What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
REB'EL, noun [Latin rebellis, making war against.] Question the differences between between rebelling against suggested information by other form, and resisting the temptation of velocity; of being moved towards death.
The parasite sleight of hand for this is one representing a "rebel without a cause" aka not war against others; but struggle within balance for the sustenance of self. Flow represents the cause; form represents the effect.
Suggested law represents the self sacrifice of ignoring to resist the natural order for consent to submit to suggested orders by others aka want over need aka ignorance over self sustenance. Flow generates; form degenerates when ignoring self sustenance within flow.
VIRTUE, noun [Latin virtus, from vireo, or its root. See Worth.] - "strength". ALL worth is within balance; ONEs strength represents resisting the flow that causes the balance; which implies balancing within value by constant evaluation (adaptation).
The root of virtue is vir - "man"; which implies the masculine aspect of velocity (electric) to the feminine aspect of resistance (magnetic).
How inconvenient are the suggested convenience stores these days? It's all about need (struggle) and want (temptation) and understanding the consequences of each (self sustenance/ignorance) aka responsibility as choice within balance.
A representation of balance aka the ignorance of the many tempting the insolence of the few; hence rebelling against society by parasitically exploiting weaknesses within the host.
Now from the perspective of the few...suggesting the Diogenes allegory of the rebellious one among all; distracts the many to understand that the few run society itself as a parasitic exploitation racket. The Diogenes story suggests symptoms of an ignored cause; while putting them on the pedestal of Cynic Philosophy; so that the many can reason (conflict) about symptoms; while keep ignoring the cause of ignorance.
Will represents choice (free will); ignorance represents choice of want over need (ignorance over adherence). There's no unwilling ignorance just lack of understanding as the foundation of ONE having growth potential within ALL.
Conforming implies consent by choice to suggested choice by others aka wanting or not wanting to conform. Before that comes the choice based response to balance under natural law aka need or want; which is why all conformity suggested implies ignoring that flow represents the origin of form; which doesn't need to be conformed to other form; but needs to respond to balance of flow (momentum).
The resembling aspect of suggested conformity (unity) also ignores that a) flow segregates form and b) that unity (unitas) implies the ONEness of ALL (energy); not the ONEs within playing make-believe togetherness to become the energy they already are...
So rebelling (willingly violating war) is being corrupted by the suggested laws of men; which represent the tools of the few to racketeer the many who willingly "violate" natural law by ignorance (choice of want over need).
The ignorance of the many is in rebellion to the balance of natural law; hence causing imbalance for themselves and their surroundings. The parasitic few ruthlessly exploit that ignorance; hold the mirror to the ignorance of the many; and mimic rebellious behavior to a) propagate the laws of men as tools of control and b) to deal with the temptation of ignorance causing insolence among themselves. You can spot them at the onset of staged rebellions; inciting the ignorant many to follow them into other tools of control like protests (pro and testor aka affirmation); wars (form to flow transmutation or the "lead to gold"-alchemy allegory.) or just devaluation; asset seizing; migratory patterns, or the staging of natural catastrophe rackets.
All of these represent suggested tools to deal with an ongoing rebellion (ignorance); within our status quo of representing temporary chaos out of ongoing order. And underneath...want (loss) represents responding choice within balance; just like need (growth).
Why the fashion? To be seen aka to suggest towards an audience of onlookers. Vanity? Sure, but also yet another tool of mass population control aka dressing up to tempt conformity to suggested orders.
Because no (nothing) represents ignorance of everything; fault (imbalance) represents ignorance of balance and action represents ignorance of representing reaction. What's causing this ignorance is "found"; which implies "seeking" aka choice of wanting (suggested) over needing (perceived).
Always ONE aka ONEness of ALL, ONE within ALL or self sustenance of ONEself.
Inherent within energy implies self sustenance (inherent balance aka flow/form aka loss/growth); hence the virtue of everything implies balance. What's missing is the response to it...choice, which allows ignorance of balance (imbalance).
Now who proclaims virtue...balance or choice? When choice proclaims virtue; it ignores that balance expresses virtue through constant movement; while choice of ignorance represents imbalance.
Rainwater filtration; fruits; morning dew; snow; ever expanding map of wells around me; keeping taps on what the local wildlife prefers and avoids, and anything that keeps water in steady movement.
Suggested information by the few to divide the many into reasoning about wanted vs not wanted meaning; while ignoring perceived needed meaning (inspiration).
The Labrador expresses balance by adaptation to inspiration; the professor ignores balance for suggestion of information; while the students are trying to keep an understanding build out of imbalance together; while wondering why the outcomes always suck.
ONE in ignorance of balance: "maybe if I study suggested math hard enough; I can finally solve the suggested problem of suggested imbalance?"
Lack of self discernment...who does one blame for that? Imagine getting temporary access (ONE) to everything (ALL); yet failing on the onset to grow self discernment by simply resisting to ignore reality. Is that too much responsibility in exchange for everything?
All form is shaped differently; while parasites suggest similarity as education to corrupts perception of differences (inspiration). This is why browning everything represents diversity.
A memory filled with suggested information restricts itself from adapting to perceived inspiration.
Allegory for form trying to disrupt flow; while ignoring being within the momentum thereof; hence water always finding level after any disruption.
Thinking implies processing input as form by flow; trying to apply thinking towards the source for what to think about is what tempts one to wage war with flow aka lack of understanding based on ignorance, tempting resistance against flow (imbalance) instead of for the sustenance of form (balance).
Form represents the conformation of flow aka the consequences thereof. Confirmation implies form trying to affix ongoing states while ignoring flow. Consideration implies a "motive for action"; which ignores responsibility of representing a reaction. Countenance represents the temptation to corrupt ongoing pattern recognition by holding onto counted assumptions.
The former represents an allegory for being temporary chaos (mud) within ongoing order (water); the latter an allegory for resistance to velocity for growth potential. What's missing for both is momentum separating flow/form...form cannot muddy flow; only other form within the momentum of flow. The water; the mud and the swimmer represent differentiated form mimicking the same flow; by adapting to balance.
Reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested information (idolized meaning).
Self sustenance. Sustaining self expands benefits to surrounding others; while sustaining others ignores self; which corrupts ones surroundings.
Kippah (yiddish; kuppel - "dome") hence under the dome implying being free will of choice under the dominance of balance.
Good luck controlling the ignorant many by suggestion; without utilizing it among your own as-well. The so called talmud teaches implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want); which represents farmhands controlling the reasoning of the cattle by suggested contradictions (talmudic reasoning); while protecting themselves from the corruption of suggestion by use of implication and other more sever physical restrains to keep each other in check.
The grey man.
What does the walrus represent for all others and vice versa? Inspiration through perceived differentiation to sustain ONEself. Each ONE living within the same habitat (momentum) of ALL; each ONE different aspect of the same ALL. Understanding the sameness of ALL still demands responsibility for the sustenance of the differentiated ONE within.
So we each represent the walrus; yet it should inspire us to question why the perceived differences; which in return leads ONE to understand more of the same ALL; hence growing.
All implying want for; while ignoring need in response to.
Collectively (bloodline) wrapped around the individual (blood). A fertility ritual. Just dancin' around the dick; while keeping the seed close to home.