Let's Talk FE
(imgur.com)
Comments (91)
sorted by:
https://imgur.com/a/T2kzW4m
Be sure to click for more photos, as there are over 50
It may flag it as over 18 content, but there's nothing NSFW whatsoever
I'm surprised you used imgur since its run by faggots. Use catbox next time.
Will do!
Thanks :)
Based and truth pilled. Do the Holocaust next please.
The last link is a 200 image dump of ww2/Jew topic images, put together after you asked for some Holocaust stuff
The pics are in no particular order
Holocaust it harder to illustrate through memes, and if you haven't gone down that particular rabbit hole yet, I'd say to check out a couple of the abundant videos available
Europa is popular, but its over 11 hours long; I've never actually watched it
Europa: https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/
I've seen Adolf Hitler vs the Jew World Order (3h40m) https://www.bitchute.com/video/2AuypcHCeC2m/
In the Name of Zion (6h30m) https://www.bitchute.com/video/cssXkCAPV3jY/
I'm about an hour into "the Secret Masonic Victory of WW2" https://www.bitchute.com/video/4OVRiyJqFrpn/
I'm not sure which would be best or where to start, and there will be a ton of overlap as they're all sort of talking about the same events
Everything is a long video, hours long, but even videos like this quirky guy giving a history lesson from a different perspective but you still come to the same conclusions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUyWmmWtcFM
Myron Fagan 1967 talking about the history of the Illuminati, and the CFR, etc https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4q1TXhW/illuminati-history-from-1967-myr/c/
Cole in Auschwitz, a young Jewish man who went on Donahue with his documentary after visiting the camps and interviewing the staff https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFA8XZBNLVM
If it's new to you, be prepared to get really mad and upset. Your heart will break for the German people and their allies who fought against the globalist Zionist demons.
https://conspiracies.win/p/141FAc8RJB/
Indeed! Let's all talk about FE!
Ama!
I guess the feds finally decided to work on the .wins. Flat Earth is a planted conspiracy designed to discredit forums by association. It requires a highly impractical amount of resources for a tiny gain.
NASA alone brings in over a billion a month in taxpayer money, and in return gives us some cgi pictures once in a while
If that’s what you consider a highly impractical amount of resources, I don’t know how to help you
Money aside, the point is to steer us away from God
They’re the synagogue of Satan
You’re either being disingenuous or you just haven’t awoken to the scope of their lies yet
I won't deny that Nasa is capable of producing some pretty fake shit, but you'd need to hide the truth from people who go outside. Every air traveler, every hobbyist astronomer, every trainee pilot, every long-exposure photographer, and everyone capable of launching a space balloon with a gopro (read: literally everyone with a stable middle-clasd job). All supposedly to turn people aetheist, something that evolution, modern science, and Internet activism have already done at .001% of the cost of hiding the world from the naked eye.
Go test the curve for yourself
Spot a distant landmark over water and then calculate how much curve there should be
No pictures needed
It’s neither a globe nor spinning
Look into it
So I can take a powerful telescope to the East coast and see Europe?
Unfortunately no, at some point you’re going to be limited by atmosphere no matter how big of an optical zoom you have
Im not sure how far that is but it’s likely in the range of a few hundred kilometres
We can use technology to see through the atmosphere with a laser or something but I don’t know really anything about that and can’t test for myself either
I've watched ships "sink" over the horizon as they travel to other continents. I've also observed the northstar not being visible while in the southern hemisphere, due to it being over the northern horizon.
Vanishing point
Perspective
These things are 101
Any FAQ flat earth video covers these obvious questions
We were miseducated.
The primary reason for both of those phenomena is not the shape of the earth, but the density gradient in our air.
I recommend watching, or better yet - doing, some demonstrations on light/lasers into density gradients to understand better the path the light takes from the distant sources (as well as why it stops reaching you, and where it goes).
Fair. I'm just pointing out how much cheaper and more practical tools can be used to achieve mass atheism. By dazzling people with wonderous discoveries, it is easy to sprinkle in lies to push agendas.
Operation avalanche, in point of fact! (Likely under the banner of mockingbird anyway, certainly to the same end)
You think the feds are just now working on the dot wins and it’s FE they’re pushing
How do you look at these 50 pictures and conclude that they’re all fiction
Amazing to me
As a flat earther, you should agree with me that any and all pictures alone can be faked and shopped
Okay then look at the fucking napkin picture and have you ever seen a crumpled up piece of paper or napkin before?
Did gravity pull it flat against the ground/surface?
No?
Or have you ever witnessed smoke rising from a fire?
Why doesn’t gravity pull the smoke down to the ground?
Or why doesn’t the earths supposed 1600 kmh spin at the equator effect the smoke column?
It’s like a half Km per second
No pictures needed
Just use your brain
The material strength of the napkin in crumpled form is greater than the force of gravity. Same reason we don't pancake against the ground
Air has mass and exerts force. Smoke in a vaccume would indeed fall to the ground, but in the natural atmosphere, sufficieny light particles get carried by air currents. In the case of fire, the hotter and less dense air travels upward, carrying the smoke along with it while the cooler air fills in the space below.
Speed is relative. If you've ever travelled on a plane or train, you'd know that you can be travelling 100s of miles per hour without feeling anything. The air inside the cabin/train car has accelerated to the same speed as the vehicle and you, so there is no wind knocking you down.
The atmosphere is the same. Through influence from the spinning earth, the air has accelerated to be in equibrium with the earth, give or take based on weather patterns. Recall above that smoke is carried by the air.
Even in a vaccume, if one observed an object get launched from earth into the sky (for instance, a stomp rocket), the initial forces on the object pre-launch bring the object in equibrium with the earth's rotation, bringing the object to a seemingly standstill to an observer also standing on earth. At launch, the only additional forces on the object are those exerted by the launcher pointing away from earth, so as the object leaves earth, it still stays relatively inline with the ground because no forces have been exerted to counter the object's sideways motion.
I am genuinely curious, if not gravity, what to you call the force that pulls a ball to the ground when you let go of it, or keeps you from falling into the sky when you jump?
Gravity is strong enough to hold trillions of gallons of water snug against a violently spinning globe but the napkin overpowers it
Amazing. Amazing that you believe this.
Do you know what cognitive dissonance is?
“What pulls things to the ground then?”
HAVE YOU HEARD OF DENSITY BEFORE
AND FUCKING INERTIA?! IS IT INERTIA CARRYING THE BIRD ALONG WITH THE VIOLENTLY SPINNING EARTH AS THE BIRD FLOATS TO AND FRO, CHANGING DIRECTION AS THEY PLEASE
THATS NOT INERTIA
Very interesting. This seems like a plausible explanation if not for 1 thing: airless chambers.
Should density explain the gravity-like forces in our world, then objects in an airless chamber should float. They don't.
Everything I’ve observed during my lifetime contradicts what I’m told about gravity and how it functions
People who don’t understand inertia and their observable surroundings attempt to use inertia as the reason hot air balloons and birds don’t see the ground violently spinning below them
It’s near the bottom but consult the image in the link with the hot air balloon, airplane, and clouds
It’s not a picture it’s a concept; no fakery possible like the smoke stack picture
" material strength of the napkin in crumpled form is greater than the force of gravity "
"... is greater than the force of DENSITY " - corrected
" sufficieny light particles get carried by air currents " - this is, again, density and buoyancy. Not only is it not gravity, when we try to apply the theory of gravity to what we are observing, it doesn't make sense
" what to you call the force that pulls a ball to the ground when you let go of it, or keeps you from falling into the sky when you jump"
LITERALLY DENSITY
The answer, is weight!
Weight is an intrinsic and inexorable property of all matter, and in no way imbued by fictional "fields" that do not in any way exist (nor can they in any way be measured).
This explanation flies in the face of Newton's Laws, so I suspect you think those are fake as well.
Taking for granted that weight is a constant, does everything fall to earth at the same rate in a vaccume? If so, how much does the earth weigh, and why doesn't fall beneath our feet? Is there an infinite ground below us? Or some sort of bedrock like in Minecraft? If that's the case, how is it possible for one to traverse all continents and end up in the exact same place by heading in a single direction long enough?
An airplane can circle around the flat earth in a circle and appear to the compass as always facing in one direction
As for your questions about how much does the earth weigh and what’s below the earth, how could one possibly know this?
Answered your question re circumnavigation so answer mine:
Why has NO ONE EVER circumnavigated the earth North/South?
Not really, newton is just very badly misunderstood (due to intentional miseducation to make him an idol). Gravitation is not newton's idea, and he specifically asked that his name not be associated with it because of how stupid and philosophically unsound it was. You can read about it in his own pen if you wish.
Well, it is and it isn't. It is constant (or at least primarily constant in stable substances/atomic structures) in regards to intrinsic weight (weight without buoyant force), and varying in effective weight (weight with buoyant force factored in).
Excellent question, and a splendid place to begin.
Firstly, it is worth understanding that a vacuum is not an attainable thing in reality. You cannot devoid any area in existence of all matter - it cannot be done, even theoretically. Nature abhors a vacuum. So we are discussing partial vacuums only (i.e. chambers that still have, at least, gas filling them)
In partial vacuums, archimedes law (and drag) still applies. The answer to your question, is NO. Only things that are the exact same density and shape could possibly fall exactly the same way (probably for TOTAL exact, you'd need the volume to match too...) Of course, functionally the difference is so slight that our "rule of thumb" is typically adequate for use.
No one has any idea how much the world weighs, obviously.
Ah, the famous "out of phase" paradox. What keeps them from just falling through the floor now that they are "out of phase"?!
In science we try and explain phenomenon that ARE, not that you think OUGHT to be. Leave the scifi fanboy snark for hassling capt kirk (i.e. nitpicking fiction).
We don't imagine phenomenon that aren't and then contrive fiction for why it ISN'T (not in f*ing science anyway).
The world doesn't fall beneath our feet. So we have no need to explain why it should. Does this make sense to you?
All of the matter is stacked on all the other matter. What is at the bottom you ask? Why it is turtles, all the way down - naturally. When you ask stupid questions, get ready for stupid answers!
No one knows. The deepest we have ever drilled is around 8 miles. We haven't the foggiest what is down there, and anyone who says otherwise is deluded or lying.
Technically/pedantically, it isn't. Essentially no one can go in a single direction for an entire trip (even around their house, let alone the entire f*ing world). It isn't possible, and it isn't verifiable/validateable because of the challenges of motion through the world.
Now let's actually address your question in earnest. Circumnavigation is a large circle over a large plane (possibly bowl or other shape, but essentially certainly not spherical). You pass over the continents when they are beneath you, and you end up where you started when you complete the circle. No, you cannot fly over the south pole in order to get to the north one on the other side. In fact, there may be no (singular) south pole at all.
Ama!
Everyone in this thread is lost in minutia. Which is exactly how thread based conversations are designed to 'work'. It is how misinformation is created. It is why 'debate' is pushed on thread based forums, when in reality, debates can only take place in person. There is a reason the older format of forums disappeared, and that reason is the endorphin feedback loop.
Simply taking part in this thread, we are unknowingly taking part in misinformation.
Okay CNN
You've intentionally misquoted me, and ignored everything else I said that did not support the narrative you yourself wish to portray.
.
I’ve heard every insult before
They have no effect
Understand that I’m presenting easily repeatable and verifiable evidence
And you’re the one calling me stupid
Present some evidence and go from there
Based.
Keep killing it.
You are also supposed to progress beyond your kindergarten level understanding...
Ad hominem is the last resort of the intellectually weak. Out of incompetence and the inability to address the thought, they attack the thinker instead.
Do try to do better in the future. :)
Why are >90% of your comment replies attacks on our community members?
Disappointing
" You don't know why smoke rises.
You don't know why we can fold paper. "
Where did I contest why smoke rises?
I'm advocating for density and buoyancy, and where did I say heat doesn't rise?
I'm pointing out that gravity has nothing to do with anything, ever
It's made up, as part of the spinning globe heliocentric model invented and pushed by Freemasons
"fold paper"
... really?
I'm pointing out that the material strength of the napkin on the ground is enough to counteract DENSITY and DENSITY ALONE
No "gravity" involved
Hingus and I have talked a lot this week
Cruise my 18 months of post history and determine if I'm a human
and, as I said to Hingus, EVEN IF I'M A ROBOT, DOES THAT CHANGE THE EVIDENCE I'M PRESENTING
Give your head a shake
Earth is flat and non-rotating, based on a plethora of evidence
It's sad to me that so many still believe the lie, and so I spend time sharing information I find to be easy to digest and bring it here so people don't even have to go looking for it
Name calling and disingenuous arguments, yet never any spinning globe evidence that isn't immediately rebuked with easily repeatable and verifiable evidence
People are dumb, and so they'll read a well written response and it is in line with what the indoctrination institutions have peddled for generations and so they side with them and move on to the next thread
FE is real; I've presented easy to digest information in the form of images, with additional video links for further reading
Take a look at it sometime if you care about being lied to and stolen from
80% chance I utilized a bot to reply?
I'm 100% genuine, every single time
Hit me up with whatever bullshit tests you need to to confirm I'm a human or not
and, as I said the other day, EVEN IF I AM A ROBOT, DOES IT HAVE ANY EFFECT ON THE EASILY REPEATABLE AND VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE I AM PRESENTING?
Look into FE and discover you're being lied to, like we all are, to an even greater extent than we already know we are being lied to by TPTB
No one looks into FE for a couple of hours and concludes that it's still a spinning globe
You should care about being lied to and stolen from
I assure you, when engaged with properly - flat earth research is nothing of the sort.
It is used that way by the enemy however. It's a controlled opposition play for them, to advertise and create as many fools repeating obviously stupid things about it; so normies know not to evaluate it and, of course, to mock and deride any heretic that would dare question such dogma.
Ama!
Fuck off back to reddit you glow nigger faggot
the fed doth protest loudly
lol thanks for outing yourself as a kike shill.
Several of the images make an erroneous claim about day being night when on the opposite side of the sun. Which makes no sense, as the 24 hours of a day is determined by both the rotation of the Earth and the orbit around the sun. So night will always be night during the same 24 hour rotation regardless of position.
What they fail entirely to discuss is the night sky, as with the orbit will cause night to be facing four different directions during the four seasons, yet we can always see the same features all year round. Which only makes sense if we are on the top facing side of a much larger planet, causing up to always be up, no matter were you are in the habitable zone we reside in.
Thinking the night sky is proof is retarded. Its the same every years yet supposedly everything is always moving in a supposed galaxy. The great pyramids still line up with orion's belt thousands of years later.
Do you change the time on your clock 2 hours every month?
24 hour day every day
6 months from now, Earth would be on the other side of the Sun because we are told we orbit around the sun
They’ve tried to cover for it saying the days are only 23h56m or something like that, but then, no one has to change their watch 4 minutes every day, so both can’t be true
Thanks for checking them out!
If the day/night opposite side of the sun one isn’t great, how about some of the others?
I usually just stick to talking about the visible distant building/landmark/object that should be blocked from view due to earths supposed curvature, because I can go prove that one for myself without any doubt
Or the spin
I find the smoke stack example hard to reconcile with a spinning globe and so have to conclude we aren’t spinning at all
And it’s closer to the bottom but the one with the plane and the clouds talking about spin
Horizon raising to meet at eye level
The number of obvious disingenuous proofs offered by people like Neil degrasse Tyson and all of the nasa fails and the contradicting official pictures of earth
Crepuscular sun rays
Gravity
I linked some videos under relevant memes, timestamped when applicable
Hours and minutes are determined by the day. The day is determined by the rotation and subsequent sunrise. If you add a second rotation on top of the first, this shortens the day, and yet will still determines the length of the hour and minute. As hours and minutes are constructs created by man.
You have been tricked into believed a controlled opposition talking point, as it can easily be disproven.
The Lost History Of The Flat Earth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFvelQHn16k
ATLANTIS RISING(playlist):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-CjABSP2Ls&list=PLMYB1WEMkYL1iNvNWGw990Anm8uabLhYg
Secrets In Plain Sight - Volume 1 - Complete:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHhgLnIvuAs
You link me LHOE as a truth?
I like ewaranon but I’m talking real evidence here and he goes out into left field on LHOE
It’s also called the lost history of FLAT earth
Did you see his previous video, “what on earth happened?”
Again, we talk about crystal silicon giant trees and that the oceans are there because it was a mining operation but he still goes on to describe the earth as a plane
Forgetting the length of day memes in the link, how did you find the other 50 pictures
No way you look at all 50+ pictures and conclude they are all fairy tales
The napkin on the ground defying gravity?
Right. And by real evidence you apparently mean only things you can see, with no thinking involved.
No thinking involved?
Look at the pictures
They’re self explanatory for the most part
How do you reconcile the napkin picture
Or the smoke stack
You have to teleport through a hundred mental hula hoops to believe the fairy tales they sell us like the Big Bang and gravity
I’m presenting easily verifiable and repeatable evidence
“No thinking involved”
If you’re staring evidence right in the face and can’t see what’s going on then I guess it’s just not your time
Right. I was only critiquing one topic, which is something you are clearly incapable of dealing with, as you are all over the place. That topic being, the day to night cycle, and how time works. As for you, your writing style of single sentence paragraphs without punctuation is telling in itself.
I'm sorry, is your Chinese to Engrish translation software not doing the job?
Again, only things you can see, without thinking. Which is exactly how parlor tricks work. They are designed to work on the dumb.
You wish for me to debate, a picture of a crumpled napkin with a caption on it that reads "SO GRAVITY IS REAL? WHY ISN'T THIS ENTIRE NAPKIN BEING PULLED TOWARDS THE EARTHS CORE?"
Which leads me to believe that you are either here in bad faith, or retarded.
I’m presenting evidence aplenty and you’re worried about my punctuation
“Your obvious and easy to understand evidence is parlour tricks”
Wow
Fuck the picture, I already said
HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A CRUMPLED NAPKIN OR PAPER ON THE GROUND OR TABLE? DID GRAVITY PULL THE ENTIRE NAPKIN FLAT TO THE GROUND?
DOES GRAVITY PULL EVERY LEAF TWIG AND BRANCH TOWARD THE CENTRE OF THE EARTHS CORE OR IS IT MAYBE JUST DENSITY WE ARE OBSERVING
so fucking tired of you kike shills
Die in a fire
the napkin's material strength is enough to resist DENSITY, not gravity
gravity is a fairy tale
no one is contesting that density and buoyancy exists