On point 1, there is so much evidence of their passion for ridding the Earth of excess people. It's a hateful and flawed set of positions going back to Malthus. Even when Simon debunked and humiliated The Population Bomb author, the position has only gained more adherents. And they haven't all been too secretive. You have Eugenics in America with Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood (Bill Gates' dad). You have cultural monuments like the Georgia Guidestones, academics who push for VHE (voluntary human extinction), so many movies that push the people need reducing trope. So much of eco thinking is really just hatred of humans. Here in California the purported well being of certain animals is placed above farmers raising healthy crops.
Add the ever pervasive "white people are responsible for everything bad" narrative and you can see how it's foreign agents pushing Marxist drivel ONLY to destabilize the nation.
They don't want to kill off just a few million people with side effects. The shot reduces symptoms enough so they survive in the event of a mutation that is deadly to people who haven't taken the shot. They need to survive in order to transmit the new deadly variant to large numbers of people. That way they can target who dies, which will be the impoverished and disobedient.
Vaccines have always been dangerous, not just the mRNA ones. In the US the pharmaceutical companies producing them have no liability and do not care if they are safe or effective. The numbers of all these supposedly eradicated or greatly reduced diseases were going down well before mass vaxxes began. Many of these diseases were less deadly than the dreaded covid which is barely a threat even if you believe the numbers are true.
The vaccine manufacturers don't have quality control and no one can hold them accountable. Even if I hopoened to believe vaccines work as they say, I would not take any based on that alone:
There is a spiritual component. Think "Monsters Inc", where extra-dimensional entities feed off emotional energy from this world. As in the movie, and as shown by the history of the occult, the energy of children is especially prized.
This is why the primary effect is child abuse. Teaching them they are diseased, preventing them from seeing other children and family, making them go through humiliating rituals, and of course, injecting them with drugs. Having the abuse inflected by family members and authority figures, who deny that it is abuse.
Do enough of this abuse and people break into mental pieces. This process is referred to as trauma based mind control. The person can have multiple versions of reality, which a control can flip through like pages in a book. These are typically seeded at a young age by mass media. The spiritual energy of this person is available for the entities to harvest.
Have you ever heard the theory that the earth is a loosh farm for a bunch of shitty alien lizards? Crazy conspiracy, that still is on the list of maybe.
If everything retains like this (forced masks, semi infinite lockdowns, social distancing, leisure traveling and mass gatherings become eliminated permanently) in a semi infinite state, MSM is still blowing up mutant covid hysteria regardless of how anyone took the vaccine or not (which I SERIOUSLY doubt is different from the Polio vaccines or Measles Vax) then this IS the cull.
The psychological effects will be so severe that people will inevitably regress into an animalistic state.
The Elite of 100,0000-ish will laugh at us as we fall for their lies and literally regress into feral cannibals that kill their own as they surpass "all of creation" by replacing us with GMO human warrior slaves.
Your scenario will only work if the elite has an intent to let this crisis end at the next year, maximum. This does not appear to be the case. We still have 1 to 3 decades to go.
By 2025, it's one of the "Fourth Turnings" of the American Empire.
You will see Trump being re-elected for the sake of collapsing America into something that resembles Somalia or Yugoslavia, followed by "the New Founding Fathers" waging war on Russia and China and being stampeded.
The Federal Reserve went completely unopposed at the Winter of that year, then Spanish Flu, Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, Maoist "Antifa" China, Cold War, Cambodian Genocide...back to back.
It's worth keeping the possibility open.
The economic consequences of lockdowns are reducing population on their own, no further action will be required.
...
The machine will still need operators.
People to code, people to hold it's hand when it fucks up. Working with programmed devices, these things fuck up more often than Popsci articles would admit.
Some downstream manufacturing issue occurs with a widget, and the machine produces garbage.
Also input cows for the AI as data input for large datasets; People on Onlyfans (who is on the backend of that database ffs....).
...
Take a look at the cold war.
Constant fear porn for decades.
Plebs hiding under desks, ready to accept any military budget or action.
The bombs never drop.
The nukes never go off.
After proving a tiny minority can control more people more easily (think the China model), you would want to end the party because you are so sick in the head?
This is precisely why; they want to impose it globally. The smart way to do this is through great upheaval.
After proving a tiny minority can control more people more easily (think the China model), you would want to end the party because you are so sick in the head?
The China Model is still mostly in China. The party hasn't begun because the rest of the world has not yet adopted it. The ones people targeted are people who refuse or don't have access to the shots.
Unless "elites" would plan to kill each other next - fighting for even more power.
In such case nationalist and smart soldier might be better than sheep for their purposes.
Or they think they are so powerful that nobody can stop them - so are not afraid about "nationalists" who ? Or it is about killing weakest, dumbest and ill ones simply - just another eugenics... Who knows. We don't know really.
No fucking clue. All we know is what we see and some leaks too small to make solid big picture.
But my thought about that: if you would be genocidal monster doing depopulation who would be more affordable if you would have to face crisis and lack of resources:
those smart,thinking and trying to be self-sustainable,thrifty and hard working ?
dumbest sheeps needing to be controlled and too lazy to be useful for anything except things you order them.And what's worse extremely lavish ?
In case if they want just power and/or are stupid and energy and climate crisis is lie they would obviously want to kill first - us. If they are smart enough to even do calculation - I doubt it really, majority of those idiots on the top are not self made mans what means they are in most cases some kind of degenerates.
If they really think that we have energy crisis and resource crisis (do they ? I doubt it !) than more advanced technology and more obedient consumers isn't a solution but source of problems as it would consume more rare resources and energy. Profit must be higher or equal than effort put in thing or investment is failure. Simple economy. But do they know it ? I'm afraid they are not.
In case those problem are real - even despite political problems we would cause - we - critical thinkers,survivalists and so on - would be beneficial choice to be left alive. Simply because if there are coming hard times and you would have cattle herd you would want to have strongest ones in herd. Weak ones are too big effort to care about them. If they really ever think they would make some AI to make people drones controlled by it than they will cause disaster that will wipe out both human drones and them. Not because of AI power.Because of its lack.
However of course only psychopath would treat humans like cattle.
I'm talking about the rationale that allows the people behind it not to feel sinister.
So surely you've heard that we are over populated and in the middle of climate catastrophe?
Meanwhile all these useless plebes insist on living the ways they do using up resources and destroying the environment, hence "gaining control of the earth's population" and allowing a new system to regulate and manage birth rates would be saving humanity.
Secondly yes, atheists do often times adhere to some level of good and evil however yes, they only exists as concepts even in Gods eyes.
Remember that it was only when Adam ate the FORBIDDEN fruit that he began thinking in those concepts and then needing morality, a dualistic concept to stop him from doing undesirable things. Simply as a.member of this species you will have an aversion to killing other members of this species. It's hardwired into us being a highly social animal. What stops a wolf from ravaging all the other wolves in its pack? Simply that it is hardwired for more social behavior than rhat, in fact few animals kill their own species off.
Do ants need concepts of good and evil to stop them from murdering other ants in their own cony? Do they think they are doing anything inherently good when they are giving up their lives for their cony? No, it's just been n their genetic make up to do certain things, and to not do others.
Humans are no different in that. We are different in that we are bio-cultural organisms capable of assimilating and being governed by subjective ideas that vary from culture to culture such as ideas about good and evil, and we have consciousness and what we are conscious of can become as much a condition and factor influencing behavior as culture or genetics.
So yes, even athirst are going to rationalize things and they will likely rationalize them according to an IDEA of what is desirable for mankind as opposed to what is undesirable so when they (in their eyes) create the perfect society for humanity they can pay themselves on the back and take credit as being the founding fathers of that new world order.
Speaking of founding fathers, they had no problem killing off brits to establish what they thought would be a better society for the Majority of people in the colonies who themselves did not feel strongly enough the same way enough to join the fight. But the founding fathers had a vision of a more perfect society and they did it as much for the rest of the colonist as they did for future generations.
Make no mistake, the NWO has the same thing going on in their minds, but have taken it to another level and that level is an arrogant and foolish crime against humanity.
They feel they are fighting a war against ignorance and destruction by taking the reigns for all of humanity.
Even Jesus rejected being called good and insisted no one was good. Jesus did not teach anything on the concepts of morality.
Adam walked with God, until he gave into the serpant who told him that to judge things good and evil was to be like God, yet God told him that would be his end. He fell into the mind of duality.
All dualistic concepts are merely concepts, yet God is objective.
To label things as good and bad is to judge yet we are taught to "judge not lest ye be judged yourself" but instead of judging we are taught that it is better to know, understand, and live by that " what ye sew, so shall ye reap" so it is better to do what is prosperous and to help other people, including/especially your enemy by that reasoning alone. We are taught not to do things because they make us "good", or are "good" things.
If you are not judging you are not labeling things as having a false duality. The moment you judge something as good or evil you have judged and are thus sinning and dwelling in a lie.
So long as you judge things and people you sustain yourself on forbidden fruit and dwell in death and do not walk with God.
The NWO are playing God, and planning their own judgment day for humanity and they are doing so based on concepts of what they believe is Good. They have their own idea of Utopia for mankind and believe they are justified in what they do because of their sense of morality.
If someone does something truly good, they don't lie to and manipulate the very people they're trying to do good for.
Not effective.This not works usually.
If God does not exist there is no objective truth, only subjective opinion, and literally nothing has any significance outside of the fleeting, subjective here and now.
While I believe God probably exist - you are wrong. Objective truth exists as everyone is connected to another, however its perception - is God existing or not - is purely subjective. At the end nobody can surely know and understand the greater order of things we call "truth".
The objective, abstract, immaterial standards of good and evil cannot exist in a reality that is nothing more than material (matter). Similarly, the laws of logic cannot exist in a universe that is nothing but matter being acted upon by time and chance. These standards of good and evil, along with the laws of logic, exist independently of the material world.
Materialism vs idealism being opposites is philosophy delusion. Matter (form) and idea (movement/change) are bonded each other. Pantheism is more right than dualism.
Dude, the only reason we can have 8 billion people on the planet is due to cheap/plentiful fossil fuels. The era of cheap/plentiful fossil fuels is ending. We literally won't be able to feed everyone. We can let the population reduce naturally via starvation, but it's better (and more profitable) for the elite to have controlled depopulation.
Yes.
On point 1, there is so much evidence of their passion for ridding the Earth of excess people. It's a hateful and flawed set of positions going back to Malthus. Even when Simon debunked and humiliated The Population Bomb author, the position has only gained more adherents. And they haven't all been too secretive. You have Eugenics in America with Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood (Bill Gates' dad). You have cultural monuments like the Georgia Guidestones, academics who push for VHE (voluntary human extinction), so many movies that push the people need reducing trope. So much of eco thinking is really just hatred of humans. Here in California the purported well being of certain animals is placed above farmers raising healthy crops.
Add the ever pervasive "white people are responsible for everything bad" narrative and you can see how it's foreign agents pushing Marxist drivel ONLY to destabilize the nation.
They don't want to kill off just a few million people with side effects. The shot reduces symptoms enough so they survive in the event of a mutation that is deadly to people who haven't taken the shot. They need to survive in order to transmit the new deadly variant to large numbers of people. That way they can target who dies, which will be the impoverished and disobedient.
Re: 4, perhaps they will use the fear of vaccination to stop proven vaccines and have children dying again from various illnesses.
Vaccines have always been dangerous, not just the mRNA ones. In the US the pharmaceutical companies producing them have no liability and do not care if they are safe or effective. The numbers of all these supposedly eradicated or greatly reduced diseases were going down well before mass vaxxes began. Many of these diseases were less deadly than the dreaded covid which is barely a threat even if you believe the numbers are true.
The vaccine manufacturers don't have quality control and no one can hold them accountable. Even if I hopoened to believe vaccines work as they say, I would not take any based on that alone:
https://cairnsnews.org/2018/11/19/u-s-govt-loses-landmark-vaccine-lawsuit/
There is a spiritual component. Think "Monsters Inc", where extra-dimensional entities feed off emotional energy from this world. As in the movie, and as shown by the history of the occult, the energy of children is especially prized.
This is why the primary effect is child abuse. Teaching them they are diseased, preventing them from seeing other children and family, making them go through humiliating rituals, and of course, injecting them with drugs. Having the abuse inflected by family members and authority figures, who deny that it is abuse.
Do enough of this abuse and people break into mental pieces. This process is referred to as trauma based mind control. The person can have multiple versions of reality, which a control can flip through like pages in a book. These are typically seeded at a young age by mass media. The spiritual energy of this person is available for the entities to harvest.
Have you ever heard the theory that the earth is a loosh farm for a bunch of shitty alien lizards? Crazy conspiracy, that still is on the list of maybe.
If everything retains like this (forced masks, semi infinite lockdowns, social distancing, leisure traveling and mass gatherings become eliminated permanently) in a semi infinite state, MSM is still blowing up mutant covid hysteria regardless of how anyone took the vaccine or not (which I SERIOUSLY doubt is different from the Polio vaccines or Measles Vax) then this IS the cull.
The psychological effects will be so severe that people will inevitably regress into an animalistic state.
The Elite of 100,0000-ish will laugh at us as we fall for their lies and literally regress into feral cannibals that kill their own as they surpass "all of creation" by replacing us with GMO human warrior slaves.
Your scenario will only work if the elite has an intent to let this crisis end at the next year, maximum. This does not appear to be the case. We still have 1 to 3 decades to go.
Let me tell you something.
By 2025, it's one of the "Fourth Turnings" of the American Empire.
You will see Trump being re-elected for the sake of collapsing America into something that resembles Somalia or Yugoslavia, followed by "the New Founding Fathers" waging war on Russia and China and being stampeded.
Nobody could harness that potential, though. You have a chance by the Christmas of 1913. Your ancestors paid that, full price.
(And yes, Hitler is financed using the Central Banks of London and the Federal Reserve, so is Stalin and Mao.)
No, 1913 is the beginning of the mass regression.
The Federal Reserve went completely unopposed at the Winter of that year, then Spanish Flu, Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, Maoist "Antifa" China, Cold War, Cambodian Genocide...back to back.
Some of the most prominent and powerful opponents to the Creature from Jekyl Island died in the icu North Atlantic.
It's worth keeping the possibility open.
The economic consequences of lockdowns are reducing population on their own, no further action will be required.
...
The machine will still need operators.
People to code, people to hold it's hand when it fucks up. Working with programmed devices, these things fuck up more often than Popsci articles would admit.
Some downstream manufacturing issue occurs with a widget, and the machine produces garbage.
Also input cows for the AI as data input for large datasets; People on Onlyfans (who is on the backend of that database ffs....).
...
Take a look at the cold war.
Constant fear porn for decades.
Plebs hiding under desks, ready to accept any military budget or action.
The bombs never drop.
The nukes never go off.
Preserve the thinkers & skeptics? That's not how it goes. The Soviets killed the Polish thinkers and skeptics, as they are the hard-to-control ones.
The Hutus didn't preserve any Tutsi NPC or thinker.
If you don't know, in this situation, if you are Hutu or Tutsi, consider yourself Tutsi.
This is precisely why; they want to impose it globally. The smart way to do this is through great upheaval.
The China Model is still mostly in China. The party hasn't begun because the rest of the world has not yet adopted it. The ones people targeted are people who refuse or don't have access to the shots.
Unless "elites" would plan to kill each other next - fighting for even more power. In such case nationalist and smart soldier might be better than sheep for their purposes.
Or they think they are so powerful that nobody can stop them - so are not afraid about "nationalists" who ? Or it is about killing weakest, dumbest and ill ones simply - just another eugenics... Who knows. We don't know really.
No fucking clue. All we know is what we see and some leaks too small to make solid big picture.
But my thought about that: if you would be genocidal monster doing depopulation who would be more affordable if you would have to face crisis and lack of resources:
In case if they want just power and/or are stupid and energy and climate crisis is lie they would obviously want to kill first - us. If they are smart enough to even do calculation - I doubt it really, majority of those idiots on the top are not self made mans what means they are in most cases some kind of degenerates.
If they really think that we have energy crisis and resource crisis (do they ? I doubt it !) than more advanced technology and more obedient consumers isn't a solution but source of problems as it would consume more rare resources and energy. Profit must be higher or equal than effort put in thing or investment is failure. Simple economy. But do they know it ? I'm afraid they are not.
In case those problem are real - even despite political problems we would cause - we - critical thinkers,survivalists and so on - would be beneficial choice to be left alive. Simply because if there are coming hard times and you would have cattle herd you would want to have strongest ones in herd. Weak ones are too big effort to care about them. If they really ever think they would make some AI to make people drones controlled by it than they will cause disaster that will wipe out both human drones and them. Not because of AI power.Because of its lack.
However of course only psychopath would treat humans like cattle.
It's not sinister, no more than controlling the population via abortion.
It's responsible, it's management, it's the right thing to do, it's compassionate to the future of all creatures including our own species.
It can be rationalized as harrowing act of compassion, and rather than being seen as selfish and evil, it is what we need to do to save humanity.
I'm talking about the rationale that allows the people behind it not to feel sinister.
So surely you've heard that we are over populated and in the middle of climate catastrophe?
Meanwhile all these useless plebes insist on living the ways they do using up resources and destroying the environment, hence "gaining control of the earth's population" and allowing a new system to regulate and manage birth rates would be saving humanity.
That it was sinister is the ops words, not mine.
Secondly yes, atheists do often times adhere to some level of good and evil however yes, they only exists as concepts even in Gods eyes.
Remember that it was only when Adam ate the FORBIDDEN fruit that he began thinking in those concepts and then needing morality, a dualistic concept to stop him from doing undesirable things. Simply as a.member of this species you will have an aversion to killing other members of this species. It's hardwired into us being a highly social animal. What stops a wolf from ravaging all the other wolves in its pack? Simply that it is hardwired for more social behavior than rhat, in fact few animals kill their own species off.
Do ants need concepts of good and evil to stop them from murdering other ants in their own cony? Do they think they are doing anything inherently good when they are giving up their lives for their cony? No, it's just been n their genetic make up to do certain things, and to not do others.
Humans are no different in that. We are different in that we are bio-cultural organisms capable of assimilating and being governed by subjective ideas that vary from culture to culture such as ideas about good and evil, and we have consciousness and what we are conscious of can become as much a condition and factor influencing behavior as culture or genetics.
So yes, even athirst are going to rationalize things and they will likely rationalize them according to an IDEA of what is desirable for mankind as opposed to what is undesirable so when they (in their eyes) create the perfect society for humanity they can pay themselves on the back and take credit as being the founding fathers of that new world order.
Speaking of founding fathers, they had no problem killing off brits to establish what they thought would be a better society for the Majority of people in the colonies who themselves did not feel strongly enough the same way enough to join the fight. But the founding fathers had a vision of a more perfect society and they did it as much for the rest of the colonist as they did for future generations.
Make no mistake, the NWO has the same thing going on in their minds, but have taken it to another level and that level is an arrogant and foolish crime against humanity.
They feel they are fighting a war against ignorance and destruction by taking the reigns for all of humanity.
Even Jesus rejected being called good and insisted no one was good. Jesus did not teach anything on the concepts of morality.
Adam walked with God, until he gave into the serpant who told him that to judge things good and evil was to be like God, yet God told him that would be his end. He fell into the mind of duality.
All dualistic concepts are merely concepts, yet God is objective.
To label things as good and bad is to judge yet we are taught to "judge not lest ye be judged yourself" but instead of judging we are taught that it is better to know, understand, and live by that " what ye sew, so shall ye reap" so it is better to do what is prosperous and to help other people, including/especially your enemy by that reasoning alone. We are taught not to do things because they make us "good", or are "good" things.
If you are not judging you are not labeling things as having a false duality. The moment you judge something as good or evil you have judged and are thus sinning and dwelling in a lie.
So long as you judge things and people you sustain yourself on forbidden fruit and dwell in death and do not walk with God.
The NWO are playing God, and planning their own judgment day for humanity and they are doing so based on concepts of what they believe is Good. They have their own idea of Utopia for mankind and believe they are justified in what they do because of their sense of morality.
Not effective.This not works usually.
While I believe God probably exist - you are wrong. Objective truth exists as everyone is connected to another, however its perception - is God existing or not - is purely subjective. At the end nobody can surely know and understand the greater order of things we call "truth".
Materialism vs idealism being opposites is philosophy delusion. Matter (form) and idea (movement/change) are bonded each other. Pantheism is more right than dualism.
Dude, the only reason we can have 8 billion people on the planet is due to cheap/plentiful fossil fuels. The era of cheap/plentiful fossil fuels is ending. We literally won't be able to feed everyone. We can let the population reduce naturally via starvation, but it's better (and more profitable) for the elite to have controlled depopulation.