by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not here to demonstrate my Internet research skills. People need to be notified when news stories they want to read and share are being censored by the world's largest search engine.

by pkvi
▲ 4 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 4 points ago +4 / -0

Source:

Parents Catch FBI In Plot To Force Mentally Ill Son To Be A Right Wing Terrorist https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/parents-catch-fbi-plot-force-mentally-ill-son-right-wing-terrorist/

I was unable to find this article on Google using the entire headline.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't lecture you about anything. You are lecturing me.

▲ 4 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are shills. They came out last year as part of a project to make forums like this illegal.

▲ 7 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 7 points ago +7 / -0

It is every place not moderated by approved agencies. It is not just being used, but it was orchestrated.

▲ 8 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 8 points ago +8 / -0

January 2022 is exactly when I noticed the wave of calls to violence here. It is a setup, just as I said then.

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

How can we verify that your article is legitimate?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

In case anybody doesn't get the point, this is a gish gallop.

https://speakingofresearch.com/2012/09/11/gish-gallop/

Gish Gallop is a technique, named after the creationist Duane Gish who employed it, whereby someone argues a cause by hurling as many different half-truths and no-truths into a very short space of time so that their opponent cannot hope to combat each point in real time. This leaves some points unanswered and allows the original speaker to try and claim his opponent lacks the counter-arguments.

The problem with most of these questions is that they are actually little arguments containing hidden premises.

https://www.ck12.org/book/ck-12-probability-and-statistics-concepts/section/12.5/

A hidden premise is a premise that is required in order to reach the stated conclusion, but is not itself stated clearly in the argument.

"How did they "Train" the 54,000 Mules?" is actually something along the lines of:

  • Dinesh D'Souza claims there were 54,000 vote mules.
  • Being a vote mule is skilled labour.
  • Skilled labour requires training.
  • Training 54,000 vote mules would have been infeasible.
  • Therefore, Dinesh D'Souza is wrong and there were no vote mules in the 2020 election.
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

This media is blocked as the channel "Contains Incitement to Hatred".

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Since Klaus Schwab is clearly a Romulan, NWO Emperor would be a better fit.

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can't believe that thing is real. I would like to see evidence that it is authentic.

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

Typing this headline into google does not get this article. Is it fake?

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're right about me being largely ignorant of what you just wrote about. She was no longer a part of the Trump legal team after she made some of her allegations. So you are saying that despite that, the document is worth reading?

I was unable to find anything other than mainstream debunking when I searched for this, but I eventually came upon this:

Evidence of Fraud - 2020 Election https://www.sidneypowell.com/election-evidence-2020

Have you got a link to what it is you are talking about, or is what I linked to everything?

EDIT: Be aware that u/ghost_of_aswartz may be acting in bad faith in trying to comingle false claims from years ago with newly released evidence about a network of ballot trafficking mules.

▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

So two hot air balloons and a laser is all you need to demonstrate this.

▲ 8 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah! The shooter even had a manifesto blaming Internet forums for what he did!

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was making a swipe at shills.

Anyway, I don't hang out in places that parrot those people, so it really is true. I have never seen anyone make those references to do anything other than ridicule others. I have never seen comments like those, including "trust the plan" "5D underwater chess", ad nauseum used in a serious way.

EDIT: Let me amend that. I do remember discussions about Sidney Powell when she had a reputation as a credible attorney.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›