Bro I wouldn't bother arguing with jack. I've debated this guy before and all he does is pretend like hes some genius with more knowledge than you and never actually talks about his facts or even sources anything. Its just pilpul all the way down, and he's great at it too. He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it, he doesn't care about the facts or imparting knowledge to others, just claims he does. All he does is character defame.
I'm sure he'll comment and try to trick me into a debate too but the only way to win is to not play.
I pictured him with purple hair right from the start.
Honestly his tongue is more silver than some retard leftists would be. Literally mossad? Who knows. But I don't exactly just want to sit around and talk about shills all day, you know? They don't deserve that much thought.
That's true. Argument is for idiots. I only engage in rational discourse. If you think you are debating or in an argument when speaking with me, you are confused and pissing in the wind.
He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it
It saddens me that you may actually believe that. I have only the intention to share and to discuss, the "inflaming" happens organically. Take this thread for instance. The "insults" (actually valid criticisms and conclusions bore of research) were directed at beardon, but "TheScience" mistook that for personal attack against them :( Misunderstandings are easy, and communication is hard.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot and the point of it. I seek to discuss, not "win"! As I've said to you before, there is no judge and no audience - it is just us, struggling to communicate!
Bro I wouldn't bother arguing with jack. I've debated this guy before and all he does is pretend like hes some genius with more knowledge than you and never actually talks about his facts or even sources anything. Its just pilpul all the way down, and he's great at it too. He tries to "win" the argument by pissing you off and thats it, he doesn't care about the facts or imparting knowledge to others, just claims he does. All he does is character defame.
I'm sure he'll comment and try to trick me into a debate too but the only way to win is to not play.
Honestly, I insulted (not really, but from your perspective) beardon! NOT you! I have not, nor will I start, insulting you!
Factual statements that hurt your feelings, so you run away like a child.
If you encounter facts that hurt your feelings, just dismiss the messenger all together. Straight out of the commie handbook.
I'm talked to that dude. He's pretty smart. You seem stupid.
You don't act like an adult. You are acting like a gatekeeping child.
Boredom.
For you to accept that your behavior is the issue.
I wish for you to gain more iq and then realize you're projecting.
Honestly his tongue is more silver than some retard leftists would be. Literally mossad? Who knows. But I don't exactly just want to sit around and talk about shills all day, you know? They don't deserve that much thought.
You have a good one, though!
He makes you feel stupid?
That's true. Argument is for idiots. I only engage in rational discourse. If you think you are debating or in an argument when speaking with me, you are confused and pissing in the wind.
It saddens me that you may actually believe that. I have only the intention to share and to discuss, the "inflaming" happens organically. Take this thread for instance. The "insults" (actually valid criticisms and conclusions bore of research) were directed at beardon, but "TheScience" mistook that for personal attack against them :( Misunderstandings are easy, and communication is hard.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot and the point of it. I seek to discuss, not "win"! As I've said to you before, there is no judge and no audience - it is just us, struggling to communicate!