Need over want; inspiration over information and implication over reason.
Needs are defined by self sustenance within motion (food, water, shelter), while the the pull of motion itself represents temptation (wants).
Inspiration represents the consequences of actions; motion offers our senses; which is what we "need" to adapt to. Information is what others are offering us (suggestion) in exchange for believing it (which then creates the conflict of reason).
Implication represents adaption to motion; reason represents mental stagnation in ignorance of motion.
In between need/want; inspiration/information and implication/reason operates ONEs free will of choice, which only has two choices...adherence to self sustenance (need) within ALL (energy in motion) or the ignorance thereof (want aka temptation).
The gist of what's going on here is that nature (ALL potentiality) offers it to each ONE (potential) within. That's our perception. After that ONEs free will of chocie has to either adhere to it (reality) or ignore it (fiction aka ignorance of reality through self imposed beliefs). Whatever we choose builds ONEs comprehension (potential) of what ALL perceived (potentiality) means.
We choose ignorance so often, that it create a weakness that others (our annoying parasites) are exploiting by offering suggested fiction (beliefs; -isms) to our free will of choice so that we choose to ignore reality for it. Why? Because they then control the fiction we believe in, which allows them control over our ignored potential within reality.
In short...ALL is offered to ONE; but ONE can choose to ignore ALL for the offer of another ONE within ALL...that will destroy ONE, because ONE needs to adhere to ALL to sustain ONEself.
Got anywhere I can read more about this
It's all me, and you reading it represents both the temptation to believe it (which doesn't help you), or to get inspired and try to adapt to it, so that you can build your own comprehension. Your choice, and that's the problem why we cannot change others through inspiration if they don't choose to act upon it.
Suggesting information to them is the easy way (hence temptation), which is why they believe anything offered to them as long as they want it, and our parasites act as the happy merchants of temptations (wants); while tricking us to believe that we need it.
Don't believe what I write; try to use implication (if/then) to question and disprove it and acknowledge whenever one of your beliefs prevents you from further question. In the end all your beliefs will fall, because that act of upholding beliefs represents the self restriction of comprehension. Then again; you need to do this by free will for yourself, which represents gaining self discernment as being ONE within ALL.
Need over want; inspiration over information and implication over reason.
Needs are defined by self sustenance within motion (food, water, shelter), while the the pull of motion itself represents temptation (wants).
Inspiration represents the consequences of actions; motion offers our senses; which is what we "need" to adapt to. Information is what others are offering us (suggestion) in exchange for believing it (which then creates the conflict of reason).
Implication represents adaption to motion; reason represents mental stagnation in ignorance of motion.
In between need/want; inspiration/information and implication/reason operates ONEs free will of choice, which only has two choices...adherence to self sustenance (need) within ALL (energy in motion) or the ignorance thereof (want aka temptation).
The gist of what's going on here is that nature (ALL potentiality) offers it to each ONE (potential) within. That's our perception. After that ONEs free will of chocie has to either adhere to it (reality) or ignore it (fiction aka ignorance of reality through self imposed beliefs). Whatever we choose builds ONEs comprehension (potential) of what ALL perceived (potentiality) means.
We choose ignorance so often, that it create a weakness that others (our annoying parasites) are exploiting by offering suggested fiction (beliefs; -isms) to our free will of choice so that we choose to ignore reality for it. Why? Because they then control the fiction we believe in, which allows them control over our ignored potential within reality.
In short...ALL is offered to ONE; but ONE can choose to ignore ALL for the offer of another ONE within ALL...that will destroy ONE, because ONE needs to adhere to ALL to sustain ONEself.
It's all me, and you reading it represents both the temptation to believe it (which doesn't help you), or to get inspired and try to adapt to it, so that you can build your own comprehension. Your choice, and that's the problem why we cannot change others through inspiration if they don't choose to act upon it.
Suggesting information to them is the easy way (hence temptation), which is why they believe anything offered to them as long as they want it, and our parasites act as the happy merchants of temptations (wants); while tricking us to believe that we need it.
Don't believe what I write; try to use implication (if/then) to question and disprove it and acknowledge whenever one of your beliefs prevents you from further question. In the end all your beliefs will fall, because that act of upholding beliefs represents the self restriction of comprehension. Then again; you need to do this by free will for yourself, which represents gaining self discernment as being ONE within ALL.