2
wereonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ohhh. I think this is where we differ in out words but agree in our thoughts.

"...the more people make, the more debt they have..." This would be what I think of when you earlier said "overlevered". I fully agree with you that anyone making big money but with proportionally large debt payments would be in trouble.

If you make big money with big debts and things get tight, that is bad news.

If you make big money with no debts and things get tight that is good news.

I know tech Millennials that buy Manhattan condos in cash with just their hiring bonus. If the price drops 50% it sucks but is not an issue. Like any group, some are bad with money and some are ok with money.

1
wereonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the best explanation that I've seen. Solar panels UNDER the balloon doesn't make sense to me.

2
wereonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is good data but the weakness is that it assumes the probe has no active control over altitude. This assumption is most likely wrong. Investigation of the probe would confirm/disprove this.

Good Post OP

1
wereonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd agree with the leveraging. That stuff is dangerous.

Especially the older "Techie-millenial losers" and Techie-GenX that would be loosing both income power and wiht falling assets moving forward.

One counter point would be that if you were making >$250k per year as a "Techie-millenial losers" and lost half of your savings things are looking good compared to your non-techy peers of the same age making <$100k. Even if techies go from $250k to average they will still be better off than their average peers. (it will hurt more because of lost dreams)

Agreed that GenX consistently gets hosed by following the selfish Boomer generation's policies (not talking about individuals).

2
wereonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

The post seems to be predicting a market of higher wages and lower costs for assets. This is good for working savers. My point is that Gen X missed that for most of their careers. They had lower wages and purchased assets at the high. In 20+ years they will sell at the low. Given the choice, I'd rather be young in such an environment. Maybe Boomers will make out the worst, but they purchased stuff really cheap and then went all NIMBI (Generalizations are imperfect and bad).

What generation would you say gets the worst of it? [friendly discussion]

2
wereonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I accept these backwards wind calculators work. However, I need convincing that this probe went past S. Korea, over Japan, Alaska, & Canada, but was noticed until it was in the dense urban center of Montana?

1
wereonit 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sounds great for GenZ and horrible for GenX.

3
wereonit 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you cannot find something, step 3 is to try other search engines. Ecosia, startpage, yandex...

3
wereonit 3 points ago +3 / -0

No.

This has nothing to do with eggs we eat.

"Each hen was injected (intramuscular) with 150 μg of the recombination spike protein under the wings, once a week for 4 weeks, and then IgY was extracted and the titer evaluated."

by pkvi
2
wereonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are wrong on this one.

This has nothing to do with eggs at the store. This is if you inoculated eggs to COVID the eggs would make antibodies against the virus. They are seeing if they could make something like monoclonal antibody treatment with purified inoculated eggs.

by pkvi
1
wereonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Putting the most contagious variant's spike onto the deadliest variant. What could go wrong?

by DrLeaks
2
wereonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Steal to resell. Do it with what the locals want to buy.

1
wereonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be so easy for them to put a QR code line & URL link to their website with a more detailed explanation that then linked to multiple primary research articles showing the issue. But they don't. Almost like they don't have the data.

3
wereonit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which demonstrates highly irrational thinking. Single car crash, guns, medical tourism to Canada are all much easier ways to kill one's self.

6
wereonit 6 points ago +6 / -0

Suicidal is bad, but stabbing yourself in the abdomen is a whole other level of suicidal.

2
wereonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

He wants to be able to gain of function work that puts our food supply at risk to keep us safe from a virus that does not exist.

2
wereonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Let's put the spike protein from the most transmissible strain onto the most deadly strain."

3
wereonit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just a small technical correction. Chitin is not a protein. It is a long sugar chain (carbohydrate) that is decorated with amines.

Shills will disregard your comment because of a small technical error that has no impact.

1
wereonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you drink this water that you're afraid of? Get a good water filter like a Berkey or whole house system.

1
wereonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not saying you should, but you can still put a vessel atop your (wood/gas/electric) stove to up the humidity.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›