What do you trust?
What we have experienced could be part one with more to come. It could also be an actual leak of something that was still under development and not quite finished. There are still too many unknowns at this point.
I don't understand your side taking question. I'm obviously against people trying to kill people off. I believe it could be an escaped or deliberately released biological weapon (possibly still under development if accidentally leaked).
People have predicted that the situation would be taken advantage of to reduce the population in this manner.
EDIT: I have even seen a pattern in the United States and Hong Kong where opposition political groups (Republicans and pro-Democracy camp, respectively) are being discouraged from taking the jab by politicizing the issue. What do you think the political outlook in America for the next century would be if about a million Republican voters just die? Would there even be two parties after that? You can bet that some people actually want to make it happen.
They do this to forums too, like Linux Journal.
NSA: Linux Journal is an "extremist forum" and its readers get flagged for extra surveillance https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/nsa-linux-journal-extremist-forum-and-its-readers-get-flagged-extra-surveillance
What do you think they are doing to this one to "justify" that claim?
It's not fake money and would provide a hedge in the event of an economic catastrophe.
Since the jabbed still get infected and transmit it, yet without knowing they're sick, their variants are more deadly.
Excellent point. And it's far easier for a virus to mutate (for good or for bad) and be spread to others when the host is, you know, still alive. Even if they exhibit symptoms, they might not want to miss out on important things so they interact with people anyway.
All organisms are potential variant factories, so right away you know they are being disingenuous.
This is from six years ago:
This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/tthis-chicken-vaccine-makes-virus-dangerous
The article links from this image are:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/unvaccinated-people-are-potential-variant-24456596
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/03/health/unvaccinated-variant-factories/index.html
The Mirror actually has a comment section. Point this out and see if your post gets censored.
Submission statement:
Look at how the UK, as of July 1, is so overwhelmingly ground zero for the Delta variant. Statistics show 38,745 cases in the UK, the next highest country (US) having only 2,579 cases.
Chart: Where the Delta Variant Is Gaining Ground https://www.statista.com/chart/25195/delta-variant-spread-by-country/ 5 July 2021
Now see how the Boris Johnson announced lifting travel restrictions on July 6. According to BBC, "...some international travel can resume..."
Covid: What's the roadmap for lifting lockdown? https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-52530518 6 July 2021
These policies were predictable if you take into account Boris Johnson's views on global "over-population." Here is a published commentary authored him entitled "Global over-population is the real issue."
Global over-population is the real issue - The Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643551/Global-over-population-is-the-real-issue.html 25 October 2007 (This article is paywalled. Archive link here. https://web.archive.org/web/20090216214920/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643551/Global-over-population-is-the-real-issue.html )
This looks like an attempt to infect people globally in a bid to reduce "global over-population" in countries still waiting for access to the jabs. Greed may compel these places to actually allow them in.
Awesome! Thanks.
To me it looks like the graph indicates that 10% of all adults are at 120IQ or higher. See the scale at the bottom. I think the 20% which "gathers, infers own information" you are referring to starts at 115IQ.
I've seen that one. It's good and I recommend it because of the parallels between how Japan was seen as an economic rival in those days and how China is seen that way today (although I don't think Chinese companies would promptly change the burnt-out lights if you call the facilities department).
I don't have a question for you on this topic.
My username actually was chosen with the idea of delivering truths--even at great personal risk, but the real truth is that I am mostly here to learn.
I'm confused. What was predicted?
If you carefully reread what I wrote, it was, "...Ibragim Todashev's friend was partly to blame..." The point being that the hidden premise I was pointing out is that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was, in fact, one of the Boston Bombers. See how hard it is to spot?
That said, it's probably unnecessary to address the rest of your post, but I will due to its tone.
One does not cover up a shooting if the victim is responsible for a terrorist attack.
If it was a murder or due process was egregiously violated, of course they might cover it up.
Nobody in any of the communities...believes the narrative you are pushing...the title somehow gaslighting people into believing he was responsible for his own death, as it implies that he was a terrorist?
That's where you may have gotten the idea that I am acting in bad faith. That is not what I am trying to say at all. My conjecture is that the title is part of a psychological operation to instill the belief that Tamerlan Tsarnaev is guilty of being a "Boston Bomber."
Further, you can't know whether or not everybody in a community believes something, and even if your generalization were true that would be argumentum ad populum--the fallacy that something is true or false based on popular belief.
Your remaining questions don't seem serious.
The title reads, "He was a friend of one of the Boston Bombers." So the hidden premise is that Ibragim Todashev's friend was partly to blame for the Boston Marathon Bombing.
I've seen it in a couple of places, so it got my attention as a possible attempt to bypass peoples' critical thinking.
I am curious about both items on your checklist.
(The second more than the first, I swear.)
I don't know what you mean by this. What did Japan do?
They need your guns because the Chinese are not allowed to have guns and they want to impose their policies on the rest of the world. The euphemism they use for this is "harmonization."
It should be stated that this is for service members. They already undergo mandatory medical procedures.
A story about a six-year-old boy losing his father makes you smile?
The model for totalitarianism that they want to use on us is called The China Model.
I think that masking children is more or less a political statement.
I would love to take a look. What's the title of the study?
I don't think it's pedophilia behind all the kids' shows having males dressed like females. Big pharma is behind it because they want to sell as much hormone therapy as possible, and getting people to question their gender identities early is one way to do that.