What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
Question if breathing (from spiro; spirit) represents a response as temporary form (life) to ongoing flow (inception towards death)? What if you mimic continuous motion as choice (form); in response to the momentum (balance) of motion (flow)?
Question if good vs bad represents the rebranding of want vs not want (towards suggested information aka from within form); while ignoring need (in response to perceived inspiration aka from within spirit aka flow)?
Fabrication implies perceived (inspiration) shaped by choice into suggested (information) aka need/want (balance) for responding choice.
Yep; only lacking understanding of ones own position as finite (form) out of infinite (flow) aka as ONE (form) within ALL (flow).
Consider this...nature represents the source of sound; while those within represents insane (in sanus aka within sound) person (per sonos aka by sound) aka the responses to perceived sound aka the resound aka resonance.
a) how does one respond to all perceived? By choice based response to balance aka need (resonance) or want (dissonance).
b) what if choice can shape perceived sound into words, which can then be suggested as idolized meaning towards the responding choice of others? What if responding to suggested information (from within form) ignores perceived inspiration (from within spirit; spiro; to breathe aka adaptation as form to flow aka as choice to balance)? What if adaptation to inspiration is needed; while all suggested information tempts one to want vs not want it?
c) notice how the suggested meaning for "insane person" differs from the implied meaning of "in sanus + by sonos"? The former suggests a name; brand; idol for those within form, while the latter represents the attempt to communicate the function of flow. The thing is...flow communicates itself to all form within by simply moving us; which we perceive as inspiration. Responding to perceived inspiration a) grows ones comprehension of all perceived (temporary growth out of ongoing loss) and b) represents the only real communication aka resonance as choice with balance.
What if all suggested information represents spell-craft by the few towards the many? What if flow upon form represents the natural order, and the resulting communication represents the bond of offer/consent aka balance/choice? What if the parasitic few exploit ignorance of the bond by suggesting the inversion thereof aka RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] aka a bond that ignores balance/choice for choice/choice aka submission of free will to suggested -isms by free will of others?
I learned/taught myself to adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self; while resisting to suggest information to others. I only write so much because this represents me growing my comprehension by adaptation to perceived (aka the alchemical transmutation out of base ALL into ONEself).
What you call living represents consenting to behave as others suggest one to do aka participation in society (the beast system designed to domesticate free will of choice by suggestion; while racketeering the self destructive ignorance of those that consent; while using them within a chain of command hierarchy against those who stand in the way). The simplicity in what is suggested represents consent to progression aka going with the flow; while ignoring to resist as temporary form to the ongoing velocity of flow.
Life is not outcome oriented; because flow defines direction (inception towards death) for the form (life) within. Form represents a choice based response to balance (momentum) of flow.
As form within flow we each represent differentiated ONEs out of the same ALL. We are already distinct, and each of us now needs to grow self discernment thereof aka who; where and why am I? Another one cannot suggest understanding of self discernment to you; only your choice based response to perceived balance can grow your understanding of what you perceive; hence where you are; hence why you are. I can explain all these to you; that just tempts you to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information; hence choosing want over need; hence ignoring need for want, which in return causes ONEs lack of understanding of ALL perceived.
The basis you lack represents your lack of understanding the foundation for your existence aka the balance your represent the choice based response to. Before you can choose to want or not want anything anyone suggests to you...before that you respond as choice to balance under natural law by choosing need or want. Considering any suggestion (want or not want) already implies you falling for the temptation to ignore need (perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information).
From another perspective...as form within flow one exists within constant perceivable change; hence only being able to make assumptions within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. What one is missing is the understanding of the only thing that cannot change within constant change...the rules that define how change operates aka the laws of nature aka flow upon form.
Example...as life you cannot perceive your inception and death; because you exist within the momentum (balance) in-between them; yet by adapting to the moving behavior of everyone around; you can grow you understanding of your own position as life in-between inception and death; hence as form within flow; hence as ONE within ALL. This growing of self discernment represents balancing perception (input) and comprehension (response to input) aka communication by resonance to balance (momentum).
Lastly...allow yourself to question "making" aka creation out of nothing. Can you create anything without first responding to everything perceived? Can you shape a "new" thought without utilizing inspiration from everything that already exists?
Suggested creationism (out of nothing) represents the inversion of perceive transmutation (out of everything) aka formed ONEs out of flowing ALL and flow /form out of the ONEness of ALL (energy).
Temporary growth potential (form) out of ongoing loss of potentiality (flow). Energy causes internal flow (loss of potentiality); which causes internal balance (momentum); within which temporary growth is formed. Flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) causes friction; vibration; resonance all the hierarchic form we perceive as the response within it.
The river represents the ongoing that the temporary (choice) within its momentum (balance) can only comprehend by perceiving the consequences of flow upon other form. We cannot perceive flow while existing within its momentum. Only within momentum can we have a free will of choice over directions; while simultaneously being moved by flow from beginning towards end (one direction) aka free-dom..."free" will of choice in response to "dom"inance of balance.
From the alchemy perspective...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka ONEs transmutation out of base ALL (energy). Then again...this isn't textbook information one can learn from others; but needs to be individually grown as comprehension by adaptation to perceived inspiration aka the allegory of enlightenment; illumination; waking up out of the matrix etc.
Again question creation...can you create new movement or are you responding by choice of form to balance within flow? As form you can only mimic flow; yet as energy you are flow/form aka "ONE for ALL and ALL for ONE" aka "there can be only ONE" aka "islands in the stream; that is what we are; no ONE in between; how could we be wrong"...all sleight of hands for those with eyes to see by our parasitic dipshits.
This is for another level of understanding. As energy ALL is ONE aka the sleight of hand allegory "alone". You represent ONE within ALL; I represents ONE within ALL; each ONE within ALL responses for the sustenance of ONEself within ALL, and ALL (potentiality) self segregates into individual ONEs (potential) to establish self sustenance by internal balance of loss (flow) and growth (form).
ONE perceives differences only because they are needed to communicate inspiration to ONEs sense as to inspire ONEs choice to sustain ONEself within ALL. If everything would be the same; what would inspire ONE within to struggle for self sustenance? It's not I and YOU it's only ever ONE. You are alone aka ALL(in)ONE. The parasitic few suggest choice based agreements for togetherness under the suggested umbrella of unity; while to many ignore the following...U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness".
Correct; but your position as temporary form exists within the momentum of ongoing flow. Without momentum (balance); flow couldn't differentiate itself into temporarily growing form; it therefore couldn't establish growth out of loss.
The parasites suggest us to follow flow (to progress; to seek; to hope; to want etc.) They suggest us the inversion (flipping tables allegory) of reality aka seeking order out of chaos (rise of the phoenix allegory); when we represent temporary chaos (form) transmuted out of the natural order (flow). This is why life represents the struggle to grow (choice of need) within the temptation of loss (chocie of want).
a) counting (hours) implies choice based evaluation of value within balance. Time implies the mimicry of ongoing movement (tick; tick; tick...); which the parasites corrupt by suggesting affixed states (past; present; future). Consenting to those states represents the self inflicted trauma of perceived loss (past); hope/fear (future) and both together cause perceived stress (present).
The trick behind racketeering ignorance of movement is to use suggestion of affixed information which when consented to; is being upheld within ones conscious memory. That's where we are tricked to "capture the moment"; which then tempts us internally (ego) to respond to information based memory (remembering); instead of adapting to perceived inspiration from the ever changing moment(um) of motion.
The conscious memory needs to be used like a ram (temporary storage of information for ongoing adaptation to inspiration); not like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information until capacity). The former grows ONEs potential; the latter restricts it.
b) impossibility represents ONEs (growth potential) ignorance of ALL (loss of potentiality). You represent the finite potential being offered access to infinite potentiality to grow out of; which is also why the few require the many to stay ignorant aka to keep restricting the potential willingly by choosing want over need (falling for temptation of ignorance).
c) twice represents counting of ONEs; then suggesting the idolized meaning of two. The parasitic few have this one covered under the suggestion of dualism aka DUAL, adjective [Latin, two.] - "expressing the number two".
Good; bad; want; not want imply conflict. The former represents the suggested rebrand of the latter.
Up and down; headwater and delta imply coexistence of natural opposites within balance.
Want vs not want represents conflict of reason; while up/down represents implication (if/then); hence if one chooses to jump up; then it implies coming from a down and vice versa. Therefore...reason (want); implication (need). The talmud suggests to use implication over reason; while utilizing talmudic reasoning (suggestion of contradictions to both sides within the conflict of reason) to control and perpetuated every conflict from both sides. It represents a farming tool...suggestion (-isms) for division (reason).
Throw a ball (mimicking velocity) and you can perceive its momentum aka temporary holding form. There's your counted two (flow/form) within ONE ball...and then your son swings it out of the park; and what does he represents? The ongoing sustenance of ONEself...your shared self.
The becoming others represents energies inherent power (flow/form aka loss/growth) causing friction; vibration; resonance etc.)
Micro (small) implies choice of evaluation upon perceived value within balance; while cosm (words) implies being form in response to flow.
The deception of numbers is suggesting counts; while ignoring NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit reference to other units" aka that the reference for each ONE implies the collective ALL that designated itself into individual ONEs.
Consider being within energy...what are you counting?
Telling me this at the end of the post... https://pic8.co/sh/CMoF5B.jpg
Consider balance by choice as resistance within velocity...when suggesting information you tempt the resisting form of others to want or not want to consent to it; for which he ignores the need to resist ongoing velocity. Whatever you suggest will corrupt others until they make the choice of inspiration (need) over information (want).
It took me nearly a decade to allow myself to question the laws of nature without the religious connotations, and when it happened it was just me choosing to not ignore needed inspiration for wanted information anymore. There was nobody to blame but myself; and whatever others would throw at me wouldn't penetrate my free will of choice.
What changes others is inspiration; but one cannot suggest it to them; one needs to represent it aka growing oneself inspires others to adapt to inspiration; instead of ignoring to do so for suggested information. This is why the parasitic few have to utilize the mainstream media as the middle men for suggested information, an ongoing suggesting of temptation, and it doesn't even matter if wanted or not want as long as it gets responses.
Anyway; what works for me is to strip ignorance of tools to use; hence me boiling languages down to stuff like "flow/form"; because then one cannot hide behind suggested information from others anymore. The simplicity requires adaptation from their own perspective of understanding or naked ignorance; both inspire reactions; instead of hiding behind information.
It's a simple as us being moved; hence whatever we attempt to describe will find its level in motion. The parasitic few understand this and try to invert it by suggesting themselves as the authority of perceived movement; hence suggestion of currency; (river)banks; floating loans; liquidity; maritime admiralty law; piracy; owner; leader; citizen-ship etc. The use the spell-craft of suggested meaning as allegory for movement, and the consent of the ignorant many is what then allows the few to control all movements; hence causing REVOLU'TION, noun [Latin revolutus, revolvo.] - "circular motion" aka putting human responses into a hamster-wheel of ignorance; while flow is dismantling our less resisting form aka transmutation of ONE (form) back to base ALL (flow).
They use suggestion; choice and ignorance as ingredients for alchemy to distract the majority to ignore what the natural order is up to with its force of velocity upon our inadequate resistance to it.
PHILOS'OPHY, noun [Latin philosophia; Gr. to love, and wisdom.] aka want of knowledge. Wisdom also implies wise (knowledge aka perception) and dom (dominance aka flow/form aka balance/choice). Therefore wisdom is within need aka the responsibility to adapt to perceived inspiration; while resisting the temptation to want (love) suggested information branded as "wisdom".
One needs to utilize sophos (wise aka perceived inspiration); while resisting the temptation (philo- aka want) of suggested -ology (aka suggested information under the umbrella of scientism).
Furthermore...concept; from CONCEIVE, verb transitive [Latin, to take.] represents the want of what's already there; while ignoring the need to adapt to it. We suggest concepts to each other; while ignoring that this system is balance based and therefore simply requires response to it; which implies the struggle for self sustenance to be about resisting the temptation to ignore responsibility of choice to balance for choices suggested by others.
Try to learn/teach yourself to acknowledge whenever others use suggestions to get you to consent to what they want; then resist to want vs not want (conflict of reason) what they suggest and instead point out the ignored collective need. This a) grows your understanding and resistance and b) makes the suggestions of others impotent. Watch out tho; they don't like to be disarmed of their main weapon (suggestion).
The main culprit for that represents Latin to Pig-Latin (English). They stripped all natural connotations out; filled it with rhetorical deceptions; numerical encoded it; perpetuate it for legalese and the one world language (through the internet), and use constant historical revisionism upon it to corrupt any attempts at understanding communication. English is pure reasoning (want vs not want).
On the flip-side...perceiving the changes and comprehending the origin (energy to flow/form to perceived sound to choice to suggestion) can be very inspiring to comprehend what communication is (resonance as choice to balance; not among choices).
Allegory of the cave.
Branding; idolizing in-formation as suggested meaning; while ignoring in-spiration as perceived meaning through movement. Everything anyONE says is in response to ALL offered aka out of the same source; yet it's offered towards choice; hence towards needed response and wanted ignorance. Can't be choice within balance without both; hence the struggle to not ignore responsibility.
The thing is...the other life-forms are way more efficient at this; while our majority still lacks to understand...HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] aka being animated (animal) form (human) out of flow.
Ask yourself why you define truth by nothingness (no more; no less)? Next question if nature offers false information to our senses or if energy contains false states? Then allow yourself to question what proclaimed truth implies for those within constant change?
What if truth is suggested (want); and lies represent the suggested contradiction thereof (not want); while we ignore need (change)? Does "I am" represent truth or simply a state within movement that is constantly changing?
In short...does movement have to declare "truth" to communicate inspiration to responding choice? Truth (want) and False (not want) represent suggested brands for a movement that doesn't require those within to declare it to each other; yet boy do they want to...
From a slightly different angle...consider "seeking" truth aka wanting outcome (death); instead of responding to origin (balance between inception/death).
Biggest lie? Suggesting the existence of truth.
It's when your consciousness gets off the leash to deliver inspiration after your thoughts were focused on responding to others. Instead consider to adapt to inspiration although your response; hence letting the consciousness roam; which a) keeps delivering inspiration until mental exhaustion and b) prevents the unexpressed afterthoughts. It's a skill you one can grow. When I press save I'm already done with adaptation and seldom tempt myself thinking about what was.
ONE represents the representation of ALL and borrows all others as source of inspiration or temptation for expression. MET'APHOR, noun [Gr. to transfer, over, to carry.]...the transfer represents perceived inspiration; transmuted by choice of response into comprehended information; yet that implies form out of ALL into ONE; not by suggestion from other ONEs.
From the energy perspective...ongoing electric velocity represents the power that sustains temporary magnetic resistance, and each magnetic one needs to struggle to tap the electric all to stay in form; while being moved by flow. Our "repeated" response as resistance to velocity represents accumulated voltage aka magnetic unit (form) of electromotive force (flow).
The internet represents the suggested inversion of the internal net of ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived aka everything is connected and the seed of ONE is growing outwards into the soil of ALL; with the consciousness tapping everything; while utilizing more and more comprehended roots to send inspiration back for growth...or for the choice of growth if not ignored for suggested loss.
The world wide web (DARPA NET) mimics all of this within suggested information; while using every tool to exchange 1 (perceived reality) with 0 (suggested fiction) aka everything with nothing.
The represents two natural opposites in coexistence with each other...the perceivable driftwood (form) and the comprehensible river (flow). Both together represent the balance for ones responding choice. Resist both holding onto the driftwood and drowning within the river and instead "keep surfing" (another sleight of hand) or "I'm pickin' up good vibrations...She's giving me excitations" aka adaptation (vibration) to motion (excitation) or Beach (form; female) Boys (male; flow).
Creationism (out of nothing); transmutation (out of everything). Destruction (loss aka flow); resistance to destruction (growth aka form).
ONE represents flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death). Life represents balance (in-between inception till death); not outcome (death). Both inception and death only exist within ongoing flow; while life represents the temporary form within. Life represents a formed sinus curvature (growth potential) out the flowing baseline (loss of potentiality).
"fast" aka tempo implies the temporary within the ongoing; hence ONEs status quo within ALL. Speed represents temptation while being moved; resistance within momentum represents responsibility. Young/old are predefined through flow; form represents the choice of self sustenance in-between.
As for corpses...blood to soil; corpses to compost and heads on spikes for inspiration. Besides food for worms (masters of soil); death represents a generator for other life; hence the parasites using their monopoly on blood accumulation; medical organ harvesting and the perverse burial industry to corrupt the use of corpses; they even utilize the chain of command to collect the corpses of other life-forms before the many can utilize them for growth.
Self restriction...inspiration or temptation?
About that...
Simultaneously it pulls (temptation) one to ignore resisting; because velocity represents more power than the resulting resistance within its momentum.
The connection represents energy; the current (flow) causing the things (form) represents self differentiation of ALL potentiality into ONEs potential for growth (form) within loss (flow) aka the inherent power of energy; it's self sustaining balance.
ALL is ONE (energy) within which ONE (form) grows in response to ALL (flow). Two (suggested dualism) represents counting others as ONE; while ignoring ALL. Everything represents ONE different part of the same ALL. Growth (form) requires inspiration; inspiration requires perceived differences within flow (loss).
Consider everything aka the ONEness of ALL aka energy as the base for every transmutation within. Next consider if "no such thing" implies the choice within everything to ignore it for suggested nothing by the choice of others? Ask yourself...can one within all perceive nothingness; when perception implies response to input?
Standing waves represent form within the medium; from medius - "middle" (momentum) of fluid flow. Reaction as form to flow represents wandering aka hallucination). It's the suggested terms "hallucination and error" that we are told to believe represents mistake; false; which is based on the suggested inversion of reality aka seeking order out of chaos; while ignoring that temporary form (life) represents chaos out of the natural order of ongoing flow (inception towards death).
Ongoing velocity (loss) represents order; temporary resistance within (growth) represents chaos...which is why life struggles to stay within form; while being moved by flow towards death (transmutation back to base).
Consider fiction representing the choice to ignore perceived reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information); which is being upheld within conscious memory; causing stagnation within a system based on adaption (balance/choice)?
Soundtrack represents a suggested allegory for track (impression by movement) representing the source of sound for all the ones within. How do you corrupt understanding of being within the track that offers sound? By suggesting them to consent to you as the source for suggested soundtracks.
Lastly...the "real reality" implies the distinction between perceived reality (form) and comprehended real reality (flow). What's lacking is understanding of ones perspective as form within flow aka within the balance of motion (momentum). What you perceive (sound; light etc.) and your comprehension of what it really is (energy in motion)...you need to balance them.
The majority is tempted to ignore comprehended reality (samsara; be in this world; not of it; asleep within the matrix etc.); yet those who comprehend more are also tempted to ignore perceived reality (nirvana; meditation; drugs etc.). The ONEness of ALL represents energy; which the ONEs (form) within ALL (flow) can comprehend; yet energy processes flow/form for loss/growth aka internal balance aka self sustenance; which in return causes each ONE within ALL to have a response-ability of choice within balance.
Therefore...adaption to perceived reality grows comprehension of the real reality. Conscious participation as ONE within ALL can only exist within the ever changing moment(um) of balance; caused by the natural order. In other words...what your senses perceive represents the self differentiation of energy to inspire growth of potential (ONEs form) out of loss of potentiality (ALL flow).
Lack of comprehension caused by choice based response to balance aka want (from within form) over need (from within spirit) aka suggested information over perceived inspiration. The temptation we fall for is to believe that we respond to form creation; when its about transmuting out of base for the sustenance of self.
Example...the LEGOs you build are irrelevant; only the aspect of building aka your formed adaptation to flow is what sustains matter (form). Meanwhile; what you build (information) tempts you and others to want to hold onto it; which ignores that you don't need it for self sustenance; what you need is to adapt to inspiration aka to resonate with communicated movement.
Sounds are enticing; colors are pretty (wanted temptations); yet what one needs is the differentiated inspiration they represent. Adaptation to perceived differences grows comprehension of sameness.
Indicative aka IN'DICATE, verb transitive [Latin indico; in and dico, to show.] implies perceived inspiration as form out of flow. This is what one needs to adapt to; instead of falling for the temptation of others suggesting us what the indicated means (information).
Look at tadpoles within currents; who struggle within momentum for growth; usually while utilizing stones or side-currents to keep momentum aka to not be flushed away by the velocity of flow aka resistance within momentum for growth of form within flow. Believing this suggested information doesn't represents comprehending it for oneself by adaptation to perceived inspiration.
A great starting point is simple to take any object and start a list "what can I do with this object?" Fill it daily for 20 minutes or so and you will teach/learn yourself that you will never run our of inspiration to draw from that one object. Why? Because a) ALL is ONE in energy and b) the list represents your growth of comprehension thereof. You increased your potential by utilizing adaptation to inspiration from one object...now branch your perspective out into ALL perceivable reality (ripples on the surface) and understand that you can never run out of inspiration to grow from. The only limitations are you (temporary form within ongoing flow) and your choice of ignorance (want over need).
Foolish implies suggesting judgement as information upon and towards others. It corrupts both perceived inspiration as the means to grow and it tempts others to defend/attack the judgemental suggestion. For ones choice; every other one represents inspiration (need) and temptation (want)...both simultaneously as the value within balance for the evaluating choice.
Question if ignorance (want or not want) tempts insolence within others?
As for CONVERSATION, noun - "intercourse of sentiments" aka internal exchange of external input aka information suggested of inspiration perceived. Does one need to do that or is one tempted to want to do that? Doesn't seeking agreement with others imply reasoning (want vs not want) over disagreements?
What if choice doesn't require the conflict of agreement vs disagreement with other choice (dissonance); but only to respond as individual choice to collective balance (resonance). Take suggested words out and ask yourself how we would reason about disagreements without the idolization of meaning through suggested words? How to hold grudges without thinking in consented to languages?
What if spell-craft (suggested words as idols of meaning) are not only domesticating ones free will of choice; but also causing the mental self corruption of the ego aka an internal monologue about upheld meaning; suggested as words by others? How much external need for adaptation is being corrupted by the self imposed internal temptation of the ego aka the internal conflict of reasoning about wanting vs not wanting to adapt to both suggested (information) and perceived (inspiration)?
The suggested immovable surface information; that deceives the reader to ignore the moving inspiration underneath; while also tricking him to consent to give the one suggesting it the power to define it at will. Whatever one consents to read was suggested "in nomine" by a substitute author who hides perceived inspiration under suggested information. Flow represents the author of all form within; form represents the authorized choice to respond or ignore it.
Understanding aka comprehension aka intelligence originates from adaptation to knowledge aka perception..not through suggestion. What we are tempted to try to understand is the suggested information from the author of the book; which represents a want based choice tempting us to want more; while making the idol a best-selling author; which simply represents cult of personality; which can be both the author and the suggested information (words); hence personality; persona; per sonos...by sound.
Another issue here is one trying to understand all; which ignores being a differentiated ONE (potential) within the same ALL (potentiality). We are tempted to want to unlock understanding (outcome); while ignoring the growth of understanding (balance within momentum). It is the want that tempts us to consent to suggested information by others aka the fictitious shortcut for understanding, and of course the parasites are branding the suggested information "knowledge"; hence positioning themselves as the suggesting source of all knowledge; while those who consent are ignoring the perceived source of ALL knowledge for each ONE within.
Yet; is he tempted to then seek for more needs within the next suggested book? Was the book full of suggested information ever needed? As for discarding...consider not just physically; but also mentally clearing the cache of all the suggested information you dived through for the crumbs of inspiration. What if that's way more of a struggle than physically throwing the book away; and what if that unwanted information keeps accumulating within your memory?
What I'm getting at is that letting go and you'll receive represents resistance towards suggested information opens up access to perceived inspiration by unleashing the consciousness from self imposed restrictions.
What's the difference between one wanting to distance oneself from others on a mountain; and one not wanting to distance oneself from others; yet lacking to understand that sitting in-front of suggested fiction; while ignoring perceived reality represents just that?
Both the hermit and the transhumanism victim who consents to suggested 0 (fiction) over perceived 1 (reality) are ignoring balance; both are falling for suggested escapism...one physically; one mentally.
The mountaintop; the cushions and the hedgerow represent suggested goals to find enlightenment; yet where did you find it....in the moment; where imbalance (want) inspires choice to resonate with balance (need) If you climb the next mountain; dive for nickels between the cushions or jump into the next hedge; you won't find again; because you're looking for something you want; while ignoring to adapt to what's needed. So many get hooked on "enlightenment"; to then fall for the temptation to attempt to recreate and to capture the moment; while ignoring the implied momentum.
MAG'IC, noun [Latin magia] - "putting into action the power of spirits" aka using inspiration to shape suggestible information.