Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

93
The CDC admits it has held back a large amount of COVID vaccine data so the public wouldn’t view the vaccines as ineffective. Are you paying attention yet? (twitter.com)
posted 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +94 / -1
18 comments share
18 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (18)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– GoldenRatioed 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

The narrative is, by design, shifting against the shot and those who pushed it. Mass Covid injections isn't the end goal- it's merely a stepping stone that must eventually be tossed, and the time for that is very soon.

Next step is panic and unrest by the fooled masses, ultimately leading to global financial collapse- paving the way for their Reset. All part of the plan. I remain optimistic that enough of the masses are waking up for their plan to fail.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– GoldenRatioed 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

That's part of it too. Once Americans get word of their accounts getting frozen a la Canada, it'll be a bank run that'll further the destabilization and accelerate the process.

It's kind of genius tbh

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Skyrison 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

"well...its not like we FORCED PEOPLE at gunpoint to take it or anything pfffttt"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BlokeyMcBlokeFace 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

This one small article contrary to the sea of others they've published telling us how safe & effective the stunning & brave vaccines are is just them building up some defense for the coming fan shittening. They'll point to this and tell us how honest they were throughout the entire debacle.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It's called a "limited hangout"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– icockmyglock 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

If you're telling me to "trust the science" and then holding back data for fear that it will convince me not to do what you want, are you sure it's the science you want me to trust?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– samsng2 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

When they mean "trust the science" they mean: trust the funny man on TV and do as told, don't think or look anything by yourself, be afraid and behave

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– regret_is_temptation 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

No, they mean trust the scientology.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Thisisnotanexit 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

u/#popcorn

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Agent777 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

So you're saying they are counting their decades long tradition of falsifying and withholding information?

How shocking!

Does anyone else find it amusing that they are called the the Center of Disease CONTROL? THey should also add the word spread CDSC.

Everything you were taught in school about how to spot a biased source of information (which we were all taught in school) when applied to the CDC makes it pretty clear that they are a biased source of information.

In so many ways, but they have a stated agenda to promote vaccination which absolutely qualifies them as a biased aource.

Every normy or blue pill when having that pointed out to them has a moment of realization that you can see on their face as they realize they can't argue against that and that it's correct.

That fact about them means, according to everything we are taught in school about biased sources, means that they can't actually be trusted, and that they will even go so far as to hide information in ncluding facts that counter their agenda and narrative. That's when you point out that their agenda and narrative have not changed regardless of the facts and conditions changing and point out because that in is because they actually have a mission and agenda to do something regardless of the facts and conditions surrounding that.

Do not trust their science.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Primate98 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

For the same reason, ordinary people should no longer be allowed to read or own a Bible. Are you a priest, qualified to know it's meaning? We are only follow the will of God, as given by those appointed to authority over us. Reading the Bible, or any other sacred texts for that matter, will only lead to heresy.

All hail Lord Gates, and his prophet Fauci (pbuh)!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– samsng2 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Concern about the misinterpretation of hospitalization data broken down by vaccination status is not unique to the C.D.C. On Thursday, public health officials in Scotland said they would stop releasing data on Covid hospitalizations and deaths by vaccination status because of similar fears that the figures would be misrepresented by anti-vaccine groups.

So basically when people read, analyze and think by themselves they might realize something is wrong so we better hide it

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BidenLikesMiners 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

how corrupt. shut it all down. the health agencies deemed themselves royalty to get to decide what 'valid' science for the peasants is. Disband them ALL

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jmichaelhudson 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

the amount of false premises required to get to this statement is staggering

oh, so they didn't have any data when they started injecting the entire population by every possible means coercion and threat?

NOW they begin keeping data from the public, clown world rising to new levels folks

they totally knew it was poison at the beginning, and the only way to keep that truth from being widely known is to erase the entire internet, so get ready for it

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Artisan 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I was absolutely amazed by how much data was held back until the majority of the world received the shots. Then they slow-walked out all the bad news, but only after nearly everyone was suckered or bullied into taking the vax.

mRNA Vaccine skeptics: It's experimental and it's causing clots and heart attacks. Media and government:. The vaccine is perfectly safe and anyone saying differently is a conspiracy theorist. Pfizer:. It sucks we can't make refugees take the vax because they could sue us, since they are country less so we are not indemnified.

Skeptics:. Show us the Pfizer trial data Pfizer and FDA:. You can't have it for 75 year, which coincidentally is the amount of time anyone who already had the vaccine would be dead. Oh, and by the way, we have the shots to everyone in the control group so you'll never know what the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines are. It doesn't matter anyway, because now government can prescribe medical treatment we'll just use CRISPER for our next vaccine and directly change people's DNA.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy