So, the US Justice Department is warning Karen Fann, who is the Arizona Senate president, that the Arizona Senate ordered audit of the 2020 election ballots could be in violation of federal voting and civil rights laws.
Hm.
If you read the article the OP linked here, you will see the letter that DOJ Civil Rights Division has sent to Karen Fann.
The author of said letter, who is the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General (PDAAG) for the US DOJ Civil Rights Division, is Pamela S. Karlan.
If you would like to know about her legal and political tendencies, looking into a Soros funded organization called Demand Justice is a good starting point.
PROFESSOR PAMELA S. KARLAN
One of the lawyers on the list (of Demand Justice), Professor Pamela S. Karlan from Stanford University, appeared before the House on Dec. 4 to voice her support for the impeachment of President Donald Trump.
She made headlines after illustrating the constitution’s prohibitions against titles of hereditary nobility by making a joke about the name of President Trump’s son Barron. The comment caused many Republicans in congress and even First Lady Melania Trump to issue statements condemning the professor’s choice to joke about a child’s name.
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/demand-justice/
They say knowing who your real opposition is the very first step of not putting yourself at risk.
Meanwhile, the US national security panel of CFIUS has been hearing about (= considering to accept) a plea from Tencent, a de facto surveillance arm of the PLA, on why the US should allow it to keep its ownership stakes in American game developers such as Riot Games and Epic Games. [1]
Last year, the previous US administration ordered Tencent to divest US holdings because of the CCP's National Intelligence Law. [2] Fully enacted in 2018, the CCP's 'law' insists that "everyone in China is responsible for China's state security." [PDF]
Let that last sentence above sink in for a moment and try to speculate why the current US administration still doesn't seem to care about it much while "urging the US to become more competitive against China." (What a virtue signalling nothingness the phrase is.)
If you're wondering why it isn't a bigger news that Democrats want this 'signature matching' audit to be stopped, a good data point you might want to look into is 2018 Arizona Secretary of State election.
As many of us here on this board already know, the responsibility of conducting elections in/of the state and enforcing the state's election rules falls on the state's the secretary of state.
Who is Arizona's secretary of state? Soros funded Katie Hobbs.
I care considerably less about the fact that George Soros has been funding her. I wanted to dig up what was the other team doing. What kind of methods(?) 'they' used in order to allow electing Katie Hobbs in the 2018? In the end, the answer was such a typical one.
If you research on 2018 Arizona Secretary of State election deeper enough, you'll see that the so called GOP loyalty agreed to 'ignoring' what happened in said election, while stonewalling any complaints from the third-parties including the White House.
IF the current mRNA vaccination is in fact a global scale clinical trial, CRISPR is the key word.
There are true believers at the top echelons of globalist factions, but also plain power obsessive authoritarian collectivists. One common thing in what they all seem to seek? Immortality.
The other day, I saw people on this board discussing the now infamous picture of Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and other three people. One subject all those five people have seemed interested in? CRISPR gene editing. If interested + bored, look into what kind of researches in Harvard Epstein had funded. Not that relevant but you'll also find the Clinton-Foundation connections there, the organization that Jeffrey Epstein himself helped architect.
It's obvious by now that what happened in the US last year was a version of colour revolution executed in the US soil.
Many analysts wrongly view the colour revolutions -- mass protests and subsequent social turmoil that broke out in Serbia (2000), Georgia (2003), Ukraine (2004), Iraq (2005), Lebanon (2005), Kyrgyzstan (2005), Belarus (2006), Myanmar (2007), Bahrain (2011), Yemen (2011), and Ukraine (2013) -- as insurgent movements being orchestrated by the US and its allied factions to advance their geopolitical ambitions.
However,
once you start researching on which factions have profited from those so called revolutions mentioned above, you'll realize that said view couldn't be more wrong: It's the 'globalist factions without borders' that have been behind the movements.
A hilarious thing is that between 2017 and 2019, during such a short period of time, a chunk of their assets have gone down the drain [1] and their grandiose agenda has been delayed considerably. [2]
This is why they have stopped caring for the optics and also why the current US Secretary of State, not Antony Blinken but the real one, has been super busy lately with doing some serious damage controls.
Expect soon that Iran, a de facto China's Satellite State, would play prominent roles for Israel and China [3], and also that China's semiconductor and telecommunications industry would come back from a near death. [4] [5]
So, seeing the construction of the institute's BSL–4 lab initiated in 2003, they must have found something interesting while researching on influenza virus around the time this NYT article published. Too bad the 2019 strain was a dud. Those poor schmucks have had to rely on mass propaganda for vaccinating the population (which is rumoured to be a global scale clinical trial of something else entirely).
I guess by now Biden being the quintessential sock puppet would surprise no one (at least on this board):
Last year, I heard from several accounts that Wall Street and Big Pharma originally chose Kamala but she just couldn't get enough votes. So that's why they brought up Biden to the mound.
Here's a good ole Jimmy Dore talking about a similar subject:
https://youtu.be/BCzxR-vo9nA?t=1188
Jimmy Dore: "Here is the WSJ says, "As Kamala Harris Joins Biden Ticket, Wall Street Sighs in Relief." So, this is how Joe Biden [became a 2020 US Democratic presidential candidates].
... Uh, "Kamala Harris Has To Answer For Not Prosecuting Steve Mnuchin." Steve Mnuchin was the criminal CEO of One West Bank [Group LLC]. One West Bank that illegally foreclosed thousands of people. And Kamala Harris' own investigators in her office told her that. "We found thousand instances of criminality in [the case of] One West Bank. And if we look harder, we'll find thousands more. She did not prosecute and she's never answered why. The reason why, it's because she is the puppet of Wall Street and the banks. That's why. And so that's why she was the first person to get coordinated by Wall Street on Martha's Vineyard before running for the 2016 Democratic Party [presidential] primaries.
She, Kamala Harris, was the first one who was coordinated on Martha's Vineyard by the Wall Street executives and she was given all the cash, all the things, she was given OK from the Wall Streets on Martha's Vineyard. [But] she couldn't get a vote. So, what the Wall Street says "Fuck it. We'll just get Obama because he works for us. We'll get him to consolidate everybody around Joe Biden. We already got Bernie telling people Joe Biden can beat Trump. That's all they (Democrats) care about. So we will go with Joe Biden and we will make Joe Biden pick Kamala Harris. So if Joe Biden has to step down because he's demented, we'll have Kamala Harris, the one we wanted originally. (Around 2015-2016, it's already rumoured that Joe Biden would be completely retired from the DC scenes because of deterioration in health + his not so squeaky family matters.)
That's how this is working. Wall Street picked Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. That's who picked them. Okay. "As San Francisco district attorney, Kamala Harris's office stopped cooperating with victims of Catholic Church child abuse." I'm just letting you know who these people (Biden and Harris) are. That's why they talk to minorities like this (This video segment of Jimmy Dore's discusses "Leaked Audio Of JOE BIDEN Exposes Disregard for his Base.")."
Not so relevant tidbit:
We all remembered a 2020 election war-game where John Podesta played Biden. In a scenario, they concluded that if Trump refused to concede because of foreign electoral intervention, it'd be up to military to 'cross the line.'
Although Trump was said to believe the full blown martial law would only regress the nation, many accounts noted that several US military factions, as well as a number of people from his team, voiced signing the insurrection act was necessary and even justified.
The rumour is that,
Mark Milley was the one who 'cooled down' those voices and also was the one who made sure the foreign electoral intervention parts in the DNI report were severely downplayed.
Looking at Kamala Harris furiously thanking Mark Milley on the inauguration video, while the new commander in chief wandering around like a senile gramp;
I'm thinking it's not just a rumour after all.
Many thanks to u/iDontShift for locating the video and timestamping it.
Thanks! :)
I really wonder how the intelligence agencies keep up with all of it. They must be spread so thin.
On that regard, it's been known that the intelligence agencies and especially big data analysis agencies are so welcoming quantum computing + blockchain technology + 5G. :D
Of course! (And watched it! ^^)
We all know harmful effects of watching short video continuously, which have been well documented, as well as how social media is shaping up our mind and even identities.
Besides, TikTok was reported to apparently collect its users' MAC addresses and store them in the CCP controlled servers in China. [LINK] If this won't wake up people, not sure what will.
Since the Biden administration shelved the Oracle-TikTok deal indefinitely last February, [LINK] we should speak up about the importance of managing the US people's data and the TikTok's practice on the issue.
And
for the OP's case with this post's title "Reddit mods removed a post about Chinese data collection on TikTok": To me, it's simply Reddit doing Reddit. No surprise there. -_-'
Admittedly I didn't watch the video. But the part "Tiktok is Evil" of this post's title rubs me the wrong way because nothing is merely one simple black & white thing as "Tiktok is Evil." Allow me to tell a not-so-relevant-to-this-post story.
We all know this:
When the previous US administration issued executive order(s) in 2020 and banned TikTok along with WeChat from the US domestic market; by going after those Chinese companies through the CFIUS, the administration were forcing those Chinese managements to give up and sell the US portions of the companies to American companies.
The administration wanted to stop those Chinese companies sending the data to the CCP controlled servers and obviously they also wanted those newly American controlled companies + the collected data being regulated by the appropriate US laws.
The word was:
With the forced acquisition process mentioned above, another thing the administration hoped was to 'establish' a social media platform in the US that's friendly with (not the US government in general but) the administration, as in the Trump administration.
Eventually, the conditions for the deal were provided by TikTok first which were 'agreed' by the administration. The conditions were said to be almost identical to the conditions when Oracle made the deal to buy TikTok with.
And several American companies showed their interests in the deal, including Snap Inc. (Snapchat) and Pinterest. After all, TikTok, the Chinese short-form video-sharing app has been extremely popular with Generation Z.
Then, something happened:
On Q2 2020, the emails, sent from American investment firms, were circulated among silicon valley CEOs. They stated that said investment firms will not participate in the deal, in any way, shape, or form. BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street were among said investment firms, which together were reported to control somewhere around $15-20 trillion USD in 2019. To give you an idea, the 2019 GDP of China was $14.34 trillion USD and the 2019 GDP of the US was $21.43 trillion USD.
And said American investment firms with other smaller ones + American billionaires went on and donated five times more to the Biden-Harris ticket than they gave the Trump-Pence in the 2020 Election.
So, those investment firms were 'against' the almost-guaranteed-to-be-gold-nuggets deal (and the previous US administration's decision)? No. Of course, it's the factions that are behind said firms were: They said no to the money. Let that sink in for a moment.
Wow it’s almost like a nationwide manhunt for Trump supporters (related to the Jan 6) who are then transported to DC jail, denied bail, kept in solitary confinement, have their trials delayed, can’t find lawyers, and get their lives destroyed is having its intended outcome....
https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1380925241757667331?s=20
What she's saying here is a bit of hyperbole, but it has been found to be largely accurate. I guess it's also been happening not just to the Jan 06 people but also to the 'pro alt right' individuals and organizations elsewhere in various manners.
Great point. Just concerned that 'they' will fiddle with public opinion during his case and make the case a national issue, which won't be pretty for the OP. -- Jeez, I hated to say that, cause what I stated sounded like a threat.
Agreed. The medical history or any other conditions such as skin colour cannot be a determining factor. That's why the school's policy "Must leave school if no testing" itself will be argued, not the case that the OP's being removed because of said policy.
despite [Trump or any other US presidents] having had and technically still having the highest security clearance in the WORLD
Let me be rude:
The phrase quoted above is an uneducated one. The idea it's trying to present is simply wrong. The US security clearance system does not work in the way that the "highest security clearance" holder can review whatever he or she chooses to review.
Said system works as an administrative determination regarding whether or not a certain official individual in a certain branch may access certain information classified by each information's governing body. Meaning: Each information's governing body gets to determine which people need access to the information in advance of the actual issue being faced.
We assume the POTUS would need to know everything in detail to do his or her job as the commander in chief. But the US laws do not agree with the assumptions and they allow the branches and the departments to 'keep secrets away' from the POTUS when it deems necessary. In short, although the POTUS is the top dog of the US executive branch and the head of the US government, he or she doesn't hold all the keys to the US government chests.
This is why Madam Hillary's so called private email server and its access to SAP material means so significant. -- It means someone in those SAP material's governing parties have allowed Ms. Clinton to access those material, not "she was able to access since she was the US secretary of state."
And before we suggest "Well, Trump could still order appropriate official departments to bring out certain materials to him," we'd need to remember that in 2020 the US state department, under the none other than Mike Pompeo (:D), has promoted the diplomat who testified against Trump on the impeachment trial.
Let me be a downer and drama queen:
The lawsuit seems to be a logical choice since the decision by your university is unconstitutional. However, we must remember what happened when Facebook and Twitter closed down Trump's accounts on the platforms. 'People' defended the right of said platforms to do whatever it wants on the grounds that they're private companies.
So, the lawsuit seems to be a logical choice but it's not going to be an easy path. -- If I were in your situation, to be honest I would hesitate to choose any of the options. I wish you the best luck.
Interesting video.
But the opinion the video presents seemingly stems from misunderstanding what 'deep state' really is.
The so called deep state is simply unelected bureaucrats who yield administrative abilities.
Just like any other matters in the (geo)political sphere, the deep state is not one entity, and they are certainly not under one banner (although since 1980s most of them have gathered to work for the major money streams, lieutenants of the so called globalist factions).
Many things are pointing that
what's going on nowadays in DC is the symptoms of agitation or uncooperativeness between Obama clique, Genie Energy faction + Carlyle clique, the so called Zeng Qinghong clique, and Xi Jinping's Princelings.
Nothing is merely one black & white thing like "Deep State vs. Biden Admin."
Oh, I agree with your sentiment.
In this particular case, even if one isn't a super skeptical, he/she can guess it'd probably go like this:
Since there are (now barely) enough of senate Republicans who noticed their constituent's resistance against the bill, those Republicans will put their 'sincere' efforts to block the bill from proceeding to a vote, presumably with a filibuster. In short, for now there is less chance for this bill to become the law.
However, after/if 'they' have failed this time, they'll come back with a different form of the bill's premise. And the game of "the mass media and people on social media will say anyone who opposes the bill is a racist" will be more amped up than this time.
They will get it eventually.
You see, they've already tested the threshold on how much the public would tolerate with this kind of nonsense bill and even conducted dry runs on some of the OECD nations: In 2005 South Korea passed the bill that allows non-citizens to vote in the elections. They pushed it in the name of "for the people" and succeeded to convince the public to believe the bill was for the public's own benefits. In July 2020, Japan tried to pass a similar bill but the Shinzo Abe's administration at that time blocked it. Coincidentally, Shinzo Abe, who is widely described as a right-wing nationalist, resigned two months later blaming a significant resurgence of his ulcerative colitis.
Still,
we shouldn't take this inevitable insanity just sitting down and being quiet. — We must publicly voice the opinion against the bill and get support from other people in trying to postpone its becoming the law until the next nationalist US administration arrives. Even if the chances of that kind of administration's happening are now slim to none.
The previous US administration was planning to withdraw the US forces from Middle East and place more against China's advance in Indo-Pacific regions.
But of course, it's not certain that where those troops in discussion would go now. Probably your guess might be proved correct.
Or
considering the current administration is literally filled with Obama personnels, one could guess that said troops might be sent away again to Myanmar region in order to deal with the so called Genie Energy factions and Xi Jinping's Princelings.
Apr 13, 2021 -- President Biden to withdraw all U.S. troops from Afghanistan by Sept. 11, extending Trump's May 1 deadline [Archived LINK]
Excerpts:
President Joe Biden plans to pull all military forces out of Afghanistan by Sept. 11, ending U.S. presence in the Middle Eastern nation by the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks that spurred America's longest war.
The move will extend military presence in Afghanistan beyond the May 1 withdrawal date previously negotiated by former President Donald Trump.
And if you're interested,
May 19, 2019 -- DOD Releases Indo-Pacific Strategy Report [Archived LINK]
2019 Department of Defense Indo-Pacific Strategy Report [PDF]
Apr 11, 2021 -- More than 100 corporate executives hold call to discuss halting donations and investments to fight controversial voting bills. [LINK]
So, more than 100 American corporations are flexing their muscles to oppose Georgia's new voting law. Hm. We need to stop and think about who are behind this ugly movement by the suits. The bosses of those corporate executives + the Democrats + RINOs, probably. -- Then, I must say H.R.1 is the maginot line. [1] [2]
Once the bill becomes the law;
those bosses will not just be able to select the figures even for your state governments, but also they will be able to keep the other companies & politicians, that were against H.R.1, in line. Remember what has followed once Facebook & Twitter closed down Trump's account.
We shouldn't be silent on this bill. Talk to your representative.
Tin foil hat time!!
Would you believe if I said what happened to the deceased and the accused on that day was related to a massive counterfeit ring and its operations?
On December 2019 and January 2020, the US Customs and Border Protection officers seized $900K in counterfeit US currency from a commercial rail shipment from China. They were packed in 45 cartons of counterfeit $1 bills.
Jan 25, 2020 -- CBP officers seize $900K worth of counterfeit U.S. currency [LINK]
The raging rumour at that time was that the bust mentioned above was merely a tip of an iceberg and the globalist factions behind the CCP were bringing in a huge amount of fake bills to the US in order to finance their "urban operations" for the 2020 election year.
And, we all remember the $20 bill.
Jul 08, 2020 -- Counterfeit $20 bill now part of George Floyd murder case [LINK]
If you can still find the video of the incident, see the accused's reaction or his body language when he realized he was being filmed.
I get the sentiment the OP is making with this post, but
with the case of Dr. Wang Yanyi, I disagree.
Because,
at the beginning of this whole 2020 pandemic fiasco, the act of sabotage by Shanghai clique was believed to be in play. And more importantly, rather than Dr. Wang Yanyi being a female, the fact that "she's married to a Chinese professor named Shu Hongbing who is closely connected to the top tier factions of Shanghai clique" is much more relevant to what happened from 2012 to the beginning of 2020. -- To elaborate on this point, here is a Reddit post I made about 11 months ago:
Wuhan City, Wuhan Institute of Virology, and Shanghai Clique
Ha. Up to you, man. I'm just a normie who took interested in geopolitics before getting into conspiracies.