it's clear to me that there were no gas chambers or mass executions performed by the NAZIs. There were open air prisons, with forced labor. And there was starvation, no hygiene and a massive Typhus epidemic - exacerbated by the poor conditions brought about by war.
The epidemic was so bad they had to build multiple large "leichenkellars" in the forced labor camps, or "corpse cellars", to store all the dead in a cool environment while they attempted to cremate them all. It was a massive undertaking in itself. It was these large corpse cellars that later got labelled as "gas chambers" by the victors of WW2.
Was the jews the most harmed nation? Definitely not. Jewish losses in WWII hardly exceed 1-2 million, including jews who was in Red Army and Wehrmacht. Most losses was Russians and Germans, 25 and 10 millions respectively.
Jews even was not the most killed in german camps.
Yes, Germany specifically treated jews by etnicity, but that was common thing of that time around the world. From Japanese in US to Germans and Austirans in Britain, Russians and later Germans and others in USSR, chinese in Japan, etc.
If you retrospect the post WWI German history and role that Jews played in destruction of Germany, there will be no questions about the reasons why many Germans was angry towards the Jews.
So, there was nothing superspecial about the Jews.
Holohoax sacred 6 million of victims number was first declared nearly 1918 IIRC in some Jewish literature. They just strain that number to the WWII losses.
Perfect list, thank you. That is definitely some very special and sacred figure for them, to the point that they lobbied the laws in Europe with jail sentence just for questioning that 6 millions dogma.
So, every rational and intelligent human being should question and doubt it as wide as possible, just because they so try to prevent that.
In Russia, the most popular nickname for holocaust is "lohocaust", where "loh" means "potential victim of swindle" in rogue language.
Yes to an extent. Though it’s difficult to ascertain specifics because it’s so y. Everyone agrees that there were prison camps. Everyone agrees many died in the camps. The debate is about quantity, intention, and cause. Don’t forget the communists killed more than a hundred million. This is well known. Since this number dwarfs others I think as a society it’s even more important to focus on preventing this from happening again.
HOL'OCAUST, noun [Gr. whole, and burnt, to burn.] - "a burnt-sacrifice or offering".
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow offers all to each one within form; and flow meeting form causes friction; vibration; resonance and heat. Holocaust represents an allegory for the status quo of all form within flow aka a burned offering.
How to corrupt ones understanding thereof? By suggesting different meanings for "holocaust"; which causes the conflict of reason aka want (wooden doors) vs not want (six million) or vice versa; doesn't matter. Only consent to suggested meaning of "holocaust" is needed for those suggesting it to gain control over all who consented to believe or not believe it.
it's clear to me that there were no gas chambers or mass executions performed by the NAZIs. There were open air prisons, with forced labor. And there was starvation, no hygiene and a massive Typhus epidemic - exacerbated by the poor conditions brought about by war.
The epidemic was so bad they had to build multiple large "leichenkellars" in the forced labor camps, or "corpse cellars", to store all the dead in a cool environment while they attempted to cremate them all. It was a massive undertaking in itself. It was these large corpse cellars that later got labelled as "gas chambers" by the victors of WW2.
I recommend these documentaries:
1/3 of the Holocaust:
https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1001
Auschwitz: The surprising hidden truth:
https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1005
The Chemistry of Auschwitz:
https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1014
Depends on what you mean under holocaust.
Was the jews the most harmed nation? Definitely not. Jewish losses in WWII hardly exceed 1-2 million, including jews who was in Red Army and Wehrmacht. Most losses was Russians and Germans, 25 and 10 millions respectively.
Jews even was not the most killed in german camps.
Yes, Germany specifically treated jews by etnicity, but that was common thing of that time around the world. From Japanese in US to Germans and Austirans in Britain, Russians and later Germans and others in USSR, chinese in Japan, etc.
If you retrospect the post WWI German history and role that Jews played in destruction of Germany, there will be no questions about the reasons why many Germans was angry towards the Jews.
So, there was nothing superspecial about the Jews.
Holohoax sacred 6 million of victims number was first declared nearly 1918 IIRC in some Jewish literature. They just strain that number to the WWII losses.
https://nanomatic.fi/pdf/6million.pdf
Perfect list, thank you. That is definitely some very special and sacred figure for them, to the point that they lobbied the laws in Europe with jail sentence just for questioning that 6 millions dogma.
So, every rational and intelligent human being should question and doubt it as wide as possible, just because they so try to prevent that.
In Russia, the most popular nickname for holocaust is "lohocaust", where "loh" means "potential victim of swindle" in rogue language.
Yes to an extent. Though it’s difficult to ascertain specifics because it’s so y. Everyone agrees that there were prison camps. Everyone agrees many died in the camps. The debate is about quantity, intention, and cause. Don’t forget the communists killed more than a hundred million. This is well known. Since this number dwarfs others I think as a society it’s even more important to focus on preventing this from happening again.
I'm with you on that, 100%
(pssst you spelled Holodomor wrong)
watch it while you can. A different version of History
EUROPA: THE LAST BATTLE (2017) - FULL DOCUMENTARY HD https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow offers all to each one within form; and flow meeting form causes friction; vibration; resonance and heat. Holocaust represents an allegory for the status quo of all form within flow aka a burned offering.
How to corrupt ones understanding thereof? By suggesting different meanings for "holocaust"; which causes the conflict of reason aka want (wooden doors) vs not want (six million) or vice versa; doesn't matter. Only consent to suggested meaning of "holocaust" is needed for those suggesting it to gain control over all who consented to believe or not believe it.
never change, fwoc
♥
How about always change (form within the momentum of flow)?
Urgh. Fuck off, bot.
There is a huge post , which you can find by using the search function. It is also in the Conspiracy wiki