So you're saying they are counting their decades long tradition of falsifying and withholding information?
How shocking!
Does anyone else find it amusing that they are called the the Center of Disease CONTROL? THey should also add the word spread CDSC.
Everything you were taught in school about how to spot a biased source of information (which we were all taught in school) when applied to the CDC makes it pretty clear that they are a biased source of information.
In so many ways, but they have a stated agenda to promote vaccination which absolutely qualifies them as a biased aource.
Every normy or blue pill when having that pointed out to them has a moment of realization that you can see on their face as they realize they can't argue against that and that it's correct.
That fact about them means, according to everything we are taught in school about biased sources, means that they can't actually be trusted, and that they will even go so far as to hide information in ncluding facts that counter their agenda and narrative. That's when you point out that their agenda and narrative have not changed regardless of the facts and conditions changing and point out because that in is because they actually have a mission and agenda to do something regardless of the facts and conditions surrounding that.
So you're saying they are counting their decades long tradition of falsifying and withholding information?
How shocking!
Does anyone else find it amusing that they are called the the Center of Disease CONTROL? THey should also add the word spread CDSC.
Everything you were taught in school about how to spot a biased source of information (which we were all taught in school) when applied to the CDC makes it pretty clear that they are a biased source of information.
In so many ways, but they have a stated agenda to promote vaccination which absolutely qualifies them as a biased aource.
Every normy or blue pill when having that pointed out to them has a moment of realization that you can see on their face as they realize they can't argue against that and that it's correct.
That fact about them means, according to everything we are taught in school about biased sources, means that they can't actually be trusted, and that they will even go so far as to hide information in ncluding facts that counter their agenda and narrative. That's when you point out that their agenda and narrative have not changed regardless of the facts and conditions changing and point out because that in is because they actually have a mission and agenda to do something regardless of the facts and conditions surrounding that.
Do not trust their science.