And, whenst thou moan that our leaders serve Israel and that our militaries are being used to fight Israels wars, hearken unto the good book and rejoice that god doth keepeth his promises!

Isa 60:11  Therefore thy gates shall be open continually; they shall not be shut day nor night; that men may bring unto thee the forces of the Gentiles, and that their kings may be brought.

Therefore verily I say unto you, be not ye of sad countenance but rather rejoice in the blessings thee hath given unto Israel that ye may yet be blessed. For Israel hath wrought the greatest sacrifice to humankind - the sacrifice of the son of god as a propitiation for thine sins. It is therefore a joyous thing to sacrifice ones own sons in thanks for the prosperity of our spiritual forebears.

There is no greater sacrifice than to lay one’s life down for one’s friends.

The narrative being presented is that leftists are angry at Elon and attacks or protests are organic movements to hurt Elon. However these movements have always been paid events to manufacture a perceived threat and generate fake outrage. It may rile up a handful but otherwise these movements are state funded crisis either by America or by Israel.

But the question is, why Tesla? Trump’s cabinet is full of CEOs and megachurch owners so why only Tesla? Elon owns multiple companies including X/Twitter so again, why only Tesla? And why is terrorism from vandalism applied only to Tesla?

I believe it’s entirely because they want to add extra protections for Agenda 2030, 15 Minute Cities, etc which will be provided by Tesla in the form of Robotaxis and Optimus. Tesla is not a car company but rather a robotics and AI company. Elon Musk wants to use Tesla as a means to create a “sustainable” future where Tesla products bring significant changes to cities.

Example. Tesla advocates for removing parking lots so people are forced to use robotaxis.

Supposedly Tesla will begin to roll out Robotaxis this summer in Texas and California. To avoid confusion, the Robotaxi and the Cybercab are separate things. Robotaxi is just software that can be used by any of the Tesla models. Optimus is being manufactured right now as a manual labor bot but is being reserved for use by Tesla. 2026 will be the year where both of these things are mass produced and sold to the public as a service. The end goal being to automate manual labor and get people to use taxis instead of owning vehicles.

Elon has also advocated for an “Age of Abundance” using Tesla products where AI and autonomy allows you to have anything. Secondary source of Tesla themselves advocating “sustainable abundance”

“Humanity is not constrained in any real fashion,” said Elon. “I thought your first book, Abundance, was pretty accurate in terms of the future being one of abundance, where essentially any goods and services will be available in quantity to everyone. Basically, if you want something, you can just have it. Essentially, AI and robotics will drop the cost of goods and services to almost nothing.”

Also note, Elon believes in universal basic income but the kind where the state can ration services and resources by deciding what should be scarce among the people.

If people were to piece Elon’s true intentions together, there would most certainly be an organized effort to sabotage Tesla and any other company building an Agenda 2030 future. This happened in the UK where a group sabotaged ULEZ cameras to stop the tyranny. and it is likely because of this group that the Jews thought it was necessary to manufacture the anti-Tesla crisis.

Now if you were to oppose Tesla you would be considered an irrational leftist or a terrorist. I suspect once people catch on to what’s happening, there will be a few who will fight back. Since vandalism is now considered terrorism, the JWO is ready for another Luddite revolt by slapping the loud few with extreme charges and punishment.

When you see all our money being sent to Israel and you think to yourselves ‘thieves!’…

Or when you see Jews who own all the money and politicians and think to yourself ‘interlopers!’ ‘Parasites!’

Take comfort in Isaiah 61:6 and know that Gods will is being done on earth as it is in heaven and rejoice!

But ye shall be named the Priests of the LORD: men shall call you the Ministers of our God: ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves.

Rejoice in our lord and saviour Jesus Christ who declareth that heaven and earth shall not pass until all be fulfilled.

The promises of god are being fulfilled before our very eyes, most esteemed brethren. The kingdom is at hand!

11
12
9/11 miracles (files.catbox.moe)
posted ago by dukey ago by dukey

Saw this comment and reply..

Ok, can a tree suffer?

Suffering requires a central nervous system & consciousness - trees have neither. They can respond to stimuli, but they don’t feel pain or suffer like animals do. Some may pretend plants and animals are morally equivalent just an excuse to avoid ethical responsibility.


yet, I have a go at this.

What about when you have "produce" in your grocery order. I'll freshen up some types by putting water on it under the tap. Leave it sit in a bag for a day, then change bags. It really freshens it up.

However.. when you go to eat and cut the produce.. I suspect it's kind of similar as to what's going on with meat, somehow. It's almost like cutting your arm, to it.. even though it's like.. let's say.. lettuce, celery, broccoli.. on and on. tomatoes.. onions. You cut that with a knife.. it's probably "screaming" like you would, on some level. lol. So don't tell me, doing that to plants is somehow "better" than doing it to animals.

We have to eat something, though, eh.. so.. I don't know.. what would you eat, if you didn't have to "kill" a plant. Like, what.. things that fall off it. So what are those.. like fruit, eh.. tomatoes is probably ok. But when you cut it.. it'd probably emanate some type of.. kinda like you if you were cut.. sorta signals out there in the ether. lol.


animals are like what.. 2nd density level of consciousness.. we're like 3rd level. Let me check that. 


The concept of "density levels of consciousness" is often found within certain metaphysical or spiritual frameworks, rather than mainstream scientific understanding. Here's a breakdown of what that generally entails:

The General Idea:

This idea suggests that consciousness exists at different levels, or "densities," each characterized by different qualities and experiences. It's important to note that these are not universally accepted scientific concepts.

Typical Density Descriptions:

First Density: Often associated with basic elements, minerals, and fundamental physical existence.

Focuses on basic existence.

Second Density:

Typically linked to animals and plant life. Characterized by instinct, movement, and growth. Animals are said to exist within this density.

Third Density:

Generally associated with human consciousness. Marked by self-awareness, free will, and the development of the ego. This is the level of consciousness that most humans are said to exist in.

Key Points:

These concepts are often found in philosophies like "The Law of One." It's important to distinguish between these spiritual ideas and established scientific theories of consciousness.

The concept of these densities, also includes the idea that earth and humanity is currently in a transition from 3rd density, to 4th density. In summary, while the idea of animals being in a "second density" of consciousness exists within certain belief systems, it's not a scientifically established fact.


in the ra material.. we're like 3rd density.. even dogs are like 2nd density level.. like other animals

You're right to point to the Ra Material, or "The Law of One," as the source of this specific concept of density levels of consciousness. It's important to recognize that this is a metaphysical framework, not a scientifically proven one.

Here's a recap of how the Ra Material describes these densities:

Second Density:

This level is associated with animals and plants.

It's characterized by growth, movement, and a basic level of awareness. Animals operate primarily on instinct and are focused on physical survival.

Third Density:

This is the density of human consciousness. It's defined by self-awareness, free will, and the ability to make choices. Humans have the capacity for complex thought, emotions, and spiritual development.

Therefore, according to the Ra Material, the distinction you made between humans in the 3rd density, and animals, such as dogs, in the 2nd density, is accurate within that belief system.

Key takeaways regarding the Ra Material's density concepts:

These densities represent stages of spiritual evolution.

The transition between densities involves learning specific lessons. It is important to remember that this information is from a channeled text, and is not scientific fact. I hope this helps to clarify the concept.


what's first density level then


According to the metaphysical framework found in "The Law of One" (the Ra Material), first density consciousness is the most basic level of awareness. Here's a breakdown:

Core Characteristics:

It's associated with the most fundamental elements of existence. This includes things like:

Minerals

Elements (earth, water, air, fire)

Basic physical matter.

The focus is on pure, simple existence.

It's characterized by a very basic level of awareness, without self-reflection.

Essentially:

First density is about the initial "becoming" of consciousness within physical matter.

It's the starting point for the evolutionary journey of consciousness through the various densities.

This is the level where the consciousness becomes aware of "being". In simpler terms, it's the consciousness present in the most basic building blocks of the physical world.


Now.. let's go back to this part.. where it talked about 2nd density level of animals.. but it also grouped plants in that realm.

"Second Density:

Typically linked to animals and plant life. Characterized by instinct, movement, and growth. Animals are said to exist within this density."

So when this guy tried to reply to that other guy, by saying..

"Suffering requires a central nervous system & consciousness - trees have neither. They can respond to stimuli, but they don’t feel pain or suffer like animals do."

I don't think so.. saw a post the other day about isolating the human nervous system. Seems like plants root system. What happens if you cut a plant or chop a tree down.. it's like us.. let me check.


what kind of regenerative capacity do plants have.. is it like us.. if we get cut.. we can heal.. but if you chop your arm off.. you cannot. Seems like a plant or tree, if you chop a branch off.

It's true that plants possess remarkable regenerative capabilities, often far exceeding those of humans. Here's a breakdown of how plant regeneration works and how it differs from human healing:

Plant Regeneration:

Stem Cells (Meristems):

Plants have specialized tissues called meristems, which contain stem cells. These cells can differentiate into various plant tissues, enabling regeneration.

Meristems are located in areas like:

Tips of roots and shoots.

Lateral buds.

Vascular cambium (responsible for growth in thickness).

Wound Response:

When a plant is injured, it initiates a complex wound response.

This involves:

Closing the wound to prevent infection.

Activating meristematic cells to generate new tissues.

Hormonal signals (like auxin and cytokinin) play crucial roles in regulating regeneration.

Regeneration Examples:

Cutting Propagation: Many plants can grow entirely new roots and shoots from cuttings (e.g., taking a stem cutting of a rose and growing a new rose plant).

Branch Removal: When a branch is removed, the plant can seal the wound and grow new branches from dormant buds.

Regrowing from Roots: Some plants can regenerate entire new shoots from their root systems.

Differences from Human Healing:

Totipotency:

Plant cells exhibit a higher degree of totipotency, meaning they have a greater ability to differentiate into various cell types.

While humans can heal wounds, we cannot regenerate entire limbs or organs in the same way plants can.

Modular Structure:

Plants have a more modular structure, allowing different parts to function relatively independently.

This enables them to regenerate lost parts more effectively.

Stem Cell Distribution:

Plant stem cells are distributed throughout the plant, whereas human stem cells are more localized.

In summary:

Plants have a significantly higher regenerative capacity than humans due to their unique cellular and structural organization.

Their ability to regenerate is facilitated by meristems and hormonal regulation.

Plants are able to regenerate entire new plants from cuttings, or regrow large portions of themselves, where humans can only heal existing tissue.


So they're considered 2nd density in the Ra material, on the same par as animals.. hmm.. I think this has to do with our like spark or something in there.. the micro chunk of god that's in each of us. lol.

14
24
Doom cycle (files.catbox.moe)
posted ago by dukey ago by dukey
19
Oh no (storage.imgbly.com)
posted ago by dukey ago by dukey
view more: ‹ Prev Next ›