I'm 100% parallel society now.
And now he was paid his real wages.
If you are genetically superior you should play and turn it into "crackerball" XD
I'm surprised to see a black African say that. Most black people were like "fuck this vaccine shit". What a bitch.
stfu I'm not going to read that.
Hope they made you get the jab working at your three letter agency.
Hahaha. That is the dumbest shill shit I've ever heard.
Shut the fuck up you moronic shill.
You reject Christ and embrace Flat Earth. My mind is closed to your bullshit, shill.
It would be a smart idea to have a few women, they look unassuming.
Sure thing fed.
^No surprise here. The Flat Earth disinfo agent is spreading disinfo about Jesus.
Blasphemy. The man claims to be God on Earth and even worse while protecting pedophiles.
God's judgement is real. Fear that more than any man.
Original investigations scare them more than anything. They don't want people putting the pieces together before their controlled op let's them.
No evidence found either way. But it could be real.
I hate that questioning NASA became almost 100% Flat Earth. Besides that, good documentary.
The more I learn about Elon's companies, the more I realize they are about 50% bullshit 50% product.
Was he referring to what the government did or his past affairs?
"Genius" Elon Musk promises autonomous high speed underground transport, but instead delivers Teslas in tiny tunnels. All part of the clown show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RPMt_FS-s8
Not at all. I'm not that interested in your topic as it sounds like bs, I'm just letting you know your work is shoddy and shows you don't care about reading beyond a headline.
Hilarious you can write paragraphs making excuses for not doing good work, but won't put that energy into just doing good work.
Saying a screenshot isn't a source does not mean Zelinsky is a good guy. But there is plenty of disinfo based on sensationalist headlines like this. The fact you didn't bother to link the source shows you don't think reading past the headline is important.
That isn't a source and I'm not going to waste my time.
This study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17143117/ was not trying to estimate the total number of incidences when they came up with the 1,101 figure. 1,101 is what they found in the literature.
This study https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.804617 did attempt to estimate the total number of incidence (from 1980 to 2006) and came up with 1,866.