AUSTRALIA: Hold the Bloodline!
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
What is that flag?
That would be the 1901 Federal Flag... https://www.theage.com.au/national/from-the-archives-1901-australia-s-new-flag-flies-for-the-first-time-20200901-p55rfh.html
Thank you for the additional information? Why did your original image impose a Star of David onto the six-pointed star representing the six states of Australia? That is not in the photograph of the protest.
I checked, and I found:
Australian Red Ensign 1901 - 1903, Australian Red Ensign 1901 - 1903 Design, circ 1901-03 https://victoriancollections.net.au/items/5bf625d021ea6f11b86d2ef6
History Of The Red Duster, The Peoples Commonwealth of Australia Flag. https://sovereignaustralian.com/history-of-the-red-duster-the-commonwealth-of-australia-peoples-flag/
For anyone who was wondering, the flag on the #holdthebloodline banner is the Australian Aboriginal Flag https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Aboriginal_Flag
Inspiration is what you perceive (choice of need); information what you choose to make out of it (choice of want)...want represents ignorance of need.
a) I simply outlined the star on the higher resolution flag to make it easier to see on the low resolution crowd picture.
b) ask yourself why perceiving a symbol (six pointed star) turned into reasoning (want vs not want) about suggested meanings thereof (star of david vs six states of Australia)?
While you're at it; how about adding the star of remphan; the masonic square and compass; the forwards attack triangle and the backwards defense triangle of martial arts and a snowflake to your line of thinking?
Ask yourself...how can ALL represent ONE and how can ONE represent ALL?
STATE, noun [Latin, to stand, to be fixed.] - "condition". Did the condition change since then? If so...why do we consent to call them affixed (states)?
Why are there different (six) states within the same habitat (Australia)? Does 2021 Australia seem to be a beneficial habitat for Australians? If not...what was used to internally divide their habitat?
Wealth aka value implies evaluation. How does one evaluate? By choice based response to balance; hence balance (value); choice (evaluation).
Now does balance represent the property of each responding choice, and does balance belong to choice if individual choice came out of the same balance?
"common wealth" represents a rhetorical deception that exploits the ignorance of wealth (balance) and ownership (a responding formed vessel out of flow aka choice out of balance) and this deception is what causes Australia to not belong to Australians (same with every other suggested nation).
a) the monopoly on blood? Red Cross (also look at the union jack) through rothschild aka red shield aka "protector of blood"
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...how does one "hold" what needs to be flowing?
I'm trying in good faith to have a discussion with you. Instead of wasting all that time insulting our intelligence, you could just tell me to fuck off.