AUSTRALIA: Hold the Bloodline!
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Looks like what's going on all across America. Oh wait... No it doesn't.
ppl aren't being put into camps in the US
Yet...
Americans shouldn't be fucking running anywhere. That's the problem. See, if you're running that means you're not fighting.
The stories of detaining the Abo's just to get hold of their land for mining is fucked up beyond belief. Hanging is literally too good for them.
Yo Axo, this pic is from November.
https://twitter.com/clif_high/status/1457370762499670020
thanks, that's recent enough! It was from a thread that included a video from the other day, I assumed they were the same event. Thx for clarification! Go Aussies!!
That's a lot of white t-shirts.
White is all you want in an Australian summer.
That's what I thought =]
Sorry, can someone quickly explain to me the "hold the bloodline" thing?
Props for these guys though! They should just destroy their government, not wait for the satanists to learn moral values. À la guerre comme à la guerre.
Look at the chosen flag under the police for freedom sign (also the peace sign aka the broken cross within the kike; circle)... https://pic8.co/sh/1Vl2Gw.jpg
What is that flag?
That would be the 1901 Federal Flag... https://www.theage.com.au/national/from-the-archives-1901-australia-s-new-flag-flies-for-the-first-time-20200901-p55rfh.html
Thank you for the additional information? Why did your original image impose a Star of David onto the six-pointed star representing the six states of Australia? That is not in the photograph of the protest.
I checked, and I found:
Australian Red Ensign 1901 - 1903, Australian Red Ensign 1901 - 1903 Design, circ 1901-03 https://victoriancollections.net.au/items/5bf625d021ea6f11b86d2ef6
History Of The Red Duster, The Peoples Commonwealth of Australia Flag. https://sovereignaustralian.com/history-of-the-red-duster-the-commonwealth-of-australia-peoples-flag/
For anyone who was wondering, the flag on the #holdthebloodline banner is the Australian Aboriginal Flag https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Aboriginal_Flag
Inspiration is what you perceive (choice of need); information what you choose to make out of it (choice of want)...want represents ignorance of need.
a) I simply outlined the star on the higher resolution flag to make it easier to see on the low resolution crowd picture.
b) ask yourself why perceiving a symbol (six pointed star) turned into reasoning (want vs not want) about suggested meanings thereof (star of david vs six states of Australia)?
While you're at it; how about adding the star of remphan; the masonic square and compass; the forwards attack triangle and the backwards defense triangle of martial arts and a snowflake to your line of thinking?
Ask yourself...how can ALL represent ONE and how can ONE represent ALL?
STATE, noun [Latin, to stand, to be fixed.] - "condition". Did the condition change since then? If so...why do we consent to call them affixed (states)?
Why are there different (six) states within the same habitat (Australia)? Does 2021 Australia seem to be a beneficial habitat for Australians? If not...what was used to internally divide their habitat?
Wealth aka value implies evaluation. How does one evaluate? By choice based response to balance; hence balance (value); choice (evaluation).
Now does balance represent the property of each responding choice, and does balance belong to choice if individual choice came out of the same balance?
"common wealth" represents a rhetorical deception that exploits the ignorance of wealth (balance) and ownership (a responding formed vessel out of flow aka choice out of balance) and this deception is what causes Australia to not belong to Australians (same with every other suggested nation).
a) the monopoly on blood? Red Cross (also look at the union jack) through rothschild aka red shield aka "protector of blood"
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...how does one "hold" what needs to be flowing?
I'm trying in good faith to have a discussion with you. Instead of wasting all that time insulting our intelligence, you could just tell me to fuck off.
What if faith (consent towards suggestion) is what causes the conflict between good (want) vs bad (not want)? Is faith towards suggestion needed or is response towards perceived needed?
Did you ever exist outside of "now"? What are you counting within the ever changing moment(um) of "now" and why are you doing it? Also; where would waste within energy go?
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand). What if intelligence can only grow within self...from perceived (inspiration); not from suggested (information)?
What if we cannot share (our) intelligence (understanding); but each ONE has a different understanding of ALL perceived?
Notice that "in"telligence; "in"formation and "in"sulting are all implying within aka as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); while perception [Latin percipio; per and capio, to take; to receive] implies from aka as form from flow.
-dis implies "lack of, not" aka disconnection; dishonesty; disenfranchised; disharmony; distrust; disloyalty; disallow; discard etc.
Ask yourself...do we exist without discussions? If so; then we coexist within a reality that defines us and to which we represent the choice based response to, and choice represents the response to balance; not to the imbalance caused by seeking agreement versus disagreement (discussion) among suggested choices.
What I'm doing is adapting to what inspires me aka adaptation to inspiration aka my choice of need over want. You respond to suggested information; which you see me as the source of, and which you try to reason about (want vs not want). When you respond to something suggested and lack understanding thereof; you try to get understanding from the suggesting source; but that doesn't represents grow of understanding; it represents submission to idolize suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration.
The majority of mankind is being fooled to ignore perceived inspiration (need) for suggested information (want vs not want). This is what causes all the conflicts; all the lack of understanding; and the parasitic few controlling the ignorant many.
You perceive a conflict; because you consented to the information you are reading; instead of using it as inspiration to grow your own understanding. The conflict is between your choice of wanting versus not wanting the information you're reading, and you may perceive that conflict as true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; offensive vs inoffensive; intelligent vs stupid; helpful vs distracting and so on.
All these conflicts (reason) represent a rebrand of your choice between want vs not want; and see me as the opponent within this conflict; based on your consent to want vs not want information; instead of the need to adapt to perceived inspiration. Under natural law; you're falling for the temptation to ignore need for want, and our species is ruthlessly exploited for that ignorance by the suggestions of others; who suggest us temptations (want or not want over need).
You read text on a screen; I'm not there with you; I didn't suggest anything to you; I didn't consent to any conflict with you; I use others as inspiration aka as an expression of the only reality perceivable. I resist the temptation to view others as the source of anything; but as ONE individual expression of the collective ALL.
That being said...fucking off represents your free will of choice and isn't defined by a suggestion from me.
To go back to the topic at hand...consider if flags aren't an expression from the people to express themselves to each other; but suggested idols from to the few towards the many to deceive them to believe they have representation among the rest of the slaves? Why? Because suggested representation corrupts understanding of perceived lack of representation.
Okay, now the masses need to run all over the police suckers and into the Parliament. they wouldn't have a chance of escaping because of the panic
Tentatar4