16
posted ago by skf93 ago by skf93 +17 / -1

One piece is a worldwide best selling manga and popular anime. The main antagonists of the show are called the world Government. Sound famieler, certain groups may want to establish one here. The world government inthe show has been shown to cover up their atrocities and change history for their benefit. One of their atrocities is destroying the inhabitants of an island because a group of historians and archeologists there may uncover secret history they kept buried. This secret history is known as the void century, and it is essentially a 100 years of history which the world government has buried. It is speculated that this history tells the truth of the world governments founding a d not their propaganda. It is not hard to believe that certain events in our history may have been lied about or altered. Certain events may have been covered up for all we know. We know that the truth of the 2020 election won't be covered in history, and the Trump presidency will be deemed a failure without observing the good he has done. O e of the most interesting things is the rich and powerful of their world can buy and sell slaves at an auction house run by traffickers. That sounds like pizzagate to me. Also, certain families live outside the law in the One Piece world. They are known as the Celestial Dragons and are the descendants of the WGs original founders. They can kill and enslave whoever they want with no consequences. Sounds like some of our elites today. Do you think the author to this series is exposing the real world in his work? One of the characters watching the rich and powerful buy slaves at an auction house said, "this is like a miniature version of the world in here." Who's world, his or ours?

Comments (27)
sorted by:
5
sweet_malaak 5 points ago +5 / -0

You made one piece sound a whole lot better than just a kid with a read hat

2
braveContrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

one piece actually is really good. its an adventure story about a tyrannical world government and ive seen what the OP sees since it came out. basically luffy is essentially Jesus, and most of the fanbase cant accept it (they like generic pirate, they hate the idea of predestination and some kinda god but thats how it is in one piece actually)

in ancient history the world government took over and killed anyone who knew anything, enslaved everyone, and erased history during a point known as the void century, and anyone who can figure out how to read ancient artifacts and shit is arrested and their entire island gets nuked basically. luffy is the jesus like figure whos basically been prophesied by most/all marginalized groups to be "the one" and they just know it when they see him. some of them along the way even willing to sacrifice their lives for that goal (one animal-human hybrid thing literally suicide bombs himself to try and hold back extremely powerful people to help the straw hats)

I deeply relate to luffy and the story of one piece and I do think on some occult level, subconsciously thats what made it the MOST POPULAR MANGA/ANIME of ALL TIME.

like everyone innately feels certain ways even if they block out those thoughts. the inspiration definitely came from the world, but the author may not even know that. it couldve been subconscious inspiration even.

3
pizzakek 3 points ago +3 / -0

One piece surely is one of the closer to a true analogy.

Obviously any young boy who is now in conspiracies and used to read mangas can draw a lot of parallels.

I stopped reading it much time ago and have no patience to recover the read (tooo much stuff), but i do sometimes visit the wikia for fun and spoilers.

Another manga that is exceptional in drawing parallels is HxH (hunter hunter)

The zoldick family. The hunters. The world government playing their inner wars. But most of all the way Nen works, and how it is shielded from the rest of the world.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +4 / -1

Celestial Dragons

Friendly reminder that the hero is called Monkey D. Luffy, with the D standing for (((Dragon))).

One Piece

That title is the biggest sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...ONE represents ALL; while Piece (a fragment of) represents ONE within ALL. And guess why that doesn't make sense to most? Because they lack comprehension of being ONE within ALL.

Now what's the whole story about? Seeking the One Piece aka gaining comprehension, and who is seeking? Pirates aka a vessel in water (motion) aka ONE within the motion of ALL.

1
Tarrock 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't stand for Dragon, infact, Luffy's dad is named Dragon. The D is currently a mystery of what it stands for as there's a phenomena in the universe called "The Will of D" where people with D in their name will cause problems for the world government. People speculate that the D stands for Demon.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't stand for Dragon, infact, Luffy's dad is named Dragon

You are correct. Damn; Monkey D. Dragon. I had that name in mind when thinking about Monkey D. Luffy.

D stands for Demon.

Demon represents spirit, which comes from spiro and means "to breathe", which represents ONEs responsibility within ALL to adhere to uphold life over death.

people with D in their name will cause problems for the world government.

Besides the world government equals globalism; government means "govern mind" aka control the mind, which thereof stands for deception. Causing problems for a mental deception represents comprehension based on selflessness. Notice that Luffy says that he's gonna be the pirate king (Kaizoku ou ni ore wa naru), yet his actions are not selfish, since he helps all those around him.

That is all allegory...he's a pirate aka a vessel within motion; his goal is predefined (I'm gonna be), which represents death, and while moving towards this, he adheres to self sustenance by creating unity with others.

The question is if Eiichiro Oda will be allowed to set his ending into motion or if the parasites will corrupt it?

2
LoganAct 2 points ago +2 / -0

I totally agree, I've been thinking about the same for years now. That's the reason one piece is so addictive. And probably the reason the maker doesn't have a finish yet.

It makes sense you theory.

2
skf93 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, the celestial dragons are also referred to as the world nobles.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Noble means elevated. Remember 'as above; so below"? That's them telling you that ALL is ONE, yet the ignorant believe in us vs them instead.

1
PhantomTruthSeeker 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was just thinking about this the other day lol

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think all great works of art transmit knowledge, tweaking on sacred frequencies that resonate with our true selves, some with limited bursts of blunt insight and others with subtle ideas that contain universes.

I don’t know much about one piece but cool post!

For me the modern sources of insight are probably:

Star Wars

The Bungie games

The Assassins Creed games

The Matrix

-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +2 / -3

transmit knowledge

No. They transmute out of the same source material (energy as the source of ALL information). Knowledge means "to know", and that's what's missing...ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

All fiction as a transmutation of the ineffable ONE into a graspable PIECE?

That’s probably the way of describing it, if that’s what you’re saying I agree for sure

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

All fiction as a transmutation of the ineffable ONE into a graspable PIECE?

First...what is fiction? Ignoring motion (reality) while mentally holding onto (believe) physical occurrences within motion, while ignoring motion. Nature does not offer fiction; only ALL information as inspiration to each ONE within itself, so the free will of chocie to ignore reality for fiction is on each ONE.

Transmutation represents being ONE within the motion of ALL, while creating out of the information offered. That's what all creation is...created out of information aka ALL allows ONE the act of creation, based on the inspiration from the information offered.

The "graspable piece" represents ONE lacking the comprehension of being ONE within ALL, while trying to claim a "piece" of ALL for self. That's just selfish ignorance of reality, while justifying it with beleif based fiction (It's mine, because I say so).

"transmutation of the ineffable ONE"...here I'm not sure why you say "ineffable", which means "unspeakable; unutterable; that cannot be expressed in words"? The problem with words is that if ONE comprehends to be ONE within ALL (having self discernment) then branding oneself with a name, becomes a selfish claim within ALL.

The transmutation of ONE represents either in adherence or in ignorance of self sustenance. ONE represents a vessel (potential) emitting out the potentiality of ALL, depending on ONEs choices. To ignore means that less information of ALL goes through ONE, which leads to less inspiration for others, which leads to more ignorance from others.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fiction is anything a human being writes, films, or speaks that doesn’t place fealty to materialism at the pinnacle of expression. Examples include: The Epic of Gilgamesh, all religious texts, The Matrix, Assassins Creed and everyone’s posts on social media.

You say nature does not offer fiction, are the shamans who dream of the world turtle not a part of nature offering a fiction to help those of us who can’t yet dream to comprehend? Is the story of motion a set of programming instructions from The Builder? Or is it just the most accurate fiction you’ve found so far?

I used ineffable as a contrast to graspable. The ALL is ungraspabple, unspeakable, unnamable, for as you accurately point out, when branded with a name it becomes imprisoned and unnatural. However aren’t we forced to grasp at the ineffable if we are to understand anything further about existence? Does that grasping eventually lead to the holding of one or more pieces? What then? I think then we become teachers.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fiction is anything a human being writes, films, or speaks that doesn’t place fealty to materialism at the pinnacle of expression. Examples include: The Epic of Gilgamesh, all religious texts, The Matrix, Assassins Creed and everyone’s posts on social media.

No. All of the aforementioned represents creation out of the information reality offers. It all becomes fiction if ONE believes in the attached meaning of it, while ignoring adherence to reality. I for example can use Assassins Creed as inspiration for martial arts, while adhering to reality, but I have to be aware that playing the fictions game represents ignorance of self substance, especially because those who offer all these games enslave, corrupt and destroy through the offer of fiction.

Religious texts are simultaneously a self destructive dogma for those who consent to them by believing, while also highly beneficial information in allegorical form, which offer inspiration for one to comprehend how other ones use allegories to deceive others by trying to hide reality from them (corrupting their comprehension by tricking them to consent to belief).

Speaking is a huge problem we have to face...nature does not use words to communicate, while we define reality by belief based words (fiction); while ignoring reality. This corrupted us so far as to not only having a parasite exploiting us for it, but also for the creation of the "ego"; the inner monologue; based on belief based definitions of reality in form of words.

How much of our life do we ignore when we are reasoning about fiction within our own minds? talmudic "reasoning" is all about exploiting just that self corruption, by using contradictions to keep the reasoning going.

the world turtle

Great A'Tuin...imagine being a turtle with no access to veggies, and we think our lives are a struggle.

are the shamans who dream of the world turtle not a part of nature offering a fiction to help those of us who can’t yet dream to comprehend?

To gain comprehension one cannot consent to belief; because an affixed belief contradicts an ever changing reality. The problem is here that the shamans (which literally means wizard; conjurer) are proclaiming that ONE (themselves) can define what ALL means by offering it to another ONE to believe.

The information they were inspired to create (out of) is not the problem; the chocie they made to act upon it is (in ignorance to reality). To proclaim represents laying a claim upon reality (branding it), while ignoring that it's changing.

Those who consent to the offer also actin ignorance...did they need to believe another one about some giant turtle, or did they want to believe them? Needs over wants; it's that simple.

Is the story of motion a set of programming instructions from The Builder? Or is it just the most accurate fiction you’ve found so far?

How could I perceive any story without being within motion? How could I comprehend and act upon any story without being within motion? How could I write this response without setting actions into motion? How could we communicate without being within motion?

I don't believe in motion; I comprehend it and try to disprove it. I haven't found the fiction in that so far.

The ALL is in-graspable.

ONE can perceive ALL offered (input), but ONE cannot comprehend ALL (processing), because ONE is one potential within ALL potentiality. They are segregated for a reason (balance in motion).

That does not mean that ONE cannot attain self discernment about how ALL operates. Self discernment is simply the foundation of self, that requires responsibility over ones free will of choice to not ignore ALL (motion).

unspeakable

Language is merely a tool when used in adherence to motion (no proclamations; no ignorance), but it is also a massive temptations to be selfish, because it allows ONE to define ALL based on ones own assumptions. This is why responsibility over free will of choice is crucial for self discernment.

unnamable

That's also only a problem without self discernment, because after comprehending that ONE is within ALL; comes the comprehension that ALL is ONE in energy. There's no need for any brands; nature self segregated everything for inspiration, while the information is all predefined (nothing new under the sun).

when branded with a name it becomes imprisoned and unnatural.

No. a) nothing is unnatural for nature is ALL. b) the branded doesn't become imprisoned for information cannot be stopped since it's energy in motion aka the flow of information offered. The corruption; the fiction; the self restriction is all within ONEs mind; that's where ONE made the choice to uphold the brand; the beleif; the idol; the fiction; the offer made by another.

That's where right now the "coronavirus" resides for those who believe in it, and guess why (((they))) branded it so? Corona (crown aka head); virus (poison aka belief). What are the mask wearers called? Zombies. Remember "The Cranberries"?...In your head; zombie, zombie, zombie-e-e-e.

However aren’t we forced to grasp at the ineffable if we are to understand anything further about existence?

No. That's the temptation of ones wants, while only adherence to ones needs leads automatically to comprehension. Why? Because to want means to ignore need, and ignorance means restricted comprehension. One cannot comprehend and ignore simultaneously to get what one needs.

Does that grasping eventually lead to the holding of one or more pieces? What then? I think then we become teachers.

Nope. To want within motion means to always want more aka self destruction. To teach means to show; not to give...inspiration; not information. A teacher (the branded idol of false authority) claims to have information to share, while those who teach (the action in adherence to need) use themselves to inspire others; all based on adherence to self sustenance.

Do you see how comprehension changes the same situation? Furthermore...to learn means to teach; otherwise how would one know if one has learned anything?

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

It all becomes fiction if ONE believes in the attached meaning of it, while ignoring adherence to reality.

Can you define “attached meaning” for me? Do you mean the “author’s intent”, the “critical consensus”, one’s own conjured meaning? Some combination?

but I have to be aware that playing the fictions game represents ignorance of self substance, especially because those who offer all these games enslave, corrupt and destroy through the offer of fiction.

Yes and no, I feel like at some level you need to take fiction “seriously” as a level of analysis, one of many. For example in AC they get meta and at one point the “game” has you “playing” as a tester at ubisoft after it was infiltrated by the templars to mind control gamers, lmao, does it get more “on the nose”? So while obviously some interactions are built by those who seek to enslave, surely it is also one of our best tools for liberation?

a self destructive dogma for those who consent to them by believing, while also highly beneficial information in allegorical form


How much of our life do we ignore when we are reasoning about fiction within our own minds? ... using contradictions to keep the reasoning going.

This attitude has been becoming omnipresent from the institutional voices, and may be the distilled problem behind a false myriad of society’s issues today. Is the only recourse a violent whiplash upon being physically forced to comprehend or is there any way to use language to free our brothers and sisters gently?


....How could we communicate without being within motion?

While us, as separate ones, trying to communicate the ALL, clunkily clanking keys or even in speech, we are limited a priori, as you elucidate in much of your insights. BUT... from whence do dreams come? Could the MIND not be a middleman between the PHYSICAL (radar dish) and the METAPHYSICAL (signal)? I always come back to John Chang. Video proof of the metaphysical with no (apparent) malign intents on anyone involved’s behalf. What are your thoughts on the metaphysical, and our relationship with it as fleshy vessels in the river samsara?

Language is merely a tool when used in adherence to motion (no proclamations; no ignorance)

How could one communicate in English (as opposed to Omnitelepathically) and achieve a state of no proclamations nor ignorance? Are we not by definition ignorant the moment we open our mouths? The moment we formulate our thoughts from the formless? One would need to be god to communicate in your manner or, a god, super natural to the physical, right?

Agreed on almost everything but it couldn’t possibly be everything or else we would be the same person. Thanks!

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you define “attached meaning” for me? Do you mean the “author’s intent”, the “critical consensus”, one’s own conjured meaning? Some combination?

The "author's intent" is always control, because he "authorizes" information in the name of reality. He offers it to ones free will of chocie, and if one consents to it by believing it; it becomes fiction contradicting reality.

"Critical consensus" refers the odds between those who believe it and those who do not, so it's the result of a belief (fiction) based conflict; ergo only ever more fiction.

Both author and consensus represent offers made by others, which requires one to ignore oneself as the sole authority over self. It is indeed one own free will of choice to ignore reality in favor of fiction that transmutes meaning of predefined (reality) information within ones own mind.

Adding to this...if one consent to the offer of another one, then the other gains the (ignored) power to act in the name of the offered belief, which allows him to freely change the meaning by his free will of choice, while the believer has to adapt to the contradictions to his beliefs.

I feel like at some level you need to take fiction “seriously” as a level of analysis, one of many.

Does any other life form "needs" to take fiction seriously? The fiction is based on information freely offered to you within reality...tap into that source to find out what others did to corrupt it. ALL is inspiration to ONE (even fiction); but adhering to fiction gives others control over you.

they get meta and at one point the “game” has you “playing” as a tester

You can right now perceive the consequences of all actions; trace them back to the action of origin; compare the action to the laws of nature to define the intent of the action, then isolate who acted upon the intent, to then take actions to avoid the consequences of further actions stemming from that intent.

Why choose fiction when reality offers you ALL you choose to make out of it?

The templars to mind "control" gamers, lmao, does it get more “on the nose”?

Sure...whose holding the controller?

surely it is also one of our best tools for liberation?

Is going into a prison the best tool to get out of a prison? Also liberation; from liber - "free". Is ONE within ALL free or bound by the rules that define ALL?

a false myriad of society’s issues today

SOCI'ETY, (Latin societas, from socius, a companion) - "the union of beings". The problem is that we believe that society represents unity, when it represents the isolated selfish under the idol of society aka a false authority. Unity under the laws of nature comes from individual adherence to self sustenance, which then creates the needs to unite under shared responsibilities. Male and female self sustenance leads to what? Procreation aka the family unit, which represents shared responsibility for each otehr, which then grows into more needs (increased potential).

Is the only recourse a violent whiplash upon being physically forced to comprehend or is there any way to use language to free our brothers and sisters gently?

Ignorance represents the temptation of selfishness, which is defined as one shirking responsibility over self sustenance. a) that's ones free will of chocie to ignore, and b) another using force makes the other what? A false authority the selfish can keep shirking his responsibility over self onto.

Comprehension is solely based on inspiration gained, choice made in adherence to self sustenance, and then acted upon. They "need" to confront themselves, but they don't "want" that. This selfish behavior is also exactly what inspires those who exploit the selfish ruthlessly, because the selfish always want more, and their actions prove it.

The problem with language is that the selfish believers will either perceive what you offer as a contradiction and defend their beliefs, or they will believe you, which then tempts you to exploit them. And on top of that every word we speak is corrupted by multi layered rhetorical traps to get us to argue about definitions.

While us, as separate ones, trying to communicate the ALL

Understand that ONE communicating ALL to other ONEs is not a need; it is based on the other ONEs lacking self discernment based on their choice of ignorance. The need lies in inspiring others to stop ignoring themselves, because we need unity for self sustenance, and the ignorance of the majority restricts that.

from whence do dreams come?

Energy is the source of ALL information. Whatever ONE perceives while dreaming was already available no ONE can add information (dream based or not) to reality, one can only create out of aka transmute out of that which already is.

Could the MIND not be a middleman between the PHYSICAL (radar dish) and the METAPHYSICAL (signal)?

The physical represents the potential of each ONE set into motion; and only the mental allows access to ALL potentiality offered aka the unused potential. To get at it ONE needs to increase ONEs own potential through unity with other ONEs.

The reason why there needs to be conscious communication between ALL and each ONE is to establish the function of ALL, which is self sustenance. Energy creating motion through the loss of its potentiality; and motion recharging potentiality through the unity of potential. Both together (within balance aka momentum aka where we are) represents self sustenance of energy aka the source of ALL information.

The radar dish represents perception (input), while the signal represents the motion (the flow of information) allowing those within to perceive the consequences of actions as inspiration. Without motion; no perception; no action.

What are your thoughts on the metaphysical

METAPHYS'ICS ([Gr. after, and physics) - "body first; mind second". It's information first; motion second and then through the momentum (balance within motion) body and mind can coexist as natural opposites.

The information represents ALL; the motion represents the function of ALL (self sustenance), and body and mind in coexistence represent the ONE within ALL.

our relationship with it as fleshy vessels in the river samsara?

The river samsara is allegory for motion, and the vessel (body and mind in coexistence) represents the tool to sustain self, which is within the "shared" bloodline, with the blood (liquid) representing that which remains during the loss/recharge function. Body/mind go right back to base energy; blood/liquid remains, hence it representing a shared self.

Omnitelepathically

If possible; then through unity in adherence. There are many instinctive reactions among collectives within other lifeforms (herd mentality; collective agreement of temporary "cease fire" rules without those rules ever being proclaimed; pin point accuracy of measurement of motion (not time) and placement etc.)

The term "telephatic" is a recent one (1882) so there's certainly deception afoot to corrupt our comprehension of what this is really about. As far as I see it...access to collective mental communication requires massive responsibility over self and to others, which is why unity in adherence seems to be the logical foundation needed for that.

How could one communicate in English and achieve a state of no proclamations nor ignorance?

Questions. Adaptation to inspiration instead of arguing over assumptions about information offered. No idolatry aka no beliefs. And as for ignorance....responsibility over choice for each action.

Are we not by definition ignorant the moment we open our mouths?

Language represents creation within motion (transmutation) aka just an action set into motion. Motion corrupts creation and so language needs maintenance (responsibility) in adherence to the laws of nature (defining how motion operates). Language has to be in adherence to change; build on assumptions and used as adaptation to circumstances within motion; not to proclaim what something is or isn't.

Now to the problem...upholding affixed definitions of words within ones mind; thereby creating the inner monologue (ego) about reasoning over fiction, while ignoring reality. So far my attempts to reel that inner monologue in are fruitless (or so it seems). My comprehension operates unrestricted since beliefs don't even tempt me anymore; I cleared my memory of the majority of loss, hope and fear by comprehending the deception of time, and cleaned up my communication towards adherence to need over wants, which let to endless improvements, but communicating with myself without language, while not falling for the temptation of the ego; that's so far out of my range.

The moment we formulate our thoughts from the formless?

Not formless; potentiality freely offered. One may use it; but one has no right to claim any of it, because that represents ignorance of being ONE within ALL; of being in coexistence as energy.

One would need to be god to communicate in your manner or, a god, super natural to the physical, right?

Wrong. Have you ever perceived a worm proclaiming reality to others or any other lifeforms doing that? Nope, and yet they use language to communicate with each other. It's once again our selfish ignorance at play.

it couldn’t possibly be everything or else we would be the same person

We are ONE as energy, which segregated us into differences to inspire us to sustain ourselves and therewith ALL. Energy represents information, and to act upon information ONE needs inspiration, and that can only come from differences. Imagine ALL is white, and so how would you as the ONE within perceive anything (including yourself) when all is white.

This is why each ONE is different, while having the shared need for self sustenance, which represents the function of ALL. Person means per (through) and sona (sound), which represents resonance within motion, which is what allows form.

Thanks!

And thank you for these great questions.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ubisoft Montreal specifically lol, the city that has recently given us cultural touchstones like Pornhub and one of the continents first “modern” mass shootings...

Just a side note lol because editing comments with “formatting” is fucking aids on this site haha

1
braveContrarian 1 point ago +1 / -0

idk but luffy is my spirit animal and I always planned to mimic him if shit ever hit the fan.

Like if im doomed anyway I actually will try to get a crew together and say that im the man whos gonna be pirate king.

I'll die but at least it might be entertaining for awhile.

1
Dukearchus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've taken advantage of my extra time at home amongst covid by getting into One Piece. I just finished the Water 7 arch. Definitely started to feel how you are. We should all be like iceberg. T^T

1
skf93 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry for spoiling future plot points.

1
Dukearchus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh that's okay. It's so long, and I'm so good at forgetting.

0
Mad_King_Kalak 0 points ago +1 / -1

"We know that the truth of the 2020 election won't be covered in history, and the Trump presidency will be deemed a failure without observing the good he has done."

I disagree. It took 40 years or so until there was a consensus that JFK stole the 1960 election, once it was safe from the distance of time to do so. I anticipate about 20 years for 2020.

Also, they tried their best, that is liberals in the media and academia, to banish Reagan to the halls of "worst president ever" but he's more beloved now than the day he won a 49 state landslide. When separated from Trump's presidency by time, and his eventual death, there will be a relatively respectful appraisal of his time in office.