Same thing could be said about science, only difference is that there exist no evidence that their scientific theories are true, it is all faith based. People saw it on TV, so they assumed it must be true.
Big bang is nothing more then a theory. No proof exist that Einsteins theories holds up, in fact all you are going to find is that he has been disproved, e=mc2 does not even work. 300 years later we still have no proof that Newtons theory of gravity holds up, people were able to explain why things fall even before Newton, any idea that two objects attracts each other is just false. NASA, the Moon landing, ISS and Mars rovers, all fake, can not be confirmed by anyone outside of the governments Freemasons.
I am worried about the implications of recent "trends" in the treatment of scientific topics by science journalists. The new topic seems to be the treatment of "scientific knowledge" by science journalists, especially those writing for popular publications.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question. The treatment of the topic of the power of scientific knowledge to alter our lives is especially worrying because it seems to me that, by putting a more positive spin on the value of knowledge, the mainstream media is ignoring the possibility that scientific knowledge can be twisted to serve political or commercial interests.
I am worried about the implications of...the treatment of "scientific knowledge"
Knowledge represents perceived inspiration; not suggested information. Nature offers (balance); those within consent (choice). Everything suggested under the umbrella of scientism represents choice suggests (information); choice consents to submit to suggested choices; while ignoring balance.
The corruption of science (to know aka to perceive) into scientism (submisson to suggested) operates underneath anything suggested. Your choice needs to response to balance (need/want); while resisting suggested conflict (want vs not want). One does not need suggested information; on needs perceived inspiration.
All these groups formed under scientism and any other suggested -isms; represent idol worshipers, an idol represents suggested information over perceived inspiration.
Example....A "cow" represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death), and we can perceive the behavior of form within flow as needed inspiration to respond to by choice; which allows us to grow our understanding of everything perceived. Nature communicates inspiration by moving us.
The word "cow" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the form within flow; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "cow" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "cow" for all those attached to it. Nature does not brand any information; it moves everything within itself as perceivable inspiration.
All words; all languages represent suggested spell-craft by the few as idolized meaning for the many; as to deceive them to ignore to respond by choice (evaluation) to real meaning of balance (value) within movement.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question.
It is the ignorance of the many towards knowledge (perception of inspiration) being self evident; to instead consent to believe that the idol "knowledge" (suggested information) is self evident. It is our consent to the suggested word "knowledge" that gives the parasitic few the power to define its suggested meaning against the many.
the value of knowledge
Perceived knowledge represents value; responding choice represents evaluation. All suggested knowledge represents devaluation of evaluation by choice; by misusing choice to submit to the suggested choices of others.
the mainstream media
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); flow represents the main stream of all perceivable; while media (Latin medius; middle) represents the middlemen between perceived inspiration and choice of reaction. Those parasitic middlemen represents the suggested information by the few towards the consenting choice of the ignorant many. The choice of want over need.
to serve political or commercial interests.
a) the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof. Suggesting a substitute value (money) tricks one to consent to devalue ONEs evaluation of ALL existence. How? By submitting to the will of others for suggested value.
b) representative government aka govern (to control) and ment (from mens; mind) represents ignoring free will of choice for representative choices suggested by others. Each needs to respond as choice to balance and ignoring to do so does not give choice away; it just corrupts understanding of being choice within balance, hence being mind controlled by the will of others.
c) if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government), one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives. One cannot have a choice without evaluation; hence one needs to be choice in order to be responsible for one's choices. One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible. One cannot choose to be responsible for one's choices without having a choice.
d) there is NO "government" for any people; there is only a government of one's own choices. All people need to be responsible for their own choices. Each one needs
Nature operates on real (perceived) inspiration by those attached to it, and it is not limited by suggested words; to operate on suggested information.
One does not need to know; one needs to know what one chooses to believe; one needs to respond to real balance; one needs to respond to real inspiration.
The word "nature" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the balance within movement; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "nature" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "
If flow (inception towards death); then form (life). If balance; then choice. Implication (if/then) represents balance; reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing etc.) represents imbalance caused by ignorance of balance.
If question for choice (want vs not want); then balance (need/want) came before and want over need (ignorance) was chosen.
Choice/choice in ignorance of balance (to bind anew) creates choice/choice in ignorance of balance. The essence of the religion (to bind anew) is not the original bond, but the will to submit to others.
The original bond under natural law represents offer/consent. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we each represent choice (consent) within balance (offer). To bind anew implies choice consenting to suggested choices of others aka to submit to the will of others.
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
Just choice implies without balance, yet as choice one represents the response to balance aka being within balance with the choice to either adhere to it or ignore it. Ignorance (imbalance) represents a state within balance.
"free" will of choice represents response to the "dom"inance of balance. Therefore; free-dom implies being free within being dominated. The suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance; but it's always there; while our choice of want over need imbalances us.
You realize "science" is an outgrowth of protestant Christianity right? Almost all of the big hitting philosophers and scientists that initiated the scientific revolution of the sixteenth century where protestant Christians who were influenced by something they found in the teachings of Jesus Christ.
You have little scientia about what you're talking about. Do less accusing and more accepting responsibility. Do not attack those who try to enlighten you.
No matter how many times civilization has been wiped out, the Bible still stands, containing stories going back pre-flood, to the time of the old world.
This is quite possible the stupidest thing I've read on this site. Every single piece of the bible can be attributed to some other religion and just about ALL of them were pagan. It's literally a 'soup' of paganism, mixed with a plethora of other misguided religions that the jews cobbled together.
Same thing could be said about science, only difference is that there exist no evidence that their scientific theories are true, it is all faith based. People saw it on TV, so they assumed it must be true.
Big bang is nothing more then a theory. No proof exist that Einsteins theories holds up, in fact all you are going to find is that he has been disproved, e=mc2 does not even work. 300 years later we still have no proof that Newtons theory of gravity holds up, people were able to explain why things fall even before Newton, any idea that two objects attracts each other is just false. NASA, the Moon landing, ISS and Mars rovers, all fake, can not be confirmed by anyone outside of the governments Freemasons.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOW, verb transitive [Latin nosco, cognosco.] - "to perceive".
What if consent to suggested scientism corrupts understanding of perceived knowledge?
I am worried about the implications of recent "trends" in the treatment of scientific topics by science journalists. The new topic seems to be the treatment of "scientific knowledge" by science journalists, especially those writing for popular publications.
It seems that the assumption is that knowledge is self-evident and must be accepted without question. The treatment of the topic of the power of scientific knowledge to alter our lives is especially worrying because it seems to me that, by putting a more positive spin on the value of knowledge, the mainstream media is ignoring the possibility that scientific knowledge can be twisted to serve political or commercial interests.
Knowledge represents perceived inspiration; not suggested information. Nature offers (balance); those within consent (choice). Everything suggested under the umbrella of scientism represents choice suggests (information); choice consents to submit to suggested choices; while ignoring balance.
The corruption of science (to know aka to perceive) into scientism (submisson to suggested) operates underneath anything suggested. Your choice needs to response to balance (need/want); while resisting suggested conflict (want vs not want). One does not need suggested information; on needs perceived inspiration.
All these groups formed under scientism and any other suggested -isms; represent idol worshipers, an idol represents suggested information over perceived inspiration.
Example....A "cow" represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death), and we can perceive the behavior of form within flow as needed inspiration to respond to by choice; which allows us to grow our understanding of everything perceived. Nature communicates inspiration by moving us.
The word "cow" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the form within flow; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "cow" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "cow" for all those attached to it. Nature does not brand any information; it moves everything within itself as perceivable inspiration.
All words; all languages represent suggested spell-craft by the few as idolized meaning for the many; as to deceive them to ignore to respond by choice (evaluation) to real meaning of balance (value) within movement.
It is the ignorance of the many towards knowledge (perception of inspiration) being self evident; to instead consent to believe that the idol "knowledge" (suggested information) is self evident. It is our consent to the suggested word "knowledge" that gives the parasitic few the power to define its suggested meaning against the many.
Perceived knowledge represents value; responding choice represents evaluation. All suggested knowledge represents devaluation of evaluation by choice; by misusing choice to submit to the suggested choices of others.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); flow represents the main stream of all perceivable; while media (Latin medius; middle) represents the middlemen between perceived inspiration and choice of reaction. Those parasitic middlemen represents the suggested information by the few towards the consenting choice of the ignorant many. The choice of want over need.
a) the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof. Suggesting a substitute value (money) tricks one to consent to devalue ONEs evaluation of ALL existence. How? By submitting to the will of others for suggested value.
b) representative government aka govern (to control) and ment (from mens; mind) represents ignoring free will of choice for representative choices suggested by others. Each needs to respond as choice to balance and ignoring to do so does not give choice away; it just corrupts understanding of being choice within balance, hence being mind controlled by the will of others.
c) if one would have a choice to evaluate ALL existence (representative government), one needs to evaluate all suggestions (suggested values) that are presented as alternatives. One cannot have a choice without evaluation; hence one needs to be choice in order to be responsible for one's choices. One cannot be responsible for one's choices without choosing to be responsible. One cannot choose to be responsible for one's choices without having a choice.
d) there is NO "government" for any people; there is only a government of one's own choices. All people need to be responsible for their own choices. Each one needs
Nature operates on real (perceived) inspiration by those attached to it, and it is not limited by suggested words; to operate on suggested information.
One does not need to know; one needs to know what one chooses to believe; one needs to respond to real balance; one needs to respond to real inspiration.
The word "nature" represents a suggested meaning (idol) for the balance within movement; which when consented to by choice (believing and not believing); allows those who suggested the word "nature" to define; redefine; corrupt or withhold at will the meaning of the idol "
I do not answer what if questions.
If flow (inception towards death); then form (life). If balance; then choice. Implication (if/then) represents balance; reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing etc.) represents imbalance caused by ignorance of balance.
If question for choice (want vs not want); then balance (need/want) came before and want over need (ignorance) was chosen.
Want is from "to want" (not want); true is from "true" (false); good is from "good" (bad); and balance is from "balance" (imbalance).
To balance:
need/want (if/then) = need (balance) over want (imbalance)
good/bad (if/then) = good (balance) over bad (imbalance)
Truth/false (if/then) = truth (balance) over false (imbalance)
Balance (need/want/good/true/false) is the reason
Choice/choice in ignorance of balance (to bind anew) creates choice/choice in ignorance of balance. The essence of the religion (to bind anew) is not the original bond, but the will to submit to others.
The original bond under natural law represents offer/consent. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we each represent choice (consent) within balance (offer). To bind anew implies choice consenting to suggested choices of others aka to submit to the will of others.
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
Just choice implies without balance, yet as choice one represents the response to balance aka being within balance with the choice to either adhere to it or ignore it. Ignorance (imbalance) represents a state within balance.
"free" will of choice represents response to the "dom"inance of balance. Therefore; free-dom implies being free within being dominated. The suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance; but it's always there; while our choice of want over need imbalances us.
Therefore, we are free to choose what we want and need, but we are never free to choose what we want over what we need.
As the tree grows, it is only free to grow within its nature; and it is not free to grow outside its nature.
The choices we make are in balance, and the choices we make are within our nature.
If you want to be free, you must be in balance, and you must be within your nature.
You realize "science" is an outgrowth of protestant Christianity right? Almost all of the big hitting philosophers and scientists that initiated the scientific revolution of the sixteenth century where protestant Christians who were influenced by something they found in the teachings of Jesus Christ.
You have little scientia about what you're talking about. Do less accusing and more accepting responsibility. Do not attack those who try to enlighten you.
No matter how many times civilization has been wiped out, the Bible still stands, containing stories going back pre-flood, to the time of the old world.
This is quite possible the stupidest thing I've read on this site. Every single piece of the bible can be attributed to some other religion and just about ALL of them were pagan. It's literally a 'soup' of paganism, mixed with a plethora of other misguided religions that the jews cobbled together.