Evidence shows Jesus was probably gay.
(www.theguardian.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
A jew wrote this.
Here's the core nugget of shit in the article:
"Had he been devoid of sexuality, he would not have been truly human"
News flash: He claimed to be Son of God.
The author: "Paul Oestreicher is an Anglican priest, and peace and human rights activist."
This guy is a raging homo and touches kids, so he became a priest (as you do), and now wants to justify it.
To be fair, most priests don’t touch kids until after they become priests.
Right, that's like saying a thief doesn't steal things until they break into your house. Sunday school is full of kids.
?
Poe's Law.
One of my favorites.
Man.. back in the day.. there was no such thing as gay.
You did what felt good, and that was that. Was 100% normal to be 100% bisexual.
The old, world famous Roman bath houses? Yea... not where you took your girlfriend. It's where the men took their boy toys, for real. They were legit 'burlesque' bath houses, but with younger boys, not kids.
Took ancient Greek / Roman history in university for a couple semesters, was fairly surprised to find that out lol. So I would believe this to be probable back then.
It’s just another classification used to divide us.
u/ScutFarkus: Fuck off with that blasphemy, go better try to paint Muhammad in some arab district you faggot.
God answer to homosexualism is simple: white phosphorus and napalm.
Why the self loathing?
I should ask, 'what is your damage and have you ever honestly, patiently read the bible?' However I don't want to discuss anything with you so I'm gonna hang back and let God sort this all out with you. Good luck.
Do you love Jesus Christ? Then you love gay people.
Do you hate gay people? Then you hate Jesus Christ.
Let the cognitive dissonance begin!
Evidence shows Jesus, possibly not his real name, may have been a real person.
Demons, angels, heaven, hell, the talking snake in the garden of eden....these are examples of fairy tales told to humans who were 3 hairs away from a baboon in order to keep them in line.
As we’ve learned with the whole election fraud drama, evidence does not equal proof.
I believe the word “probably” is doing some heavy lifting in that article.
Still, it’s a very real possibility.
You got that from a bullshit opinion piece written by the Guardian. It ain't worth the paper it is printed on
Okay gay ass. why has the Pope condemned gays as sin, refusing to bless same sex marriage. The Catholic church won't bless gays despite some congregations calling for it. It won't bless their union.
Somehow you think it was because Jesus was a gay? This is because you have a fetish for buggery, it makes everybody else queer as well. Not flattered not amused.
Jesus was infact married. The gospel of Magdalene. In fact the bible has omitted a few gospels and added others which weren't written in the original version. But Jesus was married. Angels and Demons. The Gospel of Magdalene otherwise proves it, as well as perhaps the other omissions. There is a lot of controversy on the new Testament. It is hugely contentious and was warred over for at least a century among its followers on which version was later compiled. There supposedly weren't even 12 disciples. Christ didn't resurrect in the original print.
Why did they write this shit? Another nail in religion's coffin except it simply makes other beliefs stronger. Like Islam or Judaism flourishing as Christianity simply divides and declines into becoming much less worshipped. These people hate Christ, because they believe in monkeys. They want to write the narrative controlling you like communism.
Poe's Law.
This is not a good attempt at sarcasm.
To distill what you wrote: “Jesus being gay is communist propaganda.”
Does that sum it up?
No. I said Jesus was probably married, it is a little known fact. Because the gospel of Magdalene hasn't been published into the new testament. What has been recorded is her being his lover in the version we all have read. Other missing gospels also suggestively add to this. Much of the new testament has been added later, relayering, because there weren't originally 12 disciples.
This paper is socialist drivel. Communists equally hate religion. The reason this bullshit has been printed isn't because it is factual, his marriage is a much more commonly accepted conspiracy and fact because it is in a huge margin of being correct. It was printed for bullshit propaganda hammering the very nails into him. Causing people to turn away from religion when it is an excuse for sin. A sin other religions do not condone, and because they don't their conviction to their faith flourishes today. However this press wants to be god and write the script. It wants to tell us what to believe. Until there is no belief, there is only consumption and advertising.
It’s really a shame that you don’t know the difference between socialism and communism.
Then again, you’re filled with hate and are likely filled with contempt for the educated so why would you know the difference.
You are one dumb scattyfuckus. No wonder you air the gayness. I am not interested in your bullshit. It is a lie.
What are you talking about. You literally can't read. Where did I say socialism was communism. But you have, you dumb faggot. I didn't. They practically are. When communism has directly allied with socialism globally in almost every socialist nation. Every socialist revolution has been fascist.
That is an off topic conversation. We aren't talking about that. I said this paper is socialist crap. It incites stupidity. Stupidity has revolutions becoming fascist or communist. All it takes is some dumb liberal communists first. They aren't socialists or they'd shove their stupidity up their ass and nounce right off bothering somebody else. Instead of being revolutionaries.
I said this paper is a lie. When simple research shows Jesus and Magdalene are lovers, this is in the new testament. In the omitted Gospel of Magdalene they are married.
You haven't once understood this. Or debated it. Literally as dumb a person as you could ever get. Reading your name explains it.
Ok boomer.
If you hate anyone, you're not doing it right. Keep trying to love, it is extremely difficult.
I agree.
Perhaps you would find the book of Jude an interesting read. This is the part I was looking for but all of it is relevant:
CH1"22 Have mercy on those who doubt; 23 save others by snatching them from the fire; have mercy on others but with fear, hating even the garment defiled by the flesh."
Holman Christian standard Bible
People like to say hate the sin and love the sinner but living it out is much more difficult that it sounds.
So... You're just sitting there, imagining people's heads exploding after reading this, aren't you?
Does hypocrisy make people’s heads explode?
So deep. So profound. I will be contemplating your words for days to come. This has been an an epiphany.
Lol