Nearly everyone I love has gotten the vaccine. I've explained to allof them that it's highly experimental, it doesn't actually give them immunity and there is no liability if it hurts them. I provided sources. They all just mentally blue screened on me and wouldn't say anything. I've never seen anything like this.
I provided sources. They all just mentally blue screened on me and wouldn't say anything. I've never seen anything like this.
Don't use reason (conflict between truth versus false), because they are tricked to perceive reality as such...as a conflict, yet their natural instincts are still telling them to avoid conflict, which is why whenever you offer your contradictions to their truth/false beliefs they will either attack or defend (in your case defense by ignoring you).
Instead of reason (truth vs false) use implication (if/then) which is in adherence with motion, which is our reality (from inception to death. It's not time (the measurement of motion that tricks us to ignore motion), but motion as in constant change.
Belief (affixed); motion (change). Utilize implication (as taught in the talmud) and you avoid the conflict of reason, but be aware that this will unmask their choice of ignorance, which often causes them to literally flee from you just to avoid facing responsibility for their own chocie of actions.
Need over want; inspiration over information and implication over reason.
Needs are defined by self sustenance within motion (food, water, shelter), while the the pull of motion itself represents temptation (wants).
Inspiration represents the consequences of actions; motion offers our senses; which is what we "need" to adapt to. Information is what others are offering us (suggestion) in exchange for believing it (which then creates the conflict of reason).
Implication represents adaption to motion; reason represents mental stagnation in ignorance of motion.
In between need/want; inspiration/information and implication/reason operates ONEs free will of choice, which only has two choices...adherence to self sustenance (need) within ALL (energy in motion) or the ignorance thereof (want aka temptation).
The gist of what's going on here is that nature (ALL potentiality) offers it to each ONE (potential) within. That's our perception. After that ONEs free will of chocie has to either adhere to it (reality) or ignore it (fiction aka ignorance of reality through self imposed beliefs). Whatever we choose builds ONEs comprehension (potential) of what ALL perceived (potentiality) means.
We choose ignorance so often, that it create a weakness that others (our annoying parasites) are exploiting by offering suggested fiction (beliefs; -isms) to our free will of choice so that we choose to ignore reality for it. Why? Because they then control the fiction we believe in, which allows them control over our ignored potential within reality.
In short...ALL is offered to ONE; but ONE can choose to ignore ALL for the offer of another ONE within ALL...that will destroy ONE, because ONE needs to adhere to ALL to sustain ONEself.
Got anywhere I can read more about this
It's all me, and you reading it represents both the temptation to believe it (which doesn't help you), or to get inspired and try to adapt to it, so that you can build your own comprehension. Your choice, and that's the problem why we cannot change others through inspiration if they don't choose to act upon it.
Suggesting information to them is the easy way (hence temptation), which is why they believe anything offered to them as long as they want it, and our parasites act as the happy merchants of temptations (wants); while tricking us to believe that we need it.
Don't believe what I write; try to use implication (if/then) to question and disprove it and acknowledge whenever one of your beliefs prevents you from further question. In the end all your beliefs will fall, because that act of upholding beliefs represents the self restriction of comprehension. Then again; you need to do this by free will for yourself, which represents gaining self discernment as being ONE within ALL.
In all of my life I have never witnessed gov/media pushing a vaccine like this one.
Strange times we live in.
It's nucking futs!
Nearly everyone I love has gotten the vaccine. I've explained to allof them that it's highly experimental, it doesn't actually give them immunity and there is no liability if it hurts them. I provided sources. They all just mentally blue screened on me and wouldn't say anything. I've never seen anything like this.
Don't use reason (conflict between truth versus false), because they are tricked to perceive reality as such...as a conflict, yet their natural instincts are still telling them to avoid conflict, which is why whenever you offer your contradictions to their truth/false beliefs they will either attack or defend (in your case defense by ignoring you).
Instead of reason (truth vs false) use implication (if/then) which is in adherence with motion, which is our reality (from inception to death. It's not time (the measurement of motion that tricks us to ignore motion), but motion as in constant change.
Belief (affixed); motion (change). Utilize implication (as taught in the talmud) and you avoid the conflict of reason, but be aware that this will unmask their choice of ignorance, which often causes them to literally flee from you just to avoid facing responsibility for their own chocie of actions.
Got anywhere I can read more about this, or any more tips?
Need over want; inspiration over information and implication over reason.
Needs are defined by self sustenance within motion (food, water, shelter), while the the pull of motion itself represents temptation (wants).
Inspiration represents the consequences of actions; motion offers our senses; which is what we "need" to adapt to. Information is what others are offering us (suggestion) in exchange for believing it (which then creates the conflict of reason).
Implication represents adaption to motion; reason represents mental stagnation in ignorance of motion.
In between need/want; inspiration/information and implication/reason operates ONEs free will of choice, which only has two choices...adherence to self sustenance (need) within ALL (energy in motion) or the ignorance thereof (want aka temptation).
The gist of what's going on here is that nature (ALL potentiality) offers it to each ONE (potential) within. That's our perception. After that ONEs free will of chocie has to either adhere to it (reality) or ignore it (fiction aka ignorance of reality through self imposed beliefs). Whatever we choose builds ONEs comprehension (potential) of what ALL perceived (potentiality) means.
We choose ignorance so often, that it create a weakness that others (our annoying parasites) are exploiting by offering suggested fiction (beliefs; -isms) to our free will of choice so that we choose to ignore reality for it. Why? Because they then control the fiction we believe in, which allows them control over our ignored potential within reality.
In short...ALL is offered to ONE; but ONE can choose to ignore ALL for the offer of another ONE within ALL...that will destroy ONE, because ONE needs to adhere to ALL to sustain ONEself.
It's all me, and you reading it represents both the temptation to believe it (which doesn't help you), or to get inspired and try to adapt to it, so that you can build your own comprehension. Your choice, and that's the problem why we cannot change others through inspiration if they don't choose to act upon it.
Suggesting information to them is the easy way (hence temptation), which is why they believe anything offered to them as long as they want it, and our parasites act as the happy merchants of temptations (wants); while tricking us to believe that we need it.
Don't believe what I write; try to use implication (if/then) to question and disprove it and acknowledge whenever one of your beliefs prevents you from further question. In the end all your beliefs will fall, because that act of upholding beliefs represents the self restriction of comprehension. Then again; you need to do this by free will for yourself, which represents gaining self discernment as being ONE within ALL.
He has been crushing it since resigning.
At least we know he has a conscious!
I think it's this guy, who was interviewed. I listened to this podcast 2x: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dr-mike-yeadon/id1449753062?i=1000515435267
Here is another article on this from this guy: https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/vaccine-is-trojan-for-totalitarian-takeover