"I'm not an anti-vaxxer but mRNA therapy isn't a vaccine."

"I'm not a Trump supporter but the Democrats are off the rails and must be stopped."

Sorry, I'm part of the problem.

In this society, we're put into a meat grinder that separates us whether we like it or not. Division is their answer to regulate, tag, track.. it is the diseased society, the psychological trauma mind control meat grinder we have no choice to be put into. You're either are a Democrat or a Republican, a this or that.. so that we are shuffled into separation so that we cannot fight for each other when we enter their slaughter houses. The only way we escape this is to not label each other, accept each other's differences.. but the powerful CIA propaganda machine has been too successful for the majority of the cattle, they continually inflict the trauma to disassociate us from humanity and into individual categories of people. We need god, we need out of the system, we need to put ourselves in the way of the gears and the actual machine before we can have any change and any chance of survival.

Right on Axol. At its most basic form, it's a logical fallacy. It suggests that if you're part of a certain group, you're inherently wrong, or if you're part of the other group, you're inherently right. Then comes the virtue signaling "I'm not___, but..." which placates to this lie, this fallacy.

Ideas stand or fail on their own, they have no connection to who believes or disbelieves them. Belief is not a necessary requirement for truth, nor is the inverse. If a Nazi believes 2+2=4 it doesn't make it wrong. If a communist believes real communism has never been tried it doesn't make them right. If a globalist believes MAPs deserve to live it doesn't make them right either.

We are literally in a war of good/truth/logic versus evil/lies/illogic.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist but...

This is a powerful rhetorical tool if used correctly.

I'm not a holocaust denier, but these who are claim that the holocaust is nothing but a conspiracy theory, it has no hard facts supporting it but relies exclusively of interpreting ambiguous evidence in the worst possible way and testimony by witness who stand to profit from lying, many of whom have been discredited. For example the existence of mass graves in a time of war doesn't actually mean anything on it's own. They claim the holocaust is a scam and an excuse to justify an unjust and expensive war. This is their position and honestly I have a hard time disputing any of it. It's a far more simple and reasonable explanation than the Germans executing millions of jews in exotic ways for absolutely no reason. What do you think?

You see this is a great way to convince a normie of a hot button issue. Lay out the best evidence while distancing yourself from it. The typical response is to attack you for holding the position, but if you don't hold it they are forced to deal with the evidence.

If fact this sort of thing is really the only way to engage in certain topics because normies and lefties have conditioned themselves to only respond with ad hominem.

When inane beliefs go completely unchallenged and combine with absolute power, the Dark Ages is all but an inevitable.

The first one retained for 5 Centuries.

The second one retained for 1 century.

This one would retain for a decade, with equal destructive force.

Even 3 months of Dark Ages would be too much. Let's make it a 0.

People use this language to talk to those who still don't understand what's going on. It's called testing the water.

"I don't give a FUCK what you're NOT. I care about what you ARE."

Right. You drunk bro? Because if so, you are not a very clear headed drinker.

"Believe in yourself and never be afraid to ask questions and suggest theories."

I work for a living. I can not afford to lose my job. I need to test the waters before I tell a guy the mRNA therapy will kill his wife and children. I'm not just going to tell every person I meet, China has secret bases in the US, or Hillary Clinton is involved in humans trafficking.

So true. People are so used to groups and labels that they can no longer distinguish themselves anymore.

For example, I believe in God but I don't consider myself a christian because these people take this one black book with a cross on it quite literally... They cannot see that the God of the Old Testement killed children, while the God of the New Testement wants you to pray for your enemies... They think it's the same one...

I'm not an idiot, but...

Agree wholeheartedly with this. You need to lead by example and offering outs at the beginning is weakening the whole argument.

I appreciate your consistency over the years and have typically been some of my favorite forum posters over the years. Keep up the good service!

They are so worried about being accepted / fitting in, because of the risk to being put aside.

They need to grow a pair and affirm what they are thinking.

100%

Have to agree. Don't be a limp dick

👍

To this point, rename the site header 'conspiracytruth' or something

Sometimes you have to ease the normies in...

Can we apply this same logic of grouping people to when you refer to "liberals" "libs" "dems" "democrat". Annoys me to no end. No group is a monolith and it reduces you to tribal non logical conclusions. Same goes for everyone on the other side if the spectrum with "conservative" or "Trumpers". I agree with your message but most of this board is not consistent with the logic because they are blinded by partisanship.

I'm not a vaxxer but...the jab is bad.

You discuss being pigeonholed into "fake factions" and lament the "othering" of society in the same breath as claiming "they" will murder your entire family.