I did give you one point, the CMB doesn't match what the preposed model claims.
Maybe I should clarify my position. I'm not arguing the shape of the earth, nor am i "flat earther". I'm a person who doesn't "believe" in things that I cant prove with my own research or logical deduction. Im more then ok saying im not certain or convinced of either.
To me saying things like a closed in realm with a loving god are just as silly as saying an infinite nothingness powered by random chaos.
So who from ESA said what you claim?
Then why quote him as reply to my question? If it's not relevant to my question, what's the point?
Here's my question again. Of course you will not answer it.
I did give you one point, the CMB doesn't match what the preposed model claims.
Maybe I should clarify my position. I'm not arguing the shape of the earth, nor am i "flat earther". I'm a person who doesn't "believe" in things that I cant prove with my own research or logical deduction. Im more then ok saying im not certain or convinced of either.
To me saying things like a closed in realm with a loving god are just as silly as saying an infinite nothingness powered by random chaos.