Instead of machine translating from some alien language can you use English?
A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.] Does nature use English to communicate itself to us or does "another" one within nature suggests English to us; in exchange for us believing what they proclaim it describes?
I can help you out
Adapt to whatever inspires for the sustenance of self; which then in return inspires others to do the same.
So needlessly complex
If nature only uses motion to communicate inspiration to our senses; then imagine what a complex clusterfuck suggested languages in ignorance of motion could cause to those who consent to believe it?
Nature simply is. We find patterns. There is only figurative exchange.
adapt ... sustenance of self
Do you need sustenance? Maybe you are doing this to find the few that can understand your convoluted grammar?
about consenting to believe in spoken languages ignorant of natural somethings
Yes, I know you have a point. I've experimented extensively with linguistics via NLP and a number of talking therapeutic techniques.
I fancy myself developing a form of language where concepts are expressed and then they are merged, I realize that structure is not that far off from Sanskrit. Even if I explain it there is no chance of adoption.
So what's your deal then? Are you looking for certain people? Or just linguistically trolling?
Exactly what you are talking about. Really they sought/seek to use the Cassini Diskus, a relic, to figure out how to encode language into pictures, basically.
Now Sanskrit and Hebrew are unique due to their cymatics, which I would fathom is hard to replicate. Really, you would want to work it backwards from the sound shape to develop the language.
Oh, and the people doing it are all self-proclaimed vampires. Even have a Youtube channel with some pretty tame, but bizarre, music videos.
The website is a trip. I have plenty of commentary on the matter, but perhaps if they really are vampires, then maybe that would explain their adeptness with language (plenty of time and all).
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing"
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced]
Nature represents energy aka ALL is ONE in energy, so energy represents the source of ALL information for the ONES within; but energy is producing within itself; between its two main states...flow and form.
If you apply motion to energy it causes momentum; within which ongoing flow segregates into temporary form aka ALL potentiality into ONE potential. That's where we are; within the moment(um) of motion as form within flow.
We find patterns.
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original or model proposed for imitation"
Correct...form mimics from flow. If flow is applied to information (potentiality); then the potential within perceives it as inspiration...as moving information that inspires adaptation.
The "finding" aspect is not within what we perceive (which is ALL at any given moment), but what ONE comprehends of it. Perception represents input of inspiration; comprehension represents choice based processing of perceived inspiration into comprehended information.
This can only happen if ONE chooses to adhere to ALL (form to flow); not if ONE chooses to believe another one (form to form). We have a parasite exploiting this by inverting it through suggestion...they trick us to consent to ignore ALL for the suggestions of other ONEs.
There is only figurative exchange.
FIG'URE, noun. [Latin figura, from figo, to fix or set.]
That represents you perceiving form within flow; while ignoring the flow. You're tricked to only comprehend the communication (exchange) between form and form; which is where the parasites acts as the happy merchant of temptations.
That which is set into form (by flow) represents figurative exchange; that which sets (flow); communicating itself to those within (form); represents the fundamental communication out of source (energy). Physically we exchange figuratively among form; mentally we need to adhere to the perceived input (flow to form) to be able to sustain form within flow.
Do you need sustenance?
As form within flow "self sustenance" defines need; while the pull of flow upon form represents want (temptation). Form within flow acts within balance (momentum of motion); which is why we have free will of choice between need (self sustenance) or want (ignorance thereof).
Form responses to flow; hence form choosing need over want (life over death) representing ONEs responsibility over self within ALL. Stand still and flow will teach form what's needed (water; food; shelter). No patience? Hold your breath and wait until you comprehend that need over want; life over death represents a collective impulse (survival instinct) that demands adaptation as form to flow.
Maybe you are doing this to find the few that can understand your convoluted grammar?
Comprehension represents ONEs own effort in adherence to ALL. Another ONE (me) cannot offer comprehension. What you make out of this is based on your choice to either believe/not believe (reason) the information you perceive; or to adapt to the inspiration ALL is offering to each ONE. I try to adhere to the latter.
I've experimented extensively with linguistics via NLP and a number of talking therapeutic techniques.
You want information; you need inspiration. The parasites suggest information in exchange for consent by "believing"; which in return corrupts comprehension and thereby perception of inspiration.
Everything offered to you by other ONEs (form) represents the temptation for you to ignore that ALL (flow) represents the source of ALL information. All the other ONEs represent inspiration to you, but your choice (need or want) defines how you process the input, and the parasites act as a substitute input by suggesting us endless information.
Flow communicates to form on instinctive level (simple), which is why other form suggests endless complexity to trick us to ignore to adhere to simplicity. Education represents domestication of ignorance. You cannot figure out what they're offering you by consenting to what they're offering you. The comprehension you're missing can only come from adaptation to inspiration; not from believing information.
Form does not need to believe flow; form needs to adapt to flow; because form is within flow...out of flow.
I fancy myself developing a form of language where concepts are expressed and then they are merged, I realize that structure is not that far off from Sanskrit.
Good start. You're looking for a less corrupt form of communication...the corruption represents us using languages to proclaim form within flow, because it ignores flow. We perceive; we brand; we believe it to be true/false; we ignore that flow will change it; we reason (truth versus false) within form; while ignoring flow.
We as form are "expressed" by flow, what you need to "develop" is your comprehension about what flow is offering to form...infinite potentiality to finite potential.
Within flow all form represents a different potential; because differences are needed to inspire form to sustain itself within flow. Form transmutes out of flow (inception); form is being processed by flow (life) and form is being "merged" back into flow (death).
The linguistic structure you try to build is build within form instead on the foundation of flow. When the velocity of motion (flow) meets the resistance of momentum (form) it causes friction; vibration and resonance. ONEs choice of adherence to ALL represents resonance; ONEs choice of ignorance thereof represents dissonance. Consenting to believe the suggestions of other ONEs represents dissonance between ONEself and ALL.
So what's your deal then?
Foremost..adaptation to inspiration to build my comprehension (potential). Alongside that...resistance to temptation.
Are you looking for certain people?
I learned that this represents one of the temptations that needs to be resisted. I adapt to inspiration within text; while resisting to try to communicate with others through technology suggested by parasites who use it to mimic communication within fiction; while we ignore sense based communication within reality. Look away from the screen...I'm not there. We're not communicating. We fool ourselves to believe that we do; while using the suggested tools of those who destroy us through them.
Or just linguistically trolling?
I first use an old dictionary to show the contradiction in meaning of words defined by others, afterwards I use the oldest definitions (the ones where the natural connotations are still somewhat recognizable) and put it into the perspective of natural law (based on my potential/comprehension of it), and lastly I strip languages down; while pointing out the inversion and rhetorical tricks within.
I learned to not try to change someones mind (which would use suggestion); but to strip their choice of ignorance of tools to use to hide behind. For example...a believers beliefs become impotent when I start questioning offer/consent under natural law required for them to consent by free will of choice to believe.
My questions use implication upon the foundation used to build their beliefs. Their choice of ignorance cannot handle that contradiction with the use of beliefs, which is why they either become hostile; very careful in their responses to not make mistakes, or inspired to poke me with questions to find a weak-spot. For me that's all inspiration and I grow in comprehension when adapting to it.
Avoiding temptation implies that the desires of the body and mind are rooted in sin.
to strip their choice of ignorance of tools to use to hide behind
Most people are not capable of questioning their choices, beliefs, because of Gestalt theory. Without a firm grasp of the temporal nature of the human mind, and the relatively impotent control held by the conscious mind, you have very little chance of truly enlightening anyone.
And perhaps to your point, I refuse to teach such techniques except in person.
differences are needed to inspire form to sustain itself within flow
I still believe that form-focused thought creates a myriad of story... free of the homogeneity of flow. That perhaps our duty, in as much as existence itself can have a duty, is to revel in our constraints, and produce great works within them.
One/All
Is it wrong to take for granted that the scope of All is so grand that One|One vs One is no longer relevant? What connection to All would matter?
Avoiding temptation implies that the desires of the body and mind are rooted in sin.
Flow represents temptation to form to ignore the sustenance of self within flow. Flow defines both the need for form to sustain self within it, and the want to be tempted by the pull of flow upon form. The root of form is flow, and the root of flow is information (energy).
Sin represents the suggested restriction upon action; based on moral rules of behavior under the laws of men (inversion of the laws of nature). Flow establishes form needing to have the free will of choice over action to be able to adapt to ever changing circumstances.
Morality is defined as forms response to flow aka ONEs responsibility over self within ALL aka the responsibility to balance between need and want by choice of action. Each one of our actions either adheres to the struggle of self sustenance (need) or ignores this for the temptation of flow pulling us towards death.
DESIRE, noun - "an emotion or excitement of the mind, directed to the attainment or possession of an object". Choice of ignorance represents the temptation of selfishness aka shirking responsibility to maintain form within flow by trying to hold onto form without adapting to flow. We cannot claim ownership over form within flow without ignoring that flow processes form from beginning towards end (growth/loss).
Most people are not capable of questioning their choices
Each ONE potential out of ALL potentiality is capable to sustain itself. The choice between need and want is instinctively (collective survival instinct) predefined by the demanded value of life over death. Need is fundamental for form within flow; while the choice to adhere to it or ignore it for wants is secondary.
Even if you choose to ignore need; you still need to adhere to self sustenance within flow through adaptation by breathing aka the spirit contract SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe).
All restrictions upon comprehension (ONEs potential) are self inflicted by ONEs choices towards ALL. The self discernment needed to comprehend this implies the responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
beliefs
Energy to flow to form...then choice within form of adherence to ALL inspiration or ignorance thereof in favor for information suggested by other ONEs in exchange for consent to "believe" them.
All beliefs are based on consenting to suggested information; which one then upholds as true/false assumptions, while ignoring flow (within which there's no true/false information) One cannot proclaim "true/false" upon change without ignoring being within change.
All beliefs are based on ignorance by choice; which is why the defense for all beliefs is again ignorance. Religion (to bind anew) industrialized this ignorance by suggesting the source of suggestion to be unquestionable (deities), which puts the ignorance of all believers right in between an unquestionable authority to shirk responsibility over self onto, and and opposition (conflict of reason) to ones beliefs (the non-believer) onto which one can caste blame.
Reflection upon inside directed through suggested deflection upon outside.
because of Gestalt theory. Without a firm grasp of the temporal nature of the human mind, and the relatively impotent control held by the conscious mind,
Within energy...flow represents ALL potentiality in motion; while form represents the individual ONE potential within momentum. The flow aspect represents loss of potentiality; while the form aspect represents recharge of potentiality through unity of potential. Both together represent self sustenance of energy (information). That's the control infrastructure.
The consciousness represents the communication of ALL information; through the flow state; as inspiration to the form state. This represents our perception (input) and causes the initial growth of form within flow. After that we process that collective input of ALL perception; through the individual ONEs free will of choice (adherence or ignorance), which is what builds ONEs potential...comprehension of the perceived.
The perception sustains the foundation to keep the momentum going (hence the growth), after which choice to struggle for self sustenance adds to the recharge through form that balances the loss through flow. The foundation to sustain the momentum is needed to make sure that form cannot corrupt flow through choice of ignorance.
In short...the power of flow sustains itself by restricting the form within its momentum, to the momentum; within which form has free will of choice of action. A power within a power aka ONE potential within ALL potentiality. We are not impotent; we are given the responsibility of choice over a potential with temporary access to unlimited potentiality.
Each of us represents pure potential within a system that uses ALL to inspire each ONE to utilize it for the sustenance of self.
Gestalt theory and all science represents ONE suggesting another ONE within form what form means; which tricks them to ignore adherence to flow. They suggest the inversion of motion (time as the measurement of motion); to then attach affixed states to it (past; present; future); which allows them to act in the name of, as to get us attached to that which isn't; while ignoring that which is.
They understand flow, and set any thing they want into flow; while deceiving us to ignore flow through suggestion of form; which is why their destructive agendas are all moving forward, with us being attached to it through ignorance.
you have very little chance of truly enlightening anyone.
Each ONE is by definition inspiration to each other ONE as flow upon form. The illumination comes from within...ALL through each ONE; with free will of choice acting as the valve for growth of potential. Each ONE represents an ecosystem spreading outwards; while utilizing the inspiration of ALL as fertilizer.
Form within flow represents magnetic within electric, and each potential within magnetic needs to utilize the electric potentiality to be able to sustain the temporary magnetic form. That utilization represents perceived inspiration transmuted through choice of action into comprehended information.
Inspiration represents flow; information represents form. ONE needs to do the transmutation within ONEself to be able to sustain ONEself. We can't get it by consenting to the information suggested by other ONEs. It needs to be flow to form; not form to form.
Changing others represents a temptation for us to resist (want). The more we grow through adherence (need); the more others will choose to change themselves by adherence to the inspiration ONE represents within ALL.
And perhaps to your point, I refuse to teach such techniques except in person.
That's another inversion...(teacher and student) based on a chain of command established by consent to belief in false authority over self. As form within flow; teach/learn represents the same action when allied to self...to teach self equals to lean for self and vice versa. ONEs teacher is ALL, and each other ONE is how ALL communicates inspiration to ONE to teach/learn ONEself.
It is the teacher over student inversion that tempts you to withhold "techniques"; to claim ownership over form within flow; while ignoring that flow offers ALL to form. That's all chain of command behavior.
In person on the other hand represents direct adaptation instead of through the world wide web inversion. That's good; but more important is it to comprehend that teach/learn isn't about exchanging information; but about adapting to each others different potential as inspiration.
I still believe that form-focused thought creates a myriad of story...
That represents using form to transmute it into different form; based on ONEs potential (comprehension) of ALL. You try to create progress (another parasite inversion) by reconfiguration of form for perceived accomplishments. That's the whole "be in this world; not of it" allegory.
We are being deceived to be goal oriented; when flow defines goal for form as death (form back to flow); which in return puts the value onto balance as form within flow, and balance represents self sustenance aka growth of self; not the accomplishments of self upon other form.
Goals represent the temptation of our wants; while the struggle to sustain self represents out needs. Falling for those wants is why all our accomplishments are always crumbling down around us, and why the parasites only use form to lure us to destroy ourselves with it.
They are perceived as not being creators; but destroyers, which lacks perspective...we create (transmute) based on consent to their suggestions, and we destroy ourselves as the consequences thereof. Meanwhile they transmute information within our minds, based on whatever inspires them, which is mostly our collective ignorance towards self sustenance.
free of the homogeneity of flow
Free implies freedom (free and dominance), and ONEs actions represent reactions to the flow of ALL. Action implies acting upon. To be implies to be within. Flow implies form; motion implies momentum; velocity implies resistance...ONE implies ALL.
That perhaps our duty, in as much as existence itself can have a duty
Form represents response to flow; choice (need or want) represents responsibility over balance as form within flow.
DUTY, noun - "that which a person owes to another". That's form to form; based on the ignorance of flow; hence the ownership claim (want).
to revel in our constraints, and produce great works within them.
REV'EL, verb intransitive [Latin rabo, rabio, to rage, whence rabies, rabid.] - "to feast with loose and clamorous merriment". That's a want; not a need. Adherence to need would increase potential; which would allow more and more efficient access to possibilities. Yet; the more great shit we build; the more we are tempted to want more; while ignoring adherence to our needs. We cannot escape the balance; we need to adhere to it.
the scope of All is so grand
You perceived the grandness of ALL through the limitation within ONEself. Understanding energy and therewith being ONE potential within ALL potentiality will clear this up. Potential to potentiality represents infinite growth potential. What's missing? Flow aka the loss that defines the potential (us) to be temporary. Together we have finite within infinite.
If you comprehend this you don't "want" the infinite; because you understand that your finite existence defines it.
One vs One is no longer relevant?
All versus within the coexistence of form within flow is based on chocie of ignorance towards flow (reality) in exchange for adherence to suggested beliefs aka form (fiction). Reality and fiction are not natural states; they represent what ignorance is causing...a conflict.
Whatever you believe you measure as truth or false (also not natural states), and when you act upon any belief aka proclaiming them to everyone else; you cause a conflict of reason (truth versus false) with all those who did not consent to believe/not believe what you consented to.
All conflicts are in ignorance of flow; and comprehending this gets them out of your mind. Comprehension relieves (relevant; from Latin relever, to relieve) ignorance, which in return makes the ignorant behavior of others inspiration for the sustenance of self.
What connection to All would matter?
The direct connection of ALL to ONE...perception as input for growth; flow (loss) as the status quo upon form to resist. The latter causes the former; and choice is applied to former; which defines the rate of growth (potential aka comprehension).
A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another.] Does nature use English to communicate itself to us or does "another" one within nature suggests English to us; in exchange for us believing what they proclaim it describes?
Adapt to whatever inspires for the sustenance of self; which then in return inspires others to do the same.
If nature only uses motion to communicate inspiration to our senses; then imagine what a complex clusterfuck suggested languages in ignorance of motion could cause to those who consent to believe it?
Nature simply is. We find patterns. There is only figurative exchange.
Do you need sustenance? Maybe you are doing this to find the few that can understand your convoluted grammar?
Yes, I know you have a point. I've experimented extensively with linguistics via NLP and a number of talking therapeutic techniques.
I fancy myself developing a form of language where concepts are expressed and then they are merged, I realize that structure is not that far off from Sanskrit. Even if I explain it there is no chance of adoption.
So what's your deal then? Are you looking for certain people? Or just linguistically trolling?
Ever look at forgottenlanguages when it was up on reddit? Or the website proper.
No I haven't. What was it about?
Exactly what you are talking about. Really they sought/seek to use the Cassini Diskus, a relic, to figure out how to encode language into pictures, basically.
Now Sanskrit and Hebrew are unique due to their cymatics, which I would fathom is hard to replicate. Really, you would want to work it backwards from the sound shape to develop the language.
Oh, and the people doing it are all self-proclaimed vampires. Even have a Youtube channel with some pretty tame, but bizarre, music videos.
The website is a trip. I have plenty of commentary on the matter, but perhaps if they really are vampires, then maybe that would explain their adeptness with language (plenty of time and all).
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing"
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced]
Nature represents energy aka ALL is ONE in energy, so energy represents the source of ALL information for the ONES within; but energy is producing within itself; between its two main states...flow and form.
If you apply motion to energy it causes momentum; within which ongoing flow segregates into temporary form aka ALL potentiality into ONE potential. That's where we are; within the moment(um) of motion as form within flow.
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original or model proposed for imitation"
Correct...form mimics from flow. If flow is applied to information (potentiality); then the potential within perceives it as inspiration...as moving information that inspires adaptation.
The "finding" aspect is not within what we perceive (which is ALL at any given moment), but what ONE comprehends of it. Perception represents input of inspiration; comprehension represents choice based processing of perceived inspiration into comprehended information.
This can only happen if ONE chooses to adhere to ALL (form to flow); not if ONE chooses to believe another one (form to form). We have a parasite exploiting this by inverting it through suggestion...they trick us to consent to ignore ALL for the suggestions of other ONEs.
FIG'URE, noun. [Latin figura, from figo, to fix or set.]
That represents you perceiving form within flow; while ignoring the flow. You're tricked to only comprehend the communication (exchange) between form and form; which is where the parasites acts as the happy merchant of temptations.
That which is set into form (by flow) represents figurative exchange; that which sets (flow); communicating itself to those within (form); represents the fundamental communication out of source (energy). Physically we exchange figuratively among form; mentally we need to adhere to the perceived input (flow to form) to be able to sustain form within flow.
As form within flow "self sustenance" defines need; while the pull of flow upon form represents want (temptation). Form within flow acts within balance (momentum of motion); which is why we have free will of choice between need (self sustenance) or want (ignorance thereof).
Form responses to flow; hence form choosing need over want (life over death) representing ONEs responsibility over self within ALL. Stand still and flow will teach form what's needed (water; food; shelter). No patience? Hold your breath and wait until you comprehend that need over want; life over death represents a collective impulse (survival instinct) that demands adaptation as form to flow.
Comprehension represents ONEs own effort in adherence to ALL. Another ONE (me) cannot offer comprehension. What you make out of this is based on your choice to either believe/not believe (reason) the information you perceive; or to adapt to the inspiration ALL is offering to each ONE. I try to adhere to the latter.
You want information; you need inspiration. The parasites suggest information in exchange for consent by "believing"; which in return corrupts comprehension and thereby perception of inspiration.
Everything offered to you by other ONEs (form) represents the temptation for you to ignore that ALL (flow) represents the source of ALL information. All the other ONEs represent inspiration to you, but your choice (need or want) defines how you process the input, and the parasites act as a substitute input by suggesting us endless information.
Flow communicates to form on instinctive level (simple), which is why other form suggests endless complexity to trick us to ignore to adhere to simplicity. Education represents domestication of ignorance. You cannot figure out what they're offering you by consenting to what they're offering you. The comprehension you're missing can only come from adaptation to inspiration; not from believing information.
Form does not need to believe flow; form needs to adapt to flow; because form is within flow...out of flow.
Good start. You're looking for a less corrupt form of communication...the corruption represents us using languages to proclaim form within flow, because it ignores flow. We perceive; we brand; we believe it to be true/false; we ignore that flow will change it; we reason (truth versus false) within form; while ignoring flow.
We as form are "expressed" by flow, what you need to "develop" is your comprehension about what flow is offering to form...infinite potentiality to finite potential.
Within flow all form represents a different potential; because differences are needed to inspire form to sustain itself within flow. Form transmutes out of flow (inception); form is being processed by flow (life) and form is being "merged" back into flow (death).
The linguistic structure you try to build is build within form instead on the foundation of flow. When the velocity of motion (flow) meets the resistance of momentum (form) it causes friction; vibration and resonance. ONEs choice of adherence to ALL represents resonance; ONEs choice of ignorance thereof represents dissonance. Consenting to believe the suggestions of other ONEs represents dissonance between ONEself and ALL.
Foremost..adaptation to inspiration to build my comprehension (potential). Alongside that...resistance to temptation.
I learned that this represents one of the temptations that needs to be resisted. I adapt to inspiration within text; while resisting to try to communicate with others through technology suggested by parasites who use it to mimic communication within fiction; while we ignore sense based communication within reality. Look away from the screen...I'm not there. We're not communicating. We fool ourselves to believe that we do; while using the suggested tools of those who destroy us through them.
I first use an old dictionary to show the contradiction in meaning of words defined by others, afterwards I use the oldest definitions (the ones where the natural connotations are still somewhat recognizable) and put it into the perspective of natural law (based on my potential/comprehension of it), and lastly I strip languages down; while pointing out the inversion and rhetorical tricks within.
I learned to not try to change someones mind (which would use suggestion); but to strip their choice of ignorance of tools to use to hide behind. For example...a believers beliefs become impotent when I start questioning offer/consent under natural law required for them to consent by free will of choice to believe.
My questions use implication upon the foundation used to build their beliefs. Their choice of ignorance cannot handle that contradiction with the use of beliefs, which is why they either become hostile; very careful in their responses to not make mistakes, or inspired to poke me with questions to find a weak-spot. For me that's all inspiration and I grow in comprehension when adapting to it.
Avoiding temptation implies that the desires of the body and mind are rooted in sin.
Most people are not capable of questioning their choices, beliefs, because of Gestalt theory. Without a firm grasp of the temporal nature of the human mind, and the relatively impotent control held by the conscious mind, you have very little chance of truly enlightening anyone.
And perhaps to your point, I refuse to teach such techniques except in person.
I still believe that form-focused thought creates a myriad of story... free of the homogeneity of flow. That perhaps our duty, in as much as existence itself can have a duty, is to revel in our constraints, and produce great works within them.
Is it wrong to take for granted that the scope of All is so grand that One|One vs One is no longer relevant? What connection to All would matter?
Flow represents temptation to form to ignore the sustenance of self within flow. Flow defines both the need for form to sustain self within it, and the want to be tempted by the pull of flow upon form. The root of form is flow, and the root of flow is information (energy).
Sin represents the suggested restriction upon action; based on moral rules of behavior under the laws of men (inversion of the laws of nature). Flow establishes form needing to have the free will of choice over action to be able to adapt to ever changing circumstances.
Morality is defined as forms response to flow aka ONEs responsibility over self within ALL aka the responsibility to balance between need and want by choice of action. Each one of our actions either adheres to the struggle of self sustenance (need) or ignores this for the temptation of flow pulling us towards death.
DESIRE, noun - "an emotion or excitement of the mind, directed to the attainment or possession of an object". Choice of ignorance represents the temptation of selfishness aka shirking responsibility to maintain form within flow by trying to hold onto form without adapting to flow. We cannot claim ownership over form within flow without ignoring that flow processes form from beginning towards end (growth/loss).
Each ONE potential out of ALL potentiality is capable to sustain itself. The choice between need and want is instinctively (collective survival instinct) predefined by the demanded value of life over death. Need is fundamental for form within flow; while the choice to adhere to it or ignore it for wants is secondary.
Even if you choose to ignore need; you still need to adhere to self sustenance within flow through adaptation by breathing aka the spirit contract SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe).
All restrictions upon comprehension (ONEs potential) are self inflicted by ONEs choices towards ALL. The self discernment needed to comprehend this implies the responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
Energy to flow to form...then choice within form of adherence to ALL inspiration or ignorance thereof in favor for information suggested by other ONEs in exchange for consent to "believe" them.
All beliefs are based on consenting to suggested information; which one then upholds as true/false assumptions, while ignoring flow (within which there's no true/false information) One cannot proclaim "true/false" upon change without ignoring being within change.
All beliefs are based on ignorance by choice; which is why the defense for all beliefs is again ignorance. Religion (to bind anew) industrialized this ignorance by suggesting the source of suggestion to be unquestionable (deities), which puts the ignorance of all believers right in between an unquestionable authority to shirk responsibility over self onto, and and opposition (conflict of reason) to ones beliefs (the non-believer) onto which one can caste blame.
Reflection upon inside directed through suggested deflection upon outside.
Within energy...flow represents ALL potentiality in motion; while form represents the individual ONE potential within momentum. The flow aspect represents loss of potentiality; while the form aspect represents recharge of potentiality through unity of potential. Both together represent self sustenance of energy (information). That's the control infrastructure.
The consciousness represents the communication of ALL information; through the flow state; as inspiration to the form state. This represents our perception (input) and causes the initial growth of form within flow. After that we process that collective input of ALL perception; through the individual ONEs free will of choice (adherence or ignorance), which is what builds ONEs potential...comprehension of the perceived.
The perception sustains the foundation to keep the momentum going (hence the growth), after which choice to struggle for self sustenance adds to the recharge through form that balances the loss through flow. The foundation to sustain the momentum is needed to make sure that form cannot corrupt flow through choice of ignorance.
In short...the power of flow sustains itself by restricting the form within its momentum, to the momentum; within which form has free will of choice of action. A power within a power aka ONE potential within ALL potentiality. We are not impotent; we are given the responsibility of choice over a potential with temporary access to unlimited potentiality.
Each of us represents pure potential within a system that uses ALL to inspire each ONE to utilize it for the sustenance of self.
Gestalt theory and all science represents ONE suggesting another ONE within form what form means; which tricks them to ignore adherence to flow. They suggest the inversion of motion (time as the measurement of motion); to then attach affixed states to it (past; present; future); which allows them to act in the name of, as to get us attached to that which isn't; while ignoring that which is.
They understand flow, and set any thing they want into flow; while deceiving us to ignore flow through suggestion of form; which is why their destructive agendas are all moving forward, with us being attached to it through ignorance.
Each ONE is by definition inspiration to each other ONE as flow upon form. The illumination comes from within...ALL through each ONE; with free will of choice acting as the valve for growth of potential. Each ONE represents an ecosystem spreading outwards; while utilizing the inspiration of ALL as fertilizer.
Form within flow represents magnetic within electric, and each potential within magnetic needs to utilize the electric potentiality to be able to sustain the temporary magnetic form. That utilization represents perceived inspiration transmuted through choice of action into comprehended information.
Inspiration represents flow; information represents form. ONE needs to do the transmutation within ONEself to be able to sustain ONEself. We can't get it by consenting to the information suggested by other ONEs. It needs to be flow to form; not form to form.
Changing others represents a temptation for us to resist (want). The more we grow through adherence (need); the more others will choose to change themselves by adherence to the inspiration ONE represents within ALL.
That's another inversion...(teacher and student) based on a chain of command established by consent to belief in false authority over self. As form within flow; teach/learn represents the same action when allied to self...to teach self equals to lean for self and vice versa. ONEs teacher is ALL, and each other ONE is how ALL communicates inspiration to ONE to teach/learn ONEself.
It is the teacher over student inversion that tempts you to withhold "techniques"; to claim ownership over form within flow; while ignoring that flow offers ALL to form. That's all chain of command behavior.
In person on the other hand represents direct adaptation instead of through the world wide web inversion. That's good; but more important is it to comprehend that teach/learn isn't about exchanging information; but about adapting to each others different potential as inspiration.
That represents using form to transmute it into different form; based on ONEs potential (comprehension) of ALL. You try to create progress (another parasite inversion) by reconfiguration of form for perceived accomplishments. That's the whole "be in this world; not of it" allegory.
We are being deceived to be goal oriented; when flow defines goal for form as death (form back to flow); which in return puts the value onto balance as form within flow, and balance represents self sustenance aka growth of self; not the accomplishments of self upon other form.
Goals represent the temptation of our wants; while the struggle to sustain self represents out needs. Falling for those wants is why all our accomplishments are always crumbling down around us, and why the parasites only use form to lure us to destroy ourselves with it.
They are perceived as not being creators; but destroyers, which lacks perspective...we create (transmute) based on consent to their suggestions, and we destroy ourselves as the consequences thereof. Meanwhile they transmute information within our minds, based on whatever inspires them, which is mostly our collective ignorance towards self sustenance.
Free implies freedom (free and dominance), and ONEs actions represent reactions to the flow of ALL. Action implies acting upon. To be implies to be within. Flow implies form; motion implies momentum; velocity implies resistance...ONE implies ALL.
Form represents response to flow; choice (need or want) represents responsibility over balance as form within flow.
DUTY, noun - "that which a person owes to another". That's form to form; based on the ignorance of flow; hence the ownership claim (want).
REV'EL, verb intransitive [Latin rabo, rabio, to rage, whence rabies, rabid.] - "to feast with loose and clamorous merriment". That's a want; not a need. Adherence to need would increase potential; which would allow more and more efficient access to possibilities. Yet; the more great shit we build; the more we are tempted to want more; while ignoring adherence to our needs. We cannot escape the balance; we need to adhere to it.
You perceived the grandness of ALL through the limitation within ONEself. Understanding energy and therewith being ONE potential within ALL potentiality will clear this up. Potential to potentiality represents infinite growth potential. What's missing? Flow aka the loss that defines the potential (us) to be temporary. Together we have finite within infinite.
If you comprehend this you don't "want" the infinite; because you understand that your finite existence defines it.
All versus within the coexistence of form within flow is based on chocie of ignorance towards flow (reality) in exchange for adherence to suggested beliefs aka form (fiction). Reality and fiction are not natural states; they represent what ignorance is causing...a conflict.
Whatever you believe you measure as truth or false (also not natural states), and when you act upon any belief aka proclaiming them to everyone else; you cause a conflict of reason (truth versus false) with all those who did not consent to believe/not believe what you consented to.
All conflicts are in ignorance of flow; and comprehending this gets them out of your mind. Comprehension relieves (relevant; from Latin relever, to relieve) ignorance, which in return makes the ignorant behavior of others inspiration for the sustenance of self.
The direct connection of ALL to ONE...perception as input for growth; flow (loss) as the status quo upon form to resist. The latter causes the former; and choice is applied to former; which defines the rate of growth (potential aka comprehension).