"People that are in power seeking a specific outcome want to shut debate down. They do this because power steps into the void when reason no longer exists and gets to define reality for you from up above. ... When everything is taken from you, the truth is the only thing you have left. ... and information becomes your most powerful weapon."
- Maajid Nawaz on JRE 1780 ~ 1:49:00
Question the origin of the words "jews" and "satan"; instead of reasoning (want vs not want) about the suggested meaning thereof?
Now question "are" aka you using choice to suggest what something is towards my responding choice. If I consent to what you suggest; then for me; you became the source that defines reality. You then represent the choice to define for others what perceived reality "is".
Your choice represents the response to already perceived, and suggesting to others what reality is; ignores the perceived reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information).
What came before...suggested word or perceived sound? If I go outside and listen; will nature suggest me "I'm a tree"; "I'm wind"; "you're a human"; "Kaitlyn Jenner is a proud and beautiful woman"? Or is the choice of others required to shape the perceived sound into suggestible words?
a) spirit from spiro - "to breathe" simply represents form (life) to flow (inception towards death) adaptation.
b) demon from dai-mon- "divider, provider" represents flow dividing (self segregation) and providing (inspiration towards comprehension; balance towards choice; input toward memory etc.) for the form within.
c) how can one within all perceivable existence define for others what "doesn't exist"?
d) don't represents "doing nothing"; which implies the ignorance of being moved within everything perceivable; hence a reaction to the source of action.
e) perception implies response to something; so how could one then perceive "nothing"? Where do you got "nothing" from? Who suggested this word to you? When will you question the source of nothingness and more importantly your consent to the suggestion thereof?
a) making up implies mass consent to the suggested information the few "made up". What about questioning the choice of consent that allows the suggestions of the few to flourish into a clusterfuck of self destruction for the many; instead of blaming parasites for responding to a weakness the host ignores to address...that weakness being ignorance itself?
b) what if mass consent to suggested "laws" of men; is what allows the parasitic few to wield law enforcement (force upon mind); while contradicting those very laws as suggested "crime"; which allows them to suggest rules of behavior towards the "free" will of choice of the many?
c) what if being moved represents the natural order aka the laws of nature for those temporary formed by the ongoing flow within? What if one represents the resistance (life) to the natural order (inception towards death); which parasites exploit by suggesting those who ignore to resist the natural order; to instead follow suggested orders? Notice any problems with mankind and "order following"? Chain of command ring any bell? How about communist party-line or mainstream media?
d) are the few really hiding anything; or could it be that the many ignore literally everything perceived for the suggestions of few; while those with eyes to see (comprehension grown by adaptation to perceived inspiration) can watch the whole as the ALL seeing I?
Can you use the internet without consenting to the suggestion thereof? Can you access suggested information without informing those who suggest it? Do suggested handouts from the military industrial complex towards civilian use seem to telegraph a top-down control grid; based on information harvesting?
You gotta have "faith" in God; right? Aka consent by choice to suggestion by choice of others; by those who suggest "in nomine" (in the name of). What does submitting to Satan; pledging loyalty to Satan; succumbing to Satan; falling for the temptation of Satan etc. imply? The same choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law aka the suggested inversion of the perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
What if it's you that ignores perceived sound for suggested words by others; which in return tempts you to judge those who suggest words; instead of adapting to that which communicates perceivable sound?
"Insane Person" represents suggested words; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) imply perceived sound. Which one do you choose to respond to?
I've already told you you are not being too complicated. You're being too boring. That hasn't changed. You are the only one who thinks what you are saying is super interesting. I can't even read a sentence without falling asleep.
What if that's your want to be entertained by the suggested information from others? Hence; entertainment (enter tame mind)...how many suggested movies and games one has to consume to stay ahead of boredom? Does it work? Nope; only to the next fix.
Meanwhile; I can write so much; because I choose to adapt to what inspires me; instead of falling for the temptation to shape it for the entertainment of others. Try putting what I write about into your own perspective; while adapting to whatever inspires. Write for the sustenance of self; instead of the bottomless boredom of others...it works.
It's a need. I need you to stop loving yourself so much that you push everyone else away, or I can't invest my time.
Need implies want; which represents balance (need/want) for responding choice; which implies an ongoing movement (inception towards death); causing a momentum (balance) for the temporary form (life) within to have the choice to respond.
The word "stop" aka cessation of motion represents a deliberately suggested corruption of the status quo (being moved). That being said...you don't need others to stop anything; you need to shape the consequences of whatever others are choosing to do; by adapting to what inspires you to sustain yourself.
Whatever others are doing represents circumstances within momentum aka constant change aka the ongoing flow of perceived inspiration; which also tempts you to ignore resisting while going with the flow; because that's always easier than struggling for sustenance.
Love implies versus hate; so you view what I write through the lens of reason (conflict). What if that's what tempting you away?
Another aspect...as one within all; each of us is being differentiated out of the same source. The whole want of coming together ignores the reality of unity (from unitas - "the state of being one; oneness"). Choice exists alone aka ALL(in)ONE within balance. No other choice can choose anything for you without you ignoring perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
It's the parasitic few who suggest that unity means coming together; meanwhile one keeps wondering why the so called jews can be individually so destructive; while adhering to collective outcomes? Especially with all their internal strife. It's as simple as resisting to ignore the reality of being an individual ONE within a collective ALL. The endlessly growing identities of the so called jews represents the response to the many who ignore their own identity.
The issue with that is that you perceive others as investment opportunities; while ignoring that ALL already put the highest value into each ONE...evaluation. You don't need to invest in other evaluation; you need to respond as evaluation (choice) to value (balance) for the sustenance of self.
Furthermore; INVEST', verb transitive [Latin investio; in and vestio, to clothe.] - "to clothe money in something permanent or less fleeting". The layers of clothe represents your growth of resistance within velocity (currency); hence you representing the stock for investment (investing in mind).
Lastly; time implies the ongoing flow (tick; tick; tick...); yet you exist within its momentum aka the ever changing moment your choice needs to adapt to. It's not your time; it's your individual choice within the collective momentum.