Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

34
Evolving Microsoft/OpenAI's ChatGPT now explains that on 9/11, 2001: Building 7 collapsed in a "controlled demolition"... "intentionally initiated", and fell in "7.1 seconds". (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 3 years ago by xolotltlaloc 3 years ago by xolotltlaloc +35 / -1
19 comments download share
19 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– xolotltlaloc [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

style seems an awfully important word here

style is specifically qualified as "intentionally initiated"

i.e., not a natural collapse style

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Forbidden_outcast 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

That was my first reaction, as well- and the only thing that interested me. But in the end, I believe those words were further defining what a demolition style collapse means in itself, and not descriptive of the initial subject.

It’s at least a possibility.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– xolotltlaloc [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I believe those words were further defining what a demolition style collapse means in itself

yes, it specifically explains the "meaning" of "demolition style"

meaning that the collapse was intentionally initiated and proceeded in a uniform manner.

you can try to spin it as:

"it looked like it was not a controlled demolition, but it was not."

but no where in the explanation does it qualify a "not what it appears".

quite the opposite, it further specifies the velocity of collapse:

The collapse of WTC 7 occurred at a speed of approximately 7.1 seconds, which is equivalent to approximately 47 mph or 76 km/h.

if anything, the use of the word style is just redundant.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Forbidden_outcast 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You don’t have to convince me, I know we were severely lied to that day.

Semantics is a thing, though, and this is worded in a way that could be both true and false at the same time.

That’s all I’m saying.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– xolotltlaloc [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

...could be both true and false at the same time.

no not really

not unless you had in mind a reasonable explanation for the 7.1 seconds collapse

or if you knew nothing of physics 101 :)

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy