4
user20461 4 points ago +4 / -0

lol that's just a drop in the ocean for her resume

TheImpossible1 did a great write up of what a swamp monster she is

https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16b6Dhyyw8/x/c/4TtrIM6rFfE

5
user20461 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, she's horrible. Imp has a whole laundry list on what a swamp monster she is.

5
user20461 5 points ago +5 / -0

Elon is Agent Orange 2.0

Yaccarino has also partnered with government on several occasions, first helping to promote healthy lifestyles as a member of the President’s Council on Sports Fitness and Nutrition, appointed by former President Donald Trump, and later working with government agencies, the White House and Pope Francis to produce a Covid-19 vaccination campaign in her role as chair of nonprofit advertising group the Ad Council.

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

Take it and you're weak.

How is it being weak when you understand the situation with clarity and know what actually needs to be done?

Weak is thinking politicians and zoomers are going to save you and you just need to vote harder.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great investigative work.

Any way Trump could appeal the decision and argue that the law is bullshit?

Someone else mentioned that the law is ex post facto, which I know to be illegal under the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

I guess the argument could be made that the law only amends the statute of limitations so it's not really ex post facto.

by DrLeaks
2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

How did he catch them?

0
user20461 0 points ago +1 / -1

It pains me to say it, but we must deport all illegal aliens due to their ability to camouflage as white supremacists.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting, thanks for sharing!

As long as it’s fully backed and redeemable, it seems good to me, but could also be a stepping stone to a surveillance digital currency. The devil is in the details. Will the digital currency be permissionless or private? Can addresses be sanctioned?

Yeah, this is the key for me, especially whether it can be withheld for having the wrong opinions.

by pkvi
5
user20461 5 points ago +5 / -0

Vaccine is just meaningless now.

Not if you understand that they believe the human race to be a virus on the planet.

by pkvi
2
user20461 2 points ago +3 / -1

LOL omg you're actually asking for evidence about TRUMP!?

Holy shit, are you stupid or do you really need evidence?

I'm guessing you see nothing wrong with the vaccine salesman, lockdown supporting, gun control supporting, DREAMer loving NY Liberal.

You're either too stupid to be conversating with or you're a shill.

In either case, I'm done letting you waste my time.

EDIT: this guy is still going after I told him I'm no longer responding to him lol

by pkvi
1
user20461 1 point ago +2 / -1

But he isn't a globalist nor has he ever taken any globalist stances.

https://media.patriots.win/post/SGEttovAJaUR.jpeg

by pkvi
1
user20461 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why not George Soros or Klaus Schwab or Bill Gates or?

They have zero appeal to anyone, including leftists.

Trump and Elon have appeal to far greater numbers. Trump with boomers, Elon with zoomers.

by pkvi
4
user20461 4 points ago +4 / -0

People enjoy hearing their beliefs being repeated back to them by celebrities. It makes them feel validated. These are the people that are supposed to be on our side and they're easily fooled. This is why I'm blackpilled.

by pkvi
2
user20461 2 points ago +3 / -1

to include Trump for no relevant reason?

He explains the reason:

it matches trying to trick nationalists into getting behind them.

Elon is Trump 2.0, with more zoomer appeal and tactical 420s and 69s.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

So another gateway to digital prison hell.

You'd have to buy the crypto, so you're not required to use it.

And the crypto can be redeemed for gold/silver or money.

My biggest concern would be how it would not be used to prevent us from making purchases and whether purchases would be anonymous.

In the case of anonymity, I guess we'd have to redeem the crypto into gold/silver/money.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Left vs Right paradigm is real. You can't tell me the world wouldn't be different if it was ruled exclusively by leftwingers or rightwingers.

What you're probably referring to is the democrat vs republican paradigm, which is in fact a facade for the most part. No matter which one you vote for, the country ultimately moves in the same direction and the same agenda is carried out.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to the article, you can redeem the crypto for gold (or money).

then why not just let us trade in silver and gold?

I don't think there's a law against trading in silver and gold.

I think the problem is that they'd have to buy the gold/silver and start minting coins, then put the coins in circulation. Not necessarily a tough thing, but it's easier to set up the crypto blockchain and then, if you want the physical gold, you can redeem it.

BTW I'm not saying your concerns aren't valid, I'm just offering what I think is the answer to your questions. Personally, I would love for a crypto expert to read through the bill and explain everything and give their thoughts.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe. The law would require them to purchase that amount of physical gold and store it. That gold could and should be audited. With that said, who knows what could happen one day where they either lie or refuse to be audited, like Fort Knox or the federal reserve. If the law doesn't address this, then yeah, it's flawed.

Something to note is that the Texas bill allowed to redeem the digital currency for gold.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

People could choose to use Bitcoin or Monero. However, constitutionally, Gold and Silver are the only legal tender that states are allowed to mint, if I'm not mistaken. The Texas bill would be constitutional in that sense.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol neither do, but it's still interesting and could be adopted in the future by other states or countries.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you explain in your own words how a currency can be backed by a commodity in this day and age?

I'm not looking for debate (as the thread title states, I'm just wondering what people think).

However, there's another article explaining how the Texas cryptocurrency would work, so I'll just quote it:

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/texas-bill-would-create-state-issued-gold-backed-digital-currency

In practice, individuals would be able to purchase digital currency from the state. The state would then use the money to purchase gold that would be held in the Texas Bullion Depository or another secure vault. Individuals would be able to redeem their digital currency for dollars or gold.

If you think it's flawed, I'm interested in your thoughts.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

Personally, I think it would be a great idea if it wasn't done by the government.

At least it'll be a better store of value than fed bucks, but you should still keep money aside for when you plan to make purchases.

1
user20461 1 point ago +4 / -3

They used front (screen) projection! Camera tricks - not cgi.

I'd imagine someone like Elon Musk would know the difference and that's on top of the meme he posts that depicts CGI in that era.

At the end of the day, no one ever said that CGI was used to fake the moon landing and strawman arguments are a sign that you're wrong and are relying on dumb people not to notice.

3
user20461 3 points ago +6 / -3

Elon sort of has a point.

I've read a lot of conspiracy theories about the moon landing and not once has CGI (computer generated imagery) ever been mentioned. I don't know what point you think he has, but he's making a strawman argument, which is a sign that he's wrong.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›