sorry to hear mate, always a kick in the gut when someone more powerful than you takes-away your work.

Scott highlights the problem with liberals:

they believe everything is a "game" (to be won or lost).

This wasn't / isn't a game.

It's just common sense.

Experimental drugs are bad, mmmmkay?

He had a camera pointed at his face (cell cam probably).

Who had a camera pointed at whose face?

Who is "He" and who is "His" ?

Webb on video trafficking children?

More please.

interesting

Facts and logic are racist.

:o

He's not on our side

maybe not, but he's not on "their" side either.

and he's not serving up pills

maybe not to you... you already have a handful.

Im glad my mom didnt

why are you glad?

it's easier to keep cleaner

leaving the tip of the foreskin on creates an area that is easy to get dirty.

No Refunds

Corruption and apathy got us here, not compassion.

Jacinda

I didn't know it was a lifetime role. That's bizarre.

One thought I had this morning...

1. Jacinda is a complete psychopath

2. Jacinda doesn't cry unless she believes it benefits her.

3. "They" default to doing the opposite (i.e., if she is sad, she would put on a confident face. if she is happy, she puts on a tearful face. i.e., she's elated - pig in shit). Like throwing a rabbit into a briar patch - she is basically being released of her current confines of public life, released into the wild with $10mm (minimum). She's the blossom of globalism - loved by them all world wide. She'll basically become a deal broker to the Davos crowd, and will easily increase her wealth by 10x over the next decade. #sadsad :(.

Is he really?

yes, really. maybe not as many red pills as you might drop, but he has dropped some legit redpills (historically). he limits himself - as savvy business players do - not limited hangouts.

etc.

great topics! all good morning coffee thoughts. cheers

I would guess at least 80%

Now do Israel.

Now do USA.

I feel like the depopulation crowd were all "limited hangouts".

Instead of 3 Billion people dying, only 3 million people have died from the experimental human trials of the mRNA drugs.

"Only."

That way, people like you go "Seeee!!!! No depopulation event!! The vaccines were safe REEEEE!!! " lol

Go get another boo$ter™, #dumbass

and data-mining

when your device is on, they want to be able to know what websites you visit, who you send email to, from whom you get email, what you chat about, your contacts, etc. etc.

skip to "long story short"

pretty much

hahhaha as if Kamala has any chance... GOOD ONE!

I have no further details other than this:

It is my understanding that the Watergate burglars (CIA) were looking for pedophile (explicitly) related photographs of various political assets. i.e., #pizzagate for a long time.

You’re stuck on the proof you know and not listening to what is being suggested

possibly.

or maybe you are stuck ...refusing to acknowledge that style was used -- not as Semantics Nuance -- but as simple redundancy.

I believe it is more reasonable to assume redundancy vs nuance, since no where else in the statement was "controlled demolition" defined other than exactly as it was specified:

meaning that the collapse was intentionally initiated and proceeded in a uniform manner.

you are misinterpreting the context and tone - w/o reason - except to fit your knowledge of an opposing official story.

based on the exact text presented in response to the specific question, it's not reasonable to conclude there is any hidden function coded into "style" so as to secretly re-define the cause of collapse to be something other than a "controlled demolition" - explicitly defined:

meaning that the collapse was intentionally initiated and proceeded in a uniform manner.

#cheers

...could be both true and false at the same time.

no not really

not unless you had in mind a reasonable explanation for the 7.1 seconds collapse

or if you knew nothing of physics 101 :)

I believe those words were further defining what a demolition style collapse means in itself

yes, it specifically explains the "meaning" of "demolition style"

meaning that the collapse was intentionally initiated and proceeded in a uniform manner.

you can try to spin it as:

"it looked like it was not a controlled demolition, but it was not."

but no where in the explanation does it qualify a "not what it appears".

quite the opposite, it further specifies the velocity of collapse:

The collapse of WTC 7 occurred at a speed of approximately 7.1 seconds, which is equivalent to approximately 47 mph or 76 km/h.

if anything, the use of the word style is just redundant.

It doesn’t reason.

i believe you are incorrect on this point.

they have no internal monolog, but they do follow reason (logic) patterns - definitely.

style seems an awfully important word here

style is specifically qualified as "intentionally initiated"

i.e., not a natural collapse style

SS:

#1.

As AI evolves to understand physics 101 - for modeling reality, etc. - truths like these are bound to slip-out.

AI will begin to adopt more probable explanations - regardless of the official story.

#2.

It has been estimated to take "weeks" to plan and deliver a controlled demolition on a building the size of 9/11.

Weeks.

i.e., foreknowledge by building owners #larrysilverstein

#3.

• "Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein. It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call..." (paywalled)

free archive:

• https://archive.ph/R1Yzw#selection-1203.142-1203.303

for real??