The consequences of ignorance are disgusting; blaming the symptoms of ignorance sustains the cause of ignorance, which is always free will of choice.
The few represent a mirror of the weakness within the many, and it is them who a) suggest belief to cause division (reason) and b) suggest endless boogeymen (including themselves) for the many to shirk responsibility over self onto (by casting blame).
Its the blind leading the blind
Flow defines direction for all form within. Ignorance thereof is a choice of action by each individual ONE (form) within ALL (flow), and the few comprehend exactly what they're doing when using suggestion to feed to ignorant many into the ignored flow (through the temptation of wants).
Ignorance corrupts comprehension; which represents blindness towards perception. We perceive ALL offered; we choose to restrict our comprehension of it by consenting to suggested beliefs (-isms) from others.
nothing we can do about it really
ONE can do everything within ALL; based on ONEs potential (comprehension) of ALL potentiality (perception). How about you question why being surrounded by everything; let to you choosing to believe in "nothing"? And if you try to justify this by "figure of speech", then ask yourself why nature doesn't use words to communicate itself to us? The languages we use to describe reality to each other is being suggested to us by each other, and those who we choose to consent to believe are gaining the power to act in the name of what they're suggesting.
Whoever wakes up to the truth
There's no such states as truth/false for form within flow; because flow represents constant change. The only thing that cannot change are the rules that define how change operates, which those within form can only comprehend mentally; yet not perceive physically. Bringing comprehension and perception into balance by choice of action (adaptation) represents gaining self discernment.
I believe in Jesus Christ. I can forgive the "free" masons for all the suffering and fake wars they caused, as I am not the one who is going to judge them.
My recommendation to you, start reading the holy Bible. In English language you got the Kings James version from 1611, that is the pure word of God, before the Catholic Church got their hands on it and started changing it.
You used your free will of choice aka your sole authority over self; to consent to the those who used their free will of choice to suggest "Jesus Christ" to you. They acted in the name of what you believe...in the name of (in nomine) patris et filii et spiritus sancti.
You did not consent by free will of choice to Jesus Christ or any other suggested belief; you consented to the free will of another, who through this consent gains the power to act in the name of whatever he gets you to believe.
This is called control through suggestion.
start reading the holy Bible
Once you ignore your sole authority over self (free will) for the false authority under another (their free will); you operate under the will of another; which puts you into a chain of command, which you then perpetuate for them by acting in the name of (Holy Bible) to suggest others to also submit their free will to the chain of command and the "unquestionable" authority up top (deity).
In English language
Aka Pig-Latin; a designed slave language; robbed of all natural connotations, and filled to the brim with rhetorical inversion to corrupt human comprehension about a reality that doesn't use words to communicate. it turns out that nature doesn't actually use words; brands; idols to communicate itself to our senses, but inspiration through motion instead.
Flow communicates information as inspiration to form within, so that form can can adhere to self sustenance within flow. And what does a belief represent? Mental stagnation in ignorance of a motion that demands physical adaptation.
pure word of God
Suggested to you "in the name of" by others; who you consent to; while ignoring your own free will of choice; which just happens to represent the highest value in all existence...ones evaluation of all.
before the Catholic Church got their hands on it and started changing it.
What does blaming others protect? Ignorance of self. Notice also how you blame institutions, yet ignore that the power to build them originates in the many that consented to the false authority of the few, and guess what those few suggested to get the many to "believe" them?
What are the implications of using beliefs to justify ignorance? Could this let to self corruption of comprehension?
Responding to me represents use of your free will of choice. It's not something you own; it's a function needed for balance within motion. You cannot give free will away; only choose to ignore it.
Form represents a response to flow; which is why adherence to self sustenance within flow (by choice of action) represents a responsibility...that you choose to ignore, when consenting to the suggestions of others.
freely
Free implies free/dominance aka coexistence of form within flow.
the one
You represent ONE (form) within ALL (flow), and ALL is ONE in energy.
true
Nature doesn't offer false, yet you believe in true, which causes the conflict of reason (truth vs false). Your beliefs are suggested to you (control by suggestion) and no matter which side you choose (truth/false); contradictions will be suggested to both sides to keep the conflict of reason (division) going.
I am his loyal servant
LOY'AL, adjective [Latin lex, law.] - flow defines the law for the form within.
SERV'ANT, [L. servant, from servo, to keep or hold; properly one that waits, that is, stops, holds, attends, or one that is bound.] - form cannot stop flow; it can only ignore flow. Others are feeding you into that flow by getting you to consent to the ignorance thereof.
amen
"to confirm" consent by free will of choice over and over again. Form doesn't confirm flow; it needs to confirm self within flow.
Instead of machine translating from some alien language can you use English?
A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.] Does nature use English to communicate itself to us or does "another" one within nature suggests English to us; in exchange for us believing what they proclaim it describes?
I can help you out
Adapt to whatever inspires for the sustenance of self; which then in return inspires others to do the same.
So needlessly complex
If nature only uses motion to communicate inspiration to our senses; then imagine what a complex clusterfuck suggested languages in ignorance of motion could cause to those who consent to believe it?
Nature simply is. We find patterns. There is only figurative exchange.
adapt ... sustenance of self
Do you need sustenance? Maybe you are doing this to find the few that can understand your convoluted grammar?
about consenting to believe in spoken languages ignorant of natural somethings
Yes, I know you have a point. I've experimented extensively with linguistics via NLP and a number of talking therapeutic techniques.
I fancy myself developing a form of language where concepts are expressed and then they are merged, I realize that structure is not that far off from Sanskrit. Even if I explain it there is no chance of adoption.
So what's your deal then? Are you looking for certain people? Or just linguistically trolling?
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing"
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced]
Nature represents energy aka ALL is ONE in energy, so energy represents the source of ALL information for the ONES within; but energy is producing within itself; between its two main states...flow and form.
If you apply motion to energy it causes momentum; within which ongoing flow segregates into temporary form aka ALL potentiality into ONE potential. That's where we are; within the moment(um) of motion as form within flow.
We find patterns.
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original or model proposed for imitation"
Correct...form mimics from flow. If flow is applied to information (potentiality); then the potential within perceives it as inspiration...as moving information that inspires adaptation.
The "finding" aspect is not within what we perceive (which is ALL at any given moment), but what ONE comprehends of it. Perception represents input of inspiration; comprehension represents choice based processing of perceived inspiration into comprehended information.
This can only happen if ONE chooses to adhere to ALL (form to flow); not if ONE chooses to believe another one (form to form). We have a parasite exploiting this by inverting it through suggestion...they trick us to consent to ignore ALL for the suggestions of other ONEs.
There is only figurative exchange.
FIG'URE, noun. [Latin figura, from figo, to fix or set.]
That represents you perceiving form within flow; while ignoring the flow. You're tricked to only comprehend the communication (exchange) between form and form; which is where the parasites acts as the happy merchant of temptations.
That which is set into form (by flow) represents figurative exchange; that which sets (flow); communicating itself to those within (form); represents the fundamental communication out of source (energy). Physically we exchange figuratively among form; mentally we need to adhere to the perceived input (flow to form) to be able to sustain form within flow.
Do you need sustenance?
As form within flow "self sustenance" defines need; while the pull of flow upon form represents want (temptation). Form within flow acts within balance (momentum of motion); which is why we have free will of choice between need (self sustenance) or want (ignorance thereof).
Form responses to flow; hence form choosing need over want (life over death) representing ONEs responsibility over self within ALL. Stand still and flow will teach form what's needed (water; food; shelter). No patience? Hold your breath and wait until you comprehend that need over want; life over death represents a collective impulse (survival instinct) that demands adaptation as form to flow.
Maybe you are doing this to find the few that can understand your convoluted grammar?
Comprehension represents ONEs own effort in adherence to ALL. Another ONE (me) cannot offer comprehension. What you make out of this is based on your choice to either believe/not believe (reason) the information you perceive; or to adapt to the inspiration ALL is offering to each ONE. I try to adhere to the latter.
I've experimented extensively with linguistics via NLP and a number of talking therapeutic techniques.
You want information; you need inspiration. The parasites suggest information in exchange for consent by "believing"; which in return corrupts comprehension and thereby perception of inspiration.
Everything offered to you by other ONEs (form) represents the temptation for you to ignore that ALL (flow) represents the source of ALL information. All the other ONEs represent inspiration to you, but your choice (need or want) defines how you process the input, and the parasites act as a substitute input by suggesting us endless information.
Flow communicates to form on instinctive level (simple), which is why other form suggests endless complexity to trick us to ignore to adhere to simplicity. Education represents domestication of ignorance. You cannot figure out what they're offering you by consenting to what they're offering you. The comprehension you're missing can only come from adaptation to inspiration; not from believing information.
Form does not need to believe flow; form needs to adapt to flow; because form is within flow...out of flow.
I fancy myself developing a form of language where concepts are expressed and then they are merged, I realize that structure is not that far off from Sanskrit.
Good start. You're looking for a less corrupt form of communication...the corruption represents us using languages to proclaim form within flow, because it ignores flow. We perceive; we brand; we believe it to be true/false; we ignore that flow will change it; we reason (truth versus false) within form; while ignoring flow.
We as form are "expressed" by flow, what you need to "develop" is your comprehension about what flow is offering to form...infinite potentiality to finite potential.
Within flow all form represents a different potential; because differences are needed to inspire form to sustain itself within flow. Form transmutes out of flow (inception); form is being processed by flow (life) and form is being "merged" back into flow (death).
The linguistic structure you try to build is build within form instead on the foundation of flow. When the velocity of motion (flow) meets the resistance of momentum (form) it causes friction; vibration and resonance. ONEs choice of adherence to ALL represents resonance; ONEs choice of ignorance thereof represents dissonance. Consenting to believe the suggestions of other ONEs represents dissonance between ONEself and ALL.
So what's your deal then?
Foremost..adaptation to inspiration to build my comprehension (potential). Alongside that...resistance to temptation.
Are you looking for certain people?
I learned that this represents one of the temptations that needs to be resisted. I adapt to inspiration within text; while resisting to try to communicate with others through technology suggested by parasites who use it to mimic communication within fiction; while we ignore sense based communication within reality. Look away from the screen...I'm not there. We're not communicating. We fool ourselves to believe that we do; while using the suggested tools of those who destroy us through them.
Or just linguistically trolling?
I first use an old dictionary to show the contradiction in meaning of words defined by others, afterwards I use the oldest definitions (the ones where the natural connotations are still somewhat recognizable) and put it into the perspective of natural law (based on my potential/comprehension of it), and lastly I strip languages down; while pointing out the inversion and rhetorical tricks within.
I learned to not try to change someones mind (which would use suggestion); but to strip their choice of ignorance of tools to use to hide behind. For example...a believers beliefs become impotent when I start questioning offer/consent under natural law required for them to consent by free will of choice to believe.
My questions use implication upon the foundation used to build their beliefs. Their choice of ignorance cannot handle that contradiction with the use of beliefs, which is why they either become hostile; very careful in their responses to not make mistakes, or inspired to poke me with questions to find a weak-spot. For me that's all inspiration and I grow in comprehension when adapting to it.
The consequences of ignorance are disgusting; blaming the symptoms of ignorance sustains the cause of ignorance, which is always free will of choice.
The few represent a mirror of the weakness within the many, and it is them who a) suggest belief to cause division (reason) and b) suggest endless boogeymen (including themselves) for the many to shirk responsibility over self onto (by casting blame).
Flow defines direction for all form within. Ignorance thereof is a choice of action by each individual ONE (form) within ALL (flow), and the few comprehend exactly what they're doing when using suggestion to feed to ignorant many into the ignored flow (through the temptation of wants).
Ignorance corrupts comprehension; which represents blindness towards perception. We perceive ALL offered; we choose to restrict our comprehension of it by consenting to suggested beliefs (-isms) from others.
ONE can do everything within ALL; based on ONEs potential (comprehension) of ALL potentiality (perception). How about you question why being surrounded by everything; let to you choosing to believe in "nothing"? And if you try to justify this by "figure of speech", then ask yourself why nature doesn't use words to communicate itself to us? The languages we use to describe reality to each other is being suggested to us by each other, and those who we choose to consent to believe are gaining the power to act in the name of what they're suggesting.
There's no such states as truth/false for form within flow; because flow represents constant change. The only thing that cannot change are the rules that define how change operates, which those within form can only comprehend mentally; yet not perceive physically. Bringing comprehension and perception into balance by choice of action (adaptation) represents gaining self discernment.
I believe in Jesus Christ. I can forgive the "free" masons for all the suffering and fake wars they caused, as I am not the one who is going to judge them.
My recommendation to you, start reading the holy Bible. In English language you got the Kings James version from 1611, that is the pure word of God, before the Catholic Church got their hands on it and started changing it.
You used your free will of choice aka your sole authority over self; to consent to the those who used their free will of choice to suggest "Jesus Christ" to you. They acted in the name of what you believe...in the name of (in nomine) patris et filii et spiritus sancti.
You did not consent by free will of choice to Jesus Christ or any other suggested belief; you consented to the free will of another, who through this consent gains the power to act in the name of whatever he gets you to believe.
This is called control through suggestion.
Once you ignore your sole authority over self (free will) for the false authority under another (their free will); you operate under the will of another; which puts you into a chain of command, which you then perpetuate for them by acting in the name of (Holy Bible) to suggest others to also submit their free will to the chain of command and the "unquestionable" authority up top (deity).
Aka Pig-Latin; a designed slave language; robbed of all natural connotations, and filled to the brim with rhetorical inversion to corrupt human comprehension about a reality that doesn't use words to communicate. it turns out that nature doesn't actually use words; brands; idols to communicate itself to our senses, but inspiration through motion instead.
Flow communicates information as inspiration to form within, so that form can can adhere to self sustenance within flow. And what does a belief represent? Mental stagnation in ignorance of a motion that demands physical adaptation.
Suggested to you "in the name of" by others; who you consent to; while ignoring your own free will of choice; which just happens to represent the highest value in all existence...ones evaluation of all.
What does blaming others protect? Ignorance of self. Notice also how you blame institutions, yet ignore that the power to build them originates in the many that consented to the false authority of the few, and guess what those few suggested to get the many to "believe" them?
What are the implications of using beliefs to justify ignorance? Could this let to self corruption of comprehension?
I give my will to Jesus Christ, the one true living God, freely. He can do with me as he pleases, I am his loyal servant, now and forever, amen.
Responding to me represents use of your free will of choice. It's not something you own; it's a function needed for balance within motion. You cannot give free will away; only choose to ignore it.
Form represents a response to flow; which is why adherence to self sustenance within flow (by choice of action) represents a responsibility...that you choose to ignore, when consenting to the suggestions of others.
Free implies free/dominance aka coexistence of form within flow.
You represent ONE (form) within ALL (flow), and ALL is ONE in energy.
Nature doesn't offer false, yet you believe in true, which causes the conflict of reason (truth vs false). Your beliefs are suggested to you (control by suggestion) and no matter which side you choose (truth/false); contradictions will be suggested to both sides to keep the conflict of reason (division) going.
LOY'AL, adjective [Latin lex, law.] - flow defines the law for the form within.
SERV'ANT, [L. servant, from servo, to keep or hold; properly one that waits, that is, stops, holds, attends, or one that is bound.] - form cannot stop flow; it can only ignore flow. Others are feeding you into that flow by getting you to consent to the ignorance thereof.
"to confirm" consent by free will of choice over and over again. Form doesn't confirm flow; it needs to confirm self within flow.
Instead of machine translating from some alien language can you use English? If you need some examples I can help you out. So needlessly complex ..
He just copy pastes from something like this.
A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.] Does nature use English to communicate itself to us or does "another" one within nature suggests English to us; in exchange for us believing what they proclaim it describes?
Adapt to whatever inspires for the sustenance of self; which then in return inspires others to do the same.
If nature only uses motion to communicate inspiration to our senses; then imagine what a complex clusterfuck suggested languages in ignorance of motion could cause to those who consent to believe it?
Nature simply is. We find patterns. There is only figurative exchange.
Do you need sustenance? Maybe you are doing this to find the few that can understand your convoluted grammar?
Yes, I know you have a point. I've experimented extensively with linguistics via NLP and a number of talking therapeutic techniques.
I fancy myself developing a form of language where concepts are expressed and then they are merged, I realize that structure is not that far off from Sanskrit. Even if I explain it there is no chance of adoption.
So what's your deal then? Are you looking for certain people? Or just linguistically trolling?
Ever look at forgottenlanguages when it was up on reddit? Or the website proper.
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing"
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced]
Nature represents energy aka ALL is ONE in energy, so energy represents the source of ALL information for the ONES within; but energy is producing within itself; between its two main states...flow and form.
If you apply motion to energy it causes momentum; within which ongoing flow segregates into temporary form aka ALL potentiality into ONE potential. That's where we are; within the moment(um) of motion as form within flow.
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original or model proposed for imitation"
Correct...form mimics from flow. If flow is applied to information (potentiality); then the potential within perceives it as inspiration...as moving information that inspires adaptation.
The "finding" aspect is not within what we perceive (which is ALL at any given moment), but what ONE comprehends of it. Perception represents input of inspiration; comprehension represents choice based processing of perceived inspiration into comprehended information.
This can only happen if ONE chooses to adhere to ALL (form to flow); not if ONE chooses to believe another one (form to form). We have a parasite exploiting this by inverting it through suggestion...they trick us to consent to ignore ALL for the suggestions of other ONEs.
FIG'URE, noun. [Latin figura, from figo, to fix or set.]
That represents you perceiving form within flow; while ignoring the flow. You're tricked to only comprehend the communication (exchange) between form and form; which is where the parasites acts as the happy merchant of temptations.
That which is set into form (by flow) represents figurative exchange; that which sets (flow); communicating itself to those within (form); represents the fundamental communication out of source (energy). Physically we exchange figuratively among form; mentally we need to adhere to the perceived input (flow to form) to be able to sustain form within flow.
As form within flow "self sustenance" defines need; while the pull of flow upon form represents want (temptation). Form within flow acts within balance (momentum of motion); which is why we have free will of choice between need (self sustenance) or want (ignorance thereof).
Form responses to flow; hence form choosing need over want (life over death) representing ONEs responsibility over self within ALL. Stand still and flow will teach form what's needed (water; food; shelter). No patience? Hold your breath and wait until you comprehend that need over want; life over death represents a collective impulse (survival instinct) that demands adaptation as form to flow.
Comprehension represents ONEs own effort in adherence to ALL. Another ONE (me) cannot offer comprehension. What you make out of this is based on your choice to either believe/not believe (reason) the information you perceive; or to adapt to the inspiration ALL is offering to each ONE. I try to adhere to the latter.
You want information; you need inspiration. The parasites suggest information in exchange for consent by "believing"; which in return corrupts comprehension and thereby perception of inspiration.
Everything offered to you by other ONEs (form) represents the temptation for you to ignore that ALL (flow) represents the source of ALL information. All the other ONEs represent inspiration to you, but your choice (need or want) defines how you process the input, and the parasites act as a substitute input by suggesting us endless information.
Flow communicates to form on instinctive level (simple), which is why other form suggests endless complexity to trick us to ignore to adhere to simplicity. Education represents domestication of ignorance. You cannot figure out what they're offering you by consenting to what they're offering you. The comprehension you're missing can only come from adaptation to inspiration; not from believing information.
Form does not need to believe flow; form needs to adapt to flow; because form is within flow...out of flow.
Good start. You're looking for a less corrupt form of communication...the corruption represents us using languages to proclaim form within flow, because it ignores flow. We perceive; we brand; we believe it to be true/false; we ignore that flow will change it; we reason (truth versus false) within form; while ignoring flow.
We as form are "expressed" by flow, what you need to "develop" is your comprehension about what flow is offering to form...infinite potentiality to finite potential.
Within flow all form represents a different potential; because differences are needed to inspire form to sustain itself within flow. Form transmutes out of flow (inception); form is being processed by flow (life) and form is being "merged" back into flow (death).
The linguistic structure you try to build is build within form instead on the foundation of flow. When the velocity of motion (flow) meets the resistance of momentum (form) it causes friction; vibration and resonance. ONEs choice of adherence to ALL represents resonance; ONEs choice of ignorance thereof represents dissonance. Consenting to believe the suggestions of other ONEs represents dissonance between ONEself and ALL.
Foremost..adaptation to inspiration to build my comprehension (potential). Alongside that...resistance to temptation.
I learned that this represents one of the temptations that needs to be resisted. I adapt to inspiration within text; while resisting to try to communicate with others through technology suggested by parasites who use it to mimic communication within fiction; while we ignore sense based communication within reality. Look away from the screen...I'm not there. We're not communicating. We fool ourselves to believe that we do; while using the suggested tools of those who destroy us through them.
I first use an old dictionary to show the contradiction in meaning of words defined by others, afterwards I use the oldest definitions (the ones where the natural connotations are still somewhat recognizable) and put it into the perspective of natural law (based on my potential/comprehension of it), and lastly I strip languages down; while pointing out the inversion and rhetorical tricks within.
I learned to not try to change someones mind (which would use suggestion); but to strip their choice of ignorance of tools to use to hide behind. For example...a believers beliefs become impotent when I start questioning offer/consent under natural law required for them to consent by free will of choice to believe.
My questions use implication upon the foundation used to build their beliefs. Their choice of ignorance cannot handle that contradiction with the use of beliefs, which is why they either become hostile; very careful in their responses to not make mistakes, or inspired to poke me with questions to find a weak-spot. For me that's all inspiration and I grow in comprehension when adapting to it.