One piece is a worldwide best selling manga and popular anime. The main antagonists of the show are called the world Government. Sound famieler, certain groups may want to establish one here. The world government inthe show has been shown to cover up their atrocities and change history for their benefit. One of their atrocities is destroying the inhabitants of an island because a group of historians and archeologists there may uncover secret history they kept buried. This secret history is known as the void century, and it is essentially a 100 years of history which the world government has buried. It is speculated that this history tells the truth of the world governments founding a d not their propaganda. It is not hard to believe that certain events in our history may have been lied about or altered. Certain events may have been covered up for all we know. We know that the truth of the 2020 election won't be covered in history, and the Trump presidency will be deemed a failure without observing the good he has done. O e of the most interesting things is the rich and powerful of their world can buy and sell slaves at an auction house run by traffickers. That sounds like pizzagate to me. Also, certain families live outside the law in the One Piece world. They are known as the Celestial Dragons and are the descendants of the WGs original founders. They can kill and enslave whoever they want with no consequences. Sounds like some of our elites today. Do you think the author to this series is exposing the real world in his work? One of the characters watching the rich and powerful buy slaves at an auction house said, "this is like a miniature version of the world in here." Who's world, his or ours?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
transmit knowledge
No. They transmute out of the same source material (energy as the source of ALL information). Knowledge means "to know", and that's what's missing...ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived.
All fiction as a transmutation of the ineffable ONE into a graspable PIECE?
That’s probably the way of describing it, if that’s what you’re saying I agree for sure
All fiction as a transmutation of the ineffable ONE into a graspable PIECE?
First...what is fiction? Ignoring motion (reality) while mentally holding onto (believe) physical occurrences within motion, while ignoring motion. Nature does not offer fiction; only ALL information as inspiration to each ONE within itself, so the free will of chocie to ignore reality for fiction is on each ONE.
Transmutation represents being ONE within the motion of ALL, while creating out of the information offered. That's what all creation is...created out of information aka ALL allows ONE the act of creation, based on the inspiration from the information offered.
The "graspable piece" represents ONE lacking the comprehension of being ONE within ALL, while trying to claim a "piece" of ALL for self. That's just selfish ignorance of reality, while justifying it with beleif based fiction (It's mine, because I say so).
"transmutation of the ineffable ONE"...here I'm not sure why you say "ineffable", which means "unspeakable; unutterable; that cannot be expressed in words"? The problem with words is that if ONE comprehends to be ONE within ALL (having self discernment) then branding oneself with a name, becomes a selfish claim within ALL.
The transmutation of ONE represents either in adherence or in ignorance of self sustenance. ONE represents a vessel (potential) emitting out the potentiality of ALL, depending on ONEs choices. To ignore means that less information of ALL goes through ONE, which leads to less inspiration for others, which leads to more ignorance from others.
Fiction is anything a human being writes, films, or speaks that doesn’t place fealty to materialism at the pinnacle of expression. Examples include: The Epic of Gilgamesh, all religious texts, The Matrix, Assassins Creed and everyone’s posts on social media.
You say nature does not offer fiction, are the shamans who dream of the world turtle not a part of nature offering a fiction to help those of us who can’t yet dream to comprehend? Is the story of motion a set of programming instructions from The Builder? Or is it just the most accurate fiction you’ve found so far?
I used ineffable as a contrast to graspable. The ALL is ungraspabple, unspeakable, unnamable, for as you accurately point out, when branded with a name it becomes imprisoned and unnatural. However aren’t we forced to grasp at the ineffable if we are to understand anything further about existence? Does that grasping eventually lead to the holding of one or more pieces? What then? I think then we become teachers.
Fiction is anything a human being writes, films, or speaks that doesn’t place fealty to materialism at the pinnacle of expression. Examples include: The Epic of Gilgamesh, all religious texts, The Matrix, Assassins Creed and everyone’s posts on social media.
No. All of the aforementioned represents creation out of the information reality offers. It all becomes fiction if ONE believes in the attached meaning of it, while ignoring adherence to reality. I for example can use Assassins Creed as inspiration for martial arts, while adhering to reality, but I have to be aware that playing the fictions game represents ignorance of self substance, especially because those who offer all these games enslave, corrupt and destroy through the offer of fiction.
Religious texts are simultaneously a self destructive dogma for those who consent to them by believing, while also highly beneficial information in allegorical form, which offer inspiration for one to comprehend how other ones use allegories to deceive others by trying to hide reality from them (corrupting their comprehension by tricking them to consent to belief).
Speaking is a huge problem we have to face...nature does not use words to communicate, while we define reality by belief based words (fiction); while ignoring reality. This corrupted us so far as to not only having a parasite exploiting us for it, but also for the creation of the "ego"; the inner monologue; based on belief based definitions of reality in form of words.
How much of our life do we ignore when we are reasoning about fiction within our own minds? talmudic "reasoning" is all about exploiting just that self corruption, by using contradictions to keep the reasoning going.
the world turtle
Great A'Tuin...imagine being a turtle with no access to veggies, and we think our lives are a struggle.
are the shamans who dream of the world turtle not a part of nature offering a fiction to help those of us who can’t yet dream to comprehend?
To gain comprehension one cannot consent to belief; because an affixed belief contradicts an ever changing reality. The problem is here that the shamans (which literally means wizard; conjurer) are proclaiming that ONE (themselves) can define what ALL means by offering it to another ONE to believe.
The information they were inspired to create (out of) is not the problem; the chocie they made to act upon it is (in ignorance to reality). To proclaim represents laying a claim upon reality (branding it), while ignoring that it's changing.
Those who consent to the offer also actin ignorance...did they need to believe another one about some giant turtle, or did they want to believe them? Needs over wants; it's that simple.
Is the story of motion a set of programming instructions from The Builder? Or is it just the most accurate fiction you’ve found so far?
How could I perceive any story without being within motion? How could I comprehend and act upon any story without being within motion? How could I write this response without setting actions into motion? How could we communicate without being within motion?
I don't believe in motion; I comprehend it and try to disprove it. I haven't found the fiction in that so far.
The ALL is in-graspable.
ONE can perceive ALL offered (input), but ONE cannot comprehend ALL (processing), because ONE is one potential within ALL potentiality. They are segregated for a reason (balance in motion).
That does not mean that ONE cannot attain self discernment about how ALL operates. Self discernment is simply the foundation of self, that requires responsibility over ones free will of choice to not ignore ALL (motion).
unspeakable
Language is merely a tool when used in adherence to motion (no proclamations; no ignorance), but it is also a massive temptations to be selfish, because it allows ONE to define ALL based on ones own assumptions. This is why responsibility over free will of choice is crucial for self discernment.
unnamable
That's also only a problem without self discernment, because after comprehending that ONE is within ALL; comes the comprehension that ALL is ONE in energy. There's no need for any brands; nature self segregated everything for inspiration, while the information is all predefined (nothing new under the sun).
when branded with a name it becomes imprisoned and unnatural.
No. a) nothing is unnatural for nature is ALL. b) the branded doesn't become imprisoned for information cannot be stopped since it's energy in motion aka the flow of information offered. The corruption; the fiction; the self restriction is all within ONEs mind; that's where ONE made the choice to uphold the brand; the beleif; the idol; the fiction; the offer made by another.
That's where right now the "coronavirus" resides for those who believe in it, and guess why (((they))) branded it so? Corona (crown aka head); virus (poison aka belief). What are the mask wearers called? Zombies. Remember "The Cranberries"?...In your head; zombie, zombie, zombie-e-e-e.
However aren’t we forced to grasp at the ineffable if we are to understand anything further about existence?
No. That's the temptation of ones wants, while only adherence to ones needs leads automatically to comprehension. Why? Because to want means to ignore need, and ignorance means restricted comprehension. One cannot comprehend and ignore simultaneously to get what one needs.
Does that grasping eventually lead to the holding of one or more pieces? What then? I think then we become teachers.
Nope. To want within motion means to always want more aka self destruction. To teach means to show; not to give...inspiration; not information. A teacher (the branded idol of false authority) claims to have information to share, while those who teach (the action in adherence to need) use themselves to inspire others; all based on adherence to self sustenance.
Do you see how comprehension changes the same situation? Furthermore...to learn means to teach; otherwise how would one know if one has learned anything?