What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
Balance represents the foundation your responding free will of choice exists within. As form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) you represent temporary finite within ongoing infinite.
Balance (momentum) represents the response of being pushed by flow (from/to aka one direction); while the responding form within balance has free will of direction; while being pushed from (inception) towards (death) aka life represents the in-between choice within balance.
Flow represents the natural order causing the balance for the responding choice of flow; while being moved towards death. Flow represents velocity causing momentum; within which form represents resistance to velocity aka choice within balance. Velocity/resistance represents loss/growth aka the internal balance of EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
In short...life is not outcome oriented; it's balance oriented, hence representing the responding choice of need/want.
Your perspective as form within flow is either in adherence to it aka being ONE in adherence to perceived ALL (choice of need) or in ignorance thereof (choice of want); which ignores perceived inspiration for suggested information by others.
In short...if you consent to believe anything suggested; then you look through the lens defined by the will of others to which you consented to; which in return corrupts your understanding of the one and only frame (ONE within ALL).
Potential represents growth (form) within loss (flow) aka ONEs temporary growth potential within the ongoing loss of ALL potentiality.
Good implies versus bad aka conflict caused by you consenting to the suggestion of "good" from others. Good vs bad represents the rebranding of want vs not want; while ignoring need. The inspiration we perceive represents the need for adaptation; while any information suggested to us represents the choice between wanting or not wanting it; hence causing a want vs not want conflict. This conflict is called "reason" and the few use suggestion (-isms) to divide (reason) the many for mass population control.
What you need to acknowledge; from KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceived inspiration; is your position as form within flow; as choice within balance; as potential within potentiality, as finite within infinite; as resistance within velocity; as magnetic within electric; as ONE within ALL; because that implies your growth of self discernment aka the who; where and why of your existence; which no other can give you; hence "self" discernment.
I can write it down; but if you believe suggested information (aka from within form) over perceived inspiration (aka from within spirit; spiro; to breathe aka adaptation to flow); then you don't comprehend perceived; but only what another suggested. You need to reestablish a direct connection as ONE to perceived ALL; while resisting the suggestions from other ONEs. How? Choice of need over want; inspiration over information, and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want).
Temporary growth out of ongoing loss aka a balance for choice; not a versus conflict between good vs bad. Morality isn't suggested sin (restriction of behavior); but responsibility as choice to balance (free will aka unrestricted choice needed for balancing as form within flow).
Great for both resisting the temptations surrounding oneself and to resonate with the ever changing moment(um); yet it also tempts one to ignore adaptation to perceived outwards for seeking inwards within accumulated memory (ego). Watch out for those who suggest paths outwards (progression; achievements; goals; hope etc.) and inwards (enlightenment; nirvana; bliss; cessation of motion etc.). Why? Because balance implies momentum between inwards (mental) and outwards (physical).
The parasitic few are suggesting both sides to deceive one to ignore balance in every aspect of reality.
Try being outdoors shortly before dusk; to perceive how other lifeforms resonate while awakening. One can perceive that growth caused by resonance with momentum and of course adapt to it. Learn/teach yourself to resonate with that perceivable momentum; which will grow your resistance to temptation of suggested distractions thereof.
Resist seeking (want) incentives for; question representing a response (need) to.
Question if breathing (from spiro; spirit) represents a response as temporary form (life) to ongoing flow (inception towards death)? What if you mimic continuous motion as choice (form); in response to the momentum (balance) of motion (flow)?
Question if good vs bad represents the rebranding of want vs not want (towards suggested information aka from within form); while ignoring need (in response to perceived inspiration aka from within spirit aka flow)?
Fabrication implies perceived (inspiration) shaped by choice into suggested (information) aka need/want (balance) for responding choice.
Yep; only lacking understanding of ones own position as finite (form) out of infinite (flow) aka as ONE (form) within ALL (flow).
Consider this...nature represents the source of sound; while those within represents insane (in sanus aka within sound) person (per sonos aka by sound) aka the responses to perceived sound aka the resound aka resonance.
a) how does one respond to all perceived? By choice based response to balance aka need (resonance) or want (dissonance).
b) what if choice can shape perceived sound into words, which can then be suggested as idolized meaning towards the responding choice of others? What if responding to suggested information (from within form) ignores perceived inspiration (from within spirit; spiro; to breathe aka adaptation as form to flow aka as choice to balance)? What if adaptation to inspiration is needed; while all suggested information tempts one to want vs not want it?
c) notice how the suggested meaning for "insane person" differs from the implied meaning of "in sanus + by sonos"? The former suggests a name; brand; idol for those within form, while the latter represents the attempt to communicate the function of flow. The thing is...flow communicates itself to all form within by simply moving us; which we perceive as inspiration. Responding to perceived inspiration a) grows ones comprehension of all perceived (temporary growth out of ongoing loss) and b) represents the only real communication aka resonance as choice with balance.
What if all suggested information represents spell-craft by the few towards the many? What if flow upon form represents the natural order, and the resulting communication represents the bond of offer/consent aka balance/choice? What if the parasitic few exploit ignorance of the bond by suggesting the inversion thereof aka RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] aka a bond that ignores balance/choice for choice/choice aka submission of free will to suggested -isms by free will of others?
I learned/taught myself to adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self; while resisting to suggest information to others. I only write so much because this represents me growing my comprehension by adaptation to perceived (aka the alchemical transmutation out of base ALL into ONEself).
What you call living represents consenting to behave as others suggest one to do aka participation in society (the beast system designed to domesticate free will of choice by suggestion; while racketeering the self destructive ignorance of those that consent; while using them within a chain of command hierarchy against those who stand in the way). The simplicity in what is suggested represents consent to progression aka going with the flow; while ignoring to resist as temporary form to the ongoing velocity of flow.
Life is not outcome oriented; because flow defines direction (inception towards death) for the form (life) within. Form represents a choice based response to balance (momentum) of flow.
As form within flow we each represent differentiated ONEs out of the same ALL. We are already distinct, and each of us now needs to grow self discernment thereof aka who; where and why am I? Another one cannot suggest understanding of self discernment to you; only your choice based response to perceived balance can grow your understanding of what you perceive; hence where you are; hence why you are. I can explain all these to you; that just tempts you to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information; hence choosing want over need; hence ignoring need for want, which in return causes ONEs lack of understanding of ALL perceived.
The basis you lack represents your lack of understanding the foundation for your existence aka the balance your represent the choice based response to. Before you can choose to want or not want anything anyone suggests to you...before that you respond as choice to balance under natural law by choosing need or want. Considering any suggestion (want or not want) already implies you falling for the temptation to ignore need (perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information).
From another perspective...as form within flow one exists within constant perceivable change; hence only being able to make assumptions within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. What one is missing is the understanding of the only thing that cannot change within constant change...the rules that define how change operates aka the laws of nature aka flow upon form.
Example...as life you cannot perceive your inception and death; because you exist within the momentum (balance) in-between them; yet by adapting to the moving behavior of everyone around; you can grow you understanding of your own position as life in-between inception and death; hence as form within flow; hence as ONE within ALL. This growing of self discernment represents balancing perception (input) and comprehension (response to input) aka communication by resonance to balance (momentum).
Lastly...allow yourself to question "making" aka creation out of nothing. Can you create anything without first responding to everything perceived? Can you shape a "new" thought without utilizing inspiration from everything that already exists?
Suggested creationism (out of nothing) represents the inversion of perceive transmutation (out of everything) aka formed ONEs out of flowing ALL and flow /form out of the ONEness of ALL (energy).
Temporary growth potential (form) out of ongoing loss of potentiality (flow). Energy causes internal flow (loss of potentiality); which causes internal balance (momentum); within which temporary growth is formed. Flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) causes friction; vibration; resonance all the hierarchic form we perceive as the response within it.
The river represents the ongoing that the temporary (choice) within its momentum (balance) can only comprehend by perceiving the consequences of flow upon other form. We cannot perceive flow while existing within its momentum. Only within momentum can we have a free will of choice over directions; while simultaneously being moved by flow from beginning towards end (one direction) aka free-dom..."free" will of choice in response to "dom"inance of balance.
From the alchemy perspective...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka ONEs transmutation out of base ALL (energy). Then again...this isn't textbook information one can learn from others; but needs to be individually grown as comprehension by adaptation to perceived inspiration aka the allegory of enlightenment; illumination; waking up out of the matrix etc.
Again question creation...can you create new movement or are you responding by choice of form to balance within flow? As form you can only mimic flow; yet as energy you are flow/form aka "ONE for ALL and ALL for ONE" aka "there can be only ONE" aka "islands in the stream; that is what we are; no ONE in between; how could we be wrong"...all sleight of hands for those with eyes to see by our parasitic dipshits.
This is for another level of understanding. As energy ALL is ONE aka the sleight of hand allegory "alone". You represent ONE within ALL; I represents ONE within ALL; each ONE within ALL responses for the sustenance of ONEself within ALL, and ALL (potentiality) self segregates into individual ONEs (potential) to establish self sustenance by internal balance of loss (flow) and growth (form).
ONE perceives differences only because they are needed to communicate inspiration to ONEs sense as to inspire ONEs choice to sustain ONEself within ALL. If everything would be the same; what would inspire ONE within to struggle for self sustenance? It's not I and YOU it's only ever ONE. You are alone aka ALL(in)ONE. The parasitic few suggest choice based agreements for togetherness under the suggested umbrella of unity; while to many ignore the following...U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness".
Correct; but your position as temporary form exists within the momentum of ongoing flow. Without momentum (balance); flow couldn't differentiate itself into temporarily growing form; it therefore couldn't establish growth out of loss.
The parasites suggest us to follow flow (to progress; to seek; to hope; to want etc.) They suggest us the inversion (flipping tables allegory) of reality aka seeking order out of chaos (rise of the phoenix allegory); when we represent temporary chaos (form) transmuted out of the natural order (flow). This is why life represents the struggle to grow (choice of need) within the temptation of loss (chocie of want).
a) counting (hours) implies choice based evaluation of value within balance. Time implies the mimicry of ongoing movement (tick; tick; tick...); which the parasites corrupt by suggesting affixed states (past; present; future). Consenting to those states represents the self inflicted trauma of perceived loss (past); hope/fear (future) and both together cause perceived stress (present).
The trick behind racketeering ignorance of movement is to use suggestion of affixed information which when consented to; is being upheld within ones conscious memory. That's where we are tricked to "capture the moment"; which then tempts us internally (ego) to respond to information based memory (remembering); instead of adapting to perceived inspiration from the ever changing moment(um) of motion.
The conscious memory needs to be used like a ram (temporary storage of information for ongoing adaptation to inspiration); not like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information until capacity). The former grows ONEs potential; the latter restricts it.
b) impossibility represents ONEs (growth potential) ignorance of ALL (loss of potentiality). You represent the finite potential being offered access to infinite potentiality to grow out of; which is also why the few require the many to stay ignorant aka to keep restricting the potential willingly by choosing want over need (falling for temptation of ignorance).
c) twice represents counting of ONEs; then suggesting the idolized meaning of two. The parasitic few have this one covered under the suggestion of dualism aka DUAL, adjective [Latin, two.] - "expressing the number two".
Good; bad; want; not want imply conflict. The former represents the suggested rebrand of the latter.
Up and down; headwater and delta imply coexistence of natural opposites within balance.
Want vs not want represents conflict of reason; while up/down represents implication (if/then); hence if one chooses to jump up; then it implies coming from a down and vice versa. Therefore...reason (want); implication (need). The talmud suggests to use implication over reason; while utilizing talmudic reasoning (suggestion of contradictions to both sides within the conflict of reason) to control and perpetuated every conflict from both sides. It represents a farming tool...suggestion (-isms) for division (reason).
Throw a ball (mimicking velocity) and you can perceive its momentum aka temporary holding form. There's your counted two (flow/form) within ONE ball...and then your son swings it out of the park; and what does he represents? The ongoing sustenance of ONEself...your shared self.
The becoming others represents energies inherent power (flow/form aka loss/growth) causing friction; vibration; resonance etc.)
Micro (small) implies choice of evaluation upon perceived value within balance; while cosm (words) implies being form in response to flow.
The deception of numbers is suggesting counts; while ignoring NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit reference to other units" aka that the reference for each ONE implies the collective ALL that designated itself into individual ONEs.
Consider being within energy...what are you counting?
Telling me this at the end of the post... https://pic8.co/sh/CMoF5B.jpg
The seed; the soil; the growth; the crops...now add choice based response to each of it (need/want) and there's the free-dom of balance.
Resisting energy (magnetic form) to velocity energy (electric flow). The momentum of velocity causes the self segregation; while transmutation of perceived inspiration into comprehended information allows electric velocity into magnetic resistance to prolong self sustenance.
Being temporary growth out of ongoing loss implies being limited potential out of unlimited potentiality. Growing comprehension by adaptation to perceived inspiration raises ONEs potential within ALL, and each ONE represents a representative ecosystem (seed) containing the collective ALL; yet with individual growth defined by choice of response.
That's the parasite inversion of progressing aka going with the flow aka utilizing the incoming energy to reach suggested goals; which are never enough or always out of reach; while only death remains as the outcome for life. Suggested hope is how the parasites keep their slaves chasing towards death anyway.
Consider balance by choice as resistance within velocity...when suggesting information you tempt the resisting form of others to want or not want to consent to it; for which he ignores the need to resist ongoing velocity. Whatever you suggest will corrupt others until they make the choice of inspiration (need) over information (want).
It took me nearly a decade to allow myself to question the laws of nature without the religious connotations, and when it happened it was just me choosing to not ignore needed inspiration for wanted information anymore. There was nobody to blame but myself; and whatever others would throw at me wouldn't penetrate my free will of choice.
What changes others is inspiration; but one cannot suggest it to them; one needs to represent it aka growing oneself inspires others to adapt to inspiration; instead of ignoring to do so for suggested information. This is why the parasitic few have to utilize the mainstream media as the middle men for suggested information, an ongoing suggesting of temptation, and it doesn't even matter if wanted or not want as long as it gets responses.
Anyway; what works for me is to strip ignorance of tools to use; hence me boiling languages down to stuff like "flow/form"; because then one cannot hide behind suggested information from others anymore. The simplicity requires adaptation from their own perspective of understanding or naked ignorance; both inspire reactions; instead of hiding behind information.
It's a simple as us being moved; hence whatever we attempt to describe will find its level in motion. The parasitic few understand this and try to invert it by suggesting themselves as the authority of perceived movement; hence suggestion of currency; (river)banks; floating loans; liquidity; maritime admiralty law; piracy; owner; leader; citizen-ship etc. The use the spell-craft of suggested meaning as allegory for movement, and the consent of the ignorant many is what then allows the few to control all movements; hence causing REVOLU'TION, noun [Latin revolutus, revolvo.] - "circular motion" aka putting human responses into a hamster-wheel of ignorance; while flow is dismantling our less resisting form aka transmutation of ONE (form) back to base ALL (flow).
They use suggestion; choice and ignorance as ingredients for alchemy to distract the majority to ignore what the natural order is up to with its force of velocity upon our inadequate resistance to it.
PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. to love, and wisdom.] aka want of knowledge. Wisdom also implies wise (knowledge aka perception) and dom (dominance aka flow/form aka balance/choice). Therefore wisdom is within need aka the responsibility to adapt to perceived inspiration; while resisting the temptation to want (love) suggested information branded as "wisdom".
One needs to utilize sophos (wise aka perceived inspiration); while resisting the temptation (philo- aka want) of suggested -ology (aka suggested information under the umbrella of scientism).
Furthermore...concept; from CONCEIVE, verb transitive [Latin, to take.] represents the want of what's already there; while ignoring the need to adapt to it. We suggest concepts to each other; while ignoring that this system is balance based and therefore simply requires response to it; which implies the struggle for self sustenance to be about resisting the temptation to ignore responsibility of choice to balance for choices suggested by others.
Try to learn/teach yourself to acknowledge whenever others use suggestions to get you to consent to what they want; then resist to want vs not want (conflict of reason) what they suggest and instead point out the ignored collective need. This a) grows your understanding and resistance and b) makes the suggestions of others impotent. Watch out tho; they don't like to be disarmed of their main weapon (suggestion).
The main culprit for that represents Latin to Pig-Latin (English). They stripped all natural connotations out; filled it with rhetorical deceptions; numerical encoded it; perpetuate it for legalese and the one world language (through the internet), and use constant historical revisionism upon it to corrupt any attempts at understanding communication. English is pure reasoning (want vs not want).
On the flip-side...perceiving the changes and comprehending the origin (energy to flow/form to perceived sound to choice to suggestion) can be very inspiring to comprehend what communication is (resonance as choice to balance; not among choices).
Allegory of the cave.
Branding; idolizing in-formation as suggested meaning; while ignoring in-spiration as perceived meaning through movement. Everything anyONE says is in response to ALL offered aka out of the same source; yet it's offered towards choice; hence towards needed response and wanted ignorance. Can't be choice within balance without both; hence the struggle to not ignore responsibility.
The thing is...the other life-forms are way more efficient at this; while our majority still lacks to understand...HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] aka being animated (animal) form (human) out of flow.
Ask yourself why you define truth by nothingness (no more; no less)? Next question if nature offers false information to our senses or if energy contains false states? Then allow yourself to question what proclaimed truth implies for those within constant change?
What if truth is suggested (want); and lies represent the suggested contradiction thereof (not want); while we ignore need (change)? Does "I am" represent truth or simply a state within movement that is constantly changing?
In short...does movement have to declare "truth" to communicate inspiration to responding choice? Truth (want) and False (not want) represent suggested brands for a movement that doesn't require those within to declare it to each other; yet boy do they want to...
From a slightly different angle...consider "seeking" truth aka wanting outcome (death); instead of responding to origin (balance between inception/death).
Biggest lie? Suggesting the existence of truth.
It's when your consciousness gets off the leash to deliver inspiration after your thoughts were focused on responding to others. Instead consider to adapt to inspiration although your response; hence letting the consciousness roam; which a) keeps delivering inspiration until mental exhaustion and b) prevents the unexpressed afterthoughts. It's a skill you one can grow. When I press save I'm already done with adaptation and seldom tempt myself thinking about what was.
ONE represents the representation of ALL and borrows all others as source of inspiration or temptation for expression. MET'APHOR, noun [Gr. to transfer, over, to carry.]...the transfer represents perceived inspiration; transmuted by choice of response into comprehended information; yet that implies form out of ALL into ONE; not by suggestion from other ONEs.
From the energy perspective...ongoing electric velocity represents the power that sustains temporary magnetic resistance, and each magnetic one needs to struggle to tap the electric all to stay in form; while being moved by flow. Our "repeated" response as resistance to velocity represents accumulated voltage aka magnetic unit (form) of electromotive force (flow).
The internet represents the suggested inversion of the internal net of ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived aka everything is connected and the seed of ONE is growing outwards into the soil of ALL; with the consciousness tapping everything; while utilizing more and more comprehended roots to send inspiration back for growth...or for the choice of growth if not ignored for suggested loss.
The world wide web (DARPA NET) mimics all of this within suggested information; while using every tool to exchange 1 (perceived reality) with 0 (suggested fiction) aka everything with nothing.
The represents two natural opposites in coexistence with each other...the perceivable driftwood (form) and the comprehensible river (flow). Both together represent the balance for ones responding choice. Resist both holding onto the driftwood and drowning within the river and instead "keep surfing" (another sleight of hand) or "I'm pickin' up good vibrations...She's giving me excitations" aka adaptation (vibration) to motion (excitation) or Beach (form; female) Boys (male; flow).
Creationism (out of nothing); transmutation (out of everything). Destruction (loss aka flow); resistance to destruction (growth aka form).
ONE represents flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death). Life represents balance (in-between inception till death); not outcome (death). Both inception and death only exist within ongoing flow; while life represents the temporary form within. Life represents a formed sinus curvature (growth potential) out the flowing baseline (loss of potentiality).
"fast" aka tempo implies the temporary within the ongoing; hence ONEs status quo within ALL. Speed represents temptation while being moved; resistance within momentum represents responsibility. Young/old are predefined through flow; form represents the choice of self sustenance in-between.
As for corpses...blood to soil; corpses to compost and heads on spikes for inspiration. Besides food for worms (masters of soil); death represents a generator for other life; hence the parasites using their monopoly on blood accumulation; medical organ harvesting and the perverse burial industry to corrupt the use of corpses; they even utilize the chain of command to collect the corpses of other life-forms before the many can utilize them for growth.
Self restriction...inspiration or temptation?
About that...
Simultaneously it pulls (temptation) one to ignore resisting; because velocity represents more power than the resulting resistance within its momentum.
The connection represents energy; the current (flow) causing the things (form) represents self differentiation of ALL potentiality into ONEs potential for growth (form) within loss (flow) aka the inherent power of energy; it's self sustaining balance.
ALL is ONE (energy) within which ONE (form) grows in response to ALL (flow). Two (suggested dualism) represents counting others as ONE; while ignoring ALL. Everything represents ONE different part of the same ALL. Growth (form) requires inspiration; inspiration requires perceived differences within flow (loss).
Behavior of flow; comprehensible by responding form within; who only perceive the consequences of other form being moved. In other words...being within constant change; makes the behavior of what causes change the only thing that cannot change aka the comprehensible foundation for making assumptions upon perceived.
a) Dis- implies "lack of, not" aka ones choice to ignore perceived everything for suggested nothingness.
b) the ONEs representing the response to ALL reality; don't need to claim anything (they're tempted to want to); they need to utilize everything for the sustenance of self.
c) consider that each ONE perceives (through senses) ALL; yet that each ONE lacks understanding of what ALL perceived means. The suggested rhetoric "making sense or nonsense" corrupts us to blame perceived; while ignoring that comprehension is grown by choice based response to perceived (inspiration)...a rhetoric then followed by suggested information.
Stating that which expresses itself is what corrupts us to understand it, since we exist within that self expressing "law unto itself". The parasitic few suggest "law enforcement" to deceive the many to ignore that force (velocity of flow) implies the law for the responding resistance of form.
They also suggest the laws of men (rules of behavior for form); which corrupt us to ignore being "free" will of choice within "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom (unrestricted choice out of restricting balance), and furthermore they suggest the idolized meaning "natural law" under contract of religion (choice bound by choice through suggestion).
The main corruption of our understanding represents the corruption of perceived balance (momentum of flow) aka need/want for ones responding choice; to suggested imbalance (conflict of reason) aka want vs not want for ones responding choice.
Before one can choose among wanting vs not wanting any suggestion; one chooses in response to balance (need/want) under natural law. The whole suggested dualism spell is about the rebranding of want vs not want into true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; left wing vs right wing; humans vs animals; Christianity vs Islam; Capitalism vs Communism etc. There's no versus within balance; only imbalance within those who ignore balancing.
Consider nature representing ongoing; civilization representing suggested domestication of those within ongoing by ignoring that which moves for that which is being moved.
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced] aka form out of flow (transmutation)...not from other form (creationism). The waterwheel and dam were shaped by ONEs responding choice out of ALL offered reality.
The beaver doesn't worship the dam; he uses it for self sustenance by adapting to constant change aka balancing within momentum aka resisting the velocity of flow as form.
Because as ONE we are surrounded by other ONEs; hence excited and tempted to fall for their suggested in-form-ation; instead of the perceived inspiration through being being moved.
The real social union represents the ONEness of ALL (can only be comprehended; not perceived by the ONEs within ALL); while the fictitious society suggests to unite with others aka seeking to win the conflict (reason) of agreement vs disagreement with other ONEs; while ignoring ALL.
Essential (from essence; to be) Component (part of) implies being ONE within ALL aka ONE part of ALL.
How could they not if they already consented to think in suggested words; languages; idolized meanings; brands? Quite the conundrum...
With reason aka being internally tempted to reason (conflict) about the meaning of suggested words; hence the internal monologue (ego).
Consider being resistance; lacking adaptation to momentum (warm up); causing corruption of resistance (form). TRAIN, verb transitive [Latin traho] - "to draw along" has to be understood in the perspective of being (form) drawn along (flow); hence within constant momentum and with the responsibility to adapt to by choice.
I learned/thought myself from a lifestyle based on martial arts to resist the temptation to train for outcomes; and instead train in response to momentum. I train throughout the whole day as a maintenance tool for self sustenance.
Reason (want vs not want) implies perceiving reality as a conflict; hence others as opponents or allies; which tempts the want to change them. Those who ignore being changed (as form by flow); try to be the change they want to see.
The main deception for ignoring balance for conflict is the suggestion of outcomes (progress; achievements; prices; certificates; accumulation etc.) while ignoring the responsibility to momentum (balance). The few suggest "order out of chaos"; while the many ignore being "temporary chaos our of ongoing order". A fictitious inversion of reality as usual and all done by suggestion.
Want and not want both represent temptation aka flow tempting form by pulling it; so those who set a choice into ongoing temptation are being pulled away; hence perceiving the easier route to the needed struggle of resistance for self sustenance within the momentum of being pushed.
One needs to resist being pushed; while also resisting the temptation of being pulled. Resistance to being pushed grows resistance; while ignoring to resist being pulled represents loss of resistance. All derived from understanding movement.
As for convincing...to choose want of need represents ignorance of need (perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information). They are convinced by what others suggest them to consent to believe; while lacking the understanding of what's going on.
Information over inspiration. Flow supplies ALL; ONEs form gets tempted by what ONE shapes out of ALL aka "getting high by their own supply".
The sovereign (king) within form represents ONEs choice aka mental (crown) choice. To believe implies consent to the suggested idolized meaning of "king" and "crown".
Manage (control) ment (mind) requires response by choice of form to input by flow; which other suggested choices can corrupt. Leadership represents a sleight of hand for the ONE vessel (ship) out of ALL (leader). The water leads the ship; both captain and crew are shaping course within by choice of adaptation to water. Who has the leadership over a ship without water?
Hence comprehending to be (form) directed by (flow).
We are tempted to blame parasites (suggested information); which is based on lacking to understand parasitic behavior (perceived inspiration); which would inspire understanding of exploitation of host weakness; and the weakness of form within flow represents choice of want over need instead of need over want.
The parasitic few represent the response to the ignorance (want over need) of the many; and mass ignorance tempts ruthless insolence towards it as well.
OPPORTU'NITY, noun [Latin opportunitas.] - "a time favorable for the purpose" aka the one and only ever changing moment(um) aka the balance our choice responses to. The understanding of balance/choice makes every moment a perceived opportunity to respond to; but only the choice of need over want grows resistance to velocity to be able to continue balancing.
Climbing out of pitfalls can be a great opportunity to get inspired by awareness of momentum (balance) or tempt you to fall into the next; since you made it out of the previous one; which is where others will be tempted to try pungi sticks...
Aka using liquid (flow) and whetstone (form) to shape resistance by choice.
Irritate (wrath) aka EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.]; hence ignoring to be moved by aka being in response to being moved; while resisting that which tempts to move one away from responsibility.
Hope implies want for aka towards the temptation. Instead try staying within momentum by questioning your choice of response...inspiration (need) or temptation (want) aka what can I do with this instead of what can it do to me? Be aware of balance and stay in control over choice.
Understanding the whole still implies existing among the differentiation within; hence having the responsibility to balance by choice. Suggested Buddhism tempts ONE to seek becoming the ALL; but that ignores the point of being ONE aka experiencing the differentiated ALL by balancing as ONE within.
Existence implies being temporary within ongoing. Balance may represent ALL the value; but ONEs choice within represents the highest value...temporary evaluation of ongoing value aka free will of choice.
Media; from mediate (Latin; medius) - "middle". The middle of perceived inspiration and ones responding choice to it; represents the suggested information by others aka those who suggest a fictitious substitute to the mains stream of flow...
High (want) vs low (not want) represents your choice upon suggested information (MSM); plus the implied conflict (versus) of reason; while ignoring the needed inspiration from the real main stream (flow to form) aka perceived movement as inspiration to your senses to respond to by choice.
When you understand all of this; then anything suggested within MSM becomes the same choice of inspiration or temptation; which the added temptation of the whole chain of technology you consent to use while engaging with MSM. This is where transhumanism comes in with the agenda of 0 (suggested fiction) over 1 (perceived reality) by means of wanted technology. Something; something...smartphone zombies.
From the energy perspective...FRE'QUENCY, noun - "a return or occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals". The few understand frequency...look at the havoc the ongoing suggestion of the racism accusation is causing? Try asking them if racism represents the hate of others; then what's the term for loving your own? They are being deceived to reason about hate; while ignoring that no love alternative was suggested to them. Every race is accusing each other; while lacking any defense against miscegenation.
Next time you read about energy weapons...frequency of suggestion.
REB'EL, noun [Latin rebellis, making war against.] Question the differences between between rebelling against suggested information by other form, and resisting the temptation of velocity; of being moved towards death.
The parasite sleight of hand for this is one representing a "rebel without a cause" aka not war against others; but struggle within balance for the sustenance of self. Flow represents the cause; form represents the effect.
Suggested law represents the self sacrifice of ignoring to resist the natural order for consent to submit to suggested orders by others aka want over need aka ignorance over self sustenance. Flow generates; form degenerates when ignoring self sustenance within flow.
VIRTUE, noun [Latin virtus, from vireo, or its root. See Worth.] - "strength". ALL worth is within balance; ONEs strength represents resisting the flow that causes the balance; which implies balancing within value by constant evaluation (adaptation).
The root of virtue is vir - "man"; which implies the masculine aspect of velocity (electric) to the feminine aspect of resistance (magnetic).
How inconvenient are the suggested convenience stores these days? It's all about need (struggle) and want (temptation) and understanding the consequences of each (self sustenance/ignorance) aka responsibility as choice within balance.
The source-code (flow) doesn't have a flaw to find; everything is offered through flow (need); the form within tempts stealing (want); the exploit (ones advantage) represents choice of response, and the fault represents lack of understanding flawlessness.
Hacking tempts one to seek faults within suggested information; thereby a) falling for want over need and b) exploiting others who also fell for want over need; while perpetuating the suggested system of mass exploitation and helping those who suggest it to change the perceived faults.
Math is about suggesting problems; then use the solutions provided by those consenting to it to suggest more sophisticated problems. Meanwhile; the majority of those unable to solve problems gets dumber and dumber; since they are kept along by regurgitating the already solved problems. The foundation for that deception is the ignorance of balance for conflict (problem solving).
The only number that mattes within ALL represents ONE; for ALL is ONE in energy...math represents the suggestion to count ONEs over and over again to "unlock" ALL; while the path towards that goal is corrupting the understanding of ONEself among the majority. Hilariously wicked; yet once again a suggestion met by willing consent.
a) what one represents is resistance to velocity; so that's what can be cultivated (growth) or ignored (loss) aka growing potential (comprehension) out of potentiality (perception).
b) the self represents that which remains of form within flow aka the blood (individual self) within the shared bloodline (collective self). You represent the accumulation of all that was; the choice to respond to all that is, and the gatekeeper for all that will be aka not his-story; but yours aka of ONE within ALL.
Increased resistance (potential) decreases the potency of suggestions by others. Once you perceive need/want of any suggested information (by definition a want over need; hence real communication representing resonance as choice to balance); you will be surrounded by mental impotence; substituted by physical potency directed at you. If you point out their wants over the collective need; they get offended about you not wanting, and if you question need; then their wants feel ignored; because they lack understanding of the needs you talk about.
This is btw why the few attack children; because they lack understanding; yet adapt less restricted to inspiration unless domesticated by suggestion; hence being corrupted into the ignorant adults.
They aren't for want tempts more want and nothing is ever enough for those who ignore everything. When I point out ignored needs; then I do it as adaptation to inspiration for the sustenance of self...not as a pointed out information for others; but it's their free will of choice to perceive inspiration over information. When someone responses I can then bring two perspective into balance; which helps me grow understanding immensely. All of this here represents on the fly adaptation.
Teach/learn represents balance within ALL for ONEs responding choice; hence to teach self represents to learn for self and vice versa. Teaching others represents suggesting information to others; while tempting them to perceived you as the source to learn from; hence causing a chain of command under a false authority. That represents ONE trying to be another ONE; while ignoring to grow ONEself out of ALL. Both teacher and students are corrupting each other through idolatry (cult of personality). The students are corrupted by the suggested information; while the teacher is being corrupted by the power of wielding suggested information over others. Look at the actor/audience relationship...the audience wants the actor; the actor wants the stage without the audience. Hollywood destroyed its actors; while using them to destroy the audience.
Balance (need) over outcome (want) is the understanding required to deal with others. If you try to change others by suggestion; you cause imbalance, yet struggle to resonate with balance grows oneself; which in return inspires others to choose to change themselves...yet you need to resist wanting that beforehand; otherwise you corrupt your own growth. Balance cannot be tricked by pretending to not care for outcome.
Everything I've ever wanted...
Plato: "Socrates...wtf?!"
Aristotle: "interesting suggestion..."
Socrates: "what if I control you both and you don't even realize it?"
Defining implies choice; boundary for choice implies balance (need/want); balance implies ALL value for each ONEs choice of evaluation within; hence defining implying ignoring need for want to define as suggestion for others.
The particularity of it moving on; while you try to slap the brand of "truth" on it; while ignoring that your perspective is that of the temporary within the ongoing. Your suggested brand will die with you; while motion continues to communicate its inspiration through constant change to the balance within (momentum); a balance one ignores when reasoning about suggested true vs false brands.
It's the suggested term "true" that implies the conflict of reason against "false". It's the rules of behavior of flow (river) that doesn't change for those within. For example flow causes momentum (balance); which for those within implies choice based existence in-between natural opposites. That represents a rule that cannot change within constant change.
Understanding this leads to further understand the source of flow/form aka energy (internal power); which changes understanding of flow/form into loss/growth aka ALL ongoing potentiality / ONEs temporary potential within.
Your river perspective lacks understanding of the momentum the river causes; which represents the self differentiation of ALL flowing into formed ONEs within momentum. You understand the river as the source of the form within; yet not the balance (momentum) that separates flow/form; a balance causes by the velocity of the river causing a momentum that allows growth within loss.
Try watching underwater currents and throw balls while questioning momentum. As for form growing within momentum...rotate a bottle half filled with water and watch the temporary growth within the momentum you caused by your mimicking of velocity. Alcohols works...temptation tho.
a) knowledge represents perception.
b) each ONE perceived ALL; yet lacks understanding of what it means. Growth potential...
c) loss of potentiality within energy (flow) causes growth of potential (form); loss/growth represents the internal balance of energy aka the self sustenance for the ONEs within ALL and the ONEness of ALL.
d) understanding cannot be shared; it has to be grown individually...ain't that a bitch?
Ever (everything); never (nothing)...another suggested inversion.
STOP, verb transitive - "to put an end to any motion or action"... aka a suggested rhetoric that ignores ones perspective as being moved; hence the reaction thereof.
Trying implies choice; yet choice represents the response to balance; hence bound to form. Choice represents a limitation for the ONE within ALL; not for the ONEness of ALL; which represents self sustenance; hence inherent generation of power (energy).
Accomplish implies choice of want over need; hence ignoring ALL aka everything already existing (energy); for suggested nothingness aka creationism. Try to create anything new without using everything perceived as inspiration to transmute out of...
Can you breathe the inside "emptiness"? That would imply exchange of input. Emptiness is based on suggested fullness; while ignoring the ONEness of ALL (energy) aka "is the glass half full or half empty?" It's all energy and full/empty represents your choice upon suggested amounts.
The deception underneath suggested "0" is that the one suggesting it defines it as a substitute balance for ones consenting choice. Suggested "off" represents transmuting something from one position to another within "always on".
USE, noun [Latin urus.] - "employment of". That implies ONE employing another ONE within ALL.
What if the real balance represents everything (ALL) and the lack thereof within (ONE)? How could you perceive "nothing" when perception implies reaction to input of something?
The suggested something or nothing balance represents the 1 (perceived reality) vs 0 (suggested fiction) of transhumanism.
a) the normal state represents a system not branding anything with words
b) digestible for others represents lowest common denominator
c) redefining simply represents shaping perceived based on workflow potential.
d) neither have I so far any problems following your perspective; nor do my own children have a problem following what I write. They simple put aside what the individually lack to understand; after which they collectively talk about their individual perspectives; followed by me getting poked mercilessly...this is part of our home-school curriculum.
It's not about others not understanding you; it's about them not being restricted by self imposed beliefs through consent to suggested information. Children viciously adapt to inspiration if allowed. Learn/teach yourself to adapt to inspiration and let them view your attempts...monkey see/monkey do will do the rest (mimicry).
That ain't new; it represents your less restricted consciousness roaming through ALL perceived; while bringing inspiration from different sources back; which ever so often connect more and more of your previous understanding aka the internal net of ONEs growth into ALL offered through loss. Writers blockage is about wanting that inspiration; while desperately trying to recreate what inspired it. The key is staying within momentum (adaptation to inspiration) to take the consciousness off the chain. It's a skill one can grow and also diminish by ignoring to adapt to balance.
Justification of the same choice of want over need. ONE cannot own any other ONE; only use ALL offered or ignore it for pretended ownership; while suffering the consequences.
Consider everything aka the ONEness of ALL aka energy as the base for every transmutation within. Next consider if "no such thing" implies the choice within everything to ignore it for suggested nothing by the choice of others? Ask yourself...can one within all perceive nothingness; when perception implies response to input?
Standing waves represent form within the medium; from medius - "middle" (momentum) of fluid flow. Reaction as form to flow represents wandering aka hallucination). It's the suggested terms "hallucination and error" that we are told to believe represents mistake; false; which is based on the suggested inversion of reality aka seeking order out of chaos; while ignoring that temporary form (life) represents chaos out of the natural order of ongoing flow (inception towards death).
Ongoing velocity (loss) represents order; temporary resistance within (growth) represents chaos...which is why life struggles to stay within form; while being moved by flow towards death (transmutation back to base).
Consider fiction representing the choice to ignore perceived reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information); which is being upheld within conscious memory; causing stagnation within a system based on adaption (balance/choice)?
Soundtrack represents a suggested allegory for track (impression by movement) representing the source of sound for all the ones within. How do you corrupt understanding of being within the track that offers sound? By suggesting them to consent to you as the source for suggested soundtracks.
Lastly...the "real reality" implies the distinction between perceived reality (form) and comprehended real reality (flow). What's lacking is understanding of ones perspective as form within flow aka within the balance of motion (momentum). What you perceive (sound; light etc.) and your comprehension of what it really is (energy in motion)...you need to balance them.
The majority is tempted to ignore comprehended reality (samsara; be in this world; not of it; asleep within the matrix etc.); yet those who comprehend more are also tempted to ignore perceived reality (nirvana; meditation; drugs etc.). The ONEness of ALL represents energy; which the ONEs (form) within ALL (flow) can comprehend; yet energy processes flow/form for loss/growth aka internal balance aka self sustenance; which in return causes each ONE within ALL to have a response-ability of choice within balance.
Therefore...adaption to perceived reality grows comprehension of the real reality. Conscious participation as ONE within ALL can only exist within the ever changing moment(um) of balance; caused by the natural order. In other words...what your senses perceive represents the self differentiation of energy to inspire growth of potential (ONEs form) out of loss of potentiality (ALL flow).
Lack of comprehension caused by choice based response to balance aka want (from within form) over need (from within spirit) aka suggested information over perceived inspiration. The temptation we fall for is to believe that we respond to form creation; when its about transmuting out of base for the sustenance of self.
Example...the LEGOs you build are irrelevant; only the aspect of building aka your formed adaptation to flow is what sustains matter (form). Meanwhile; what you build (information) tempts you and others to want to hold onto it; which ignores that you don't need it for self sustenance; what you need is to adapt to inspiration aka to resonate with communicated movement.
Sounds are enticing; colors are pretty (wanted temptations); yet what one needs is the differentiated inspiration they represent. Adaptation to perceived differences grows comprehension of sameness.
Indicative aka IN'DICATE, verb transitive [Latin indico; in and dico, to show.] implies perceived inspiration as form out of flow. This is what one needs to adapt to; instead of falling for the temptation of others suggesting us what the indicated means (information).
Look at tadpoles within currents; who struggle within momentum for growth; usually while utilizing stones or side-currents to keep momentum aka to not be flushed away by the velocity of flow aka resistance within momentum for growth of form within flow. Believing this suggested information doesn't represents comprehending it for oneself by adaptation to perceived inspiration.
A great starting point is simple to take any object and start a list "what can I do with this object?" Fill it daily for 20 minutes or so and you will teach/learn yourself that you will never run our of inspiration to draw from that one object. Why? Because a) ALL is ONE in energy and b) the list represents your growth of comprehension thereof. You increased your potential by utilizing adaptation to inspiration from one object...now branch your perspective out into ALL perceivable reality (ripples on the surface) and understand that you can never run out of inspiration to grow from. The only limitations are you (temporary form within ongoing flow) and your choice of ignorance (want over need).
Foolish implies suggesting judgement as information upon and towards others. It corrupts both perceived inspiration as the means to grow and it tempts others to defend/attack the judgemental suggestion. For ones choice; every other one represents inspiration (need) and temptation (want)...both simultaneously as the value within balance for the evaluating choice.
Question if ignorance (want or not want) tempts insolence within others?
As for CONVERSATION, noun - "intercourse of sentiments" aka internal exchange of external input aka information suggested of inspiration perceived. Does one need to do that or is one tempted to want to do that? Doesn't seeking agreement with others imply reasoning (want vs not want) over disagreements?
What if choice doesn't require the conflict of agreement vs disagreement with other choice (dissonance); but only to respond as individual choice to collective balance (resonance). Take suggested words out and ask yourself how we would reason about disagreements without the idolization of meaning through suggested words? How to hold grudges without thinking in consented to languages?
What if spell-craft (suggested words as idols of meaning) are not only domesticating ones free will of choice; but also causing the mental self corruption of the ego aka an internal monologue about upheld meaning; suggested as words by others? How much external need for adaptation is being corrupted by the self imposed internal temptation of the ego aka the internal conflict of reasoning about wanting vs not wanting to adapt to both suggested (information) and perceived (inspiration)?
The suggested immovable surface information; that deceives the reader to ignore the moving inspiration underneath; while also tricking him to consent to give the one suggesting it the power to define it at will. Whatever one consents to read was suggested "in nomine" by a substitute author who hides perceived inspiration under suggested information. Flow represents the author of all form within; form represents the authorized choice to respond or ignore it.
Understanding aka comprehension aka intelligence originates from adaptation to knowledge aka perception..not through suggestion. What we are tempted to try to understand is the suggested information from the author of the book; which represents a want based choice tempting us to want more; while making the idol a best-selling author; which simply represents cult of personality; which can be both the author and the suggested information (words); hence personality; persona; per sonos...by sound.
Another issue here is one trying to understand all; which ignores being a differentiated ONE (potential) within the same ALL (potentiality). We are tempted to want to unlock understanding (outcome); while ignoring the growth of understanding (balance within momentum). It is the want that tempts us to consent to suggested information by others aka the fictitious shortcut for understanding, and of course the parasites are branding the suggested information "knowledge"; hence positioning themselves as the suggesting source of all knowledge; while those who consent are ignoring the perceived source of ALL knowledge for each ONE within.
Yet; is he tempted to then seek for more needs within the next suggested book? Was the book full of suggested information ever needed? As for discarding...consider not just physically; but also mentally clearing the cache of all the suggested information you dived through for the crumbs of inspiration. What if that's way more of a struggle than physically throwing the book away; and what if that unwanted information keeps accumulating within your memory?
What I'm getting at is that letting go and you'll receive represents resistance towards suggested information opens up access to perceived inspiration by unleashing the consciousness from self imposed restrictions.
What's the difference between one wanting to distance oneself from others on a mountain; and one not wanting to distance oneself from others; yet lacking to understand that sitting in-front of suggested fiction; while ignoring perceived reality represents just that?
Both the hermit and the transhumanism victim who consents to suggested 0 (fiction) over perceived 1 (reality) are ignoring balance; both are falling for suggested escapism...one physically; one mentally.
The mountaintop; the cushions and the hedgerow represent suggested goals to find enlightenment; yet where did you find it....in the moment; where imbalance (want) inspires choice to resonate with balance (need) If you climb the next mountain; dive for nickels between the cushions or jump into the next hedge; you won't find again; because you're looking for something you want; while ignoring to adapt to what's needed. So many get hooked on "enlightenment"; to then fall for the temptation to attempt to recreate and to capture the moment; while ignoring the implied momentum.
MAG'IC, noun [Latin magia] - "putting into action the power of spirits" aka using inspiration to shape suggestible information.
Speaking represents shaped out of perceived sound (resonance); reason implies conflict about suggested meaning (dissonance). In-between operates choice in response to balance (need/want) or in submission to other choices (want vs not want).
As I was getting high on Teddy Ruxbin...
Yep; utilizing form as inspiration (within spirit); instead of falling for the temptation of suggested information (from within form). As in "don't tell me what you are; let me figure out what you express"...minus telling other what to do; hence suggesting information yourself; which is where words as spell-craft come into play. Using words for oneself is dangerous enough; because they tempt us to uphold them as idolized meaning within our conscious memory; which needs to be used like ram (temporary storage for ongoing adaptation) instead of like a hard-drive (filling up until capacity).
The whole affair aka the ONEness of ALL (energy) implies being "all(in)one" aka alone. The perceivable differences among the individual ONEs are needed as inspiration for choice; otherwise the struggle of temporary form within ongoing flow couldn't work; based on lack of inspiration to struggle for growth.
Now look around and notice how the temptation of ongoing movement still gets most to ignore perceived inspiration. One hasn't learned responsibility of choice yet.
Just a rhetorical deception to trick us to ignore being animal (animated) humans (form) by flow. Suggesting the many to look down upon animals; while corrupting understanding of being animated...it's that simple to fuck choice over with suggested information (idolized meaning).
When you hear soul; spirit think adaption of form to input by flow and you can understand that each ONE within ALL adapts to input; hence being differentiated out of it. If it represents growth (form) within loss (flow); it represents soul; spirit; conscious communication aka adaptation of form to flow.
ROCK, noun (Gr., Latin rupes, from the root of rumpo, to break)...so break it until you understand the smaller parts and their connectivity. Eventually you understand input/response formed into a different expression.
The temptation represents the suggested price (a substitute value); the inspiration represents evaluation by choice of perceived value. The haggling part of the transaction represents balance within momentum; which makes the price agreed upon irrelevant afterwards. The choice within momentum matters; not wanted outcomes.
As for rocks...there were always water surfaces around waiting to be skipped or girls giving you a smile if you gift them a shiny rock. And then came the discovery of a slingshot...
Field of apples...you're hungry and grab one (need); you proclaim that this apple is mine (want); which causes want of more apples (greed); and others wanting your claimed apple (envy). The grass is always greener on the other side...
Mental implies the lack of understanding balance (need/want); which is caused by ignoring perceived need for suggested want. This ignorance among the many is at such a severe level; that the parasitic few exploiting it even managed to suggest us the apple as the symbolism of sin; while the many keep ignoring the responsibility of choice.
Choices; deceptive exploitation of choices; suggested temptation.
Potential of different choices.
Understanding of perceived preventing falling for suggested temptation (want) - still bound to hunger (need).
Adaptation to momentum is where the growth is (aka resistance of form to velocity of flow). The temptation of form vs form and the consequences thereof is what inspired both of you.
a) as inspiration if one chooses to utilize it as such.
b) as an allegory it represents the deception of cessation of motion aka stopping to rest while driving through. One didn't stop; one slowed down resistance to ongoing motion for recuperation of power.
c) enlightenment aka enlighten the ment; from mens (mind) implies resisting to ignore the source of light; while adapting to perceived light; which in return grows comprehension of perceived light; hence enlightenment. It's between ONE (choice) and ALL (balance); while other ONEs (suggested choices) represents the temptation to ignore it.
Thank you and you and you and you and you and you and you and you and you.....