"People that are in power seeking a specific outcome want to shut debate down. They do this because power steps into the void when reason no longer exists and gets to define reality for you from up above. ... When everything is taken from you, the truth is the only thing you have left. ... and information becomes your most powerful weapon."
- Maajid Nawaz on JRE 1780 ~ 1:49:00
stupid people are the reason why satanists have all this control. not the internet.
Internet and satanism represent suggestions; reasoning (want vs not want) represents consent to a suggestion; while ignoring the need to adapt to perception.
What one perceives implies moving inspiration; while stupid (stupor; stop - "cessation of motion") represents the ignorance of perceived movement (inspiration) for affixed suggestions (information) by others.
In other words...choice gives each one the sole authority over self (control) within all perceived reality; unless ignored for the suggested choices of others.
Satan (adversary) represents an allegory for resistance, and form (life) within flow (inception) represents temporary resistance within ongoing velocity. Lucifer (the light bearer) represents allegory for the source of light (flowing inspiration); which allows those within (formed comprehension) to illuminate themselves through adaption.
jews are satan. Spiritual demons don't exist. They made those up to hide their crimes behind.
KEk. You sound high as fuck.
Question the origin of the words "jews" and "satan"; instead of reasoning (want vs not want) about the suggested meaning thereof?
Now question "are" aka you using choice to suggest what something is towards my responding choice. If I consent to what you suggest; then for me; you became the source that defines reality. You then represent the choice to define for others what perceived reality "is".
Your choice represents the response to already perceived, and suggesting to others what reality is; ignores the perceived reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information).
What came before...suggested word or perceived sound? If I go outside and listen; will nature suggest me "I'm a tree"; "I'm wind"; "you're a human"; "Kaitlyn Jenner is a proud and beautiful woman"? Or is the choice of others required to shape the perceived sound into suggestible words?
a) spirit from spiro - "to breathe" simply represents form (life) to flow (inception towards death) adaptation.
b) demon from dai-mon- "divider, provider" represents flow dividing (self segregation) and providing (inspiration towards comprehension; balance towards choice; input toward memory etc.) for the form within.
c) how can one within all perceivable existence define for others what "doesn't exist"?
d) don't represents "doing nothing"; which implies the ignorance of being moved within everything perceivable; hence a reaction to the source of action.
e) perception implies response to something; so how could one then perceive "nothing"? Where do you got "nothing" from? Who suggested this word to you? When will you question the source of nothingness and more importantly your consent to the suggestion thereof?
a) making up implies mass consent to the suggested information the few "made up". What about questioning the choice of consent that allows the suggestions of the few to flourish into a clusterfuck of self destruction for the many; instead of blaming parasites for responding to a weakness the host ignores to address...that weakness being ignorance itself?
b) what if mass consent to suggested "laws" of men; is what allows the parasitic few to wield law enforcement (force upon mind); while contradicting those very laws as suggested "crime"; which allows them to suggest rules of behavior towards the "free" will of choice of the many?
c) what if being moved represents the natural order aka the laws of nature for those temporary formed by the ongoing flow within? What if one represents the resistance (life) to the natural order (inception towards death); which parasites exploit by suggesting those who ignore to resist the natural order; to instead follow suggested orders? Notice any problems with mankind and "order following"? Chain of command ring any bell? How about communist party-line or mainstream media?
d) are the few really hiding anything; or could it be that the many ignore literally everything perceived for the suggestions of few; while those with eyes to see (comprehension grown by adaptation to perceived inspiration) can watch the whole as the ALL seeing I?
Can you use the internet without consenting to the suggestion thereof? Can you access suggested information without informing those who suggest it? Do suggested handouts from the military industrial complex towards civilian use seem to telegraph a top-down control grid; based on information harvesting?
You gotta have "faith" in God; right? Aka consent by choice to suggestion by choice of others; by those who suggest "in nomine" (in the name of). What does submitting to Satan; pledging loyalty to Satan; succumbing to Satan; falling for the temptation of Satan etc. imply? The same choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law aka the suggested inversion of the perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
What if it's you that ignores perceived sound for suggested words by others; which in return tempts you to judge those who suggest words; instead of adapting to that which communicates perceivable sound?
"Insane Person" represents suggested words; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) imply perceived sound. Which one do you choose to respond to?
I've already told you you are not being too complicated. You're being too boring. That hasn't changed. You are the only one who thinks what you are saying is super interesting. I can't even read a sentence without falling asleep.
No the Internet, read it, is the reason why stupid people relinquish control. Reiterate, enter, net. Look at its result.
jews abusing stupid people is why
No. The Enter Net, is why. It hasn't been easier.
Nice. Entering into choice (suggestion of information) to choice (consent to suggested information) contract law puts one into the net of those making the suggestions.
You are allowed to be wrong.