What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
Behavior of flow; comprehensible by responding form within; who only perceive the consequences of other form being moved. In other words...being within constant change; makes the behavior of what causes change the only thing that cannot change aka the comprehensible foundation for making assumptions upon perceived.
a) Dis- implies "lack of, not" aka ones choice to ignore perceived everything for suggested nothingness.
b) the ONEs representing the response to ALL reality; don't need to claim anything (they're tempted to want to); they need to utilize everything for the sustenance of self.
c) consider that each ONE perceives (through senses) ALL; yet that each ONE lacks understanding of what ALL perceived means. The suggested rhetoric "making sense or nonsense" corrupts us to blame perceived; while ignoring that comprehension is grown by choice based response to perceived (inspiration)...a rhetoric then followed by suggested information.
Stating that which expresses itself is what corrupts us to understand it, since we exist within that self expressing "law unto itself". The parasitic few suggest "law enforcement" to deceive the many to ignore that force (velocity of flow) implies the law for the responding resistance of form.
They also suggest the laws of men (rules of behavior for form); which corrupt us to ignore being "free" will of choice within "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom (unrestricted choice out of restricting balance), and furthermore they suggest the idolized meaning "natural law" under contract of religion (choice bound by choice through suggestion).
The main corruption of our understanding represents the corruption of perceived balance (momentum of flow) aka need/want for ones responding choice; to suggested imbalance (conflict of reason) aka want vs not want for ones responding choice.
Before one can choose among wanting vs not wanting any suggestion; one chooses in response to balance (need/want) under natural law. The whole suggested dualism spell is about the rebranding of want vs not want into true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; left wing vs right wing; humans vs animals; Christianity vs Islam; Capitalism vs Communism etc. There's no versus within balance; only imbalance within those who ignore balancing.
Consider nature representing ongoing; civilization representing suggested domestication of those within ongoing by ignoring that which moves for that which is being moved.
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced] aka form out of flow (transmutation)...not from other form (creationism). The waterwheel and dam were shaped by ONEs responding choice out of ALL offered reality.
The beaver doesn't worship the dam; he uses it for self sustenance by adapting to constant change aka balancing within momentum aka resisting the velocity of flow as form.
Because as ONE we are surrounded by other ONEs; hence excited and tempted to fall for their suggested in-form-ation; instead of the perceived inspiration through being being moved.
The real social union represents the ONEness of ALL (can only be comprehended; not perceived by the ONEs within ALL); while the fictitious society suggests to unite with others aka seeking to win the conflict (reason) of agreement vs disagreement with other ONEs; while ignoring ALL.
Essential (from essence; to be) Component (part of) implies being ONE within ALL aka ONE part of ALL.
How could they not if they already consented to think in suggested words; languages; idolized meanings; brands? Quite the conundrum...
With reason aka being internally tempted to reason (conflict) about the meaning of suggested words; hence the internal monologue (ego).
Consider being resistance; lacking adaptation to momentum (warm up); causing corruption of resistance (form). TRAIN, verb transitive [Latin traho] - "to draw along" has to be understood in the perspective of being (form) drawn along (flow); hence within constant momentum and with the responsibility to adapt to by choice.
I learned/thought myself from a lifestyle based on martial arts to resist the temptation to train for outcomes; and instead train in response to momentum. I train throughout the whole day as a maintenance tool for self sustenance.
Reason (want vs not want) implies perceiving reality as a conflict; hence others as opponents or allies; which tempts the want to change them. Those who ignore being changed (as form by flow); try to be the change they want to see.
The main deception for ignoring balance for conflict is the suggestion of outcomes (progress; achievements; prices; certificates; accumulation etc.) while ignoring the responsibility to momentum (balance). The few suggest "order out of chaos"; while the many ignore being "temporary chaos our of ongoing order". A fictitious inversion of reality as usual and all done by suggestion.
Want and not want both represent temptation aka flow tempting form by pulling it; so those who set a choice into ongoing temptation are being pulled away; hence perceiving the easier route to the needed struggle of resistance for self sustenance within the momentum of being pushed.
One needs to resist being pushed; while also resisting the temptation of being pulled. Resistance to being pushed grows resistance; while ignoring to resist being pulled represents loss of resistance. All derived from understanding movement.
As for convincing...to choose want of need represents ignorance of need (perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information). They are convinced by what others suggest them to consent to believe; while lacking the understanding of what's going on.
Information over inspiration. Flow supplies ALL; ONEs form gets tempted by what ONE shapes out of ALL aka "getting high by their own supply".
The sovereign (king) within form represents ONEs choice aka mental (crown) choice. To believe implies consent to the suggested idolized meaning of "king" and "crown".
Manage (control) ment (mind) requires response by choice of form to input by flow; which other suggested choices can corrupt. Leadership represents a sleight of hand for the ONE vessel (ship) out of ALL (leader). The water leads the ship; both captain and crew are shaping course within by choice of adaptation to water. Who has the leadership over a ship without water?
Hence comprehending to be (form) directed by (flow).
We are tempted to blame parasites (suggested information); which is based on lacking to understand parasitic behavior (perceived inspiration); which would inspire understanding of exploitation of host weakness; and the weakness of form within flow represents choice of want over need instead of need over want.
The parasitic few represent the response to the ignorance (want over need) of the many; and mass ignorance tempts ruthless insolence towards it as well.
OPPORTU'NITY, noun [Latin opportunitas.] - "a time favorable for the purpose" aka the one and only ever changing moment(um) aka the balance our choice responses to. The understanding of balance/choice makes every moment a perceived opportunity to respond to; but only the choice of need over want grows resistance to velocity to be able to continue balancing.
Climbing out of pitfalls can be a great opportunity to get inspired by awareness of momentum (balance) or tempt you to fall into the next; since you made it out of the previous one; which is where others will be tempted to try pungi sticks...
Aka using liquid (flow) and whetstone (form) to shape resistance by choice.
Irritate (wrath) aka EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.]; hence ignoring to be moved by aka being in response to being moved; while resisting that which tempts to move one away from responsibility.
Hope implies want for aka towards the temptation. Instead try staying within momentum by questioning your choice of response...inspiration (need) or temptation (want) aka what can I do with this instead of what can it do to me? Be aware of balance and stay in control over choice.
Understanding the whole still implies existing among the differentiation within; hence having the responsibility to balance by choice. Suggested Buddhism tempts ONE to seek becoming the ALL; but that ignores the point of being ONE aka experiencing the differentiated ALL by balancing as ONE within.
Existence implies being temporary within ongoing. Balance may represent ALL the value; but ONEs choice within represents the highest value...temporary evaluation of ongoing value aka free will of choice.
Media; from mediate (Latin; medius) - "middle". The middle of perceived inspiration and ones responding choice to it; represents the suggested information by others aka those who suggest a fictitious substitute to the mains stream of flow...
High (want) vs low (not want) represents your choice upon suggested information (MSM); plus the implied conflict (versus) of reason; while ignoring the needed inspiration from the real main stream (flow to form) aka perceived movement as inspiration to your senses to respond to by choice.
When you understand all of this; then anything suggested within MSM becomes the same choice of inspiration or temptation; which the added temptation of the whole chain of technology you consent to use while engaging with MSM. This is where transhumanism comes in with the agenda of 0 (suggested fiction) over 1 (perceived reality) by means of wanted technology. Something; something...smartphone zombies.
From the energy perspective...FRE'QUENCY, noun - "a return or occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals". The few understand frequency...look at the havoc the ongoing suggestion of the racism accusation is causing? Try asking them if racism represents the hate of others; then what's the term for loving your own? They are being deceived to reason about hate; while ignoring that no love alternative was suggested to them. Every race is accusing each other; while lacking any defense against miscegenation.
Next time you read about energy weapons...frequency of suggestion.