They need to know by how much they need to cheat. They have many ways to cheat.
They delay more than one percent because they cheat way bigger than one percent.
They did this in 2016 too when they were trying to cheat for Hillary then too. CNN kept citing THOSE numbers to explain how it made sense in 2020.
Someone from Poland told me that this was used there as well to put a leader in illegitimately.
Check out the documentary Hacking Democracy. That came out in 2006 and if I remember correctly Bev Harris talks about delaying the counting. I wish someone could link to a video clip of her thoughts on the topic.
ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement) and vaccine associated disease enchancement (VADE) are both real.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibody-dependent_enhancement
I recommend reading the following blog post:
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement and the Coronavirus Vaccines https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/02/12/antibody-dependent-enhancement-and-the-coronavirus-vaccines
When I first read about this, I misunderstood it as being similar to how bacteria become resistant when people misuse antibiotics, but this does not appear to be the case. Rather than creating "superbugs" that are difficult to treat in future patients, the effects appear to be limited to the host.
One thing that comes to mind is: could people who haven't yet contracted the disease nor taken the shot who come into contact with shed spike proteins from vaccinated people be at risk of very severe cases this way?
Read the following if you want to find out about vaccine clinical trials that were canceled because babies were far more likely to require hospitalization (dying in some cases) when infected after receiving the vaccine. There are "lessons" sections for a few viruses.
Learning from the past: development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566580/
That article also cites cases where vaccines were approved only for people who had previously contracted the virus. Could it be that the COVID-19 shots out now are safer for people who have already contracted COVID-19?
EDIT: I replied to a comment in the wrong place. I have moved my reply to https://conspiracies.win/p/12j0Mb83UK/x/c/4JAdbTtOZeg
Maybe they want to ban the sale of pollen for testosterone?
Those wanting to thwart learning by discussion are everywhere, including here. I t is relentless and we (humanity) haven't yet developed the tools to make it difficult for them to do so.
Although this is esoteric mumbo jumbo, I believe it is true that some circles would like to find a way to turn people into unthinking automatons. I think that's why lobotomies were allowed: to see what would happen and if the effect was useful to that end.
Thinking deeper, consider dramatic rise in autism spectrum individuals. Could it be that there is an environmental or pharmaceutical cause that is being allowed to continue in order to see if a class of order-takers can be created?
Nobody.
What's wrong here?
Can we link to the chan threads where this is happening?
Also, does anyone have the video of the Ashli Babbitt shooting where a moment before the shot is fired the man walks from a side hallway and then starts provoking the crowd?
Bloomberg pushes the China Model and tries to persuade its audience that Democracy is not the best form of government.
And worms? That makes "let them eat cake" sound rather nice by comparison.
I am starting to wonder if the AstraZeneca shot is risky.
Sorry, but telling you that you are making logical mistakes in no way implies that someone thinks Vladimir Putin doesn't have ulterior motives.
I'm not in a position to explain things on that topic, but medications often have off-label-use.
Why do you believe that people here don't believe that? Are you trolling us?
I agree with you that the numbers have been deliberately inflated, especially before Zhou Baiden took office. I will look into evidence that the test comes up positive for other illnesses. Thanks.
The delta variant supposedly doubles the risk of hospitalization. It could also be (non-self) selecting for "longer incubation, more contagious, more deadly."
If it is a biological weapon being deliberately used, it will just be set loose.
I'm thinking it was a weapon under development by China that accidentally got out and they went berserk because they weren't sure what it was that escaped.
Also, in the early days of the pandemic I saw a breaking story on BBC World about seven Chinese nationals that illegally flew through Iran to avoid travel restrictions. I can no longer find this story. Does anyone know where to find it?
I think there is a conspiracy to make this "ever so often" more likely to happen soon.
Are you suggesting that the PCR test will be positive if you have any viruses? Legit question.
"hung Chads"
It's hanging. HANGING chads.
The key is to find a story that overreaches and demonstrate it. Then check back from somewhere else to see if your post still shows up.
Thank you! I haven't seen the full interview, but it seems like the part starting at "The people you have mentioned" is about Russia putting thousands of the political opposition in jail.
"Just wait until they hear my words. There will be CHAOS!" -- Vladimir Putin
Do you really believe that if someone is right about something you are "siding with them"?
That's not correct. One side ends up on the losing side.