"Q" related conspiracies (at least some, though it ties a bunch together):
Satanic worshipers infiltrate positions of governance all over the world and maintain their power through blackmail (the more damning the better), deception (project Mockingbird, Paperclip, changing/erasing recorded history, etc), moral degradation (LGB+, Abortion, ignorance of natural/divine/constitutional rights, etc), and death (war, 9/11, 5G, FDA approved poisons in our food, etc). Mankind is purposefully perpetuated in war against itself in every way imaginable until all that remains is a self-destructive Satanic society where free will is mute. Q (and team) is working to fight and ultimately destroy said Satanic worshipers.
Flat Earth:
The mortal experience is designed by god and the world upon which it takes place is observable as a relatively flat surface rather than a spherical one. The presentation of a spherical model is done to purposefully suggest that the existence of the world on which we live is possible without a god figure (similar to how evolution is used in theory to suggest life's origins without needing a god figure).
Aliens:
Aliens, in whatever form they exist, do in fact exist and have been involved with the affairs of this planet from time to time. People have made contact with and continue to interact with aliens whose origins are outside of this planet. For selfish reasons (see "Q" related conspiracies as a possible explanation), the governments of the world have gone to great lengths to covet these interactions for themselves.
Planetary History:
Conspiring individuals (see "Q" related conspiracies as a possible explanation) throughout the ages have constantly destroyed historical records which reveal this planet's true history. Atlantis, the life of Christ, giants, ancient scriptures, apocrypha, aliens (see the "Aliens" conspiracy mentioned above), hollow earth, the Jews being the true builders of Egypt, and more have been obscured and hidden from view.
Other:
Other conspiracy theories that can't be categorized into one of the general categories mentioned above.
Q (not "Qanon" or conspiracies perpetuated by "Anons" following Q) make sense and have loads of evidence that is continually coming out... even if Q's cryptic messaging has yet to be decoded in full.
Flat earth doesn't make any sense at all to me. God can work with a spherical model every bit as well as a flat model. God has always been fair in allowing us the choice of whether or not we want to believe in Him. Otherwise, this would probably fit under "Planetary History".
Aliens actually have quite a bit of evidence to support their existence, though their exact nature (or the number of different extra-terrestrial civilizations we're interacting with) are still largely debated or unknown.
Planetary History is fairly easy to detect where information has been destroyed/obscured: just look for anything related to God and technology.
What do you folks think?
Basically, most conspiracy theories are true.
A couple obvious exceptions:
the Earth is flat (NOT!)
COVID19™ is a hyper-infectious threat (NOT!)
I always maintain flat earth is a planted conspiracy, designed to discredit conspiracy communities.
"Your post about Epstein Island sits between a post about flat earth and a post about obama being a lizard man. It's obviously crazy."
I actually got an apology from a friend for being right about the Epstein stuff years ago. They started waking up but jumped right back into the pit. It's sad.
If it was a planted conspiracy then why would it be vilified the same way Q was. In fact, flat earth was vilified BEFORE Q. No YouTubes, no social medias, attacked endlessly by MSM. So if they treat Q the same way then Q must also be a planted conspiracy.
No. It was vilified because it was good "example of conspiracy theory" and whipping boy. Predictive programming - aggressive part. It isn't just enough to name the enemy,you shall train people in hating enemy to make it conditioned reflex so it would cause subconscious aversive reaction. It is like with "fighting anti-vaxxers" being more and more popularised as important whipping boy because of promoting "vaccines",especially those probably most important one - cow.id "vaccine".
Is the Q theory planted and fake or not - we will see.
I'm not sure that a scale of "the more vilified a conspiracy theory is, the more likely it is true" is a good way to determine the truthfulness of the theory. The theory, if true, should be able to stand on its own regardless of how much or how little emotionally charged criticism is thrown its way.
Reconsider on Flat Earth.
https://youtu.be/qEaHjPF47_E
Thank you for the link, currently watching it. Biggest issue I'm noticing is that the assumed perspective of gravitational direction is totally off. It's attempting to project a flat-earth model of gravitational direction to a spherical body of mass (south pole always being "down", and where everything should be "falling off" the earth). Stopping to consider the gravitational direction of a spherical body of mass (one as large as a planet anyway), the "down" direction is always towards the center of the planet, whereas "up" is always away from the center of the planet. All things that are affected by gravity (such as water) would form a "spherical shell" around a spherical planet in this particular model of gravity. Still watching.
Edit: Finished watching. The biggest (and most glaring) issue I see is that there is no singular, all-inclusive "Flat Earth Model" which simultaneously explains all "Flat Earth Phenomenon". Seasons, daylight cycles, astrology, cyclonic weather patterns, eclipses, etc. There is no comprehensive "Flat Earth Model", inasmuch as I have seen. But if you can find one, please let me know.
It’s flat. Sorry you are holding onto the deception so tightly... cognitive dissonance is real.
That vague argument could easily go both ways. If the earth is indeed flat, then there should be a comprehensive "Flat Earth Model" which is able to explain all of the flat earth theory phenomenon simultaneously without any one aspect of it discrediting another. If you know of such a model, please let me know.
I am definitely interested in learning more about reality, but it’s indisputable that there is no curvature. So, regardless of what the FE model is, it’s flat. I lean towards simulation theory, and i think the orb theory fits what we experience on earth. And also fits with the bible. Here’s some further food for thought: https://pic8.co/a/89a3d702-3af6-4b1c-b4ea-897080b05db6/ffa275a8-c354-4049-81bc-96f9e56ee64a/
drop us a selfie when you get to "the edge".
Sad when people deny actual proofs that they can verify themselves to live in a fantasy world. I don’t need to go to the edge, because I KNOW there’s no curvature. But I understand it’s easier to believe what you’ve been told. Not everyone has the strength of mind or character to go against the narrative.
ok
yea...? i suppose you figured out flat earth all by yourself? or did someone tell you about it?
I solemnly swear the following is true:
Bush admin either orchestrated 9/11, or knew about it and let it happen.
The Capitol Riot was encouraged and spurred on by glowies.
The US government flooded the streets with drugs to make a quick buck.
Republicans vs Democrats is a divide and conquer puppet show to give the populace the illusion of choice.
There has not been an unrigged US election in our lifetime.
Israel knows it is hated by it's neighbors, so they swindle jews into taking up residence there and becoming meat shields, garnering sympathy from their western allies.
Germany has not changed it's political ambitions since the start of WWII.
China is asshole.
Red Wine made me post this.
No one mentioned the Moon Landing here...
I've seen some interesting stuff regarding the moon landing and official documents (primarily photos) to "prove" that it occurred. It's possible that the moon landing happened (as originally described by "official" sources) but that they decided to use faked photos taken from a studio because they were more "appealing" from a PR standpoint to encourage further exploration into space (and consequently, more money toward NASA).
I've seen arguments suggesting that NASA lacked the technology necessary to survive travel through the radiation belt covering the earth (at least at the time).
I've seen arguments suggesting that even if the original NASA moon landing was faked, that we've been to the moon (and perhaps other planets) since then, perhaps via assistance from extra terrestrials that several world governments have been in communication with for some time.
Lots of different ways to slice that one. But it could fall under "Planetary History".
It’s flat. There is no curvature. No one has been on the moon.
No one died at Sandy Hook 100% Boston Marathon bombing was moulage/drill 100% 9/11 is a MASSIVE lie 100% Vegas shooting/pulse nightclub/Umpqua Community College/gabby giffords/On Air Roanoke TV reporter double murder/San Bernadino/parkland high school Florida - these are all staged. Drills. Capstone exercises. 100% Don’t believe it - search Cassidy Stay, Spring Texas, duping delight. Moon landing 100% hoax Mars rover is in Canada, not Mars (unless Mars has similar breed lemmings) Pizza Gate is real. 95% sure of it. I saw enough on Jimmy Comet’s Instagram before they scrubbed it.
Also - Donald Trump won 2020 election. By a lot. 100% sure of it
9/11 ted gunderson
I highly believe the flat earth thing was created to discredit the hollow earth, of course I don't think the earth is completely hollow like a donut, more like some underground part but deep, very deep. My point with the flat earth theory: "What, you gonna tell me there is civilization inside the earth now? You might as well join them flat earther"
Same goes with the ancient alien, the goddamn show not the theory itself.
One of the most successful ways to emotionally discredit something is to parody it in a way that makes fun of it.
Right? But personally I don't know what to think about the flat earth theory, I didn't think it was funny but it confuses me.
Good evening, officer.
why hello retard!
Oil companies knew the effects of their products on the environment in the 70s and covered it up.