I'm talking about the rationale that allows the people behind it not to feel sinister.
So surely you've heard that we are over populated and in the middle of climate catastrophe?
Meanwhile all these useless plebes insist on living the ways they do using up resources and destroying the environment, hence "gaining control of the earth's population" and allowing a new system to regulate and manage birth rates would be saving humanity.
Secondly yes, atheists do often times adhere to some level of good and evil however yes, they only exists as concepts even in Gods eyes.
Remember that it was only when Adam ate the FORBIDDEN fruit that he began thinking in those concepts and then needing morality, a dualistic concept to stop him from doing undesirable things. Simply as a.member of this species you will have an aversion to killing other members of this species. It's hardwired into us being a highly social animal. What stops a wolf from ravaging all the other wolves in its pack? Simply that it is hardwired for more social behavior than rhat, in fact few animals kill their own species off.
Do ants need concepts of good and evil to stop them from murdering other ants in their own cony? Do they think they are doing anything inherently good when they are giving up their lives for their cony? No, it's just been n their genetic make up to do certain things, and to not do others.
Humans are no different in that. We are different in that we are bio-cultural organisms capable of assimilating and being governed by subjective ideas that vary from culture to culture such as ideas about good and evil, and we have consciousness and what we are conscious of can become as much a condition and factor influencing behavior as culture or genetics.
So yes, even athirst are going to rationalize things and they will likely rationalize them according to an IDEA of what is desirable for mankind as opposed to what is undesirable so when they (in their eyes) create the perfect society for humanity they can pay themselves on the back and take credit as being the founding fathers of that new world order.
Speaking of founding fathers, they had no problem killing off brits to establish what they thought would be a better society for the Majority of people in the colonies who themselves did not feel strongly enough the same way enough to join the fight. But the founding fathers had a vision of a more perfect society and they did it as much for the rest of the colonist as they did for future generations.
Make no mistake, the NWO has the same thing going on in their minds, but have taken it to another level and that level is an arrogant and foolish crime against humanity.
They feel they are fighting a war against ignorance and destruction by taking the reigns for all of humanity.
Even Jesus rejected being called good and insisted no one was good. Jesus did not teach anything on the concepts of morality.
Adam walked with God, until he gave into the serpant who told him that to judge things good and evil was to be like God, yet God told him that would be his end. He fell into the mind of duality.
All dualistic concepts are merely concepts, yet God is objective.
To label things as good and bad is to judge yet we are taught to "judge not lest ye be judged yourself" but instead of judging we are taught that it is better to know, understand, and live by that " what ye sew, so shall ye reap" so it is better to do what is prosperous and to help other people, including/especially your enemy by that reasoning alone. We are taught not to do things because they make us "good", or are "good" things.
If you are not judging you are not labeling things as having a false duality. The moment you judge something as good or evil you have judged and are thus sinning and dwelling in a lie.
So long as you judge things and people you sustain yourself on forbidden fruit and dwell in death and do not walk with God.
The NWO are playing God, and planning their own judgment day for humanity and they are doing so based on concepts of what they believe is Good. They have their own idea of Utopia for mankind and believe they are justified in what they do because of their sense of morality.
If someone does something truly good, they don't lie to and manipulate the very people they're trying to do good for.
Not effective.This not works usually.
If God does not exist there is no objective truth, only subjective opinion, and literally nothing has any significance outside of the fleeting, subjective here and now.
While I believe God probably exist - you are wrong. Objective truth exists as everyone is connected to another, however its perception - is God existing or not - is purely subjective. At the end nobody can surely know and understand the greater order of things we call "truth".
The objective, abstract, immaterial standards of good and evil cannot exist in a reality that is nothing more than material (matter). Similarly, the laws of logic cannot exist in a universe that is nothing but matter being acted upon by time and chance. These standards of good and evil, along with the laws of logic, exist independently of the material world.
Materialism vs idealism being opposites is philosophy delusion. Matter (form) and idea (movement/change) are bonded each other. Pantheism is more right than dualism.
I'm talking about the rationale that allows the people behind it not to feel sinister.
So surely you've heard that we are over populated and in the middle of climate catastrophe?
Meanwhile all these useless plebes insist on living the ways they do using up resources and destroying the environment, hence "gaining control of the earth's population" and allowing a new system to regulate and manage birth rates would be saving humanity.
That it was sinister is the ops words, not mine.
Secondly yes, atheists do often times adhere to some level of good and evil however yes, they only exists as concepts even in Gods eyes.
Remember that it was only when Adam ate the FORBIDDEN fruit that he began thinking in those concepts and then needing morality, a dualistic concept to stop him from doing undesirable things. Simply as a.member of this species you will have an aversion to killing other members of this species. It's hardwired into us being a highly social animal. What stops a wolf from ravaging all the other wolves in its pack? Simply that it is hardwired for more social behavior than rhat, in fact few animals kill their own species off.
Do ants need concepts of good and evil to stop them from murdering other ants in their own cony? Do they think they are doing anything inherently good when they are giving up their lives for their cony? No, it's just been n their genetic make up to do certain things, and to not do others.
Humans are no different in that. We are different in that we are bio-cultural organisms capable of assimilating and being governed by subjective ideas that vary from culture to culture such as ideas about good and evil, and we have consciousness and what we are conscious of can become as much a condition and factor influencing behavior as culture or genetics.
So yes, even athirst are going to rationalize things and they will likely rationalize them according to an IDEA of what is desirable for mankind as opposed to what is undesirable so when they (in their eyes) create the perfect society for humanity they can pay themselves on the back and take credit as being the founding fathers of that new world order.
Speaking of founding fathers, they had no problem killing off brits to establish what they thought would be a better society for the Majority of people in the colonies who themselves did not feel strongly enough the same way enough to join the fight. But the founding fathers had a vision of a more perfect society and they did it as much for the rest of the colonist as they did for future generations.
Make no mistake, the NWO has the same thing going on in their minds, but have taken it to another level and that level is an arrogant and foolish crime against humanity.
They feel they are fighting a war against ignorance and destruction by taking the reigns for all of humanity.
Even Jesus rejected being called good and insisted no one was good. Jesus did not teach anything on the concepts of morality.
Adam walked with God, until he gave into the serpant who told him that to judge things good and evil was to be like God, yet God told him that would be his end. He fell into the mind of duality.
All dualistic concepts are merely concepts, yet God is objective.
To label things as good and bad is to judge yet we are taught to "judge not lest ye be judged yourself" but instead of judging we are taught that it is better to know, understand, and live by that " what ye sew, so shall ye reap" so it is better to do what is prosperous and to help other people, including/especially your enemy by that reasoning alone. We are taught not to do things because they make us "good", or are "good" things.
If you are not judging you are not labeling things as having a false duality. The moment you judge something as good or evil you have judged and are thus sinning and dwelling in a lie.
So long as you judge things and people you sustain yourself on forbidden fruit and dwell in death and do not walk with God.
The NWO are playing God, and planning their own judgment day for humanity and they are doing so based on concepts of what they believe is Good. They have their own idea of Utopia for mankind and believe they are justified in what they do because of their sense of morality.
Not effective.This not works usually.
While I believe God probably exist - you are wrong. Objective truth exists as everyone is connected to another, however its perception - is God existing or not - is purely subjective. At the end nobody can surely know and understand the greater order of things we call "truth".
Materialism vs idealism being opposites is philosophy delusion. Matter (form) and idea (movement/change) are bonded each other. Pantheism is more right than dualism.