rebranding of the same want vs not want imbalance; caused by ignoring to respond as choice to perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka knowledge aka perceived inspiration; not suggested information (scientism). In other words...perceived (reality); suggested (fiction). There is only one perceivable source (flow) for all those perceiving it within (form).
That being said...before the suggested word (fiction) comes the perceived sound (reality). "Insane Person" represents suggested fiction; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) represents perceived reality, yet only free will of choice can discern itself within balance (perceived) or imbalance (suggested).
I am not like the other ones. I actually understand the laws of physics, where they come from, and how/why. Things are never impossible because the "laws" say so. That is a profoundly stupid belief and lays bare a depressingly feeble grasp on physics and science.
Belief has no place in knowledge, least of all scientific, and is directly across purposes to objective study of any kind (it's called bias)
No, it isn't. At least not what bearden the fraud was peddling. Change my mind!
Have you built a perpetual motion machine following bearden's instructions? If so, how long has it been running without intervention or charging/fuel (that you add) of any sort?
Also, would you consider discussing this topic further on the community I created specifically for such discussions? This is a wonderful example, and its thorough evaluation and research approach(es) to validating bearden's claims could be very useful to others!
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here. I like excepticism but they should not doubt the method, they should doubt the experiment or the man who carried it out. This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
Good advice! Now, why won't you share this science so we can do that? Bearden has no science to share, I've already determined that.
But assuming my determination is in error, can you provide some science? Pretty please with sugar on top?
Badge of honor, if you ask me!
I think the widespread scientific illiteracy also plays a large part in creating an environment where they can thrive. The people who attend these "conventions" are impressed by the bullshit, and don't know enough about science to evaluate it or criticize it properly.
Is there a simple explanation for the truth about electricity?
Thanks. Interesting character, and a great explainer!
If some world saviour does not provide a detailed reproduceable HOWTO for DIY proof of concept of his world saving device, he is a fraud.
I know Tom's site https://cheniere.org for a long time. It is a good collection of interesting devices and ideas, but none of that devices was reproduced successfully, i.e. for generating energy in self-sustaining mode. We have Russian site https://x-faq.ru/ with forum where ordinary people trying to replicate any non-conventional device from free energy and antigravity generators to medical devices and vortex things and people really discussing the problems and results of their real experiments. There are tons of information, circuits, photos, descriptions on any possible "forbidden device", unfortunately in Russian only. But if you really interested in non-conventional devices, especially if you going to replicate one - this is definitely place to visit, discomfort with online translators worth it.
That had been resolved very fast. Like with DIY YBCO liquid nitrogen superconductor. Initally results of DIY attempts was unstable, but since components was not expensive or hard-to-find, many people tried to reproduce it and quickly find all nuances, and now you could find numerous HOWTOs and even YouTube videos with every detail you need to know to get stable and reproduceable result in making your own superconductor.
So, since we still have no such HOWTOs, at least it is suspicious.
I tried to build his MEG using data from http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm and got some kind of COP>1, but completely failed to utilize this COP>1 when tried to run it in self-sustaining mode. So, it is just a measurement mishap, not something real. Working free energy device absolutely should run in self-sustaining mode without any problems.
I tried with batteries too. Unforunately it does not charge one battery more than it drains another. So eventually I got two empty batteries. I also tried big electrolythic capacitors, to eliminate losses in batteries, but that does not work for me too.
IDK, there is more than decade passed, may be there was some breakthrough, but really, even if a trick with battery will work now, it is not a good idea - any battery have limited number of charge-discharge cycles, so you will have to periodically replace batteries with new ones. That does not look like free energy at all. It will be easier just to spend aluminium garbage to get electricity in the aluminium-air batteries. At least they always works, easy to build and give perfectly useable amount of electricity.
Please, do, I'm very interested in anything that have even a tiny part of some technology that allow us to get rid of energy yoke
As for free energy devices, I think the most promising are ones based one way or another on Cazimir effect. Effect is perfectly proven and reproduceable, and any math you use to explain it show a possibility of using that effect for energy harvesting. Also, seems that Cazimir effect is a key for warp-drives and force fields - latest from Harold White et. al https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09484-z
Didn't saw that thing, but it is a kind of MEG device. And prone to wrong measurements due to high frequency harmonics of pulses.
Simpliest device I saw was cheap china 12V1A LED power adapter. Measured input power was less than measured output. However, the secret was in extremely bad input filters and all my powermeters and multimeters just don't see sharp HF ringing on the edges of transformer pulses. That HF ringing carry significant part of power. Only after using oscilloscope on the input I found that "free" energy.
Interesting, that that kind of trick could be really used to cheat electric company, since electricity counters miss that HF part of input power too.
Mechanical counters are inertial, disc will not react to extremely narrow pulses, f.e. Electronic counters have ADC's that measure instantaneous voltage and current periodically and aproximate power by that points. If you will steal power between the sampling, that power will be unaccounted.
So, somehow that works, but, unfortunately not in the way we really need.
I think self-sustainability is a perfect marker for any free energy device. Say, by that parameter, joule thief circuit works perfectly. You don't need additional power source to collect free RF energy and transorm it to some useable form. As for MEG (and many other devices, from Bedini motors to some weird "torsion field generators") - I never heard anything about it running on its own.
Searl generator looks like something promising, but I don't know about any successfull replication, and AFAIK Searl himself don't want to disclose his secrets. There was attempts to replicate Searl generator even in Russian universities, I know about at least two attempts. But researchers published papers describing antigravity effects (mass of device become lower or higher, depending on rotation direction) and some power generation, but completely abandon that research and disassembled their devices, as revealed when other scientists tried to contact them about their research. Published papers was never replicated. IDK, scientists are not angels, may be that was just a hoax to get a publication, and that's all. It was not a rare thing in Russia at the time, and is not a rare thing in the whole world now. Tons written about "replication crisis" in science, mostly social and medical, but physics have it too, just at smaller scale. Really, I can't imagine a scientist who observed some completely unknown effect and very promising and practically useful effect in his experimetns and just droped the research.
Are there any devices that would be useful for longevity, rejuvenation, health and beauty? For example, there are some interesting new technologies using RF and IR for health and beauty treatments. Or Tesla's violet ray....
Thanks for all the info :)
Try to check "Mishin coils" It is planar coils with specific winding feeded mostly with coil self resonance frequency, however some people use other frequencies, waveforms and even music to power that coils.
I don't know how it could be named in English and if there is some analog on the West, but try to use online translator on this Russian forum section https://x-faq.ru/index.php?board=174.0 You will find detailed instructions, diagrams, circuits and step-by-step howtos on building that devices.
Results are controversial. Mishin coils definitely somehow interact with humans, but whether it be positive or negative result, and on what things it depends is unclear. There are a lot of replication stories on the above forum, so judge yourself.
That's because he was a fraud. Scientists publish their findings for replication! Especially when it is important and could save the world!
Yes, it is.
It's called "put up or shut up". Can you please just do one or the other? Pretty please?
+1 hear hear!
Here's another more in depth video on the history of electricity and its potential by Eric Dollard. I am intrigued by this idea that true electrical theory has been suppressed but I am too low IQ to properly get my head around any of it (I only have an IQ of 130). I don't understand it enough to be able to verify it to any degree at all - it may as well be magic to me - but I like the idea that there is much more advanced electrical theory. I can't rule it out, with the knowledge that pretty much everything I was ever taught in public school is either 100% bullshit or extremely watered down.
You mean for the first time in his life, considering he's made 0 developments up to now.
You are most welcome to prove me wrong by providing one such development!
Oh eric (and bsf), we miss you.
Meth got him.
Very sad :(
Saying that it could be so doesn't show how to do it. I doubt that Kron actually had any secret "negative resistor" component.
Negative resistor is real thing, easy to build from OPAMP and 3 resistors or even from two transistors and few resistors. There are also tunnel diodes that have negative resistance segment on their Volt-Amp characteristic (nearly all 10GHz and higher generators build using tunnel diode working in negative resistance mode). Just search it - you will get a lot of circuits and explanations of how it works. Problem is that negative resistor always consume more power to work than you will be able to get from that negative resistance.
That sounds like a transformer, If you hide the other loop of wire, a transformer looks like a power source.
Incorrect. He was a largely talentless moron and fraud. He never contributed a single thing of value to science whatsoever. He also stole a lot of money and time from a lot of people, and so was a common thief to boot.
Change my mind (by supplying something of value to science that he did contribute)!
Nope. We've contributed exactly the same, which is to say - nothing!
As I said, I'm not like the others. I identify and destroy belief where it does not belong, like in knowledge, especially scientific. Like your belief in your guru bearden, for instance. I can't destroy it for you, but perhaps I can help you to identify it!
Try to avoid ad hominem if you can. It is the last resort of the intellectually feeble. Attack the thought! Never the thinker!
Models aren't science. As I said, I am not like the others.
My mind is made up because of my research into bearden and his egregious fraud. Maybe I'm wrong? Maybe I've been misinformed? Maybe you have scientific proof that he's not a fraud? I have been wrong many times before, it will not be a new experience for me. Let me have it! Change my mind!
I am an earnest student, and not the strawman caricature that you initially lumped me into by mistake.
'Buddy' the slang of the lost argumenter.....
You misunderstand, I'm not like the other people you are mistaking me for. There are lots of others like me!
This is a conversation. There are only words here. This is a perplexing statement in this context. Speaking of actions, why aren't you just supplying the science that bearden has contributed?
If only it were so simple! So then you completely understand bearden's "science" and can replicate and explain it thoroughly? Lay it on me, brother or sister!
You misunderstand. We are having a conversation. There has been no attack against you, just your guru. And that "attack" was merely a fair representation of the facts and a conclusion of my research into their repeated and egregious fraud. As I said, I may be wrong! Help me see the error of my ways! I am sincere and earnest, and will not spit meaningless insult at you as you have done.
Just for insulting your guru? Why not clear his name! It shouldn't be too hard. Just provide this "science" you've been going on about!
I have! I have listened to and evaluated the fraud beardon's "work"/"science". But as I said, perhaps I made a mistake! Perhaps I was in a bad mood! Maybe I didn't know enough about science at the time I made the determination! Help me out!
I don't really want you to change my mind (that's not something anyone can do), I want you - assuming you are interested - to share this "science" so we can evaluate it earnestly!
I'm intrigued! What science are you talking about?
Now, I am not calling you stupid - socrates is! I am an earnest student. Please share with me your depth of knowledge on this topic.
I have likewise spent countless hours researching this fraud, and his utter lack of scientific ability or product. If I am in error, I should like to know! Socrates is my favorite, and (evidently unlike you) I am never done learning (or correcting what I have mislearned in the past) nor have a "complete understanding" of anything!
Come on! Share the science! Don't hoard it all to yourself like a greedy dragon!
If I had the solution to the energy crisis, I would give it to you freely brother or sister! Don't leave me hangin'!
Bro I wouldn't bother arguing with jack. I've debated this guy before and all he does is pretend like hes some genius with more knowledge than you and never actually talks about his facts or even sources anything. Its just pilpul all the way down, and he's great at it too. He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it, he doesn't care about the facts or imparting knowledge to others, just claims he does. All he does is character defame.
I'm sure he'll comment and try to trick me into a debate too but the only way to win is to not play.
Honestly, I insulted (not really, but from your perspective) beardon! NOT you! I have not, nor will I start, insulting you!
Factual statements that hurt your feelings, so you run away like a child.
If you encounter facts that hurt your feelings, just dismiss the messenger all together. Straight out of the commie handbook.
I'm talked to that dude. He's pretty smart. You seem stupid.
You don't act like an adult. You are acting like a gatekeeping child.
Boredom.
For you to accept that your behavior is the issue.
I wish for you to gain more iq and then realize you're projecting.
Honestly his tongue is more silver than some retard leftists would be. Literally mossad? Who knows. But I don't exactly just want to sit around and talk about shills all day, you know? They don't deserve that much thought.
You have a good one, though!
He makes you feel stupid?
That's true. Argument is for idiots. I only engage in rational discourse. If you think you are debating or in an argument when speaking with me, you are confused and pissing in the wind.
It saddens me that you may actually believe that. I have only the intention to share and to discuss, the "inflaming" happens organically. Take this thread for instance. The "insults" (actually valid criticisms and conclusions bore of research) were directed at beardon, but "TheScience" mistook that for personal attack against them :( Misunderstandings are easy, and communication is hard.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot and the point of it. I seek to discuss, not "win"! As I've said to you before, there is no judge and no audience - it is just us, struggling to communicate!