So who from ESA said what you claim?
nor made a single claim about the shape of the earth.
Then why quote him as reply to my question? If it's not relevant to my question, what's the point?
Here's my question again. Of course you will not answer it.
Name one thing about the shape of the earth and the solar system that cannot be explained by the heliocentric model.
You claim that there is no working model for heliocentrism and your evidence is an article that makes no mention of heliocentrism.
Name one thing about the shape of the earth and the solar system that cannot be explained by the heliocentric model.
Only one thing.
You won't because you can't.
Most of it was posted around the time of the invasion and up to a year afterwards.
Since then, most Russian shills have abandoned this place, including its top mod.