"People that are in power seeking a specific outcome want to shut debate down. They do this because power steps into the void when reason no longer exists and gets to define reality for you from up above. ... When everything is taken from you, the truth is the only thing you have left. ... and information becomes your most powerful weapon."
- Maajid Nawaz on JRE 1780 ~ 1:49:00
The current pandemic wouldn't have existed without the Internet. No lock down. No vax passes. No mandatory vaccines. The Internet is absolutely responsible. There has never been an easier mechanism of control. Never has there been an easier means of applying secular narratives and enforcing and adopting control.
Here on this topic read them. They still think it's their friend, it has connected them artificially. Into a closed Web. Too the point today its net is tighting quicker then at any other point in history. It literally wants to track your every move and monitor every word said.
Break your chains. But you won't.
The internet is also the only reason we know so much about them. We’ve never been in such a good position to remove ourselves from their bondage.
Information is power.
^^ I'm going with this take. The only reason I think they finally had to move everything out into the open was because it was the only option they had left. Noticing is at an all time high so [they] were forced to take drastic measures to maintain the control that they had. And if they can collapse everything just right, they'll have the best chance they're gonna get at ushering in the Great Reset.
We’re going to be saying that humanities revolution began in Canada.
Well, I hope so.
Know aka knowledge (to perceive) implies inspiration; reason (want vs not want) represents a conflict caused by consenting to suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration.
Before the suggested word (information) comes the perceived sound (inspiration). The parasitic few suggest the former to deceive the many to ignore the latter.
Their bondage aka choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law represents the response to our ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law. Choice represents the response to perceived balance (need/want)...not to the suggested choices by others: which causes imbalance (want vs not want).
The suggested bond (contract law) was industrialized by the parasitic few as religion (religio - "to bind anew"); while the perceived bond (natural law) implies being "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
In short...each one is bound to respond to perceived nature; not to the suggestions of any others within nature. Adaptation to perceived inspiration sustains life (choice of need over want); while consent to suggested information tempts towards death (choice of want over need).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each one represents temporary resistance (form) within ongoing velocity (flow) aka power of resistance within power of velocity. To increase to power of resistance requires adaptation to the incoming power of velocity (perceived inspiration aka from within spirit); while struggling to resist the temptation of suggested information (from within form) by parasitic others who are trying to feed off your resistance; for which they requires your consent by free will of choice to their suggested information by their free will of choice.
The ignorance of the many (choice of want over need) is being harvested by the parasitic few who simply suggest them to give it all away without resisting. All suggested information sucks your power of resistance dry until you die; while the internal struggle to resist the temptation of suggested information for adaptation to perceived inspiration, grows your resistance (life) to the velocity (inception towards death); hence adaptation for self sustenance as choice within balance.
You are beyond stupid. Know so much about what. What can you do. Play silly what's it. If we keep guessing then they'll just assign another hydra. Cut off one head another even worse takes its place. The entire time it gets more invasive requiring even more control. As it layers into everything.
The comment you made, and the dumb bots behind you, read yourselves. You still think it's a solution instead of the problem.
But you sit here playing another dumb trucker?
That represents allegory for suggested information. Consent to anything suggested causes a conflict of reason (want vs not want) and each point of reasoning can be contradicted; which causes yet another separated conflict of reason; while burying those reasoning under endless suggested information.
The ignorance of need (perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information) builds the "tower of babel" aka babel (confusion) and babbel (incoherent uttering); which will always collapse upon itself until only the foundation remains aka perceived sound before suggested words.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); each represents ONE thing within ALL things. Everything represents the source for each thing within. The parasitic few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to deceive the many to ignore transmutation (implies out of everything); hence flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka ONEs transmutation out of base ALL.
It's not that the parasites infect and spread into everything; it's that the many ignore being within everything; for instead holding onto all the suggested things; which are in the process of being transmuted back to base everything (from form back to flow).
This is why the parasitic are being perceived as not creators; but destroyers. They aren't; but as long as the many ignore that creation doesn't exist within transmutation; so long can the parasitic few pretend to be the destroyers of all; while suggesting elaborate narratives (wars; pandemics; resets; replacement migration; famines; fall of civilizations; dark ages etc.) to deceive the many from comprehending what's actually taking them apart (their own ignorance to resist ongoing flow as the temporary form within).
this is why im here.
As the state leans into digital technologies, it becomes impossible to avoid them. Eg. Digital currency, digital id
If only there was an analogue digit to solve the issue of digital suggestions... https://pic8.co/sh/7bABMM.jpg
Until you're welcoming those chains. You're literally begging to be chained. See how easy it is.
The standard indigenous operating manual. Ply them with trinkets, until you captivate one, sending it off to be educated, afterwards, you can steal land and resources, or force taxes. If at any point they rebelled simply wipe them out.
Or let's just assume you're another moth. The light, bedazzled.
What's more effective: resistance or subversion?
Neither in a net.
But subversion would be in that scenario until obviously reeled in. The idea is to resist any net prior.
Prior to its control.
How does one "respond" to all perceivable reality? By choice. What does the internal net of suggested information by the choice of others require from you to work? Your consent by free will of choice.
When one consent to the suggested internal net of information; then one ignores the comprehended internal net of perceived inspiration. Suggested information; one can only understand; hence "standing under" those who suggest the information. Meanwhile; adaptation by choice to perceived inspiration allows one to comprehend it aka to compress perceived input into oneself for growth of ones potential.
Each one perceives all reality has to offer; yet lacks comprehension about what it means. Growing that comprehension (by adaptation to inspiration) allows one to become more and more proficient in sustaining self within all.
Your choice based consent to the suggested mechan-"ism" (a belief system) by the choice of others; is what represents your submission of free will to the free will of those suggesting it. You are being tricked into consenting to contract law (choice to choice); while ignoring that choice represents the response to balance; hence natural law (balance to choice). Life (form) temporarily exists as choice within the balance of inception/death (flow); which implies the choice of need (sustenance of life) or want (temptation luring towards death).
Being "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance (aka free-dom) implies that balance dominates choice; which is what in return allows the temporary use of free will of choice within the ongoing dominance of balance. This is how life can be moved from inception towards death (one direction); while having the free will of choice over directions within. Balance represents the momentum of flow (inception towards death) for the form (life) within.
Suggested his-story leaves out the main reactor (choice) within all reality (balance)...oneself; while suggesting actors for one to follow (towards death).
Choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law...aka ones choice of want over need; exploited by other ones. That's the self imposed chain that shirks response-ability (choice) within balance towards the suggested choices of others.
Thanks, and I otherwise agree. It isn't open source.
Ignoring that perceived inspiration represents the "open source" for all existence within; is what allows the parasitic few to suggest information as "open source"; while tricking the many consenting to the suggested, to enclose themselves within their own memory (mind); stuffed with suggested information (ego).
The source of form (life) represents flow (inception towards death); and perception of ongoing inspiration implies temporary access to the ongoing open source...unless ignored.
stupid people are the reason why satanists have all this control. not the internet.
Internet and satanism represent suggestions; reasoning (want vs not want) represents consent to a suggestion; while ignoring the need to adapt to perception.
What one perceives implies moving inspiration; while stupid (stupor; stop - "cessation of motion") represents the ignorance of perceived movement (inspiration) for affixed suggestions (information) by others.
In other words...choice gives each one the sole authority over self (control) within all perceived reality; unless ignored for the suggested choices of others.
Satan (adversary) represents an allegory for resistance, and form (life) within flow (inception) represents temporary resistance within ongoing velocity. Lucifer (the light bearer) represents allegory for the source of light (flowing inspiration); which allows those within (formed comprehension) to illuminate themselves through adaption.
jews are satan. Spiritual demons don't exist. They made those up to hide their crimes behind.
KEk. You sound high as fuck.
Question the origin of the words "jews" and "satan"; instead of reasoning (want vs not want) about the suggested meaning thereof?
Now question "are" aka you using choice to suggest what something is towards my responding choice. If I consent to what you suggest; then for me; you became the source that defines reality. You then represent the choice to define for others what perceived reality "is".
Your choice represents the response to already perceived, and suggesting to others what reality is; ignores the perceived reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information).
What came before...suggested word or perceived sound? If I go outside and listen; will nature suggest me "I'm a tree"; "I'm wind"; "you're a human"; "Kaitlyn Jenner is a proud and beautiful woman"? Or is the choice of others required to shape the perceived sound into suggestible words?
a) spirit from spiro - "to breathe" simply represents form (life) to flow (inception towards death) adaptation.
b) demon from dai-mon- "divider, provider" represents flow dividing (self segregation) and providing (inspiration towards comprehension; balance towards choice; input toward memory etc.) for the form within.
c) how can one within all perceivable existence define for others what "doesn't exist"?
d) don't represents "doing nothing"; which implies the ignorance of being moved within everything perceivable; hence a reaction to the source of action.
e) perception implies response to something; so how could one then perceive "nothing"? Where do you got "nothing" from? Who suggested this word to you? When will you question the source of nothingness and more importantly your consent to the suggestion thereof?
a) making up implies mass consent to the suggested information the few "made up". What about questioning the choice of consent that allows the suggestions of the few to flourish into a clusterfuck of self destruction for the many; instead of blaming parasites for responding to a weakness the host ignores to address...that weakness being ignorance itself?
b) what if mass consent to suggested "laws" of men; is what allows the parasitic few to wield law enforcement (force upon mind); while contradicting those very laws as suggested "crime"; which allows them to suggest rules of behavior towards the "free" will of choice of the many?
c) what if being moved represents the natural order aka the laws of nature for those temporary formed by the ongoing flow within? What if one represents the resistance (life) to the natural order (inception towards death); which parasites exploit by suggesting those who ignore to resist the natural order; to instead follow suggested orders? Notice any problems with mankind and "order following"? Chain of command ring any bell? How about communist party-line or mainstream media?
d) are the few really hiding anything; or could it be that the many ignore literally everything perceived for the suggestions of few; while those with eyes to see (comprehension grown by adaptation to perceived inspiration) can watch the whole as the ALL seeing I?
Can you use the internet without consenting to the suggestion thereof? Can you access suggested information without informing those who suggest it? Do suggested handouts from the military industrial complex towards civilian use seem to telegraph a top-down control grid; based on information harvesting?
You gotta have "faith" in God; right? Aka consent by choice to suggestion by choice of others; by those who suggest "in nomine" (in the name of). What does submitting to Satan; pledging loyalty to Satan; succumbing to Satan; falling for the temptation of Satan etc. imply? The same choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law aka the suggested inversion of the perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
What if it's you that ignores perceived sound for suggested words by others; which in return tempts you to judge those who suggest words; instead of adapting to that which communicates perceivable sound?
"Insane Person" represents suggested words; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) imply perceived sound. Which one do you choose to respond to?
No the Internet, read it, is the reason why stupid people relinquish control. Reiterate, enter, net. Look at its result.
jews abusing stupid people is why
No. The Enter Net, is why. It hasn't been easier.