in good faith

What if faith (consent towards suggestion) is what causes the conflict between good (want) vs bad (not want)? Is faith towards suggestion needed or is response towards perceived needed?

wasting all that time

Did you ever exist outside of "now"? What are you counting within the ever changing moment(um) of "now" and why are you doing it? Also; where would waste within energy go?

insulting our intelligence

INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand). What if intelligence can only grow within self...from perceived (inspiration); not from suggested (information)?

What if we cannot share (our) intelligence (understanding); but each ONE has a different understanding of ALL perceived?

Notice that "in"telligence; "in"formation and "in"sulting are all implying within aka as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); while perception [Latin percipio; per and capio, to take; to receive] implies from aka as form from flow.

to have a discussion

-dis implies "lack of, not" aka disconnection; dishonesty; disenfranchised; disharmony; distrust; disloyalty; disallow; discard etc.

Ask yourself...do we exist without discussions? If so; then we coexist within a reality that defines us and to which we represent the choice based response to, and choice represents the response to balance; not to the imbalance caused by seeking agreement versus disagreement (discussion) among suggested choices.

What I'm doing is adapting to what inspires me aka adaptation to inspiration aka my choice of need over want. You respond to suggested information; which you see me as the source of, and which you try to reason about (want vs not want). When you respond to something suggested and lack understanding thereof; you try to get understanding from the suggesting source; but that doesn't represents grow of understanding; it represents submission to idolize suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration.

The majority of mankind is being fooled to ignore perceived inspiration (need) for suggested information (want vs not want). This is what causes all the conflicts; all the lack of understanding; and the parasitic few controlling the ignorant many.

you could just tell me to fuck off.

You perceive a conflict; because you consented to the information you are reading; instead of using it as inspiration to grow your own understanding. The conflict is between your choice of wanting versus not wanting the information you're reading, and you may perceive that conflict as true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; offensive vs inoffensive; intelligent vs stupid; helpful vs distracting and so on.

All these conflicts (reason) represent a rebrand of your choice between want vs not want; and see me as the opponent within this conflict; based on your consent to want vs not want information; instead of the need to adapt to perceived inspiration. Under natural law; you're falling for the temptation to ignore need for want, and our species is ruthlessly exploited for that ignorance by the suggestions of others; who suggest us temptations (want or not want over need).

You read text on a screen; I'm not there with you; I didn't suggest anything to you; I didn't consent to any conflict with you; I use others as inspiration aka as an expression of the only reality perceivable. I resist the temptation to view others as the source of anything; but as ONE individual expression of the collective ALL.

That being said...fucking off represents your free will of choice and isn't defined by a suggestion from me.

flags

To go back to the topic at hand...consider if flags aren't an expression from the people to express themselves to each other; but suggested idols from to the few towards the many to deceive them to believe they have representation among the rest of the slaves? Why? Because suggested representation corrupts understanding of perceived lack of representation.